“A tale of three matches”
That is how commentator Maurice Ashley described the confrontation between Magnus Carlsen and Jeffery Xiong. The world champion kicked off with three straight wins, lost two out of the following five encounters and, after Xiong blundered and lost game 9, went on to cruise to victory adding two more wins to his tally.
19-year-old Xiong is the fifth highest rated player in the United States and was invited to the tournament most likely due to Hikaru Nakamura (the country's number four) not being available to participate. The youngster was grateful for having had a chance to play against the world champion, while Carlsen confessed things could have easily gone differently:
Today could have gone either way. [...] It was definitely not easy at all, and it was a bit frustrating to go so many games without winning or playing particularly well.
Former US champion Sam Shankland — incidentally, the country's number six in the FIDE ratings list — praised his young compatriot's play on Twitter:

The other quarterfinal match that finished on Monday saw Wesley So eliminating second seed Maxime Vachier-Lagrave — official FIDE rapid ratings are in place. So entered day two with a three-point advantage on the scoreboard. After two draws, ‘MVL’ shortened the gap with a win in game 9. The last encounter before the clutch-game section was also drawn, which meant the American had a two-point lead with 6 points still up for grabs (games 11 and 12 grant 3 points for a win).
Thus, a win and a draw would have been enough for Vachier-Lagrave to reach the semifinals. It was not meant to be for the Frenchman, though, as So won the match with a round to spare by adding 3 points to his tally in the first clutch game. The American also won the last encounter, when Vachier-Lagrave's attempts to complicate matters at all costs badly backfired.
The Italian Game is considered a sound but quiet opening without early trades, giving rise to rich positions where plans are more important than forced variations. So shows black's plans on this DVD.

Carlsen will face the winner of Alexander Grischuk v Levon Aronian, while So will be paired up against the winner of Fabiano Caruana v Leinier Dominguez. The second half of these matches will be played on Tuesday.
Carlsen 11½:6½ Xiong
Day two of the matchup started with Xiong levelling the score thanks to a convincing victory with the white pieces. Then, the youngster held the world champion to a draw with black in a game that lasted no fewer than 104 moves — Carlsen kept trying to provoke a mistake by his opponent in a pure rook v knight ending.
Game 9 was the turning point, as pointed out by Xiong. The 19-year-old had a favourable position in the middlegame, but spent too much time trying to figure out how to make the most of it. Then, in an equal rook endgame, he blundered decisively on move 42:
Rook endings are amongst the most frequently encountered endgames there are, and so your training effort will be quickly repaid in the form of half and full points. Knowing even a few rules of thumb and key methods makes life a great deal easier and provides a guiding light even in complex positions. This DVD focuses on the important themes which are to be found in common rook endings.
Xiong vs. Carlsen - Game 9
42.Kd4 allowed 42...Rf4+ and White is already in trouble. Continuing with 43.Kd3 would have kept the game going, although it is very likely that Carlsen would have converted from that position. However, the game continuation 43.Re4 Rxe4+ 44.Kxe4 Kf6 is curtains — Black will get a passer on the kingside with decisive effect.
All momentum was lost for the youngster at that point, and he ended up losing his two remaining games with black. It was a real scare for the world champion nonetheless!
|
Total |
G1 |
G2 |
G3 |
G4 |
G5* |
G6* |
G7 |
G8 |
G9 |
G10 |
G11** |
G12** |
Magnus Carlsen |
11½ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
½ |
0 |
½ |
0 |
½ |
1 |
1 |
½ |
1 |
Jeffery Xiong |
6½ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
½ |
1 |
½ |
1 |
½ |
0 |
0 |
½ |
0 |
*Games 5 and 6 are worth two points each
** Games 11 and 12 are worth three points each
1.e4 | 1,166,623 | 54% | 2421 | --- |
1.d4 | 947,298 | 55% | 2434 | --- |
1.Nf3 | 281,602 | 56% | 2441 | --- |
1.c4 | 182,102 | 56% | 2442 | --- |
1.g3 | 19,702 | 56% | 2427 | --- |
1.b3 | 14,265 | 54% | 2427 | --- |
1.f4 | 5,897 | 48% | 2377 | --- |
1.Nc3 | 3,801 | 51% | 2384 | --- |
1.b4 | 1,756 | 48% | 2380 | --- |
1.a3 | 1,206 | 54% | 2404 | --- |
1.e3 | 1,068 | 48% | 2408 | --- |
1.d3 | 954 | 50% | 2378 | --- |
1.g4 | 664 | 46% | 2360 | --- |
1.h4 | 446 | 53% | 2374 | --- |
1.c3 | 433 | 51% | 2426 | --- |
1.h3 | 280 | 56% | 2418 | --- |
1.a4 | 110 | 60% | 2466 | --- |
1.f3 | 92 | 46% | 2436 | --- |
1.Nh3 | 89 | 66% | 2508 | --- |
1.Na3 | 42 | 62% | 2482 | --- |
Please, wait...
1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 g6 3.e3 Nf6 4.d4 cxd4 5.exd4 d5 6.Qb3 Bg7 7.cxd5 0-0 8.Be2 Na6 9.Bf3 b5 10.Nge2 Rb8 11.Bf4 Rb6 12.Nxb5 g5 13.Bxg5 Nc7 14.a4 a6 15.d6 exd6 16.0-0 axb5 17.a5 Rb8 18.Ng3 Ne6 19.Be3 Nc7 20.Bg5 Ne6 21.Be3 Nc7 22.Rfc1 Be6 23.Qd1 Nfd5 24.a6 Ra8 25.a7 Qe7 26.Nh5 Nxe3 27.fxe3 Bh6 28.Bxa8 Bxe3+ 29.Kh1 Bxc1 30.Qxc1 Rxa8 31.Qc3 Nd5 32.Qc6 Nc7 33.Qb7 Bg4 34.Qb8+ Qf8 35.Nf6+ Kg7 36.Qxf8+ Kxf8 37.Nxg4 Ke7 38.Ne3 Kd7 39.d5 Kc8 40.Nf5 Kd7 41.h4 Nxd5 42.Ra6 Nc7 43.Rxd6+ Ke8 44.Rh6 Rxa7 45.Rxh7 Ne6 46.h5 b4 47.h6 Ra5 48.g4 Ra1+ 49.Kh2 Ra2 50.Rh8+ Kd7 51.Kg3 Rxb2 52.h7 Rb3+ 53.Kh4 Rb1 54.g5 b3 55.Ng3 Nf4 56.Kg4 Ng6 57.Rg8 b2 58.Rxg6 Rh1 59.Rb6 1–0
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Carlsen,M | 2863 | Xiong,J | 2709 | 1–0 | 2020 | B14 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.1 |
Xiong,J | 2709 | Carlsen,M | 2863 | 0–1 | 2020 | D31 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.2 |
Carlsen,M | 2863 | Xiong,J | 2709 | 1–0 | 2020 | B52 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.3 |
Xiong,J | 2709 | Carlsen,M | 2863 | ½–½ | 2020 | B30 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.4 |
Carlsen,M | 2863 | Xiong,J | 2709 | 0–1 | 2020 | B41 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.5 |
Xiong,J | 2709 | Carlsen,M | 2863 | ½–½ | 2020 | D31 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.6 |
Xiong,J | 2709 | Carlsen,M | 2863 | 1–0 | 2020 | C45 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.7 |
Carlsen,M | 2863 | Xiong,J | 2709 | ½–½ | 2020 | C00 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.8 |
Xiong,J | 2709 | Carlsen,M | 2863 | 0–1 | 2020 | B90 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.9 |
Carlsen,M | 2863 | Xiong,J | 2709 | 1–0 | 2020 | A45 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.10 |
Xiong,J | 2709 | Carlsen,M | 2863 | ½–½ | 2020 | B33 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.11 |
Carlsen,M | 2863 | Xiong,J | 2709 | 1–0 | 2020 | B40 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.12 |
Please, wait...
Select an entry from the list to switch between games
So 13:5 Vachier-Lagrave
While So was clearly the one calling the shots in the first half of this match, day two saw more of a balanced fight, at least in the first four games. Two hard-fought draws were followed by what would end up being Vachier-Lagrave's sole win of the match. The Frenchman played a sharp King's Indian Defence in the next game:
Bologan: "If you study this DVD carefully and solve the interactive exercises you will also enrich your chess vocabulary, your King's Indian vocabulary, build up confidence in the King's Indian and your chess and win more games."
So vs. Vachier-Lagrave - Game 10
The computer thinks 28...Bxc3 is winning for black, and it is very likely that Vachier-Lagrave would have deeply considered the capture in a classical game. With this format, however, France's number one opted for 28...Rxe4 and saw his opponent getting plenty of counterplay after 29.Rc8+. Vachier-Lagrave doubled his rooks on the second rank and was eventually forced to give perpetual check in order to avoid defeat.
The match was decided in the next encounter, as So gained two pawns in the middlegame by outcalculating his opponent in a complex position. Vachier-Lagrave's woes continued in the last game of the match, as he lost in merely 15 moves while trying to muddy the waters with the black pieces.
|
Total |
G1 |
G2 |
G3 |
G4 |
G5* |
G6* |
G7 |
G8 |
G9 |
G10 |
G11** |
G12** |
Wesley So |
13 |
½ |
½ |
½ |
1 |
1 |
½ |
½ |
½ |
0 |
½ |
1 |
1 |
Maxime Vachier-Lagrave |
5 |
½ |
½ |
½ |
0 |
0 |
½ |
½ |
½ |
1 |
½ |
0 |
0 |
*Games 5 and 6 are worth two points each
** Games 11 and 12 are worth three points each
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 Bf5 5.Nc3 e6 6.Nh4 Be4 7.f3 Bg6 8.Bd2 Nbd7 9.Qb3 Rb8 10.Nxg6 hxg6 11.cxd5 exd5 12.e4 dxe4 13.fxe4 Be7 14.e5 Ng4 15.Bc4 0-0 16.Rf1 Bh4+ 17.g3 Bg5 18.Bxf7+ Kh8 19.0-0-0 c5 20.Qe6 Nh6 21.Qxg6 Bxd2+ 22.Rxd2 cxd4 23.Rxd4 Qe7 24.Rh4 Qxh4 25.gxh4 Nxe5 26.Qg3 Nhxf7 27.Rf5 Rfe8 28.a3 Rbc8 29.Kb1 Rc4 30.Nd5 Rg4 31.Qb3 Rxh4 32.Qxb7 Nd6 33.Rxe5 Nxb7 34.Rxe8+ Kh7 35.Re7 Nd6 36.Rxa7 Rxh2 37.Nf6+ Kg6 38.Ng4 Rd2 39.Kc1 Rd4 40.Ne3 Kf6 41.Kc2 g5 42.Rd7 Ke6 43.Rg7 Ke5 44.Nd1 Ne4 45.Nc3 Kf5 46.Nxe4 Rxe4 47.Kb3 g4 48.a4 Re3+ 49.Kb4 Re4+ 50.Ka3 Re5 51.b4 Re3+ 52.Kb2 Re4 53.Kc3 Re3+ 54.Kc4 Re4+ 55.Kb5 Re5+ 56.Ka6 Re6+ 57.Ka5 Rg6 58.Rf7+ Ke6 59.Rf1 g3 60.b5 g2 61.Rg1 Kd7 62.b6 Kc8 63.Ka6 Kb8 64.a5 Rg8 65.Kb5 Rg5+ 66.Kc6 Rg6+ 67.Kd5 Rg5+ 68.Kd6 Kb7 69.Ke6 Rxa5 70.Rxg2 Kxb6 ½–½
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
So,W | 2770 | Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | ½–½ | 2020 | D12 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.1 |
Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | So,W | 2770 | ½–½ | 2020 | E32 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.2 |
So,W | 2770 | Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | ½–½ | 2020 | D12 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.3 |
Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | So,W | 2770 | 0–1 | 2020 | E34 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.4 |
So,W | 2770 | Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | 1–0 | 2020 | D11 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.5 |
Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | So,W | 2770 | ½–½ | 2020 | A28 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.6 |
Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | So,W | 2770 | ½–½ | 2020 | A08 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.7 |
So,W | 2770 | Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | ½–½ | 2020 | D12 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.8 |
Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | So,W | 2770 | 1–0 | 2020 | A06 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.9 |
So,W | 2770 | Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | ½–½ | 2020 | E92 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.10 |
Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | So,W | 2770 | 0–1 | 2020 | C50 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.11 |
So,W | 2770 | Vachier-Lagrave,M | 2778 | 1–0 | 2020 | B00 | Clutch Chess Showdown Int | 1.12 |
Please, wait...
Select an entry from the list to switch between games
Links