Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.
The most shocking moment seen (so far) in this year’s already-extraordinary Chess Olympiad was Gukesh’s final move in his game against Nodirbek Abdusattorov. Both youngsters, aged 16 and 17 respectively, are having a breakthrough in Chennai — especially Gukesh, who scored eight wins in a row in his first Olympiad outing — and they were paired up against each other in a crucial match for the final standings. Thanks to a win by Praggnanandhaa, India 2 had the lead while Gukesh and Abdusattorov continued playing a balanced queen and knight against queen and bishop endgame.
And then disaster struck for the Indian wunderkind.
72.Nf3 allowed 72...Qb7+, losing the knight. Gukesh could not believe his eyes, and saw his time on the clock run out in disbelief. Abdusattorov had collected the win that drew the match and left Uzbekistan in shared first place going into the final round of the Olympiad.
Understanding Middlegame Strategies Vol.1-4
In this video series, it's all about understanding middlegame strategies better. Pawn structures, manoeuvres and concepts are being shown through model games. New: now also available as stream!
To rub salt into the wound, Gukesh later had to deal with the fact that he missed a couple of winning moves in the middlegame. The 16-year-old surely knew he was winning, but looking at the lines shown by the engines must have been painful in the aftermath of such a loss.
This defeat does not take away from the incredible performance Gukesh has shown in Chennai, though! Moreover, India 2 could still win the whole thing as the youthful squad is a point behind the leaders, which could even both lose their matches on Tuesday.
Extraordinary coaches and team captains — Ivan Sokolov (Uzbekistan) and Ramachandran Ramesh (India) | Photo: Lennart Ootes
Since Uzbekistan was in the sole lead going into the tenth round, the draw against India 2 allowed Armenia to again climb to the top of the tournament standings after getting an impressive victory over the sixth seeds from Azerbaijan.
Gabriel Sargissian and Robert Hovhannisyan scored for Armenia. Sargissian remarkably beat elite grandmaster Shakhriyar Mamedyarov with the black pieces.
Shakh misplayed the opening and found himself in this tough position early on. Sargissian’s 23...Bd6 cemented his advantage, as the bishop trade will make it impossible for White to keep his c-pawn alive. Mamedyarov kept playing in a losing position until move 67, when he finally accepted defeat.
Armenia’s Hrant Melkumyan and Gabriel Sargissian | Photo: Lennart Ootes
The standings after round 10 have Armenia and Uzbekistan sharing first place on 17 points, with India 1, India 2 and the United States a point back. Since the leaders have faced all three of their closest chasers, they are paired up against Spain and the Netherlands respectively — both teams have 15 points at the time.
Master Class Vol.13 - Tigran Petrosian
Considered a master of prophylaxis, Petrosian sensed dangers long before they actually became acute on the board. In his prime, Petrosian was almost invincible. Let our authors introduce you into the world of Tigran Petrosian.
So it is everything to play for in what will surely be a tense final round. Potentially, if both Spain and the Netherlands win, we might get to see an unlikely trio on the podium given how the tournament has gone so far. The two rating favourites, United States and India, play on board 4, something we could have hardly predicted before the event began — in first place, we would have imagined they would have already faced each other at this point.
These are the final-round pairings including teams with 14 or more match points (i.e. 3 points or fewer away from the leaders):
1 | 9 |
|
GER | Germany | 25½ | 15 | : | 16 | 29½ | India 2 *) | IND |
|
11 | ||
2 | 12 |
|
ARM | Armenia | 26 | 17 | : | 15 | 27 | Spain | ESP |
|
4 | ||
3 | 14 |
|
UZB | Uzbekistan | 30½ | 17 | : | 15 | 27½ | Netherlands | NED |
|
7 | ||
4 | 2 |
|
IND | India | 27 | 16 | : | 16 | 24½ | United States | USA |
|
1 | ||
5 | 48 |
|
MDA | Moldova | 26 | 15 | : | 15 | 26½ | England | ENG |
|
10 | ||
6 | 6 |
|
AZE | Azerbaijan | 25 | 14 | : | 15 | 25 | Serbia | SRB |
|
23 | ||
7 | 21 |
|
TUR | Turkey | 26½ | 14 | : | 14 | 24½ | Poland | POL |
|
5 | ||
8 | 8 |
|
UKR | Ukraine | 26 | 14 | : | 14 | 24 | Lithuania | LTU |
|
35 | ||
9 | 13 |
|
IRI | Iran | 25½ | 14 | : | 14 | 26 | Hungary | HUN |
|
19 | ||
10 | 25 |
|
GRE | Greece | 26 | 14 | : | 14 | 26 | France | FRA |
|
15 | ||
11 | 40 |
|
KAZ | Kazakhstan | 25½ | 14 | : | 13 | 24 | India 3 | IND |
|
16 |
*) This team is assigned to a fixed board.
Select an entry from the list to switch between games
With a convincing victory over Kazakhstan, the Indian women retook the sole lead they had given up after losing to Poland in round 9. Bhakti Kulkarni, the reserve player of the rating favourites, was included in the lineup for the first time since round 3, and the 30-year-old delivered, as she defeated Gliskhan Nakhbayeva on board 4.
Tania Sachdev also won, as she continued her incredible run in the Olympiad. Thanks to her victory over Xeniya Balabayeva, she now has an 8/10 score and a 2492 rating performance.
Sachdev’s d-pawn turned out to be much stronger than Black’s passers on the queenside. Ten moves later, both the queens and the black pawns on the a and b-files had left the board, giving White a clearly winning position.
Improve your chess with Tania Sachdev
On this DVD, well-known Indian WGM Tania Sachdev shows you how to evaluate certain positions and then find the right concepts and plans on the basis of her own games.
Smiling — Tania Sachdev and Bhakti Kulkarni | Photo: Lennart Ootes
Much like in the open section, India is set to face the United States in the final round of the women’s tournament. The Americans stand two points behind the leaders, while other four teams — which India has already faced — are sharing second place on 16/20 match points.
Ukraine versus Poland and Azerbaijan versus Georgia are the other crucial matches in the fight for first place.
The final-round pairings:
No. | Team | Team | Pts. | MP | Res. | : | Res. | MP | Pts. | Team | Team |
1 | IND | India *) | 28 | 17 | : | 15 | 28½ | United States | USA | ||
2 | UKR | Ukraine | 27½ | 16 | : | 16 | 29 | Poland | POL | ||
3 | AZE | Azerbaijan | 28½ | 16 | : | 16 | 26 | Georgia | GEO | ||
4 | KAZ | Kazakhstan | 25½ | 15 | : | 15 | 25½ | India 3 | IND3 | ||
5 | SVK | Slovakia | 22½ | 15 | : | 15 | 28 | India 2 | IND2 | ||
6 | INA | Indonesia | 27 | 14 | : | 14 | 26½ | Germany | GER | ||
7 | CRO | Croatia | 22 | 14 | : | 14 | 26 | Armenia | ARM | ||
8 | ENG | England | 23 | 14 | : | 14 | 26 | Hungary | HUN | ||
9 | ESP | Spain | 28 | 14 | : | 14 | 25½ | Serbia | SRB | ||
10 | BUL | Bulgaria | 26½ | 14 | : | 14 | 25½ | Israel | ISR | ||
11 | FRA | France | 25 | 13 | : | 14 | 26 | Mongolia | MGL |
*) This team is assigned to a fixed board.
Advertising |