Champions Showdown: Big leads after day one

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
9/3/2019 – While those in the United States had an "unofficial end-of-summer" holiday during Labour Day, Garry Kasparov was back to work at the Champions Showdown event in Saint Louis. The former world champion had it rough, though, as he ended up losing his last three games against world number two Fabiano Caruana. Levon Aronian and Peter Svidler also racked up comfortable advantages over Hikaru Nakamura and Leinier Dominguez respectively, while Wesley So will kick off day two with a 4:2 lead over Veselin Topalov. | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Saint Louis Chess Club

ChessBase 15 - Mega package ChessBase 15 - Mega package

Find the right combination! ChessBase 15 program + new Mega Database 2019 with 7.6 million games and more than 70,000 master analyses. Plus ChessBase Magazine (DVD + magazine) and CB Premium membership for 1 year!

More...

Cornered knights

Chess 9LX, or Chess 960, or Fischer Random Chess, as it was originally called, is a variant where the pieces on the first row are placed in random, thus nullifying the effect of opening preparation and pattern recognition in playing a game (960 denotes the total number of random setups theoretically possible in the initial position). 

The format in Saint Louis stipulates that a new starting position must be drawn every four rounds, which means all sixteen games played on day one had the same setup at the outset. On Monday, the position had both knights "on the rim" — i.e. on the a and h-files — and the bishops dangerously pointed at the opponent's queenside. Therefore, as the kingside pawns needed to advance quickly in order to open up the diagonals for the bishops, an early development of the queenside knights with ♘b3 and ♞b6 was the norm on most boards.

 

Once the position was drawn, the players had one hour to prepare before the games — not with any sort of electronic device but together with some other participant. Garry Kasparov studied the setup with his compatriot Peter Svidler; Hikaru Nakamura partnered up with Wesley So; Veselin Topalov looked at the piece configuration with Leinier Dominguez; and Fabiano Caruana teamed up with Levon Aronian.

Two rounds of rapid (30 minutes plus 10-second delay) and two rounds of blitz (5 minutes plus 5-second delay) were in store. 

Leinier Dominguez, Veselin Topalov, Hikaru Nakamura

Leinier Dominguez, Veselin Topalov and Hikaru Nakamura in high spirits during the pre-game meeting | Photo: Lennart Ootes

Fabiano Caruana 5:1 Garry Kasparov

The legend from Baku started with White and finished game one on the better side of a 42-move draw. Caruana established a sort of Leningrad variation of the Dutch Defence, with both players castling kingside. Eventually, time management played an important role in this encounter — and throughout the day — as the former world champion found himself hurried by the clock, most likely due to the lack of practice. Had he preserved more time on the clock, perhaps he would not have allowed his opponent to find the repetition that led to the draw. 

Game two followed, and it was the turning point of the match-up. Apparently, Caruana thought he had to use his chances with White and played rather loosely, leaving his king uncastled and defyingly opening lines left and right. Kasparov, true to his nature, responded in kind, working to get the most of his initiative on the queenside until achieving a clearly winning position. But then disaster struck:

 

As Kasparov himself mentioned afterwards, pretty much any move wins for Black here — 30...♜e3, 30...♜d2; even 30...♚b8 or 30...h5 maintain the advantage. But not 30...xb2, the move chosen by the Russian. After 31.c5 b4 32.xa5+, White is not only out of trouble...he is now completely winning. Kasparov resigned after 32...b6 33.a4 b3 34.xb2.

Venkatachalam Saravanan is in Saint Louis and reported:

Just when Caruana is deciding to capture the a5-pawn with his queen or the rook, out came the famous Kasparov facial gestures and self-contempt, muttering to himself and throwing up his head up in disgust. The rest was a picture in the great man being disappointed with himself and bewildered on what had just happened. The histrionics are a treat to watch, though you can't help but admire the man's passion too. 

The 13th world champion was devastated and could not recover from such letdown. He got a good position in the first blitz game, but quickly collapsed and lost after 38 moves. Finally, in the last encounter of the day, Caruana took advantage of his rival's reckless play to get a clear 23-move victory.

Fabiano Caruana

Fabiano Caruana will not have it easy against his retired opponent | Photo: Lennart Ootes

Levon Aronian 5½:½ Hikaru Nakamura

When the four rounds were over, Aronian talked to Maurice Ashley — while sporting flashy red shoes — and simply stated that his opponent had  had "an off-day", which clearly illustrates what transpired in their match-up. 

In game one, Nakamura had White and castled long on move 19 — curiously, the only time either of the contenders of this match castled on Monday, as the creative nature of both was on display the whole four rounds. The American eventually gained a piece, but Aronian had a strong initiative against the white king. The position was tensely balanced, until Nakamura blundered into a nice mating net:

 

Nakamura's 39.bxc5+ leaves the king defenceless. Black did not recapture but played 39...a6 instead, and after 40.f4 came the killer blow — Black to play and mate-in-two:

 

40...b5+ and White resigned.

Much like Kasparov, Nakamura could not recover from such upsetting one-move error, and went on to lose the following two encounters. Particularly heartbreaking — therefore Aronian's statements mentioned above — was the American's loss in game three, as his queen was trapped as early as move 13 (Nakamura resigned in what was clearly the shortest game of the day).

In fact, Aronian could have easily achieved a whitewash over the U.S. Champion, but the Armenian could not make the most of his favourable position in the last game of the day.

Hikaru Nakamura, Levon Aronian

Hikaru Nakamura is totally capable of bouncing back | Photo: Lennart Ootes

Peter Svidler 4½:1½ Leinier Dominguez

These two household names of the elite have frequently played together, as Svidler is the long-time leader of Saint Petersburg's Mednyi Vsadnik, and Dominguez has been part of said squad in multiple European or Russian team events.  

The key factor in this match-up was the difference in time management. Svidler, the older of the two, in fact handled his clock better than his opponent. The Russian later stated that he was not aware of the fact that this was one of Dominguez's weak points, but that did not prevent him from creating a three-point gap in his favour before day two. 

Game one was tense throughout. Dominguez, with White, was the one pushing in the middlegame, but Svidler kept things under control and even got to simplify into a superior ending. The Russian star went on to painstakingly convert his material advantage (he was a pawn up), but could not find the easiest of moves in the end:

 

After doing all the hard work, Svidler gave away the win with the inexplicable 87...g3, when 87...♞g2 is a move most club players would find in a heartbeat. The draw was signed after 88.xe3, and Dominguez immediately pointed out the mistake to his colleague. Svidler was shocked, but later confessed that he did not feel too bad as he had a bad position out of the opening.  

Peter Svidler

Leinier Dominguez just told Peter Svidler what he had missed | Photo: Lennart Ootes 

In the second rapid encounter, Svidler got the upper hand as early as move 4 — the Cuban-born grandmaster played 1...e5, 2...d5 and 3...f6, leaving the h3-c8 diagonal wide open for White's bishop to attack (let us not forget that the kings were placed on the c-file). The Russian got the full two points — rapid games are worth twice as much — after 31 moves.

Svidler won the first blitz game in 43 moves and the players split the last point after 65.

Wesley So 4:2 Veselin Topalov

Another clash of generations, much like Kasparov v Caruana, saw the veteran player getting low on time chronically throughout the day. Furthermore, after having enjoyed a slightly better position for most of game one, Topalov gave away the first two points of the match-up to his opponent by losing on time — the Bulgarian only plays sporadically nowadays, so the lack of practice is also a factor in this case.

Game two was a draw, in which, once again, Topalov let go of some small chances. So's second win came in the first blitz encounter, but Topalov bounced back with a victory in the final game of the day...only after So missed a huge chance to get a larger advantage on the score board:

 

Two obvious checks are screaming to be played: 21...♛f1+ wins after 22.♖e1 ♜d1+ 23.♖xd1 ♛xd1+, while after 21...d1+ (played in the game) there follows 22.a2 f1 23.e8+ d7 24.d3+:

 

After having missed the win, So blundered again by opting for 24...xe8 here, allowing White to go on the attack with 25.e5+ e7 26.h5+ g6 27.xd1 xg2 28.e1, etcetera. Topalov showed he knows how to handle the initiative and won in 66 moves.

Wesley So

Wesley So | Photo: Lennart Ootes


Commentary webcast

Commentary by WGM Jennifer Shahade, GM Yasser Seirawan & GM Maurice Ashley


Links




Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

Jayarama Iyer Jayarama Iyer 9/3/2019 09:44
Appreciate your response @fixpoint. I did mean what you have said, not the literal numerical computing capabilities. I meant the evaluation of patterns and combitionations, as you have correctly pointed out.
Towards that, do you agree with my assertion?
In other words, will the best player in Chess960 in the world, also "potentially" be the best chess player in the world? I would say that it is Magnus Carson, followed by Lev Aronian.
People like Peter Svidler would also score highly in this, which means that given the same opening knowledge, these people would be the best players in the world.
Having fun with "what ifs", Please indulge me.
Marselos Marselos 9/3/2019 04:36
Javarama: a true master has talent, work, experience....
That's necessary to creates a masterpiece.
About Yesterday, I have not seen any masterpieces, but things without form.
Sorry for my bad english.
emerlion emerlion 9/3/2019 03:59
Some Chess 960 castling are ugly in my opinion. Maybe rooks and king should be fixed to a1,h1 and e1 for now. Apart from that I like this way of playing, but I'd like to see a classical time control chess game of 960. The quality of the games is always reduced to time of play.
fixpont fixpont 9/3/2019 02:28
@Jayarama Iyer: it is not about "computing (calculating) skills", pattern recognition that matters in 960.
Jayarama Iyer Jayarama Iyer 9/3/2019 01:41
With the prepared opening repetoire out of the window, I think that the Chess 960 is a true indicator of the mental computing skill, and the winner, the true champion in terms of chess computing ability.
What do others think of this assertion? Will appreciate your opinions.
Marselos Marselos 9/3/2019 09:53
Dear Garry, rapidity and randomness are enemies of experience.
1