Centenary of the Lasker v Capablanca World Championship match

by Polina Karelina
3/19/2021 – A hundred years ago, from March 15 to April 28, the historical 1921 World Chess Championship match between Lasker and Capablanca was played in Havana, Cuba. Conversations to organize the match began in 1911, but World War I got in the way. In the end, the Cuban grandmaster obtained a convincing victory.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Well overdue

A hundred years ago, from March 15 to April 28, the historical 1921 World Chess Championship match between Lasker and Capablanca was played in Havana, Cuba.

Emanuel LaskerLasker was one of the pioneers of modern chess. Before him, most players tended to focus on a single element of the position. However, Lasker had such a depth of knowledge and understanding of the game that he understood that there are several components in a position that counterbalance each other. This was an innovative idea for the time. It became clear that chess is not a simple game of black and white, where specific methods or ideas decide the game, and that there could be exceptions to rules like controlling the centre. Instead, every game is unique and should be played with a case-by-case approach.

Capablanca was a player of phenomenal natural talent. His style was simple and easy, yet elegant and brilliant, which has prompted many to compare him with Mozart. He tended to simplify positions and exchange pieces until reaching seemly balanced endgames, and yet he would often manage to score victories.

Conversations about organizing a match began in 1911, but the players could not agree on the terms. Along with a large deposit, Lasker also requested to be the only player with property rights of the games, which was unusual, since games typically belonged to both players. That was not all — he also requested for the match to consist of 30 games, where the first player to reach six points, excluding draws, wins, and if no one reaches six points, the challenger would need to have more than a one-point lead over the defending champion to get the title. This would have put Capablanca in a situation where he would need to win at least two more games than Lasker.

Alexander Alekhina, Jose Raul Capablanca

An early photograph of Alekhine and Capablanca

In 1914, the players crossed paths for the first time in a tournament in St. Petersburg. Capablanca played exceptionally well in the preliminaries, which was held as a single round-robin. The top five finishers of this part of the event were awarded the title of Grandmaster. The players were Capablanca and Lasker, along with Siegbert Tarrasch, future world champion Alexander Alekhine and Frank James Marshall.

The players continued to play in the finals of the tournament, a double round-robin, and the results of the preliminaries were carried over into the finals. Capablanca was a favourite to win the event as he began with a 1½-points lead. However, Lasker managed to escape a loss and went on to win a game against Capablanca, which allowed him to overtake the Cuban in the lead. In the end, Lasker won the event with 13½ points, only half a point above Capablanca with 13 points. Alekhine finished third after scoring 10 points.


Lasker, E. vs Capablanca, J. - St. Petersburg Final, 1914

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Bxc6 dxc6 5.d4 exd4 6.Qxd4 Qxd4 7.Nxd4 Bd6 8.Nc3 Ne7 9.0-0 0-0 10.f4 Re8 11.Nb3 f6 12.f5 b6 13.Bf4 Bb7 14.Bxd6 cxd6 15.Nd4 Rad8 16.Ne6 Rd7 17.Rad1 Nc8 18.Rf2 b5 19.Rfd2 Rde7 20.b4 Kf7 21.a3 Ba8 22.Kf2 Ra7 23.g4 h6 24.Rd3 a5 25.h4 axb4 26.axb4 Rae7 27.Kf3 Rg8 28.Kf4 g6 29.Rg3 g5+ 30.Kf3 Nb6 31.hxg5 hxg5 32.Rh3 Rd7 33.Kg3 Ke8 34.Rdh1 Bb7 35.e5 dxe5 36.Ne4 Nd5 37.N6c5 Bc8 38.Nxd7 Bxd7 39.Rh7 Rf8 40.Ra1 Kd8 41.Ra8+ Bc8 42.Nc5 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Emanuel Lasker-Jose Raul Capablanca-1–01914C68St. Petersburg7

This tournament result showed that Lasker and Capablanca were the strongest players at the time, and once again, conversations to organize a world championship began to take place. However, World War I started shortly after, causing a pause in international tournaments, making St. Petersburg Lasker and Capablanca’s only tournament encounter before the World Championship in 1921.

In early 1920, the players agreed on the terms for the match. However, just months later, Lasker resigned his title and named Capablanca as his successor. As part of their terms for the match, the players had agreed that in the case that Lasker forfeits to play the match, the title would go to Capablanca. Various publications did not seem to accept Capablanca as the world champion.

Right after Lasker’s announcement, Capablanca quickly made his way to Europe to meet with Lasker to renegotiate the terms for the match. The Grandmasters agreed to play in March 1921 for a larger prize fund, and that the winner would be the first player to collect six wins. Capablanca dominated the match, winning four gamesand losign none. Lasker resigned from the match early, after 14 games.


Lasker, E. vs Capablanca, J. - World Ch. 1921 (Game 11)

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Notes by J. R. Capablanca d5 2.Nf3 e6 3.c4 Nf6 4.Bg5 Nbd7 5.e3 Be7 6.Nc3 0-0 7.Rc1 Re8 8.Qc2 c6 9.Bd3 dxc4 10.Bxc4 Nd5 11.Bxe7 Rxe7 12.0-0 Nf8 13.Rfd1 Bd7 I do not consider the system adopted by Dr. Lasker in this game to be any good. 14.e4 Nb6 ...Nxc3 would have simplified matters somewhat, but it would have left Black in avery awkward position. The text move, by driving back the bishop, gains time for the defense. 15.Bf1 Rc8 16.b4 To prevent c5, either now or a later stage. There is no Black bishop and White’s whole plan is based on that fact. He will attempt, in due time, to place a knight on d6. Be8 17.Qb3 White might have played a4 at once, but wanted at first to prevent the Black Queen from coming out via d6 an f4. Rec7 18.a4 Ng6 19.a5 Nd7 20.e5 b6 21.Ne4 Rb8 22.Qc3 Qa3 at once was best. The text move gives Black a chance to gain time. Nf4 23.Nd6 Nd5 Had the White Queen been at a3 Black could not have gained this very important tempo. 24.Qa3 f6 25.Nxe8 This Bishop had to be taken, since it threatened to go to h5, pinning the Knight. Qxe8 26.exf6 gxf6 To retake with either Knight would have left the e Pawn extremely weak. 27.b5 With this move White gets rid of his Queen's side Pawns. Rbc8 28.bxc6 Rxc6 29.Rxc6 Rxc6 30.axb6 axb6 31.Re1 Bb5 was better. Qc8 32.Nd2 This was my sealed move and unquestionably the only move to keep the initiative. Nf8 ...Rc3 would have been met by Qa1. 33.Ne4 The White Knight stands now in a very commanding position. Black's game is far more difficult than appears at first glance and I believe that the only good system of defense would have to be based on ...f5, after ...h6, driving back the White Knight. Qd8 34.h4 Rc7 This might be said to be the losing move. Black had to play ...h6 in order to be ready to continue with ...f5, forcing the White Knight to withdraw. 35.Qb3 White's plan consists in getting rid of Black's powerfully posted Knight at d5, which is the key to Black's defense. Rg7 36.g3 Ra7 37.Bc4 Ra5 38.Nc3 Nxc3 39.Qxc3 Kf7 40.Qe3 Qd6 41.Qe4 Ra4 Neither one of us had very much time left at this stage of the game. Black's alternative was ...Ra7, which would have been met by d5, leaving Black with what in my opinion is a lost position. 42.Qb7+ Kg6 If 42...Qe7 43.Qc6 wins. 43.Qc8 Qb4 44.Rc1 Qe7 Black's game was now hopeless; for instance 44...Qa3 (best) 45.Bd3+! f5 (best) 46.Qe8+ Kh6 47.Re1 Ra8 48.Rxe6+ Nxe6 49.Qxe6+ Kg7 50.Qe5+, etc. In practically all the other variations the check with the Bishop at d3 wins. 45.Bd3+ Kh6 ..f5 would have prolonged the game a few moves only. 46.Rc7 would always win. 46.Rc7 Ra1+ 47.Kg2 Qd6 48.Qxf8+ 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Jose Raul Capablanca-Emanuel Lasker-1–01921D63Lasker - Capablanca World Championship Match11

Undoubtedly, Lasker and Capablanca were two of the most influential players in history. Both champions had an extremely deep understanding of the game, which no other player had in their time.

Links


Polina Karelina is the best woman player from the Bahamas. She is currently studying computer science and business, and her chess was inspired by Susan, Judit and Zsofia Polgar.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.