Candidates R06: Anand beats Svidler, Aronian wins

by Sagar Shah
3/17/2016 – The sixth round finally saw more than one decisive result in a round. Anand knocked out Svidler in a fast paced kingside attack. Caruana had Karjakin on the ropes but the Russian escaped thanks to some tenacious defending. Topalov and Giri drew. The last game to end Aronian-Nakamura had a lot of action in it – the touch-move rule coming into the picture and Aronian’s entertaining press conference.

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!

Along with the ChessBase 14 program you can access the Live Database of 8 million games, and receive three months of free ChesssBase Account Premium membership and all of our online apps! Have a look today!


The 2016 FIDE World Chess Candidates Tournament is a 14-round event, which determines the next Challenger to Magnus Carlsen's title, is taking place in Moscow from March 10–30. Eight players, including six of the World’s top-ten rated grandmasters. The time control is 100 minutes for the first 40 moves, 50 minutes for the next 20 moves and then 15 minutes for the rest of the game, plus an additional 30 seconds per move starting from move one. The guaranteed prize fund is US $420,000.

Candidates round six – Karjakin and Aronian lead!

Round 6, Thursday 17 March 2016
Anand Viswanathan
Svidler Peter
Topalov Veselin
Giri Anish
Aronian Levon
Nakamura Hikaru
Caruana Fabiano
Karjakin Sergey
Rest day, Friday 18 March 2016

Note that ChessBase is doing daily one-hour roundup shows after each round

Player’s outside their hotel Four Seasons

It was by far the worst weather in Moscow since the tournament began. The skies were overcast and it was already snowing a bit. The players covered with thick layers of winter wear proceeded to the tournament hall. It’s a six minute walk from the official hotel Four Seasons to the venue in the Central Telegraph.

This video shows seven of the eight players (Peter Svidler missing) leaving the Hotel Four Seasons to go to the tournament hall. It also gives you a feel of what the hotel and the surroundings are and also how far the venue is from the official hotel.

After his experiments with the Benoni yesterday,
Fabiano came well prepared for his game against Sergey Karjakin

Sergey Karjakin received wishes from his second Vladimir Potkin before the game

And off he went in an upbeat mood!

The nice thing about Levon Aronian is that he speaks in a
friendly manner with whoever meets him, even before the game

“Look at the amount of preparation youngsters have these days!”
Veselin Topalov and Silvio Danailov enter the playing hall with Peter Svidler

Did you revise 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.h4!? Sopiko and her husband Anish Giri

Anand came to the playing hall determined to do some damage!

Viswanathan Anand – Peter Svidler 1-0

The game of the day had to be Viswanathan Anand’s emphatic victory over Peter Svidler. It was ironical that Peter, who has shown excellent preparation at this event – blitzing 25 moves of theory against Nakamura, was mated by Anand in just 24 moves!

Vishy Anand and Peter Svidler have been friends off the board for close to two decades now.
Their first encounter with each other dates all the way back to 1998.

It is an open question as to what Anand would have done if Peter would have opted for the Berlin move order with 3…Nf6. But instead the Russian went for the main line of the Closed Ruy Lopez, clearly angling to play the Marshall. Anand put an end to these ambitions by playing a4, and here Peter sprung the first surprise of the game.

In all thirteen games that have reached the position after 8.a4 in Svidler’s praxis, he has gone 8…b4. Today was the first time he went 8…Bb7. No wonder, Anand was confused and took quite some time to make his moves from this point onwards. His play was natural in the style of the Ruy Lopez – developing the knight to d2, bishop came back to c2 and then going for the d4 push. Svidler could have surely played it much safer in the middlegame, but he took up the challenge and went for the following position.

To take or not to take, that is the question!

This was a critical position where Anand took quite some time. There are a lot of captures. As Anand correctly pointed out that the main question to him was whether to take on b5 or not. On one hand keeping the a-file closed keeps the rook on the back rank safeguarding it. On the other hand the a1-rook doesn't take part in the game. It is a very difficult decision to make and almost impossible to see what possibilities may arise after say eight to ten moves. But this is where intuition comes into the picture and Anand felt that bringing the a1 rook into the game was more important and that’s why he took on b5.

At this point I went to tournament hall to check out what exactly was going on. I expected Anand to be looking happy while Svidler would be at the board with his head in his hands. But the scene I saw was completely opposite. Peter had just captured the rook on a8 and was moving around confidently. Anand on the other hand was nervous, fidgety, biting his nails and looked as if he was the one on the back foot. But it was clear that Vishy was calculating the details of his final attack, anxious to make sure that his opponent had no defensive resources. And in the above position he picked up his knight and made the best move 20.Ng5!

As storm clouds gather around the black king Peter played his final trick: queen to a5. Anand immediately pushed his pawn to h4 – and Svidler resigned! Anand’s h4 looks like a normal move but the point is subtle. 24…Qe1+ 25.Kh2 Ne2 is met with the move 26.Nh3! and the g1 square is controlled. The same wouldn’t have been possible with the pawn on h3.

While Anand’s play was truly fantastic, one must give it to Svidler for being
such a sport and taking the defeat in a very graceful manner

[Event "Candidates 2016"] [Site "?"] [Date "2016.03.17"] [Round "6"] [White "Anand, Viswanathan"] [Black "Svidler, Peter"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C88"] [WhiteElo "2762"] [BlackElo "2757"] [Annotator "Sagar Shah"] [PlyCount "47"] {An emphatic victory for Anand. Let's have a look at the game to see what really went right for him and wrong for Svidler.} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. a4 ({The following game between Anand and Svidler with the inclusion of h3 and h6 is very similar to what we saw today. And Svidler played much better back then.} 8. h3 Bb7 9. d3 Re8 10. a4 h6 11. Nbd2 Bf8 12. c3 Na5 13. Bc2 c5 14. d4 cxd4 15. cxd4 exd4 16. e5 Nd5 17. Nxd4 Nb4 18. axb5 Nxc2 19. Qxc2 axb5 20. Nxb5 Qb6 $15 {1/2-1/2 (47) Anand, V (2779)-Svidler,P (2728) Morelia/Linares 2007}) 8... Bb7 {[%cal Gc8b7] Although this is the main move in the position, Anand thought for a good ten minutes. Why? Because Svidler has got the position 13 times in his games and all the times he has chosen b4.} (8... b4 {is Svidler's move.}) 9. d3 Re8 10. Nbd2 Bf8 11. c3 Na5 12. Bc2 c5 {This is all very standard Ruy Lopez stuff. Now White must remain consistent and break in the centre with d4.} 13. d4 exd4 { This came as a bit of a surprise to Anand. But Peter was mainly trying to play very concrete chess.} 14. cxd4 d5 $6 {Although this is very thematic. It is extremely dangerous. The main reason being that the two bishops on c1 and c2 are opened up against the black king.} (14... cxd4 {looks like the best way for Black to proceed.} 15. e5 Nd5 16. axb5 axb5 17. Nxd4 Nb4 18. Bb1 $13 { is an interesting game.}) 15. e5 Ne4 {This was a critical position where Anand took a lot of time. There are a lot of captures. As Anand correctly pointed out, the main question to him was whether to take on b5 or not. On one hand keeping the a-file closed keeps the rook on the back rank safeguarding it. On the other hand the rook doesn't take part in the game. It is a very difficult decision to make and almost impossible to see what possibilites may arise after say eight to ten moves. But this is where intuition comes into picture and Anand felt that bringing the a1 rook into the game was more important and that explains his next move.} 16. axb5 (16. Nxe4 dxe4 17. Rxe4 {Now this exchange sacrifice is not as effective as in the game.} (17. Bxe4 Bxe4 18. Rxe4 Qd5 $1 {Important to blockade the d-pawn before attacking it.} 19. Re3 (19. Qe2 Nb3 $17) 19... Nc6 $15) 17... Nb3 $1 18. Ng5 (18. Rh4 Bxf3 19. Bxh7+ Kh8 20. Rh3 Bxd1 21. Bg6+ $11 {All of these analyses lead us to the fact that Anand's decision of taking axb5 was better than not taking.}) 18... Nxa1 19. Qh5 Qxg5 $1 20. Bxg5 g6 (20... Nxc2 21. Rh4 h6 22. Bxh6 g6 23. Rg4 Nxd4 24. Rxg6+ fxg6 25. Qxg6+ Kh8 $11) 21. Qd1 Nxc2 22. Qxc2 Bxe4 23. Qxe4 cxd4 $15 {Only Black can be better here.}) 16... axb5 (16... Nxd2 $2 17. Bxd2 axb5 18. Bxh7+ $1 { wins! It's a standard Greek Gift!} Kxh7 19. Ng5+ Kg8 (19... Kg6 20. Qg4 $18) 20. Qh5 $18) (16... cxd4 $6 17. bxa6 Rxa6 18. Nxe4 dxe4 19. Bxe4 Bxe4 20. Rxe4 Bc5 21. b4 $1 Bxb4 22. Rxd4 Qb8 23. Qd3 $18) 17. Nxe4 dxe4 18. Rxe4 $1 { This move might be natural for a player like Anand, but for us who are taught about the relative value of the pieces since a young age, it is not easy to consider a such a move. Once you see it, though, and you realize that the bishop on e4 will be a complete monster, breathing fire in both directions, you make this move!} (18. Bxe4 Bxe4 19. Rxe4 Qd5 $11 {gives Black excellent chances to hold.}) 18... Nb3 (18... Bxe4 19. Bxe4 {[%cal Ge4a8,Ge4h7]} Ra7 ( 19... Rb8 20. Bxh7+ Kxh7 21. Ng5+ Kg8 22. Qh5 $18) (19... g6 20. Bxa8 Qxa8 21. Bd2 b4 22. Qa4 $18) 20. Bxh7+ Kxh7 21. Ng5+ $18) 19. Rxa8 Bxa8 {[%cal Gb7a8] At this point I went to tournament hall to check out what exactly was going on. I expected Anand to be looking happy while Svidler would be on the board with his head in his hands. But the scene I saw was completely opposite. Peter had just captured the rook on a8 and was moving around confidently. Anand on the other hand was nervous, fidgety, biting his nails and looked as if he was the one on the back foot. But it was clear that Vishy was calculating the details of his final attack, anxious to make sure that his opponent had no defensive resources. And in the above position he picked up his knight and made the best move 20.Ng5!} 20. Ng5 $1 {Svidler came back and saw this move. I thought that the Russian would think for a while before he would make his move but he blitzed it out. He was showing that he had it under control.} (20. Rh4 Bxf3 21. Bxh7+ Kh8 22. Rh3 Bxd1 23. Bg6+) 20... Nxc1 21. Qh5 $1 {[%csl Rf7,Rh7] Once again the only move. There is an attack on both the h7 and f7 pawns.} h6 { This move was also made quickly.} (21... Qxg5 {was a way to avoid an immediate defeat, but doesn't really serve any purpose as after} 22. Qxg5 Bxe4 23. Qxc1 $1 Bxc2 24. Qxc2 $18 {the position is technically winning. It won't be so difficult for a player of Anand's calibre to turn this into a win.}) (21... Bxe4 22. Bxe4 h6 23. Qxf7+ Kh8 24. Qg6 $18) 22. Qxf7+ Kh8 {At this point Peter once again stood up from the board and started walking around. Anand was making his final calculations, the other players were all coming to the board and making faces of disbelief. Nakamura stood right next to Svidler's seat for almost a minute. He just didn't want to leave. He checked the scoresheet, then the board and couldn't believe that Anand was just winning. He went back to his board, Anand lifted his hand and once again made the only winning move in the position.} 23. Rg4 $1 {The rook defends the knight and now the threat is Qg6. Black doesn't really have a way to stop the attack.} (23. Rf4 Ne2+ $19) 23... Qa5 {And once again Anand has the only move to win.} (23... Ne2+ 24. Kf1 $1 {wins!} (24. Kh1 $4 {however loses in an amazing fashion.} Qa5 $3 {Suddenly the back rank weakness turns out to be the critical factor in the game.} 25. h4 Qe1+ 26. Kh2 Qg1+ 27. Kh3 Qh1#)) 24. h4 $1 {Svidler resigned as he saw no point in continuing. His bluff of playing quickly had not worked. Many of you might be wondering why this is the only move. Wouldn't h3 also win? The point is subtle. The h3 square has to be kept for the knight to control g1.} (24. h3 Qe1+ 25. Kh2 Ne2 26. Nf3 Bxf3 27. gxf3 Nxd4 $17) (24. h4 Qe1+ 25. Kh2 Ne2 26. Nh3 $18 {Like a gentleman he analyzed the game with Anand, kept a very calm face in the press conference and showed great sportsman spirit.}) 1-0

Fabiano Caruana – Sergey Karjakin 0.5-0.5 – Karjakin’s brilliant defense

It was a fight between Fabiano Caruana’s excellent home preparation against Karjakin’s tenacity

It seems as if it is complete impossible to beat Sergey Karjakin in this tournament. Once again we saw the topical variation of the Queen’s Indian essayed by Karjakin with Ba6, Bb4-Be7 and d5 and we reached the following position.

Anish Giri had opted for 11.Ne5, Topalov went for 11.Rb1 and now Caruana played the move 11.a3. Apart from the obvious idea of playing b4, this move had a deeper point. Let’s have a look at what it was.

Although Karjakin didn’t play the move 14…Bf8, this position shows the point of White’s play. The rook can move to a2 and then to d2. And a2 is a much safer square than Topalov’s Rb2, which invited Black to go for Bd6. After 15.Ra2 Bd6 would simply lose to 16.Nxd5.

The move d5-d4 demonstrates what great form Karjakin is in. He sacrificed his c4 knight to push his d-pawn all the way down to the board. And he had calculated just about everything. Caruana could do nothing better than to accept the draw.

If Karjakin can defend such difficult positions his chances of winning the Candidates are really high

[Event "Candidates 2016"] [Site "?"] [Date "2016.03.17"] [Round "6"] [White "Caruana, Fabiano"] [Black "Karjakin, Sergey"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A00"] [WhiteElo "2794"] [BlackElo "2760"] [Annotator "Sagar Shah"] [PlyCount "72"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Ba6 5. b3 Bb4+ 6. Bd2 Be7 7. Nc3 d5 8. cxd5 exd5 9. Bg2 O-O 10. O-O Re8 11. a3 $5 {[%cal Ga2a3] While Topalov wanted to enforce b4 with the move Rb1, Caruana went for a3. But this move has a deeper point which is to use the safer square a2 to lift the rook rather than the b2 square.} c5 12. dxc5 bxc5 13. Ne5 Bb7 14. Bf4 Nbd7 (14... Bf8 {was played by Karjakin against Topalov, and when Topalov had responded with Rb2, the bishop came back to d6 as in many lines the rook was hanging on b2. Here Caruana can avoid all of that with the move Ra2!} 15. Ra2 $1 Bd6 $2 16. Nxd5 $1 $18) 15. Nc4 $5 (15. Nxf7 $6 Kxf7 16. Nxd5 Nxd5 17. Bxd5+ Bxd5 18. Qxd5+ Kf8 $15) 15... Nb6 16. Na5 Ba6 17. b4 $5 (17. Nc6 Qd7 18. Nxe7+ Qxe7 $11 {should be around equal.}) 17... cxb4 {This move was not expected by Caruana. It is really not the best, but to prove an advantage against it is not an easy task.} ({Better was} 17... Bd6) ({or} 17... Qd7) 18. axb4 Bxb4 19. Nc6 Bxc3 20. Nxd8 Bxe2 21. Qb3 (21. Qc2 {was also possible.} Bxa1 22. Rxa1 Raxd8 (22... Rexd8 23. Qxe2 $18 ) 23. Rxa7 $16) 21... Bxa1 22. Rxa1 Raxd8 {Karjakin didn't want to allow the manoeuvre Be5-d4 and hence took with this rook. But this means that the a7 pawn falls.} (22... Rexd8 23. Bc7 Rdc8 24. Bxb6 axb6 25. Rxa8 Rxa8 26. Bxd5 $16 ) 23. Rxa7 Nc4 {This is critical for assessing the quality of Karjakin's sacrifice. It must be said that over the board this position is not so easy to win for White. Black hardly has any weaknesses. The pawns are all on one side, which greatly reduces White's chances. Caruana tried hard but couldn't crack through Karjakin's defences.} 24. h3 Bh5 25. Bg5 Bg6 26. Bxf6 gxf6 27. g4 Kg7 28. Qc3 d4 $1 {This was truly a study-like finish by Karjakin. His defensive capabilities are truly fantastic.} 29. Qxc4 d3 30. g5 {This looks like the most natural way to force events, but better could have been} (30. Kh2 d2 31. Bf3 d1=Q 32. Bxd1 Rxd1 $16 {when White can keep trying. Whether he can win or not is a different question, but he has some chances.}) 30... d2 (30... fxg5 $2 31. Bd5 $1 d2 32. Qd4+ Kg8 33. Qxd2 $18) 31. gxf6+ Kh8 (31... Kxf6 32. Qc3+ Kg5 33. Bf3 {and the king on g5 doesn't really feel safe.} d1=Q+ 34. Bxd1 Rxd1+ 35. Kh2 Kh6 36. Qf6 Re6 37. Qf4+ Kg7 38. Rxf7+ Bxf7 39. Qg4+ Kf8 40. Qxd1 {and although White is up a lot of material this might well be a theoretical draw.}) 32. Bf3 Be4 $1 {A very strong move that had to be accurately calculated.} 33. Kh2 (33. Qxf7 $2 d1=Q+ (33... Rg8+ 34. Qg7+ Rxg7+ 35. fxg7+ Kg8 36. Bd1 $11) 34. Bxd1 Rxd1+ 35. Kh2 Rg8 36. Qxg8+ Kxg8 $19) (33. Bg4 Rg8 34. Ra1 d1=Q+ 35. Rxd1 Rxd1+ 36. Kh2 Bd5 $11) 33... Bd5 $1 34. Qg4 (34. Qh4 Rg8 $1 35. Rxf7 (35. Bxd5 d1=Q) 35... Bxf7 36. Be4 Bg6 37. f7 d1=Q 38. Qf6+ Rg7 39. f8=Q+ Rxf8 40. Qxf8+ Rg8 41. Qf6+ $11) 34... Rg8 35. Bd1 Rxg4 36. hxg4 h6 {A brilliant defensive effort by Sergey.} 1/2-1/2

Veselin Topalov – Anish Giri 0.5-0.5 – Topalov’s moment of innovation

It is obvious that Topalov is having a tough time at this Candidates tournament. Being on –2
he has to indulge in wacky play to keep himself interested in the event. And he came up with…

All of opening theory is thrown out of the window once this move is made. While it is true that this move has been played only 27 times before, it has been played by GM Simon Williams in seven of his games. Can we call it the Williams’ line? An amazing co-incidence lies in the fact that the English GM has recorded an interactive video for ChessBase Magazine 171 which is due to release on 29th of March.

Have a sneak into the seven minute video to get an idea about the 3.h4 move

The ChessBase Magazine 171 will be available in the ChessBase
Shop on the 29th of March, but you can pre-order it here

The three white pawns on the fourth rank definitely are a great sight

Topalov has switched to a daredevil mode in this tournament. He doesn’t really care
much about results – what he is looking for is an interesting game of chess.

A word from the horse’s mouth about why he chose the move 3.h4

Giri’s solution: Topalov made his move 3.h4 and left the board for Anish to think.
The Dutch grandmaster did so for nearly ten minutes and replied with…

…the Benko Gambit!

Anish explains his thought process in choosing how to respond to 3.h4

The game was interesting. Topalov didn’t really get any advantage out of the opening. He could well have been worse. Anish had typical Benko-like compensation – he kept pressing and in the end was even a pawn up. But Topalov defended staunchly and made a draw.

[Event "Candidates 2016"] [Site "?"] [Date "2016.03.17"] [Round "6"] [White "Topalov, Veselin"] [Black "Giri, Anish"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A00"] [WhiteElo "2780"] [BlackElo "2793"] [Annotator "Sagar Shah"] [PlyCount "135"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. h4 $5 {[%cal Gh2h4]} (3. Nc3 d5 4. h4 {is not so great due to} c5 $1) 3... c5 (3... Bg7 4. Nc3 {is now a better version because Black cannot play the d5 followed by c5 line.}) (3... d5 $6 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. e4 $14) 4. d5 b5 {As Anish explained, the Benko is a very sound opening, it is just that Black doesn't have the time in the opening to execute it well. But if White wastes time with 3.h4 then the same Benko Gambit can be employed.} 5. cxb5 a6 6. bxa6 Bg7 7. Nc3 O-O 8. e4 d6 9. Nf3 Qa5 {Anish had got the same position against Adrien Demuth a few months ago but with the pawn on h4. He managed to win that game. This explains why Anish was so positive about his position. The move h4 doesn't make much sense here.} 10. Bd2 Bxa6 11. Qc2 Nbd7 12. Ne2 $6 (12. Na4 $5 Bxf1 $5 (12... Qc7 13. Bxa6 Rxa6 14. O-O $14) 13. Bxa5 Bxg2 14. Nd2 Bxh1 15. Bc3 Bh6 {gives Black some compensation, but maybe it is not enough.}) 12... Qb6 13. Bc3 h5 $6 {A critical waste of time by Anish. He could have snatched the initiative without worrying about the h-file.} (13... Rfb8 $1 14. Ng3 Ng4 $1 15. h5 Bxc3+ 16. bxc3 Qb2 $17) 14. Ng3 Ng4 15. Bxg7 Kxg7 16. Bxa6 Qxa6 17. Ne2 Nge5 18. Nxe5 Nxe5 19. O-O Qd3 {This position is a dream for any Benko player, but objectively this should be around equal.} 20. Qxd3 ( 20. Rfc1 Rfb8 21. Nf4 Qxc2 22. Rxc2 Ra4 23. f3 f5 $1 $132) 20... Nxd3 21. b3 Rfb8 (21... Ra3 $5) 22. Rfd1 Ne5 23. f3 Ra3 24. Kh2 Rba8 25. Nc1 f5 26. exf5 gxf5 27. Rb1 Rb8 28. Rb2 Rb4 29. Kh3 c4 30. Re2 cxb3 31. Nxb3 Ng6 32. Kg3 Raa4 33. Red2 Kf6 34. Kf2 Rb5 {Black is surely the one who is pressing, in spite of being a pawn down, mainly because his pieces are more active and there are more targets to attack.} (34... Rxh4 35. Nd4 Ra5 $17) 35. Rh1 Rxh4 36. Rxh4 Nxh4 {White's task has eased a bit, due to the exchange of a pair of rooks, but there should still be some suffering.} 37. f4 Ng6 38. g3 h4 39. Rd3 hxg3+ 40. Kxg3 Nf8 41. Kf3 Nd7 42. a4 Rb4 43. a5 Nf8 $1 {Anish really liked this move transferring his knight to g6.} 44. Nd4 Ng6 45. a6 Ra4 46. Ne2 Rxa6 { And as is typical in Benko, from being a pawn down, Black is now a pawn up.} 47. Nd4 Nf8 48. Nc2 Nd7 49. Ne3 Ra2 50. Rd1 Rh2 51. Rg1 Rh3+ ({An interesting variation that Anish showed in the press conference went something like this} 51... Rh5 52. Rg3 Nf8 53. Rg1 Rh4 54. Rg5 $2 Rxf4+ $1 55. Kxf4 e5+ $3 $19) 52. Rg3 Rxg3+ 53. Kxg3 {Although Botvinnik said that knight endgames are like pawn endgames, this one cannot be won.} Nc5 54. Kf3 e6 55. dxe6 Kxe6 56. Nc2 Kd5 57. Ne3+ Ke6 58. Nc2 Nb3 59. Ne3 Nd4+ 60. Kf2 Nc6 61. Ke2 Nb4 62. Kd2 Nd5 63. Ng2 Ne7 64. Kd3 Nc6 65. Nh4 Nb4+ 66. Kd4 Nc6+ 67. Kc4 Nb8 68. Nxf5 $1 {and the game ends in an instant draw.} (68. Nxf5 Kxf5 69. Kd5 $11) 1/2-1/2

Levon Aronian – Hikaru Nakamura 1-0 – Nakamura’s j’adoube controversy

The game between Aronian and Nakamura was the last one to end on this day. The opening and the middlegame were surely quite interesting, but the real action was in the endgame. Nakamura was defending an inferior endgame for quite some time and looked well within the reach of a draw. The following position was reached after move 74.

Nakamura (Black) is on the move here. Hikaru thought for a while and brought his hand down on the board, very clearly touching his king with the intention to move it. At that moment he realized what a grave blunder it would be to give up the f6 square especially because Ra6+ can be met with Rd6. Hence, with his hand on the king he said “J’adoube.” This was of course unfair as he clearly wanted to move the king. Aronian lifted his hands in the air in protest and called the arbiter. Hikaru Nakamura without any argument moved his king to f8 and after Kf6 duly lost the game.

This two minute video shows exactly what transpired

The American grandmaster is having a dismal tournament with two losses and now this j’adoube controversy. Maybe we should all go easy on him as the pressure of competition often makes people do things involuntarily. However what will surely not go well with the organizers is Hikaru’s behavior after the game. He left the playing hall in a hurry, clearly not wanting to wait for the press conference. It was the first time in this event that both the players were not present at a press conference after the game. In doing so he flouted two FIDE regulations for the Candidates:

3.11.1. If a player fails to appear at the Players' Meeting, the Opening or Closing Ceremony or any approved function of the Championship such as official receptions, press conferences or interviews, or conducts himself in a manner contrary to the spirit of sportsmanship or the FIDE Code of Ethics, then he shall suffer the following penalty: 5% of his prize money shall be forfeited to the Organisers and a further 5% to FIDE for each breach. In cases of serious misconduct the player may be disqualified from the event and the World Chess Championship cycle.

3.12.2. All players are required to make themselves available for post-game press conferences, of not more than 20 minutes duration, immediately after the game. All winners and medalists are obliged to attend the final press conference after the event has ended and to provide an exclusive interview for the FIDE website, if requested by the FIDE Press Officer. Players violating these rules will be subjected to the penalties mentioned in the event regulations.

We will have to wait and watch what actions will be taken against Nakamura for not attending the post-game conference.

Aronian’s (flawed) endgame lesson

As Nakamura didn’t arrive to the press conference it was Aronian talking to Kosteniuk and Miroshnichenko. One of the questions posed to Aronian was whether the endgame was winning if Nakamura had not played Kf8.

Aronian was quite confident that this endgame was winning for White. In his element he made the press conference extremely entertaining as he jokingly behaved like a teacher who was showing the method to win this endgame to his students. As Levon said on numerous occasions, even he wasn’t 100% sure about the winning method, he was sure that the position was winning. Watch him explain the intricacies of this endgame in the video below:

You can watch the entire press conference or you can
skip to the relevant endgame part which begins at around five minutes.

The funny thing is that the position is not winning. Black can hold on with accurate play. Here is my analysis:

[Event "Candidates 2016"] [Site "?"] [Date "2016.03.17"] [Round "6"] [White "Aronian, Levon"] [Black "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E15"] [WhiteElo "2786"] [BlackElo "2790"] [Annotator "Sagar Shah"] [PlyCount "166"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 b6 4. g3 Ba6 5. Qc2 c5 6. d5 exd5 7. cxd5 Bb7 8. Bg2 Nxd5 9. O-O Nc6 10. Rd1 Be7 11. Qa4 Nf6 12. Nh4 O-O 13. Nc3 $146 {A new move by Aronian. Previously only Nf5 had been played.} g6 14. Bg5 Rb8 {Here Aronian's opening knowledge came to an end.} 15. Bf4 $5 Rc8 16. Bh6 {The idea with this Bg5-f4-h6 is to lure the rook to c8 before bringing the queen to f4 so that Qb8 is not possible.} Re8 17. Qf4 Na5 (17... Nh5 {was definitely what Levon was waiting for.} 18. Qxf7+ $1 Kxf7 19. Bd5+ Kf6 20. Ne4+ Ke5 21. f4+ Nxf4 22. gxf4#) 18. Nf5 (18. Bxb7 Nxb7 19. Nf5 Bf8) 18... Bxg2 (18... Bf8 19. Bxf8 Rxf8 20. Nd6 $16) 19. Nxe7+ $6 (19. Kxg2 {was better according to Levon.}) 19... Qxe7 20. Kxg2 Qe5 21. e3 d5 22. Bg5 Ne4 $6 (22... Kg7 $11) 23. Rxd5 Qxf4 24. gxf4 Nxc3 25. bxc3 {Around here Aronian was pleased with his position. He has the open d-file in his control and a more active king. This should mean something.} Kg7 26. Rd7 h6 27. Be7 Nc4 28. Rad1 a5 29. R1d5 Rc6 30. Ra7 Re6 31. Rdd7 Kg8 32. h4 Kg7 33. Bd8 Kg8 34. Be7 Kg7 35. Rab7 Kg8 36. Rbc7 Na3 37. Bd8 Nc4 38. Be7 Na3 39. Rb7 Nc4 40. Kf3 a4 41. Rbc7 Nd2+ 42. Rxd2 R6xe7 43. Rc6 Re6 44. Rxe6 Rxe6 45. c4 {White has a small edge but Black can hold with accurate play.} Kg7 46. e4 Re8 47. e5 Rb8 48. Rd7 Kf8 49. f5 gxf5 50. Kf4 b5 51. cxb5 Rxb5 52. Kxf5 a3 (52... Ke8 53. Rc7 (53. Ra7 c4 {and Black has better drawing chances.}) 53... Rb2 54. f4 Rxa2 55. Kf6 $18) 53. f4 $6 (53. Kf6 $1 Rb6+ 54. Rd6 $18 Rb8 (54... Rxd6+ 55. exd6 {The pawn ending is just lost.}) 55. f4 $18 Rc8 56. f5 c4 57. Rd7 c3 58. Rxf7+ Ke8 59. e6 c2 60. Rh7 $18) 53... Rb4 54. Ra7 c4 55. Rxa3 Rb2 56. Ra6 Kg7 57. a4 c3 58. Ra7 c2 59. Rc7 Rb4 60. a5 Ra4 61. Rxc2 Rxa5 {This is the endgame position which Aronian thinks that he was winning even if Nakamura didn't blunder. In the game he moved around a bit with his pieces. In the analysis he began with h5 as the right way for White to proceed.} 62. Rc4 (62. h5 Rb5 63. Rc8 Ra5 64. Rd8 Ra4 65. Kg4 Rb4 66. Kf3 { [%cal Gf4f5] This is all still main line of the analysis. According to Levon White threatens f5 here and it is a deadly idea.} Rb3+ 67. Ke4 {And now Kosteniuk played Rb1. Instead Rh3 can be a strong move.} Rb1 {Even this is not so clear as after} (67... Rh3 $1 68. f5 Rh4+ 69. Kd5 Rxh5 70. f6+ Kg6 $11) 68. Rd7 Rb4+ (68... Rb5) 69. Rd4 Rb1 70. f5 {Aronian felt that this position is winning, but after} Re1+ 71. Kd5 Rf1 72. f6+ Kf8 73. Kc6 Ke8 74. Rb4 Rc1+ 75. Kd5 Rd1+ 76. Rd4 Rc1 $11 {It is just a draw.}) 62... Ra1 63. Rc7 Kf8 {is not yet a mistake because Kf6 is met with Ra6+ and there is no Rd6 yet.} ({Also possible was} 63... Ra4 64. e6 Ra5+ 65. Ke4 Ra4+ 66. Kf3 Kf6 67. exf7 (67. e7 Ra8 $11) 67... Kg7 $11) 64. Rd7 Ra4 65. Rd3 Rc4 66. Re3 Ke7 67. Re4 Rc1 68. Rb4 Kf8 69. Rb6 Kg7 70. Rb7 Kf8 71. Rb8+ Kg7 72. Rb4 Ra1 73. Rd4 Ra2 74. Rd7 Kf8 $4 {Nakamura made this move and this led to the j'adoube controversy. Maybe Naka didn't realise that Kf6 Ra6+ can now be met with Rd6. When he touched the king he must have realized it. Or else he could have just played Ra4.} (74... Ra4 75. Rd8 (75. e6 Ra5+ 76. Ke4 Ra4+ 77. Ke3 Kf6 $1 $11) 75... Rb4 76. h5 Ra4 77. Kg4 Rb4 78. Kf3 Rb1 79. Ke4 Re1+ 80. Kf5 Rh1 $11) 75. Kf6 {Now it is all over.} Ra6+ 76. Rd6 Ra8 77. h5 Kg8 78. f5 Rb8 79. Rd7 Rb6+ 80. Ke7 Rb5 81. Rd8+ Kh7 82. Kf6 Rb6+ 83. Rd6 (83. Kxf7 Rf6+ 84. Ke8 Rxf5 85. e6 $18) 83... Rb7 { Nakamura made this move and resigned. e6 followed by e7 just wins.} 1-0

Aronian confidently saying that his position was winning when actually it was not, and Nakamura’s j’adoube incident led to a pretty angry Facebook post by ACP President Emil Sutovsky:

“I am sorry, but Aronian pretending this endgame to be winning left me speechless. I put it mildly. This sounds like complete rubbish. The plan he claimed to "know" and to be "simply winning" just doesn't work and has more than one refutation. Top player is not supposed to mislead hundreds of thousands people this way. Also the way Levon conveyed his "knowledge" was quite shocking. But still less shocking than Nakamura trying to j'adoube his king after he started making the move. The players must be really under severe pressure in this event. Sorry I have to write it instead of praising Anand or singling out Karjakin's brilliant defence. But I really believe that being a top player means a highest responsibility towards the entire Chess World.”

What do you do when the tension of watching the games becomes too much? You start playing!

Sixth round was the last day of Alexandra Kosteniuk’s role as a commentator.
She ended it with a blitz game against her husband Pavel Tregubov!

Even at ten at night there were a lot of youngsters playing against each other
on the chess sets set up in the tournament hall

All pictures by Amruta Mokal of ChessBase India

Standings after six rounds

Pairings and results

Round 1, Friday 11 March 2016
Karjakin Sergey
Svidler Peter
Nakamura Hikaru
Caruana Fabiano
Giri Anish
Aronian Levon
Anand Viswanathan
Topalov Veselin
Round 2, Saturday 12 March 2016
Svidler Peter ½-½ Topalov Veselin
Aronian Levon ½-½ Anand Viswanathan
Caruana Fabiano ½-½ Giri Anish
Karjakin Sergey 1-0 Nakamura Hikaru
Round 3, Sunday 13 March 2016
Nakamura Hikaru
Svidler Peter
Giri Anish
Karjakin Sergey
Anand Viswanathan
Caruana Fabiano
Topalov Veselin
Aronian Levon
Rest day, Monday 14 March 2016
Round 4, Tuesday 15 March 2016
Svidler Peter
Aronian Levon
Caruana Fabiano
Topalov Veselin
Karjakin Sergey
Anand Viswanathan
Nakamura Hikaru
Giri Anish
Round 5, Wed. 16 March 2016
Giri Anish ½-½ Svidler Peter
Anand Viswanathan ½-½ Nakamura Hikaru
Topalov Veselin ½-½ Karjakin Sergey
Aronian Levon ½-½ Caruana Fabiano
Round 6, Thursday 17 March 2016
Anand Viswanathan
Svidler Peter
Topalov Veselin
Giri Anish
Aronian Levon
Nakamura Hikaru
Caruana Fabiano
Karjakin Sergey
Rest day, Friday 18 March 2016
Round 7, Saturday 19 March 2016
Svidler Peter   Caruana Fabiano
Karjakin Sergey   Aronian Levon
Nakamura Hikaru   Topalov Veselin
Giri Anish   Anand Viswanathan
Round 8, Sunday 20 March 2016
Svidler Peter   Karjakin Sergey
Caruana Fabiano   Nakamura Hikaru
Aronian Levon   Giri Anish
Topalov Veselin   Anand Viswanathan
Round 9, Monday 21 March 2016
Topalov Veselin   Svidler Peter
Anand Viswanathan   Aronian Levon
Giri Anish   Caruana Fabiano
Nakamura Hikaru   Karjakin Sergey
Rest day, Tuesday 22 March 2016
Round 10, Wed. 23 March 2016
Svidler Peter   Nakamura Hikaru
Karjakin Sergey   Giri Anish
Caruana Fabiano   Anand Viswanathan
Aronian Levon   Topalov Veselin
Round 11, Thursday 24 March 2016
Aronian Levon   Svidler Peter
Topalov Veselin   Caruana Fabiano
Anand Viswanathan   Karjakin Sergey
Giri Anish   Nakamura Hikaru
Round 12, Friday 25 March 2016
Svidler Peter   Giri Anish
Nakamura Hikaru   Anand Viswanathan
Karjakin Sergey   Topalov Veselin
Caruana Fabiano   Aronian Levon
Rest day, Saturday 26 March 2016
Round 13, Sunday 27 March 2016
Caruana Fabiano   Svidler Peter
Aronian Levon   Karjakin Sergey
Topalov Veselin   Nakamura Hikaru
Anand Viswanathan   Giri Anish
Round 14, Monday 28 March 2016
Svidler Peter   Anand Viswanathan
Giri Anish   Topalov Veselin
Nakamura Hikaru   Aronian Levon
Karjakin Sergey   Caruana Fabiano

Roundup broadcasts

ChessBase is doing roundup shows at the end of each round of the Candidates.

Here is the full schedule of future broadcasts – you need to be a premium member to watch

Roundup Commentary Schedule

Date Day Round English German
18.03.2016 Friday Free day Summary Yannick Pelletier  
19.03.2016 Saturday Round 7 Oliver Reeh/Karsten Müller Klaus Bischoff
20.03.2016 Sunday Round 8 Chris Ward Klaus Bischoff
21.03.2016 Monday Round 9 Simon Williams Klaus Bischoff
22.03.2016 Tuesday Free day Summary Yannick Pelletier  
23.03.2016 Wednesday Round 10 Daniel King Klaus Bischoff
24.03.2016 Thursday Round 11 Simon Williams Klaus Bischoff
25.03.2016 Friday Round 12 Daniel King Oliver Reeh/Karsten Müller
26.03.2016 Saturday Free day Summary Yannick Pelletier  
27.03.2016 Sunday Round 13 Daniel King Klaus Bischoff
28.03.2016 Monday Round 14 Yannick Pelletier Klaus Bischoff


Sagar Shah is an International Master from India with two GM norms. He is also a chartered accountant and would like to become the first CA+GM of India. He loves to cover chess tournaments, as that helps him understand and improve at the game he loves so much. He is the co-founder of the ChessBase India website.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Rules for reader comments


Not registered yet? Register

Hernando Guzman Jaimes Hernando Guzman Jaimes 3/19/2016 02:17
if today Karjakin beats Aronian in the next round will surely see Svidler gives him the point Karjakin and thus the Russian would be refined as the most serious contender to face Carlsen, we should not minimize the need for the Russians to regain hegemony the individual chess world title
tom fox tom fox 3/19/2016 12:47
Sutovsky’s comment was most strange. What do chess player’s talk about at a press conference if not their evaluations of moves and positions? The weather?
It is ridiculous to suggest that for a tired GM to give their honest assessment of a position in a press conference is an affront to all chess player while trying to pretend you are adjusting a piece without having said ‘J’adoube’ is an understandable result of tournament pressure.
vladivaclav vladivaclav 3/19/2016 09:46
Hey Sutovsky, you engine slave, Aronian has been in TOP 10 for ages and you're not even in TOP 100. So listen up carefully what teacher Lev is saying :)
Mtudorache Mtudorache 3/19/2016 09:25
I'm not a fan Nakamura. But, as I saw the video, Aronian can have a great future as a conductor of a philharmonic orchestra (when and if he retires of chess at a certain time). The entire planet saw, Nakamura's intent to move his king. I ask again: why not wait to see the Nakamura's move? After, if he not move the king, stop the clock and call the arbiter. Sorry, but I understand Nakamura's "after game". First of all, you should think that, Aronian started talking on the Nakamura's time thinking and he don't know yet, which move will make Nakamura. So, perhaps it's best that says @chesssubs.
ivan3ivanovich ivan3ivanovich 3/19/2016 06:33

That's nonsense. After e6 fxe6+ Kxe6 Re1+ Kf5 (Kd7 and Kd6 are tablebase draws, Kd5 loses) then Re7 and there is no way for white to win.
jajalamapratapri jajalamapratapri 3/19/2016 04:51
The analysis in the Aronian-Nakamura are bad in the analysis he made on move 80..Rh1 81.e6! wins the game it´s not equalize."

Why post such nonsense if you don't know what you are talking about? That's a draw!
Emil Cabagay Emil Cabagay 3/19/2016 04:11
Aronian should not insist that he is winning againstNaka! who in turnshould admit his error! Anyway I'll gofor Anand if he instill the true confiidence and courage of a World Champion!!
Ohanessian Ohanessian 3/19/2016 03:57
Please see the board again you can´t take the pawn with the rook you have to take it with the king and the position is better for white
NJD NJD 3/19/2016 01:52
Svidler got "launched"...
Queenslander Queenslander 3/19/2016 01:21
I hope Hikaru Nakamura will unreservedly apologize for his unsporting and immature behaviour in and immediately after Round 6. He needs to understand that competing in the Candidates means he is on the international stage like never before. This incident will go into chess history. Nakamura has not only made a fool of himself, he has brought discredit on his country, and he needs to make amends. Soon.
jajalamapratapri jajalamapratapri 3/19/2016 12:35
"Caruana - Karjakin

Variation: 33. Bg4 Rg8 34. Ra1 d1Q+ 35. Rxd1 Rxd1+ 36. Kh2 Bd5= (Shah)

More correct is: 33. Bg4 Rg8 34. Ra1?? d1Q+ 35. Rxd1 Rxd1+ 36. Kh2 Rh1X "

Even more correct is ... 36. Kh2 Rh1+ +=
malfa malfa 3/18/2016 11:49
erroranalysis6, I have not checked your variation with a chess engine, so I may miss something, but I do not understand how White loses after the obvious 37.Kg3.
fightingchess fightingchess 3/18/2016 08:22
i can't wait for nakamura-aronian in final round. it would be a dream scenario for naka that aronian is in first place after round 13 and naka ruins everything for him in the last round.
erroranalysis6 erroranalysis6 3/18/2016 06:23
Caruana - Karjakin

Variation: 33. Bg4 Rg8 34. Ra1 d1Q+ 35. Rxd1 Rxd1+ 36. Kh2 Bd5= (Shah)

More correct is: 33. Bg4 Rg8 34. Ra1?? d1Q+ 35. Rxd1 Rxd1+ 36. Kh2 Rh1X

fons fons 3/18/2016 05:54
It's touch move, no argument there.

But most of the people criticizing Aronian or Nakamura for acting immorally or unsportsmanlike would do exactly the same in those circumstances, especially when the stakes are this high. (A game with the world championship at stake is a tiny bit different than your casual game at the local chess club.)

Even Sutovski is off the mark: Aronian most likely really did believe the ending was winning no matter what, he just wasn't 100% sure.
thlai80 thlai80 3/18/2016 05:51
Nakamura was shocking, and if Aronian's was shocking to Sutofsky, Sutofsky comment was utterly shocking to me. His attack on Aronian who was fresh from the game vs Sutofsky at the comfort of his home equipped with computer analysis is totally unnecessary. Take Carlsen for example, the absolute top player who play on and on in equal endgame. If you ask Carlsen, he definitely felt he was winning thus played on. It is not relevant if computer analysis shows otherwise, what's more important is whether there's enough traps and tactics in the endgame that allows Aronian to play on.

I'm sure even Sutofsky had played on an endgame which was either equal or losing because his opponent was far weaker, thus even in losing positions there's every chance he can turn it around as long as there's enough complexity to confuse the opponent. Can we then say Sutofsky was cheap to look for cheap wins?
Chessspawnvt Chessspawnvt 3/18/2016 05:43
What's the status of Agon's legal action(s) against those pesky web sites? Have they filed papers in any courts, anywhere on our planet?
malfa malfa 3/18/2016 05:27
Ohanessian, if you refer to Sagar Shah's analysis, you are the one who is wrong: after 81.e6 fxe6+ 82.Rxe6 (what else?) it is a tablebase draw: Black has no less than eight moves to save himself.
Shurlock_V Shurlock_V 3/18/2016 04:57
Nakamura is going to get flogged otb for the rest of the event. It's over psychologically for him.

And that's ok.
defrigge defrigge 3/18/2016 04:30
Nakamura clearly misbehaved. He should have apologized after some seconds of thought, but instead tried to get away with his swindling effort, then even denying the handshake and missing the press conference. Isn't it clear what his elite grandmaster collegues will think of that kind of beahvior?

This will be quite a burdon on his shoulders for the remaining rounds and be remembered quite a while. And any overzealous effort to beat Aronian (playing black) in the last round could easily backfire.
idratherplay960 idratherplay960 3/18/2016 03:58
Forget placings, Naka will be more motivated than ever to play spoiler to Aronian in the second half when he gets the white pieces.
Ohanessian Ohanessian 3/18/2016 03:55
The analysis in the Aronian-Nakamura are bad in the analysis he made on move 80..Rh1 81.e6! wins the game it´s not equalize.
idratherplay960 idratherplay960 3/18/2016 03:52
Fact is Aronian is cocky, I have no problem with it personally but if Naka or most of any of these other guys said the stuff that comes out of Aro's mouth, the public would hate them. Maybe bc he is not American or bc he smiles and is a funny nasally sounding dude he gets away with it for the most part but despite what people say about Naka, I would argue that Giri and Aronian are even more arrogant. As far as Naka's blunder, it was a knee jerk reaction and he didn't protest, he corrected his err quickly and I'm sure he feels embarrassed enough. No need to beat a dead horse.
Meckerel Meckerel 3/18/2016 03:18
Great games!

I think Svidler was brave enough to try something different than the Berlin, but his play was very imprecise, specially d5. Anand took advantage of this very accurately.

Karjakin continues to impress me, his idea d4! is amazing. But yes, perhaps he should try now another defense other than the QI.

I disliked Nakamura's behavior. He tried to "correct" his mistake in an unfairly manner and so I support Levon and his reaction. The press conference was very entertaining. I think Sutovsky is wrong, Levon simply thought he was winning, and he was honest and said what he thought. He was not misleading anybody purposefully, he simply said his opinion, in a very friendly manner. Hey, if I have that position, I will try Levon´s method anyway!
NJD NJD 3/18/2016 03:11
Svidler got "launched"...
Steven Gerrard Steven Gerrard 3/18/2016 02:44
Emil Sutovsky is clearly not a fan of Aronian's comic style "Now my children, etc"
SushiDefense SushiDefense 3/18/2016 01:32
Caruana still has the Italian flag?
Queenslander Queenslander 3/18/2016 12:59
Shocking post by Sutovsky that blatantly slanders Aronian. On what possible grounds does he 'know' that Aronian was deliberately misleading everyone? Is he a mind reader?? He seems to have completely forgotten his leadership responsibilities as ACP President. Now that his comments have been published on this site I hope he makes a public apology as soon as possible. [I hope ChessBase accepts some some editorial responsibility too.]
chesssubs chesssubs 3/18/2016 12:44
Yes. Arbiter behaved like an orbitor there. Punishments on players talking during the game and arbiter's acceptance of improper claim PROCEDURE and his abrupt visits need to be revisited
malfa malfa 3/18/2016 12:39
Actually the arbiter was not "orbiting" around the players, just doing his job. BTW, Werner Stubenvoll is one of the most experienced arbiters in the world, so chessubs'claim that he should be punished for disturbing the players is complete nonsense.
Hawkman Hawkman 3/18/2016 12:29
It's an arbiter, not an orbiter. Naka was clearly not adjusting his King and never should have said "I adjust".
malfa malfa 3/18/2016 12:16
shycharles, apparently Aronian took it for granted that after managing to push f4-f5 the game were won, but following Sutovsky's claim I found out that if Black attacks the h5 pawn White sooner or later must push to f6, in order to win the f7 pawn, which however he can never achieve because of a stalemate theme: think of a position like Kg4, Rd8, Pp. e5-f6-h5 vs. Kh7, Rf1, Pp. f7-h6, so that if 1.Rf8 then 1...Rf4+! with perpetual check, since if the rook is captured, then Black is stalemated.
chesssubs chesssubs 3/18/2016 12:14
Both Naka and Aronian were talking and signaling each other during that event WITHOUT stopping the clock.Arbiter was also there but behaved as a spectator, not sure if he has stopped the clock and not sure the claim was PROPERLY claimed.So 3 of them need to be punished including orbiter.And punishments from fide need to announced clearly to the public to raise the gentlmanship of the game.If you look at circumstances Naka faced before touching the king, it is clearly the time pressure and disturbance by orbiter's coming and going as if he signals players to finish with his visits.Naka had to see the orbiter because of his abrupt visits before touching the king, he got distrubed. Observe the 6th round complete video link before he touches the king in below URL starting from 6:43:43 time.Orbiter's visit NEEDS to be LIMITED to playing hall and DEFINED PROPERLY.
malfa malfa 3/18/2016 12:06
dunican, respect of the rules is due by anybody, therefore I suppose that, in order to submit his protest the correct way, Aronian should have first of all stopped the clock, then asked for the arbiter's assistance.
shycharles shycharles 3/18/2016 12:00
My skills in chess doesnt reach that far to clarify if the endgame in Aronian vs. Nakamura is winning for White or not.
Please can anyone prove it?
Maybe Carsten Müller in his next endgame lesson or by means of any tablebases if there exists one.
Thanks in advance.
dunican dunican 3/18/2016 10:46
Mtudorache: the reason is that Nakamura apparently said j'adoube after touching the king, which indicated his intention not to move it. This was a violation of the rules.
Kpawn Kpawn 3/18/2016 09:58
ACP President Emil Sutovsky should take a pill and chill out. Chess is complex and clearly even candidate class GM's can't get it perfect. To assert Aronian's erroneous appraisal of a position is with malicious intent misleading the chess community is beyond ludicrous.
Pionki Pionki 3/18/2016 09:32
1. Aronian deserves to fight for the title. I hope for him it's this time around.
2. The youngsters will have to wait for the next cycle.
3. I hope Chessbase never fires Daniel King. It's an art to be able to explain chess to everyone.
Mtudorache Mtudorache 3/18/2016 08:04
What a desperate Aronian! He speaking and started to show his arms, on the thinking time of Nakamura! Why not wait to see which move will make Nakamura? There is all on the video. I already understand why Nakamura is gone without a word...
Resistance Resistance 3/18/2016 07:42
Very entertaining round! A delight to see them playing good, hard-fought chess since they are all such great players.

Anand-Svidler (1-0).
Pretty sharp Ruy Lopez, Peter pushed a little too hard perhaps and Vishy responded with machine-like precision. A pity for me seeing Peter losing, but a great game from Vishy on the other hand.

Topalov-Giri (1/2).
Topalov was ready for a fight, but Giri managed to neutralize White's initiative by way of dynamic and solid play. The resulting ending, after queens got traded, was still complex and required some thought and care from both sides. Good game.

Aronian-Nakamura (1-0).
Hard-fought battle in a sharp line of the Queen's Indian, Levon seemed better prepared, though Hikaru never allowed him getting anything more than an edge. The game got decided, apparently, by an involuntary mistake on the part of Hikaru (at move 74) that tournament rules do not allow, and which forced him into a bad position which Aronian used to his advantage. Good game by both players, Levon seems to be gaining in strength, yes sir!

Caruana-Karjakin (1/2).
A sharp and complex Queen's Indian defense that led to an even sharper and more complex middle-game where Sergey sacrificed his queen for counterplay and chances in a materially unbalanced position. Fabiano, however, seemed to find the right response to Karjakin's rather extravagant conception, and for a while it looked as if he had a clear edge or maybe even more. But after a sharp exchange of moves, things finally liquidated into a drawn position. A fantastic game with many hidden possibilities that only in-depth analysis will probably reveal.

Round 7's after Friday's rest day, things are gearing up at the Candidates 2016...