Review: Sipke Ernst’s positional 1.d4 repertoire

by Christian Hoethe
5/25/2024 – If you want to improve your chess, you need a repertoire, but developing a repertoire on your own can be tedious. This is where recommendations from GMs can help. In a new ChessBase course, Dutch GM and FIDE Trainer Sipke Ernst has developed a repertoire for anyone who plays or intends to play 1.d4. Christian Hoethe went over the course and came to the conclusion that White can easily “make his/her opponent sweat” with this repertoire.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Critical continuations and sharp alternatives

ChessBase has published a very interesting trilogy: “A practical repertoire for the positional player after 1.d4” by Dutch grandmaster Sipke Ernst. Ernst, a former member of the Dutch national team and a FIDE Trainer, organises the wealth of material in his repertoire as follows.

Volume 1 deals with all the main and secondary variations after 1.d4 d5: the centrepiece here is of course the orthodox Queen’s Gambit Declined, against which Ernst recommends the exchange variation with 4.cxd5 after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6.

In my opinion, this is a good practical decision, as it avoids various theoretically critical defences such as the Vienna or the Ragozin. Ernst deals intensively both with the improved Tarrasch Defence, which arises after 4...Nxd5, and of course with the main continuation 4...exd5.

Against the Queen’s Gambit Accepted, Ernst recommends the modern 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 a6 6.O-O c5 7.Re1!?, which has the practical advantage of being relatively rare at club level.

The Semi-Slav after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.e3 Nbd7 is answered positionally with 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.b3 — instead of, for example, 7.g4!?.

I found his recommendation to tackle the typical triangle move sequence 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 c6 with the sharp Marshall Gambit 4.e4!? a little surprising. In the sequence 4...dxe4 5.Nxe4 Bb4+ 6.Bd2 Qxd4 7.Bxb4 Qxe4+ 8.Be2 White sacrifices a pawn for quicker development and the bishop pair, but Black gets a solid position in exchange.

For players who have specialised in this line from the black side thanks to the publications of Sherbakov, Krasenkov and Semkov, 4.e4 is of course the critical continuation. They will therefore encounter it regularly and will have prepared it in detail. In my opinion, this is a small advantage, but one that should not be underestimated, as they will be very familiar with the subtleties. The situation is correspondingly different for the player with white because, unlike the Nimzo or King’s Indian, he is much less likely to get the Triangle Slav on the board.

In line with GM Ernst’s recommendations on the Semi-Slav, I would therefore have found 4.e3 more coherent. But sometimes it’s helpful to have a bit more “fire on board” if you want it!

A possible alternative for the gambit after 5...Bb4+ is 6.Nc3, as in the famous game Carlsen-Anand, Chennai 2013, which Carlsen won.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 c6 4.e4 dxe4 5.Nxe4 Bb4+ 6.Nc3 A harmless continuation, examined, beside the main line, in the opening survey in CBM 152. 6.Bd2 Qxd4 7.Bxb4 Qxe4+ is the start of major theoretical research here. 6...c5 7.a3 Ba5 8.Nf3 Nf6 9.Be3 9.Be2 cxd4 10.Nxd4 Ne4 11.Ndb5 Qxd1+ 12.Bxd1 Nxc3 13.Nxc3 Bxc3+ 14.bxc3 Bd7 15.a4 Bc6 16.0-0 Nd7 17.a5 a6 18.Ba3 1/2 (18) Babula,V (2590)-Khenkin,I (2603) Germany 2003 CBM 093 [Krasenkow] 9...Nc6 9...Ne4 is simpler, e.g. 10.Qc2 Nxc3 11.bxc3 cxd4 12.Bxd4 0-0 13.Bd3 h6 13...g6 14.0-0 Nc6 15.Rab1 Bc7 16.Be4 Qe7 17.Rfe1 Bd6 18.Qa4 1-0 (36) Yermolinsky,A (2530)-Shulman,Y (2623) Philadelphia 2008 Rb8!= 10.Qd3 10.dxc5 Bxc3+ 11.bxc3 Qa5 12.Qc2 12.Qc1 e5 12...Ng4 13.Qc1 0-0 14.Be2 Nxe3 15.Qxe3 Ne7 16.0-0 Nf5 17.Qe4 Qxc5= 1/2 (41) Polgar,Z (2560)-Portisch,L (2580) Budapest 1993 10...cxd4 11.Nxd4 Ng4!= 12.0-0-0 Nxe3 13.fxe3 Bc7 A bit too passive. 13...Qe7!? A.Korotylev 14.Nxc6 14.Ndb5 0-0 15.Qc2 Qe7 16.Nxc7 Qxc7 17.Nb5 Qe5 18.Qf2 A.Korotylev f6 14...bxc6 15.Qxd8+ Bxd8 16.Be2 16.g3!? Bg5 17.Bg2 Bxe3+ 18.Kc2 Bd7 19.Rhe1 Bc5 20.Ne4 Be7 21.c5 16...Ke7 Here, too, 16...Bg5 was more to the point. 17.Bf3 Bd7 18.Ne4 Bb6 18...Bc7 19.Nc5 Be8 20.Na6 Be5 21.Rd3 (A.Korotylev) is dangerous for Black, e.g. f5 22.Rb3 Rf8 23.Rb7+ Kf6 24.Nb4 19.c5 f5 20.cxb6 fxe4 21.b7! Rab8 22.Bxe4 Rxb7 A consequence of Vishy Anand's minor inaccuracies. Still, this simplified position should be drawn but it requires accurate defence from Black - something in Magnus Carlsen's style! 23.Rhf1 Rb5 24.Rf4 24.Rd4!? was recommended by GM A.Korotylev but it is still nothing special after a5 24...g5 25.Rf3 h5 26.Rdf1 Be8 27.Bc2 Rc5 27...Re5!? 28.Kd2 Rd5+ 29.Ke2?! h4 28.Rf6 The activation of this rook is a progress for White but Black's position is still defensible. h4 29.e4 a5 30.Kd2 Rb5 31.b3 Bh5 32.Kc3 Rc5+ 33.Kb2 Rd8 33...g4 was simpler: 34.g3 hxg3 35.hxg3 Be8 A.Korotylev 34.R1f2 Rd4 This active continuation is possible but more complex. 35.Rh6 35.Bb1 Kd6 ≤35...Bd1 36.Rf8 35...g4!? 36.g3 hxg3 37.hxg3 Rd2+ 38.Rxd2 Kxf6 36.Rf8 Kc7 37.Rh8 Bd1 35...Bd1 36.Bb1 Rb5 37.Kc3 c5 38.Rb2 e5 39.Rg6 a4?! 39...g4 40.Bd3 40.Rh6 a4 41.bxa4 Rxb2 42.Kxb2 Rd2+ 43.Kc1 Rxg2 44.Kxd1 Rxh2 , and White must give the bishop back by means of 45.Bd3 g3 46.Bf1= 40...Rxb3+ 41.Rxb3 Bxb3 42.Rxg4 c4 43.Be2 Kd6 44.Rxh4 Kc5 with sufficient counterplay 40.Rxg5 Rxb3+ 41.Rxb3 Bxb3       42.Rxe5+ Kd6 43.Rh5 Rd1 44.e5+ Kd5 45.Bh7 Rc1+?! The resulting rook ending is still drawn, but matters are very close now. 45...Ra1!? is much easier, e.g. 46.Bg8+ 46.Rxh4 Kxe5= 46...Kc6 47.Bxb3 Rxa3 48.Kc4 axb3 49.Rh6+ Kd7 50.Kxc5 Ra2 51.Rb6 Rxg2= 46.Kb2 Rg1 46...Re1 is playable as well, e.g. 47.Bg8+ 47.e6+ Kd6= 47...Kd4 48.Rxh4+ Kd3 49.Rh3+ 49.Bh7+ Kd2 50.Re4 Rxe4 51.Bxe4 c4 52.h4 c3+ 53.Kb1 53.Ka1 Bc4 54.Kb1 Bd5= 53...Bd5 54.Bc2 Bb3= and Black draws by eternal hunt - continually offering the exchange of bishops.. 49...Kd4 50.Bxb3 axb3 51.Rh4+! 51.Kxb3 c4+ 52.Kc2 Re2+ 53.Kd1 Rxg2 54.e6 Rg1+ 55.Ke2 Rg2+ 56.Kf3 Rg6= 51...Kd3 52.Kxb3 but even here after Rb1+ 53.Ka2 53.Ka4 c4 53...Re1 Black's passed c-pawn should save him, e.g. 54.Rh3+ Kd4 55.g4 c4 56.g5 c3 57.Kb3 Rb1+ 58.Kc2 Rb2+ 59.Kc1 Rg2 60.Rh8 Rxg5 61.e6 Rg1+ 62.Kc2 Rg2+ 63.Kb3 Rb2+ 64.Ka4 Rb7= 47.Bg8+ Kc6 48.Rh6+ Kd7 49.Bxb3 axb3 50.Kxb3 Rxg2 51.Rxh4 Ke6? Now Black's king is too far away from the passed a-pawn. The rook belongs behind the passed pawn: 51...Re2! and White can not win, e.g. 52.a4 52.Rh5 Re3+ 53.Kc4 53.Ka4 Kc6 54.Rh6+ Kd5 55.e6 c4 56.h4 c3 57.Kb3 c2+ 58.Kxc2 Rxa3 59.e7 Re3 60.Rh7 Kd6 61.h5 Rxe7 62.Rxe7 Kxe7 63.h6 Kf7 64.h7 Kg7= 53...Rxa3 54.Kxc5 Ke6 55.Kd4 Ra4+= 52.Kc4 Rxe5 53.a4 Kc6 54.Rh6+ Kb7 55.a5 Re4+ 56.Kxc5 Re2= 52...Rxe5 53.Kc4 Kc6 54.Rh6+ Kb7 55.a5 Re4+ 56.Kxc5 Re2 and Black has reached a version of Vancura's draw, e.g. 57.Kb5 Re5+ 58.Kb4 Re4+ 59.Kc5 Re2 60.h4 Re4! The rook must attack the pawn so that White's rook can not break free. 61.Kd5 61.Rb6+ Kc7 62.Rb4 Re5+= 61...Rg4 62.Ke5 Ka7 63.Kf5 Rc4! 64.Rh7+ Kb8 65.h5 Rc5+ 66.Kg6 Rc6+ Of course not 66...Rxa5? 67.Rf7+- 67.Kg7 Rc7+= 51...Kc6? 52.a4 Re2 53.Rh6+ 53.Kc4? Rxe5 54.Rh6+ Kb7 55.a5 Ka7 56.h4 Re4+ 57.Kxc5 Rf4= 53...Kd5 53...Kb7 54.e6+- 54.a5 c4+ 54...Rxe5 55.a6 Re7 56.h4 c4+ 57.Kb4 Rc7 58.Rh5+ Kd4 59.Ra5 Ra7 60.h5 c3 61.Kb3 Kd3 62.Rd5+ Ke4 63.Rd6 Rc7 64.Kc2 Ke5 65.Rg6 Kf5 66.Rb6 Kg5 67.h6 Kh5 68.Rb3 Kxh6 69.Ra3 Ra7 70.Kxc3+- 55.Kb4 Rb2+ 56.Kc3 Rb3+ 57.Kc2 Kxe5 58.a6 Ra3 58...Kd4 59.Rh4+ Kc5 60.a7 Ra3 61.Rh7+- 59.h4 Kd4 59...Kf5 60.Rc6 Kg4 61.Rxc4+ Kh5 62.Rc6 Kxh4 63.Kb2 Ra5 64.Kb3 Kg5 65.Kb4 Ra1 66.Rc5+ Kf6 67.Ra5 Rb1+ 68.Kc5 Rc1+ 69.Kb6 Rb1+ 70.Rb5+- 60.Rd6+ Kc5 61.Rg6 Kd4 62.h5 Ra2+ 63.Kb1 Rh2 64.a7 Rh1+ 65.Ka2 Rh2+ 66.Ka3 Rh1 67.Rg2 Ra1+ 68.Ra2+- 51...Rg5? 52.Re4 Ke6 53.a4 Rg1 54.a5 Rb1+ 55.Ka2 Rb8 56.a6 Ra8 57.Ra4 Kxe5 58.a7+- 52.a4 Kxe5 53.a5 Kd6 53...Rg7 54.a6 Kd5 55.Ra4 Ra7 56.h4 c4+ 57.Kc3+- 54.Rh7! Magnus Carlsen cuts Black's king off from the queening square a8. Kd5 54...Rg8 55.a6 Ra8 56.a7 Kc6 57.h4 Kb6 58.h5 Rxa7 59.Rxa7 Kxa7 60.h6+- 55.a6 c4+ 56.Kc3 Ra2 57.a7 Kc5 58.h4 58.h4 Ra3+ 59.Kb2 Ra6 59...Rb3+ 60.Ka2+- 60.h5 Kb4 61.Rb7+ Kc5 62.h6 Kc6 63.Rg7 Kb6 64.h7 Rxa7 65.Rxa7 Kxa7 66.h8Q+- 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2870Anand,V27751–02013D31World-ch Carlsen-Anand +3-0=75

The Dubov Variation of the Tarrasch Defence is also a difficult nut for White to crack, which is why many recommendations aim for 6.dxc5! — as by GMs Pert and Kornev. GM Ernst, however, allows the Dubov-Tarrasch and favours a rarer variation, which again puts a pawn in the bargain for sharp compensation. Black and White need good positional sense and high precision to deal with such positions. In this line, Black’s attempts to seize the initiative early on are sharply countered by White. Very interesting!

Volume 2 then deals with the variations after 1.d4 Nf6, a very large complex!

The King’s Indian is strongly countered with Makagonov’s 5.h3 and 6.Be3. After that I would have expected an analogue h3 against the modern Benoni as well, but against the Benoni, Ernst recommends the Hungarian Variation with 7.Nge2 and 8.Ng3 — certainly a good, absolutely practical and interesting choice!

The same applies both to his recommended 4.e3 against the marvellous Nimzo-Indian and to the critical line with 12.a4! in the Volga Gambit. At this point at the latest, it should be clear that the struggle for an opening advantage goes hand in hand with theoretical knowledge and that White is not ‘simply better’ with natural moves.

IM John Watson already recommended countering the theory-heavy Grünfeld-Indian with the exchange on d5 along with Qa4+ in his repertoire, and this rare system really has it all. If Black doesn’t know his way around this idea, he/she can hardly get to the active build-ups typical of the Grünfeld game. Not exactly what Grünfeld players are hoping for, and therefore definitely a good practical choice by GM Ernst!

Volume 3 then contains the somewhat more exotic systems, such as the English Defence, the Dutch, 1...g6, 1...c5 and 1...d6, the Black Knights Tango, and the very rare 1...a6, 1...Nc6 and the like.

A lot has happened in the English Defence in particular since the new publications by IM Semkov and GM Gonzales, both from 2023. This applies in particular to the line after 1.d4 e6 2.c4 b6 3.e4 Bb4+! 4.Bd2 Bxd2+ 5.Qxd2 d5, which recently posed major problems for the moving player in the fight for an opening advantage. Here GM Ernst recommends an extremely rare line which, according to my database, has only been tried five times so far and will therefore certainly surprise fans of the English Defence.

The accelerated Bogo-Indian after 1.d4 e6 2.c4 Bb4+, which goes back to the great Paul Keres, is of course also dealt with here.

Paul Keres

At this point Ernst remains true to his taste and after 3.Bd2 a5 4.Nc3 Nf6 mentions the possibility of going over to a good Bd2-Nimzo-Indian with 5.e3. His main recommendation, however, is the enterprising 5.e4!?, a move that is as rare as it is sharp and may catch many advocates of the accelerated Bogo-Indian on the wrong foot!

At this point, I would also like to mention that some of Ernst’s recommendations do not have the best statistics, but have the engines’ seal of approval and are therefore the best continuations — so please don’t let the statistics mislead you!

Over a total of 17 hours of playing time, Grandmaster Ernst provides you with a well-founded 1.d4 repertoire that will certainly make your opponents sweat!

A friendly suggestion: Why not combine the Positional 1.d4 repertoire by GM Ernst with the Attacking 1.d4 Repertoire by GM Pert?!

Nicholas Pert: “An Attacking Repertoire with 1.d4!” - On the ChessBase Shop...

Sipke Ernst: “A practical repertoire for the positional player” - On the ChessBase shop


Christian Hoethe was born in 1975, is father of two daughters and one son, lives in Brunswick, Germany, and learned chess relatively late, at the age of 13, from his father. At his peak he reached an Elo of 2247. He plays for the German club SC Wolfsburg where he also teaches once a month.

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.