Candidates R2: Spectacular!

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
4/6/2024 – Fabiano Caruana, Ian Nepomniachtchi, Gukesh D and Vidit Gujrathi scored full points in the all-decisive second round of the Candidates Tournament. The most surprising result was Vidit’s impressive win over second seed Hikaru Nakamura. Praggnanandhaa v. Gukesh and Nepomniachtchi v. Alireza Firouzja were remarkable, tactical struggles, while Nijat Abasov all but self-destructed against Caruana. | Photo: FIDE / Michal Walusza

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

Wild chess galore

Eight of the very best players in the world showcased both deep theoretical preparation and incredible tactical abilities in a memorable second round at the Candidates Tournament in Toronto. All four games ended decisively, with Fabiano Caruana, Ian Nepomniachtchi, Gukesh D and Vidit Gujrathi scoring full points to become the event’s co-leaders going into round 3.

Vidit played a remarkable novelty with black and converted his advantage delightfully to end Hikaru Nakamura’s 47-game undefeated streak; Gukesh and Praggnanandhaa played a creative, sharp game which could have gone either way but ended up favouring Gukesh; Nepomniachtchi cold-bloodedly outplayed Alireza Firouzja in a tactical slugfest; while Caruana made the most of Nijat Abasov’s mishandling of a major-piece middlegame.

With half the field sharing the lead a full point ahead of the other half, it is very likely that more entertaining chess will be played in the coming days. What a start it has been to the much anticipated double round-robin!

Results - Round 2

NameRtg.Nt.Pts.Pts.NameRtgNt.
2803
½
1-0
½
2632
2789
½
0-1
½
2727
2758
½
1-0
½
2760
2747
½
0-1
½
2743

Fabiano Caruana

Fabiano Caruana beat Nijat Abasov with the white pieces | Photo: FIDE / Michal Walusza

Nakamura 0 - 1 Vidit

An extremely well-prepared Vidit twice offered Nakamura a pawn out of a Ruy Lopez. The U.S. grandmaster took the bait the second time around.

Nakamura v. Vidit

In hindsight, given the fact that Nakamura resigned the game with his queenside knight still on b1, the quiet 10.Nbd2 seems to be the most convenient move here.

However, Nakamura probably considered this game (with white) to be a good chance to score a win and, after all, going for 10.dxe5 dxe5 11.Nxe5 is by no means losing.

Vidit’s 11...Bxh3, blitzed out after merely 11 seconds, might have prompted Nakamura to rethink his previous decision, though.

Engines give 11.gxh3 as best here, when Vidit was surely ready to play 11...Qb8 — 12.Nf3, for example, fails to 12.Qg3, making use of the pin along the dark-squared diagonal. In case of 12.Bf4, Black would go 12...Bc7, which is why the queen had to be placed on b8 instead of c7 in the previous move.

None of this appeared on the board, though, as Nakamura realised that he was facing a sharply prepared opponent and opted for 11.Nc4 instead, and Black was already in the driver’s seat — a dream situation for Vidit in such a strong tournament!

What followed was a masterclass by the Indian grandmaster, who patiently improved his pieces while Nakamura struggled to deal with both tactical and strategic threats.

Vidit’s 18...f5 was praised by the commentators, as Nakamura found nothing better than to play the imprecise 19.f4 to stop the black pawn in its tracks.

Instead of saving his e5-knight, Vidit replied by the correct 19...Bb6, pinning the e3-knight and threatening to increase the pressure via ...Nd5 and potentially ...Qg5 or ...Qh4.

This was the beginning of the end for White, as there was no way to deal with the attacking threats without making major concessions. Nakamura resigned the game after Vidit’s discovered check on move 29.

29...Nf1+ was game over. Note that White’s rook and knight on the queenside never left their initial squares. A remarkable victory for Vidit, who was the first player to beat Nakamura in a classical game since the 2022 Candidates Tournament in Madrid!

Vidit Gujrathi

One for the books! | Photo: FIDE / Michal Walusza


Expert analysis by GM Daniel King


Praggnanandhaa 0 - 1 Gukesh

Much like Vidit, Pragg managed to out-prepare his opponent in round 2. Out of a Catalan, the 18-year-old (who is actually nine months older than Gukesh) fearlessly sacrificed two pawns before move 15 — moreover, he offered yet another sacrifice on move 16, which Gukesh understandably rejected.

Praggnanandhaa v. Gukesh

Normal engines — the Candidates have access to more powerful computers — give Black an edge after 15.e6 fxe6, but given the fact that Pragg had blitzed out all his moves up to this point, it made sense for Gukesh to choose 15...f5 instead (15...c6 was also playable).

After 16.Ne5 Nf6, Pragg had 1 hour and 50 minutes to Gukesh’s 40 minutes. However, Black’s rejection of the third pawn sacrifice had Pragg thinking for the first time on move 17 — in an incredibly complex position!

Naturally, both players made imprecisions in the ensuing struggle. Pragg was material down but had a knight on f7, and on move 23 he further increased the pressure on his compatriot by giving up his light-squared bishop for two central pawns.

23.Bxd5 cxd5 24.Nxd5 followed, as Pragg now had 11 minutes to Gukesh’s 14 with 16 moves to go before reaching the time control.

After 24...Be7, engines evaluate the position as even, since White can implicitly offer a draw by repetition with 25.Nh6+

If White gives the check from h6, Black can go for an immediate repetition with 25.Kh8 Nf7+ etcetera, while in case of 25.gxh6 Qg4+ 26.Bg5 h4, a more manageable position would appear on the board, one that could still go either way, nonetheless.

However, Pragg opted for 25.Qg4 instead, insisting on the attack. Gukesh then replied with the strong 25...Nd8, placing pieces on 5 out of 8 squares on the first rank (from Black’s viewpoint).

White cannot escape simplifications now, as after 26.Nxd8 Bxd8 Black is simply a piece up (for a pawn) and it is difficult to create mating threats against the monarch on g8.

Gukesh went on to liberate his pieces one by one until forcing his compatriot to throw in the towel on move 33. The game was a tense struggle between two of the most brave and creative players in the circuit!

Dommaraju Gukesh

Dommaraju Gukesh | Photo: FIDE / Michal Walusza


Expert analysis by IM Robert Ris


Nepomniachtchi 1 - 0 Firouzja

This was another case of players showing deep preparation in a sharp opening line. Nepomniachtchi, who won the two previous editions of the Candidates Tournament, gave up a pawn early on, and soon pushed his h-pawn all the way to the sixth rank, leaving both kings vulnerable for the rest of the game.

Nepomniachtchi v. Firouzja

Firouzja here found the correct 21...g5 (a similar reaction to Gukesh’s ...f7-f5, though in this case engines give it as the best continuation in the position).

By move 31, White was three pawns down but had a winning position according to the computers. Moreover, Firouzja’s clock had fallen below the 5-minute mark. Still, Nepomniachtchi’s handling of the final, tactical phase of the game was remarkable.

Black’s queen and knight tandem looks scary, but it turns out that the white king can escape a potential attack via e2-d3, as was later seen in the game. On its part, White’s queen and light-squared bishop are tremendously annoying on the seventh rank, while the dark-squared bishop on b2 will become a monster once the c-pawn gets out of the way.

Firouzja here played 31...Qh3+, when 31...Qh1+ was more trying for White.

Five moves later, Nepomniachtchi managed to finally play 36.c4, as his king stood safely on e3. Black still had two extra pawns at that point.

With seconds on his clock, Firouzja went for 36...Rxd5 here, but soon after the time control was reached, he had to admit defeat. In the final position, White had converted his dynamic edge into a material advantage — it was Nepomniachtchi who had an extra rook when his young opponent resigned the game!

Ian Nepomniachtchi, Alireza Firouzja

Ian Nepomniachtchi and Alireza Firouzja | Photo: FIDE / Michal Walusza


Post-game press conference with Ian Nepomniachtchi


Standings after round 2

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TBPerf.
1
2743
1.5
2
1.25
2930
2
2727
1.5
2
1.25
2959
3
2803
1.5
2
0.75
2904
4
2758
1.5
2
0.75
2889
5
2789
0.5
2
0.75
2572
6
2632
0.5
2
0.75
2588
7
2760
0.5
2
0.25
2560
8
2747
0.5
2
0.25
2559
TBs: Sonneborn-Berger

All games

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 4 c5 10 2.Nf3 5       d6 4 3.d4 14 cxd4 6 4.Nxd4 3 Nf6 6 5.Nc3 4 e5 5 6.Bb5+ 3:44       Nbd7 30 7.Nf5 4:07 a6 43 8.Ba4 9:20 8.Nxd6+? Bxd6 9.Qxd6 axb5-+ 8...b5 14 9.Bb3 3 Nc5 5 10.Bg5 1:40 aiming for Bd5. Bxf5 6 White is slightly better. 11.exf5 1:54 Be7 5       12.Bxf6 5:30 Bxf6 1:43 13.0-0 10:14 e4 2:43 14.Nxe4 9:35 Nxe4 1:16 15.Re1 20 15.Qd5!? 0-0 15...Ng5? 16.Rae1+ Kf8 17.h4± 16.Qxe4 15...0-0! 8 16.Rxe4 3       Black needs to defend precisely. Bxb2 14 Black is weak on the light squares 17.Rb1 2 Bf6 3:52 18.Qd5 2:38 Rc8 6:37       19.Qb7 12:29 Rc5 34:27 20.Qxa6 1:21 Rxf5 4:27 21.Rd1 4:45 White is more active. d5 2:49 22.Rb4 20:56       22.Qxb5? dxe4 23.Bxf7+ Rxf7-+ 22...Bc3 20:10 23.Rxb5 23 Rxf2 7 24.Rbxd5 10:18 Of course not 24.Kxf2?! Qh4+ 25.Kg1 Bd4+ 26.Kh1 Be5= 24...Qh4 31 25.Qd3 2:31 Rf6 2:45 26.g3 2:30 26.Qxc3? is a self mate. Qf2+ 27.Kh1 Qf1+ 28.Rxf1 Rxf1# 26...Qb4 3:18 27.Kg2 2:48 Bb2 0 28.Rf5 2:58 g6 9:41 29.Rxf6 3 Bxf6 4 30.Qf3 17 Qe7 4 31.a4 56 Kg7 1:28 32.a5 16 White should play 32.Bd5 32...Ra8= 2:55 33.Rd5 1:03 33.Qxa8!? Qe2+ 34.Kh3= 33...Ra7 5 34.Rb5 1:38 Qd8 1:25 35.Rd5 54 Qc7 1:35 But not 35...Qa8?! 36.a6 36.h4 52 Rxa5 6:15 37.Rxa5 4 Qxa5 3 38.Qb7 3 Qd8 22 39.Qxf7+ 6 Kh6 1 40.Kh3 0 Qe7 0 41.Qc4 2:23 Qe3 52 Weighted Error Value: White=0.08 (flawless) /Black=0.08 (flawless) . Mistake: White=1 --- Inaccurate: White=2 Black=5 OK: White=13 Black=15 Best: White=1 Black=1 Strong: --- Black=1 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Caruana,F2803Nakamura,H2789½–½2024B56FIDE Candidates 20241.1
Abasov,N2632Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024D53FIDE Candidates 20241.2
Firouzja,A2760Praggnanandhaa R2747½–½2024C83FIDE Candidates 20241.3
Gukesh D2743Vidit,S2727½–½2024D40FIDE Candidates 20241.4
Praggnanandhaa R2747Gukesh D27430–12024E20FIDE Candidates 20242.1
Nakamura,H2789Vidit,S27270–12024C65FIDE Candidates 20242.2
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Firouzja,A27601–02024C65FIDE Candidates 20242.3
Caruana,F2803Abasov,N26321–02024B30FIDE Candidates 20242.4
Gukesh D2743Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024E01FIDE Candidates 20243.1
Abasov,N2632Nakamura,H2789½–½2024D13FIDE Candidates 20243.2
Firouzja,A2760Caruana,F2803½–½2024B30FIDE Candidates 20243.3
Vidit,S2727Praggnanandhaa R27470–12024C70FIDE Candidates 20243.4
Nakamura,H2789Praggnanandhaa R2747½–½2024C78FIDE Candidates 20244.1
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Vidit,S27271–02024C67FIDE Candidates 20244.2
Caruana,F2803Gukesh D2743½–½2024C54FIDE Candidates 20244.3
Abasov,N2632Firouzja,A2760½–½2024E32FIDE Candidates 20244.4
Praggnanandhaa R2747Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024C42FIDE Candidates 20245.1
Firouzja,A2760Nakamura,H27890–12024C54FIDE Candidates 20245.2
Gukesh D2743Abasov,N26321–02024C43FIDE Candidates 20245.3
Vidit,S2727Caruana,F2803½–½2024B30FIDE Candidates 20245.4
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Caruana,F2803½–½2024C47FIDE Candidates 20246.1
Gukesh D2743Nakamura,H2789½–½2024B27FIDE Candidates 20246.2
Vidit,S2727Firouzja,A27601–02024B57FIDE Candidates 20246.3
Praggnanandhaa R2747Abasov,N26321–02024D40FIDE Candidates 20246.4
Firouzja,A2760Gukesh D27431–02024D02FIDE Candidates 20247.1
Nakamura,H2789Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024C42FIDE Candidates 20247.2
Caruana,F2803Praggnanandhaa R2747½–½2024C02FIDE Candidates 20247.3
Abasov,N2632Vidit,S2727½–½2024C65FIDE Candidates 20247.4
Praggnanandhaa R2747Firouzja,A2760½–½2024B47FIDE Candidates 20248.1
Vidit,S2727Gukesh D27430–12024C55FIDE Candidates 20248.2
Nakamura,H2789Caruana,F28031–02024C78FIDE Candidates 20248.3
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Abasov,N2632½–½2024C01FIDE Candidates 20248.4
Vidit,S2727Nakamura,H27891–02024C55FIDE Candidates 20249.1
Gukesh D2743Praggnanandhaa R2747½–½2024C77FIDE Candidates 20249.2
Firouzja,A2760Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024A07FIDE Candidates 20249.3
Abasov,N2632Caruana,F2803½–½2024E40FIDE Candidates 20249.4
Praggnanandhaa R2747Vidit,S2727½–½2024C65FIDE Candidates 202410.1
Nakamura,H2789Abasov,N26321–02024B22FIDE Candidates 202410.2
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Gukesh D2743½–½2024C70FIDE Candidates 202410.3
Caruana,F2803Firouzja,A27601–02024B90FIDE Candidates 202410.4
Praggnanandhaa R2747Nakamura,H27890–12024D06FIDE Candidates 202411.1
Vidit,S2727Nepomniachtchi,I27580–12024C42FIDE Candidates 202411.2
Gukesh D2743Caruana,F2803½–½2024D35FIDE Candidates 202411.3
Firouzja,A2760Abasov,N26321–02024D04FIDE Candidates 202411.4
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Praggnanandhaa R2747½–½2024C01FIDE Candidates 202412.1
Nakamura,H2789Firouzja,A27601–02024C01FIDE Candidates 202412.2
Abasov,N2632Gukesh D27430–12024E32FIDE Candidates 202412.3
Caruana,F2803Vidit,S27271–02024C54FIDE Candidates 202412.4
Nepomniachtchi,I2758Nakamura,H2789½–½2024C64FIDE Candidates 202413.1
Praggnanandhaa R2747Caruana,F28030–12024B30FIDE Candidates 202413.2
Vidit,S2727Abasov,N2632½–½2024C42FIDE Candidates 202413.3
Gukesh D2743Firouzja,A27601–02024C65FIDE Candidates 202413.4
Nakamura,H2789Gukesh D2743½–½2024E51FIDE Candidates 202414.1
Caruana,F2803Nepomniachtchi,I2758½–½2024D35FIDE Candidates 202414.2
Firouzja,A2760Vidit,S2727½–½2024C67FIDE Candidates 202414.3
Abasov,N2632Praggnanandhaa R27470–12024E69FIDE Candidates 202414.4

Vlog from Toronto: Vidit beats world number 3 Hikaru Nakamura

Ian Nepomniachtchi on understanding Magnus and his second Gustafsson

Watch tons of high-quality content on ChessBase India’s YouTube channel!


Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.