6/2/2025 – Premature resignation in chess has long been a subject of debate, and recent events have brought it back into focus. Hikaru Nakamura's resignation against Magnus Carlsen in a winning position sparked discussion about etiquette, pressure and online play. While resignation is often appropriate, even expected, history shows many cases where players have walked away from drawn or even winning positions. A look at some notable examples highlights the fine line between prudence and error. | Photo: chess.com / Thomas Tischio
Your personal chess trainer. Your toughest opponent. Your strongest ally. FRITZ 20 is more than just a chess engine – it is a training revolution for ambitious players and professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps into the world of serious chess training, or already playing at tournament level, FRITZ 20 will help you train more efficiently, intelligently and individually than ever before.
Winning starts with what you know The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.
In this course, Grandmaster Felix Blohberger delivers a complete opening repertoire for White, centred around the flexible move 1.Nf3.
€34.90
Sparing unnecessary suffering
[Note that Jon Speelman also looks at the content of the article in video format, here embedded at the end of the article.]
When people start playing chess, everything is rather confused and the conversion of an advantage fraught with danger, so that resignation by the losing side is neither necessary nor necessarily a good idea.
Later on, things become much clearer and there are positions in which it really is best to resign and spare oneself unnecessary suffering, even if one time in a million the opponent might have messed it up
Indeed resignation is part of chess etiquette and I really feel that people should do so, though there are exceptions - even if they become excellent, young kids may well not want to resign till they're 9 or 10 years old, and even if a position is lost, as long as there is any hope or you can see any tricks, then you should definitely carry on. The etiquette has also been affected by online play, and I must say, not necessarily for the better.
I'm writing this in the context of the imbroglio on another platform in which Hikaru Nakamura resigned a rapidplay game against Magnus Carlsen in a position which turned out not only not to be lost but to be demonstrably winning!
Experts examine the games of Max Euwe. Let them show you which openings Euwe chose to play, where his strength in middlegames were, which tactical abilities he had or how he outplayed his opponents in the endgame. Max Euwe became the fifth World Chess Champion after beating Alexander Alekhine in the 1935 World Championship match. A maths teacher by profession, Euwe remained an amateur throughout his life, but was still the best chess player in the Netherlands, and one of the world's best players. Euwe holds the record for the most Dutch national championships, with twelve. After winning the World Championship, Euwe was also the world's best player for a while. He lost the title again in 1937 in the rematch against Alexander Alekhine.
Free video sample: Openings
After Carlsen played 32...Bg4, Nakamura thought for only a few seconds before resigning, even though he had about three minutes on his clock.
Later he described it as "the Carlsen effect", and it was lucky for Carlsen that after starting his combination five moves earlier he hadn't seen the refutation because, if he had, he might have paused before playing ...Bg4, which would surely have transmitted itself to Nakamura even in a virtual game.
Apparently Carlsen put the engine on after the game was over and had a big shock when it went beep and told him 33.Rfg3!, so he wasn't bluffing but, in principle, even if he had seen the refutation beforehand then, given that nothing else was going to work, it would have been best to bash the move out anyway.
Magnus Carlsen | Photo: chess.com / Maria Emelianova
Over the years, there have been many instances of misguided resignations in drawn or even winning positions, and I thought that we'd look at a few more today, starting with an old chestnut:
Ignatz von Popiel v. Georg Marco - Monte Carlo (1902)
After 36.Rd1 Black resigned, believing that he was losing a piece, but there was a way out. The reason appears in the dynamic replayer at the end of the article.
Sztern v. Lundquist - Australia (1983)
In 1984, Murray Chandler, who was then editor (and I think proprietor) of the venerable British Chess Magazine, produced a one off shore spoof "Not the BCM". One item was a blunder of the year, and this was the winner chosen by a panel that included myself and Tony Miles, amongst others. Here Black offered a draw without playing his move and White quite rightly requested one.
After 28...Qxb2+! it's mate in three more moves: 29.Kxb2 Rb3+ 30.Ka1 Ra8+ 31.Ba6 Rxa6#, and forgetting that he'd been offered a draw, White resigned!
Garry Kasparov's rise to the top was meteoric and at his very first attempt he managed to become World Champion, the youngest of all time. In over six hours of video, he gives a first hand account of crucial events from recent chess history, you can improve your chess understanding and enjoy explanations and comments from a unique and outstanding personality on and off the chess board.
The next example is justly (in)famous as the best player on the planet faced by the very best computer not unreasonably believed it and resigned rather than trying for perpetual check. Of course, machines can analyse a vast distance and nowadays they are fearsomely accurate, but back in 1997 there was still much more subject to the "horizon effect" in which they "believed" that a line was clear too early and here it turns out that Black is, in fact, drawing!
Garry Kasparov facing Deep Blue in 1997
I can't remember resigning prematurely very often, but there was a London League game against the strong FIDE Master - he really ought to become an IM at some stage - Peter Sowray, in which faced with exchanging the last pair of rooks I resigned thinking that it was over, but subsequent analysis showed it should be drawn.
This was the position where I resigned - the rest of the game appears in the pgn too.
Peter Sowray v. Jon Speelman - London (2013)
Incidentally, I nearly forgot that as I write on Sunday, June 1st it's Nigel Short's sixtieth birthday, so Happy Birthday Nigel!
New ...
New Game
Edit Game
Setup Position
Open...
PGN
FEN
Share...
Share Board (.png)
Share Board (configure)
Share playable board
Share game as GIF
Notation (PGN)
QR Code
Layout...
Use splitters
Swipe notation/lists
Reading mode
Flip Board
Settings
Move
N
Result
Elo
Players
Replay and check the LiveBook here
Please, wait...
1.Nf3Nf62.g3b63.Bg2Bb74.d3c55.e4d66.0-0g67.Ng5h68.Nh3Nc69.f4e610.c3Bg711.Qe20-012.g4b513.g5Nh714.gxh6Bxh615.Qg4?!Inaccuracy. Nd2 was best.15.Nd215...b416.Qg3bxc317.bxc3Ba618.Nd2Qa519.Bb2?19.Nc4Qxc319...Qb519...Qb6!20.Ba3Bxd320.Nc4Na521.Nxa5Qxb222.c4e523.f5Qd224.fxg6fxg625.Qxg6+Kh826.Nb3?!Inaccuracy. Qxd6 was best.26.Qxd6Rg826...Qe3+?Mistake. Be3+ was best.26...Be3+27.Kh1Rg828.Qh5
From Mating with a queen; a rook; two bishops; a knight and a bishop; to the basics of pawn endgames – here you will gain the necessary know-how to turn your endgame advantages into victories!
Jonathan SpeelmanJonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.
3/4/2025 – In his latest column, GM Jon Speelman explores the fascinating Novotny theme in chess problems, sharing two of his own recent compositions. With the aid of modern software, he crafted problems that highlight this striking interference motif. He also delves into the theme's history, tracing its origins to Antonin Novotny (pictured) and Henry Turton, and recalls brilliant missed Novotnys in practical play.
2/2/2025 – When should you take the plunge on a risky move? GM Jon Speelman explores this question by diving deep into a single position from his recent 4NCL game against IM Richard Palliser. Analysing a critical moment in the Caro-Kann, Speelman weighs the dangers of a bold knight leap and the fine margins between courage and calamity. His conclusion? Sometimes, the gamble is worth it — especially if the worst outcome is losing in style.
The Elephant Gambit (1.e4.e5 2.Nf3 d5!?) has never really been given the attention it deserves. It is a very useful surprise weapon. Let us list the advantages of playing this particular opening: 1) Shock value 2) It is very aggressive. Black can take over the initiative early. 3) Many tricky lines 4) Unorthodox. Black is basically taking the game to the opponent as early as move two. Not many openings do that! It's a perfect opening for young players and club players to adopt. Let Andrew Martin select a repertoire for you on this 60 mins, which, if used with discretion, will rack up the points. I am sure that you will enjoy this unusual tour of the Elephant Gambit.
2nd Move Anti-Sicilian Powerbase 2025 is a database and contains a total of 12090 games from Mega 2025 or the Correspondence Database 2024, of which 874 are annotated.
Ruy Lopez Powerbase 2025 is a database and contains a total of 12092 games from Mega 2025 and the Correspondence Database 2024, of which 1276 are annotated.
In this 60 Minutes, Andrew Martin guides you through all the key ideas you need to know to play with confidence. Whether you’re looking to surprise your opponents, or simply want a straightforward weapon against e5, the Centre Attack has you covered.
€9.90
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.
Pop-up for detailed settings
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies, analysis cookies and marketing cookies. You can decide which cookies to use by selecting the appropriate options below. Please note that your selection may affect the functionality of the service. Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Technically required cookies
Technically required cookies: so that you can navigate and use the basic functions and store preferences.
Analysis Cookies
To help us determine how visitors interact with our website to improve the user experience.
Marketing-Cookies
To help us offer and evaluate relevant content and interesting and appropriate advertisement.