When 3 is greater than 5

by Jonathan Speelman
10/18/2020 – Star columnist Jon Speelman explores the exchange sacrifice. Speelman shares five illustrative examples to explain in which conditions giving up a rook for a minor piece is a good trade. “As a general rule and in fact (almost all?) of the time you need other pieces on the board for an exchange sacrifice to work.” | Pictured: Mikhail Tal and Tigran Petrosian following a post-mortem analysis at the 1961 European Team Championship in Oberhausen | Photo: Gerhard Hund

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

Exploring exchange sacrifices

[Note that Jon Speelman also looks at the content of the article in video format, here embedded at the end of the article.]

During the Norway tournament, I streamed commentary a couple of times myself at twitch.tv/jonspeelman, but mainly listened to the official commentary by Vladimir Kramnik and Judit Polgar.

Both were very interesting, and Kramnik in particular has a chess aesthetic which I very much like. In his prime a powerhouse positional player with superb endgame technique, he started life much more tactically and his instinct is to sacrifice for the initiative whenever possible, especially the exchange: an approach which, after defence seemed to triumph under traditional chess engines, has been given a new lease of life by Alpha Zero.

So I thought today that I’d look at some nice exchange sacrifices, but first a moment from Norway where I was actually a tad disappointed by a winning sacrifice.

 
Carlsen vs. Tari - Norway Chess
Position after 41...Rf7

At the end of a beautiful positional game, which has been annotated here in Game of the Week, Carlsen finished off with the powerful

42.Re8!

and after

42...Qxe8 43.Qh6+ Kg8 44.Qxg6+ Kh8 45.Nf6

Tari resigned

Of course, I would have played Re8 myself in a game if I’d seen it, but I was hoping from an aesthetic perspective that Carlsen would complete this real masterclass and masterpiece with a nice zugzwang.

You start with c4 to prevent 42.f3 c4, creating some very slight confusion and then it goes:

42.c4 Kg8 43.f3

 
Analysis diagram
Position after 43.f3

And for example: 43...Qd7 44.Qh6 Qe6 45.Kg3 fxe4 (45...Rg7 46.Nf6+ Kf7 47.Qh8 Qe7 48.Kg2) 46.dxe4 Rf4 47.Nxf4 exf4+ 48.Kxf4 Qf7+ 49.Kg3 Qg7 50.Qxg7+ Kxg7 51.Rxf8

Black can also try 43...Rh7

and here after 44.Rxf8+ Kg7

as the engine pointed out to me, it’s best to use the Re8 trick:

45.Qxh7+! (45.Rf6 is much messier) 45...Kxh7 46.Re8!

 
Analysis diagram
Position after 46.Re8

The black queen is trapped.

Mikhail BotvinnikFor today’s examples I used my memory and the ChessBase search mask when I couldn’t track down a game exactly. For instance, for the first one by Botvinnik [pictured], I set him as Black with 0-1, disabled ignoring colours, and put Rd4 e5 c5 on the board which turned out to identify the single game I wanted — a hole in 1! I also asked my stream on Thursday for any examples, and one of my stalwarts, a Scottish Frenchman, found me Reshevsky v Petrosian (I couldn’t remember offhand who Petrosian’s opponent was) and drew my attention to the beautiful double exchange sacrifice by Erwin L'Ami from Wijk aan Zee B.

Before the games themselves, which are in chronological order, it might be worthwhile to consider what makes an exchange sacrifice successful. Whole books have been written on this and I’m certainly not going to be able to go into serious detail. But a couple of points:

  • All things being equal a rook is really worth more than a minor piece but it needs open lines to operate effectively.
  • You’d generally like to have a pawn for the exchange, but a strong piece on a really good square — especially a knight on a strong point, a lovely diagonal for a bishop or a powerful passed pawn — can be enough.
  • As a general rule and in fact (almost all?) of the time you need other pieces on the board for an exchange sacrifice to work. A minor piece by itself can’t attack very well, but in combination with a queen or rook (or sometimes other minor pieces) it can be very powerful. There is also the question of the two bishops which can often fight very well against a rook and a knight.

The need for extra pieces applies particularly to endgames. For instance, this diagram should definitely be lost for Black:

 

It’s far from trivial, but as a general schema the white king should be able to advance right into Black’s guts and then White can do things with his pawns. Something like get Ke7 and Rf6, then g4 exchanging pawns if Black has played ...h5. Play f5, move the rook, play f6+, and arrange to play Rxf7.

But if you add a pair of rooks then it becomes enormously difficult. And indeed I really don’t know whether “God would beat God”.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 In this famous game, Botvinnik played a very nice exchange sacrifice transforming his pawn structure and giving himself a space advantage. e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.Bxc6 bxc6 6.Nc3 d6 7.d4 Nd7 8.dxe5 dxe5 9.0-0 Bd6 10.Ne2 0-0 11.Ng3 Rb8 12.b3 Black does not fear 12.Nf5 in view of Nc5 followed by 13...Bxf5 14.exf5 e4. 12...Re8 13.Be3 g6 14.c3 a5 15.Qc2 Qe7 16.Rfd1 Nc5 17.Ne1 Ne6 A positional error. 17...Ba6 was necessary, and only if 18.c4 - 18...Ne6, subsequently occupying the d4 square. The manoeuvre of the knight to f4 proves to be a significant loss of time. 18.Nd3 Nf4 19.f3 Ba6 20.c4! c5 Forced. Black does not have time for 20...Nc6 on account of 21.Qc3, when loss of material is unavoidable (but not 21.c5? Bxd3). 21.Qd2! White has exploited excellently the opponent's faulty strategy - diverting his knight away from the d4 square. Now, in view of the threats of 22.Qxa5 and 22.Nxf4. Black is forced to exchange knights, after which he is left with his weak pawns and without the slightest compensation. Nxd3 22.Qxd3 Red8 The preparatory 22...a4 23.Ne2 (of course, not 23.bxa4 Rb4) would later merely have led to the opening of the a-file. 23.Ne2 c6
24.Nc3 An imperceptible, but significant error. First 24.Qc2 was essential, in order to immediately exchange a pair of rooks after 24...Bc7. JS This is a crucial point. With a black rook left on the board the exchange sacrifice is very promising. Without it, it would be dubious.. 24...Bc7 25.Qc2 Black's position appears hopeless. His pawns are broken, but his bishops have no prospects, but ... Rd4! The sacrifice could not be delayed. It is possible only if Black retains one rook for the attack. After the exchange sacrifice Black's pawn chain is repaired: he obtains a sacrificed pawn. The closed nature of the position deprives the white rooks of any activity, and what tells is no longer the material, but the positional advantage. 26.Ne2 White prefers to take the rook with his knight and to retain his bishop. A questionable decision, since the knight would have been well placed at d3. Bc8 27.Nxd4 cxd4 28.Bf2 c5 White is completely without counterplay and is obliged to await the development of events. 29.Rf1 f5 30.Bg3 Bd7 Of course, the exchange 31.exf5 gxf5 was dangerous, since in the end Black would have created two connected passed pawns in the center. But now he gains the opportunity to restrict the enemy pieces still further and to launch an attack on the kingside. 31.Rad1 f4 32.Bf2 g5 33.g4 A vain attempt to forestall the opponent's assault, although to allow 33...g4 would have been even worse. Now the black pieces are free to take up their most active positions. fxg3 34.Bxg3 Bh3 35.Rf2 h5 36.Rfd2 h4 With every move White becomes ever more restricted. 37.Bf2 Rf8 38.Rd3 Rf4 39.Kh1 Kh7 40.Rg1 Bd8 41.Qe2 Qf7 42.Qd1 As was shown by home analysis (the game was adjourned) after 42.Be1 g4 43.fxg4 Bxg4 44.Rxg4 Rxg4 45.Qxg4 Qf1+ 46.Qg1 Qxd3 47.Qg4 Qf1+ 48.Qg1 Qe2 the e4 pawn would have also been lost. 42...Qh5 Of course, not 42...g4 43. fxg4, and the bishop at h3 is attacked. Now, however, 43...g4 is threatened. White's last hope - an ending with opposite-colored bishops- is not realized. 43.Be3 Qxf3+ 44.Qxf3 Rxf3 45.Bxg5 Rxd3 46.Bxd8 Re3
47.Bb6 After 47.Bxa5 Rxe4 48.Re1 , Black wins both by exchanging rooks and by 48...Rf4. 47...Rxe4 48.Bxc5 Re2 49.Rd1 Bg4 50.h3 Bxh3 51.b4 Bf5 52.Bd6 d3 53.bxa5 h3
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Liublinsky,V-Botvinnik,M-0–11943C77Moscow-ch 23th
Reshevsky,S-Petrosian,T-½–½1953E58Candidates Tournament2
Kasparov,G2735Short,N26150–11987D02London m 25'3
Ivanchuk,V2735Kramnik,V27750–11996B66Dos Hermanas8
L'Ami,E2606Smirnov,A26041–02020D1182nd Tata Steel GpB1.5
Lost but unclear with rooks --20201
Carlsen,M2863Tari,A26331–02020C848th Norway Chess 20208.1

Select an entry from the list to switch between games



Master Class Vol.11: Vladimir Kramnik

This DVD allows you to learn from the example of one of the best players in the history of chess and from the explanations of the authors (Pelletier, Marin, Müller and Reeh) how to successfully organise your games strategically, consequently how to keep y


Links


Jonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.