
Chess History: From Bobby Fischer to Hikaru Nakamura
By GM Lubomir Kavalek
The 2011 U.S.
Chess Championship begins today at the Chess Club and Scholastic Center
of Saint Louis, Mo., with 16 players, including the defending champion Gata
Kamsky, the 1996 world championship challenger. The top-rated American Hikaru
Nakamura, the 2004 and 2009 U.S. champion, declined to participate.
There is no $64,000 Bobby Fischer Memorial prize this year for winning all
the games. It was offered in 2009 to commemorate Fischer's amazing performance
at the 1963/64 U.S. championship. Winning all 11 games, Fischer finished 3½
points ahead his nearest rival, Larry Evans. Other stalwarts of American chess
such as Sammy Reshevsky, Robert and Donald Byrne, Pal Benko and Arthur Bisguier
also took part. Nobody repeated Fischer's feat in 2009.
Fischer's other two U.S. championship records will never be broken: he played
in eight U.S. championships and won them all; and he is still the youngest U.S.
champion, having won his first national championship in 1958 at the age of 14.
Did Kasparov miss something?
Fischer has been gone for three years, but his legacy lives on. Books about
his life and chess keep piling up. Extraordinary results by other players are
often compared to his achievements. In January, Nakamura finished ahead of the
four world's top-rated players and won the prestigious Tata Steel Chess tournament
in Wijk aan Zee. His spectacular victory was immediately compared to Fischer's
accomplishments. In a message to the New York Times, Garry Kasparov wrote: "I
think you can go back to Pillsbury at Hastings 1895 for an American tournament
victory on par with Nakamura's," and he added: "Fischer never won
a tournament ahead of the world champion. He was second in Santa Monica."
Kasparov obviously meant "a reigning world champion", but it is not
clear he was right. He was referring to the Second Piatigorsky Cup, played in
Santa Monica in 1966 and won by Boris Spassky. The reigning world champion Tigran
Petrosian shared sixth place with another American, Sammy Reshevsky. It was
a double-round robin tournament or two single tournaments. In the first half
Bobby scored 3½/9 and avoided the last place by a half point. In the
second half Fischer produced one of his finest single tournament results.

It was the only tournament in which Fischer was able to compete with a reigning
world champion. He met three of them at the chess olympiads: drawing with Mikhail
Tal in 1960 and with Mikhail Botvinnik in 1962; and losing to Spassky in 1970.
In 1979, I organized a similar double-round robin tournament in Montreal. First,
it was called the World Cup, but later it acquired other names such as "Man
and his World Chess Challenge Cup" or "Tournament of Stars."
With three world champions, five world championship candidates and all players
often rated among the world's Top Ten, it was one of the strongest world-class
events in chess history. I wish I could say I was inspired by Fischer's performance
in Santa Monica, but it was just a coincidence that history almost repeated
itself. I finished last in the first half with a catastrophic score 1½/9
, but things improved in the second half.

It was my career-best result in a single tournament. In this century, Veselin
Topalov and Alexander Morozevich took it a notch further. They finished last
in the first half, won the second half and even took first place in world-class
double-round robins.
From the above two crosstables it is clear that the winners not only finished
ahead of the reigning world champions (Petrosian and Karpov), but followed the
same pattern: they drew against the top finishers and won the rest of the games.
It was a different story in the two tournaments mentioned by Kasparov. Harry
Nelson Pillsbury won the 1895 Hastings tournament with 16½/21 points,
ahead of Mikhail Chigorin 16/21 and Emanuel Lasker 15½/21. He lost to
both of them, but beat the last four finishers. Nakamura played similarly in
Wijk aan Zee, scoring minus one against the world's top four rated players.

Ranking and rating chess history
Hikaru Nakamura, pictured on Bill Hook's photo from the 1998 Eastern Open,
showed excellent results at a young age and was considered the best American
prodigy since Bobby Fischer. He became USCF master at 10 in 1998 and grandmaster
at 15 in 2003. Too much was made of breaking Fischer's record as the youngest
grandmaster in history. Hikaru surpassed it by three months. Bobby was 15 when
he got the title, but at the same time he qualified for the Candidates tournament
and that elevated him among the top 10 players in the world. Nobody came even
close. Nakamura was able to move among the top 10 only this year, at age 23.
The ranking is based on prof. Arpad Elo's rating system, adopted by FIDE in
1970. Using these ratings, the German website Caissa
Schach Chronik published the top 50 highest ratings adjusted by inflation:
1. Fischer |
2787 |
2. Kasparov |
2759 |
3. Karpov |
2722 |
4. Tal |
2700 |
5. Anand and Kramnik |
2699 |
Nakamura will be the fourth American when the list is updated this year.
Going deeper into chess history and rating events played before 1970 is difficult.
The statisticians face all kinds of problems, ranging from missing important
tournaments to having a wrong result in a single game. Rating the 1970 Caracas
tournament illustrates the point.

This is the correct crosstable created from the Mega
database 2011, containing 4,797 495 games. The earlier version had one game
result wrong, showing that I lost to Viktor Ciocaltea. Suddenly, instead of
winning the tournament alone, I was sharing first place with Stein and Panno.
The mistake was carried into the Chessmetrics
– a website with a bold attempt to create historical ratings. It is managed
by Jeff Sonas, an excellent statistician, who knows his work depends on available
data. And he can't rate what is not there.
For example, I did not find any of my team's results from the 1979 European Cup
Championship, but it is available at the excellent Olimpbase,
which covers history of the most important team competitions.
There are tournaments that are lost forever, others that preserve the crosstables
but not the games. For example, the crosstable of the 1964 Split tournament
was published in Jugoslavenski Sahovski Glasnik 10/1964, page 208.
One year later, Bojan Kurajica won the World Junior championship. Vlado Kovacevic
became known for his victory with the black pieces against Fischer in the 1970
Rovinj/Zagreb tournament. I doubt they have the scoresheets from the event in
Split.
Di Felice to the rescue
 |
The best way to tap into chess history is to use the monumental work
of the Italian writer Gino di Felice. His nine-volume Chess Results, published
by McFarland, cover individual and team chess competitions from 1747 to
1960.
The majestic work, some 3700 pages long, contains crosstables and match
scores found in contemporary newspapers, chess periodicals, tournament
books and match records. It is the most comprehensive undertaking, eclipsing
the famous Jeremy Gaige's four-volume work Chess Tournament Crosstables
(1851-1930). It is an indispensable tool to historians, statisticians,
collectors, journalists and anyone who wants to browse through chess history.
It will be great to see Di Felice complete another decade. |
|
|
 |
During the research for the Chess Results, Di Felice discovered a gap
in chess literature a decided to cover it. He wrote a remarkable book
Chess Periodicals – An Annotated International Bibliography,
1836-2008. It is an important reference book with 3,163 entries, indexed
by periodical titles and countries.
The most periodicals were published in the United States, followed by
Germany and the Netherlands. McFarland
should be congratulated for bringing out these fascinating and useful
publications. |
Original
column here – Copyright
Huffington Post
The solution to Leonid Kubbel study from
the last week:
Note that in the replay windows below you can click on the notation to
follow the game.

The Huffington Post is an American news website and aggregated blog founded
by Arianna Huffington and others, featuring various news sources and columnists.
The site was launched on May 9, 2005, as a commentary outlet and liberal/progressive
alternative to conservative news websites. It offers coverage of politics, media,
business, entertainment, living, style, the green movement, world news, and
comedy. It is a top destination for news, blogs, and original content. The Huffington
Post has an active community, with over one million comments made on the site
each month. According to Nielsen NetRatings, the site has around 13 million
unique visitors per month (number for March 2010); according to Google Analytics
the number is 22 million uniques per month.