GCT Finals: Vachier-Lagrave takes Carlsen down

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
12/5/2019 – Ding Liren and Maxime Vachier-Lagrave are the finalists of the GCT closing event of the year, as they overcame Levon Aronian and Magnus Carlsen at the rapid and blitz phases of the semis. While Ding won almost unopposed, Vachier-Lagrave only managed to defeat the world champion in overtime — five draws were followed by an exchange of blows that led to the playoffs. Vachier-Lagrave won a wild game out of a Sicilian Najdorf and drew the last 10-minute game to get match victory. | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Epyllion

Epyllia, or little epics, are brief narrative poems, usually dealing with mythological and romantic themes. The Vachier-Lagrave v Carlsen semi-final was repeatedly and rightfully described as an epic battle during the live commentary webcast, but one of the many attractive games of the match stood out for its dramatic content — an epyllion, we might say. 

'MVL' scored the first win of the match in the second (of four) blitz encounters. Carlsen bounced right back, and a draw in the final game of 'regulation' meant the duel would be decided on playoffs. The players repeated the line of the Najdorf that had resulted in a memorable draw at the outset of the match. First Vachier-Lagrave and then Carlsen missed chances to convert clearly superior positions, but the world champion was the one making the last mistake. After the thoroughly painful loss, the Norwegian could not bounce back again.

Thus, Vachier-Lagrave obtained his pass to the final. He will face Ding Liren, who kicked off the day with two wins over Levon Aronian — a draw in the first blitz game already gave the Chinese match victory.

London Chess Classic 2019

The stage at the Olympia Conference Centre | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Vachier-Lagrave 14:14 Carlsen

Vachier-Lagrave's white games during the match saw the players exploring lines of the Ruy Lopez or the Sicilian, depending on whether Carlsen needed to win on demand or not. On the other hand, when the world champion was the one moving first, the range of setups explored was wider. After a rather tense draw in the first game of rapid, Carlsen put Vachier-Lagrave's Grünfeld to the test. He gained a pawn, but that never amounted to much:

 
Carlsen vs. Vachier-Lagrave - Rapid game #2
Position after 48.Kg4

Vachier-Lagrave simplified into a rook and knight versus rook endgame — a theoretical draw — with 58...xf3+. Thus, the score remained tied after the rapid section.


Vachier-Lagrave vs. Carlsen - Rapid games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Bc5 6.c3 0-0 7.d4 Ba7 8.dxe5 C78: Ruy Lopez: Archangelsk and Möller Defences Nxe4 9.Qd5 Nc5 10.Bc2 White has an edge. Ne7 11.Qd1 Bxh7+! is the strong threat. d5 12.exd6 Qxd6 13.Qxd6 cxd6 14.Re1 Re8
15.Na3N Predecessor: 15.Be3 Bf5 1/2-1/2 (84) Vachier Lagrave,M (2780)-Fressinet,L (2640) Brest 2019 15...Bg4 16.Bf4 Bxf3 17.gxf3 d5 18.Rad1 Ne6 19.Be3 g6 20.Bb3 d4 21.cxd4 Black should prevent d5. Nf5 22.d5 Ned4 23.Bxd4! Rxe1+ 24.Rxe1 Bxd4 25.Nc4 b5 26.Ne3 Nd6 27.Rc1 Bxb2 28.Rc6 Be5 29.Ng4 Bf4 30.Nf6+ Kg7 31.Ne4 Nf5 32.d6 Ra7 33.Bd1 Nd4 34.Rb6! Rd7 35.Rxa6 f5 36.Nc5 Rxd6 37.Rxd6 Bxd6 Endgame KBN-KBN 38.Nb3 Ne6 39.Be2 b4 40.Bc4 Nf4 41.Nc1 Kf6 42.Nd3 Nxd3 43.Bxd3 Bf4 44.Bc4 Bd6 45.Bd3 Bf4 46.Bc4 Bd6 Accuracy: White = 75%, Black = 64%.
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Vachier-Lagrave,M2777Carlsen,M2870½–½201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.3
Carlsen,M2870Vachier-Lagrave,M2777½–½201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.4

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, Magnus Carlsen

The match remained drawn after the rapid phase | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

France's number one had the white pieces first in the blitz. The players delved into the line that gave Carlsen a favourable position in the second classical encounter, except this time Vachier-Lagrave was better prepared.

The Frenchman gave up an exchange on move 17, but Black's weakened king position was the critical factor in the middlegame. Four moves later, the world champion offered to give back the exchange, and Vachier-Lagrave incorrectly accepted to restore material equality. On move 28, Carlsen made a pragmatic decision:

 
Vachier-Lagrave vs. Carlsen - Blitz game #1

The world champion gave up a pawn with 28...e3 in order to leave the e4-square vacant for his bishop. Converting the slight edge with little time on the clock proved to be out of reach for Vachier-Lagrave, and the game did not take long to peter out into a draw.

In game two of the 5-minute section, Carlsen chose a non-forcing line with the white pieces. When only rooks, bishops and pawns were left on the board, Black seemed to be for choice, but the perceived advantage was very slim. The world champion confidently traded down into a pure rook endgame:

 
Carlsen vs. Vachier-Lagrave - Blitz game #2
Position after 34...Rxc7

At this point, Carlsen played the natural-looking 35.b5, when after 35...c2+ White needs to escape from the check with 36.f3, placing the king on a sub-optimal square. In the diagrammed position, 35.e4 was the way to go, opening up the e3-square for White's monarch. This small detail was what eventually gave Vachier-Lagrave the first victory of the match. Carlsen now needed to win one of the two remaining games to stay in contention...

...and he delivered, after taking advantage of a strategical mistake by his opponent:

 
Vachier-Lagrave vs. Carlsen - Blitz game #3
Position after 15...h6

Exchanging the bishop for the knight with 16.xf6 turned out to be a crucial mistake. Black captured with the pawn, established a structure with pawns on f5-e6-f7, and went on to prove his dark-squared bishop was the stronger minor piece. Carlsen's conversion was exemplary. The match was now drawn and there was one more blitz game left to go.

In the fourth 5-minute encounter of the day, Carlsen got a small edge with his passer on the c-file, but a correct defensive effort by his rival led to a 77-move draw. 

The match was set to be decided on playoffs. The tied score would need to be broken with two 10-minute games (with 5-second delays) — if the draw continued, an Armageddon encounter would conclude the match.


Vachier-Lagrave vs. Carlsen - Blitz games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Nxe4 6.d4 Be7 7.Re1 b5 8.Rxe4 C84: Closed Ruy Lopez: Unusual White 6th moves d5 9.Nxe5 Nxe5 10.Rxe5 White is slightly better. bxa4 11.Qe2 11.b3 Be6 12.Ba3 Bxa3 13.Nxa3 0-0 14.Nb1 Qd6 15.Nc3 axb3 16.axb3 1/2-1/2 (43) Nakamura,H (2743)-Caruana,F (2818) Saint Louis 2019 11...c6 12.Bd2N Better is 12.Nc3 Predecessor: 12.Nc3 Ra7 13.Nxa4 0-0 14.Bd2 Bd6 15.f4 Bxe5 16.fxe5 1/2-1/2 (65) Saric,I (2695)-Ragger,M (2687) St Petersburg 2018 12...Be6!= 13.f4 g6 14.Nc3 a3 Reject 14...Qb6 15.Qe3± 15.b3 White has some pressure. Bd6 16.f5 gxf5 17.Rf1 Bxe5 18.Qxe5 Rg8 19.Na4 Qb8 With the idea ...Qxe5. 20.Qe3 Rg4 20...Rg6= keeps the balance. 21.Nc5± Re4 22.Nxe4 fxe4 23.Qh6 Qa7 24.Qg7 24.c3 is more complex. Qe7 25.Bg5 Qf8 26.Qxh7 Kd7 27.Qh5 24...0-0-0 25.Bb4 Re8 26.Bxa3 h5 27.Bc5 Qd7 28.Qg5 e3 28...Rh8 29.Qxe3 Bf5 30.Qf2 Bg6 31.c4 White should try 31.Bb4± 31...Bd3= The position is equal. 32.Re1 Avoid the trap 32.Qxf7? Qxf7 33.Rxf7 Re1+ 34.Kf2 Rf1+ 35.Ke3 Rxf7-+ 32...Rxe1+ 33.Qxe1 Strongly threatening cxd5. dxc4 34.bxc4 34.h4 seems wilder. Qe6 35.Qxe6+ fxe6 36.bxc4 Bxc4 37.a3 34...Bxc4 35.h3 35.a4 feels hotter. Qf5 36.a5 Qf6 37.h3 Kd7 38.Qe3 35...Qe6 36.Qxe6+ Bxe6 Endgame KB-KB 37.a3 Bd5 38.Kf2 Kd7 39.g3 Be6 40.h4 Bg4 41.Ke3 Ke6 42.Kf4 Kd5 43.Ke3 Ke6 44.Kf4 Kd5 45.Ke3 Ke6 46.Kf4 Accuracy: White = 60%, Black = 58%. ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Vachier-Lagrave,M2777Carlsen,M2870½–½201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.5
Carlsen,M2870Vachier-Lagrave,M27770–1201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.6
Vachier-Lagrave,M2777Carlsen,M28700–1201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.7
Carlsen,M2870Vachier-Lagrave,M2777½–½201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.8

Magnus Carlsen, Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

Carlsen frustrated after losing a holdable endgame | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

The first playoff encounter was the highlight of the day. Carlsen later declared that he went into the Najdorf — his rival's pet opening — because he trusted the idea he had used in the first classical game of the match. With both kings vulnerable to direct attacks, Carlsen was the first one to put a foot wrong (only to see his opponent blunder immediately afterwards):

 
Carlsen vs. Vachier-Lagrave - Playoff game #1
Position after 25.f5

Carlsen had just played 25.f5 in a wild position (25.♘xe6 was a strong shot, spotted by Peter Svidler in the commentary room), giving Vachier-Lagrave the chance to play 25...exf5, when Black's threats are difficult to parry. But the Frenchman opted for 25...e5 instead. Carlsen responded with 26.b4, and White had managed to expel Black's two strongest attacking pieces from their menacing spots on the queenside. 

The world champion had an overwhelming advantage soon after. The Norwegian missed some lethal opportunities in the ensuing complications, but he did not quite give up his advantage until disaster struck on move 35:

 
Position after 34...Rhd8

Exchanging on d8 or preparing to infiltrate with the queen via c1 or e1 were all good alternatives here, while 35.c5 was perhaps the one 'playable' move that allowed Black to get back to contention. Vachier-Lagrave found 35...xd3 36.xd3 xa3+ immediately and went on to get the upper hand after Carlsen faltered again with 37.c1.

'MVL' was now in the driver's seat. The French grandmaster made some mistakes later on, but Carlsen was visibly frustrated and failed to find the most resilient defensive resources. Eventually, a knight endgame with Black having two pawns to White's none emerged. Carlsen finally resigned on move 82.

Vachier-Lagrave had White in the rematch, and handled the situation with admirable self-composure. Despite getting a very favourable position, he settled for an equal endgame when given a chance. A 44-move draw gave him a ticket to the final.


Vachier-Lagrave vs. Carlsen - Playoff games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f3 h6 B95: Sicilian Najdorf: 6 Bg5 e6, unusual White 7th moves 8.Be3 b5 9.a3 Nbd7 The position is equal. 10.Qd2 Bb7 11.0-0-0 h5 12.Kb1 Be7 12...Rc8 13.h3 h4 14.Bd3 Ne5 15.Rhe1 Be7 16.Bg5 Nc4 17.Bxc4 Rxc4 0-1 (38) Mekhitarian,K (2559)-Topalov,V (2760) Caxias do Sul 2016 13.Rg1 Rc8 14.Be2 Nb6 15.Qe1 White has some pressure. Nfd7 16.g4 hxg4 17.Rxg4
17...Bf8N 17...Rh7= Predecessor: 17...Kf8 18.Rg2 18.Bg5± Qc7 19.Rh4 18...Ne5 19.f4 Nec4 20.Bc1 Qc7 21.Bxc4 Nxc4 22.Rd3 g6 23.b3 Bg7 24.Qd1 24.Nxe6!± fxe6 25.bxc4 Qxc4 26.Bb2 24...Qa5 25.f5 25.Nxe6= keeps the balance. Bxc3 26.bxc4 Bxe4 27.Re2 bxc4 28.Rxd6 25...Ne5? Of course not 25...Nxa3+?! 26.Bxa3 Qxa3 27.fxe6= 25...exf5! 26.Re2 f4 27.bxc4 bxc4 26.b4 26.fxg6+- Ke7 27.gxf7! 26...Qb6 26...Qc7± 27.Ncxb5 axb5 28.Nxb5 Double Attack Qd7 29.Nxd6+ Double Attack Ke7 27.fxg6+- Nxg6? 27...Nxd3 is more resistant. 28.gxf7+ Kxf7 29.Rxg7+ Kxg7 30.Qg4+ Kf8 28.Be3 Bh6 With the idea ...Bxe3. 29.Ndxb5 Bxe3 30.Nxd6+ Double Attack Ke7
31.Nxb7? 31.Nxf7! Kxf7 32.Rd6 31...Ne5?
31...Qxb7 32.Rxe3 Qb8 32.Rxe3! Nc4 32...Qxe3 33.Qd6+ 33.Rd3 Qxb7 34.Na4 34.Qc1+- 34...Rhd8 34...a5± 35.Nc5? 35.Rxd8+- Threatens to win with Rgg8. Rxd8 36.Qe1 35...Rxd3= 36.Nxd3 aiming for Qg4. Nxa3+ 37.Kc1? 37.Ka2!= and White stays safe. Nb5 38.Qg4 Nc3+ 39.Kb2 37...Qxe4-+ 38.Rf2
38...Qe3+? Better is 38...Qd4!-+ 39.h3 f5 39.Kb2= Nc4+ 40.Ka2! Nd6 41.Qh5 Nf5 42.Re2 Qg1 43.Qf3 Black must now prevent Qb7+. 43.Ne5!? Nd6 44.Qh4+ Ke8 45.Qh3 43...Qb6 44.Ne5 Qb5 ...Nd4! is the strong threat. 45.c4?
45.Qe4!= and White is okay. 45...Qa4+!-+ Worse is 45...Qxb4 46.Nc6+ Rxc6 47.Qxc6= 46.Qa3 Qxa3+ 47.Kxa3 Endgame KRN-KRN f6 48.Nd3 Rxc4 49.Nc5? 49.Kb3 was called for. Rh4 50.Rb2 49...Nd4 50.Re4?
50.Rg2 a5 51.Na6 50...a5! And now ...f5 would win. 51.Ka2 51.bxa5 Nb5+ 51...Rxb4 52.Nd3 Nb5 53.Rxb4 53.Re3 Rh4 54.h3 53...axb4 54.Nxb4 KN-KN f5 55.Kb2 Kf6 56.Kc2 Nd4+ 57.Kd3 Nf3 58.h3 e5 59.Ke3 Nh4 60.Nd5+ Kg5? 60...Kf7-+ Strongly threatening ...Ng6. 61.Nb6 Ke6 61.Ne7? 61.Nb6= 61...Ng6 62.Nc8 Nf4 Black mates. 63.h4+ Kxh4 64.Ne7 Kg5 65.Kf3 Ng6 66.Nd5 e4+ 67.Ke3 Ne5 68.Kd4 Ng4 69.Nc7 Nh2 70.Ke3 Nf1+ 71.Kf2 Nd2 72.Ke3 Nc4+ 73.Kd4 Nd6 74.Ne6+ Kg4 75.Ke3 Kg3 76.Nd4 f4+ 77.Ke2 Kg2 78.Ne6 f3+ 79.Ke3 Kg3 80.Nf4 Nc4+ 81.Kxe4 f2 82.Ne2+ Kg4 83.Kd4 Accuracy: White = 32%, Black = 45%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2870Vachier-Lagrave,M27770–1201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.9
Vachier-Lagrave,M2777Carlsen,M2870½–½201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.10

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

MVL thanked his friends for their support | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Carlsen later confessed he did not feel quite in shape from the start of the day:

To be honest, I felt pretty early on that this wasn't really my day. I just felt really, really sluggish. I think he missed some chances to put the match away. [...] I was just not good enough in the critical moments

Vachier-Lagrave, in turn, declared that he was pretty tired, but the support from his French friends encouraged him to keep fighting. Naturally, defeating Carlsen is a great achievement, but he has something else in mind:

This is not my main priority. Of course it's a great pleasure to be here, and of course I'm playing to win the event, but for me it's mostly about going to the Candidates.

The Frenchman was referring to the fact that he will be fighting to get a spot in the Candidates at the upcoming Grand Prix event in Jerusalem. After barely missing to qualify in the previous cycle, he is once again in danger of falling barely short (he already struck out at the World Cup).

Ding 19:9 Aronian

Although both semi-final matches reached the rapid stage with the score tied, they took drastically different paths on Wednesday. While the tension kept rising between Carlsen and Vachier-Lagrave, Ding Liren had all but secured victory in the first two encounters of the day. The Chinese star went for a remarkable piece sacrifice early on:

 
Ding Liren vs. Aronian
Position after 16.Qd8

White played 17.g5, giving up the d5-knight in exchange for a strong initiative. The move is approved by the engines, and probably finding it during a classical game would not be surprising for a player of Ding's calibre...but doing it in a rapid game was a commendable feat, especially after hearing the Chinese explaining his thought process. 

I think if I go back [with the knight], then at least he has a draw. Also I was short on time, so I wanted to play the most straightforward line, just moving forward.

Aronian was not lost by any means, but his pieces were awfully undeveloped, which only made things harder for him. The final blunder came on move 25:

 
Position after 25...Qf7

The Armenian's 25...f7 allowed 26.c6, forcing the exchange of rooks. Black's minor pieces on c8 and d7 are sitting ducks. Ding had no issues converting this position into a win. 

After Ding obtained another remarkable win in the second rapid game, Aronian won two and the Chinese won one in the blitz section. However, after the draw in the first 5-minute game Ding had already secured match victory. He told Maurice Ashley:

After yesterday's games I [thought] I should play better than yesterday, but I didn't expect things to go so well.

Meanwhile, the Armenian did not lose his sense of humour:

MA: Good luck in the consolation match.

LA: In the losers' match...

MA: You said it (laughs).

The players will have a rest day on Thursday, when they will be paired with entrepreneurs in friendly games to raise money for the Chess in Schools and Communities charity organization. The final and the match for third place will kick off on Friday. 


Ding Liren vs. Aronian - Rapid and blitz games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bf4 0-0 6.e3 Nbd7 7.Be2 dxc4 D37: Queen's Gambit Declined: 5 Bf4 8.0-0 a6 8...c5 9.dxc5 Nxc5 10.Bxc4 Qxd1 11.Rfxd1 b6 12.Bd6 Bxd6 13.Rxd6 Bb7 14.Rad1 Bxf3 15.gxf3 Rfc8 16.Be2 g5 17.R6d4 Kf8 18.f4 gxf4 19.Rxf4 1-0 (67) Ding,L (2811)-Firouzja,A (2702) Khanty-Mansiysk 2019 9.a4 Nd5 The position is equal. 10.Bxc4 Nxf4 11.exf4 c5 12.dxc5 Bxc5N Predecessor: 12...Nxc5 13.Ne5 Nd7 14.Qe2 Nxe5 15.fxe5 Bd7 16.Bd3 Bc6 17.Rfd1 Qc7 18.Be4 Rfd8 19.Bxc6 1/2-1/2 (19) Fedorovsky,M (2478)-Feldmann,J (2208) Munich 2017 13.Qe2 b6 14.Rad1 Qe7 15.Rfe1 g6 16.Nd5 16.Nd4 16...Qd8= 17.Ng5 exd5 18.Bxd5 Ra7
And now ...Qf6 would win. 19.b4! White has the initiative. Bxb4 20.Bxf7+! Rxf7 21.Nxf7 Qf8
22.Nd6! Decoy Bxd6 23.Qe6+ Kg7 23...Qf7! 24.Qxd6 Nf8 24.Rxd6+- Rc7 25.g3 25.h4± 25...Qf7?
25...b5 26.Rc6! Rxc6 27.Qxc6 Qf8 Now ...Nf6 and Black clings on. 28.Rc1 Nc5 With the idea ...Qd8. 29.Qxb6 Ne6 30.Qc6 Nd4 31.Qc7+ Weaker is 31.Qxc8 Ne2+ 32.Kg2 Nxc1+- 31...Kh6 32.Qxc8 Qe7 33.Rd1 Nf3+ 34.Kg2 Qe4 35.Kh3 Nd4 Accuracy: White = 74%, Black = 32%.
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Ding,L2801Aronian,L27721–0201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.3
Aronian,L2772Ding,L28010–1201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.4
Ding,L2801Aronian,L2772½–½201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.5
Aronian,L2772Ding,L28010–1201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.6
Ding,L2801Aronian,L27721–0201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.7
Aronian,L2772Ding,L28011–0201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.8

Ding Liren, Levon Aronian

Ding Liren and Levon Aronian | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour


Commentary webcast

Commentary by Jennifer Shahade, Peter Svidler, Alejandro Ramirez and Maurice Ashley


Schedule of the Grand Chess Tour Final

Times in UTC.

Date/Time Event Round
December 2, 16:00 Carlsen vs Vachier-Lagrave
Aronian vs Ding
Semi-final, Game 1
December 3, 16:00 Vachier-Lagrave vs Carlsen
Ding vs Aronian
Semi-final, Game 2
December 4 Semi-finals Rapid & Blitz  3-8
16:00 Rapid Game 1
17:30 Rapid Game 2
19:00 Blitz Game 1
19:30 Blitz Game 2
20:00 Blitz Game 3
20:30 Blitz Game 4
21:15 Playoff (If necessary)
December 5 Pro Biz Cup  
December 6, 16:00 Final Classical Game 1
December 7, 14:00 Final Classical Game 1
December 8 Final Rapid & Blitz  
14:00 Rapid Game 1
15:30 Rapid Game 2
17:00 Blitz Game 1
17:30 Blitz Game 2
18:00 Blitz Game 3
18:30 Blitz Game 4
19:15 Playoff (If necessary)

Closing ceremony to follow

Scoring

6 points for a win, 3 points for a draw and 0 points for a loss in the two Classic games
4 points for a win, 2 points for a draw and 0 points for a loss in the two Rapid games 
2 points for a win, 1 point for a draw 0 points for a loss in the four blitz games


Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.