(1) Larsen,Bent - Kavalek,Lubomir [A30]
Lugano (10), 1970
[GM Lubomir Kavalek/Huffington Post]

1.b3 The Larsen opening. Bent played it successfully, but all his efforts were overshadowed by his famous defeat against Spassky in 17 moves at the match USSR vs. Rest of the World in Belgrade. It began 10 days after Lugano finished.

1...c5 2.Bb2 Nc6 3.c4 e5 4.g3 d6 5.Bg2 Nge7 6.e3 g6
[6...d5 is a good move. Kavalek tries to transfer the game into a known position from the English opening.- Larsen]

7.Ne2
[7.Nc3 was best with the idea 7...Bg7 8.d3 to meet 8...Be6 9.Nd5 with -BL]

7...Bg7 8.Nbc3 0-0
[Better was 8...Be6 ,e.g. 9.Nd5?! Bxd5 10.cxd5 Nb4 -Larsen]

9.d3 Be6 10.Nd5 Qd7 11.h4!
Larsen's trademark - a rook pawn move. Here it prevents 11...Bh3.

11...f5
Stopping white's advance with 11...h5 was better.

12.Qd2 Rae8
Larsen thought that 12...Rab8!? gave black more chances for a counterplay on the queenside.

13.h5 b5 14.hxg6 hxg6 15.Nec3 bxc4 16.dxc4 e4 17.0-0-0 Ne5 18.Nf4 Rd8
[After 18...g5? 19.Nxe6 Nd3+ Larsen planned the exciting 20.Qxd3! exd3 21.Nxg7 Kxg7 22.Nd5+ Kg6 23.Bf3!! white is winning.]

19.Kb1
I thought here for 16 minutes about the sacrifice 19...Bxc4! and left myself with only 12 minutes for 21 moves. It is remarkable, since the time control in those days was 40 moves in 2 1/2 hours. What was I doing for the first 19 moves?

19...Bf7?!
[Chickening out, although my instinct told me that the bishop sacrifice is the right thing to do. Larsen did not think much of it, saying that after 19...Bxc4 20.bxc4 Nxc4 21.Qe2 black does not have anything. However, Gavril Veresov, a Belorussian master, later provided splendid analysis, confirming that black's attack was indeed very powerful after 21...Nxb2 22.Kxb2 Qa4! and suddenly a disaster is looming on the long diagonal a1-h8 after 23.Qd2 (23.Qc2? Rb8+ 24.Kc1 Qa3+ 25.Kd2 Rb2 ) 23...Rb8+ 24.Ka1 Qa3! 25.Rc1 d5!! and white has a hard time coping with black's threat to push his d-pawn. 26.Bf1 (26.Nfxd5?! Nxd5 27.Qxd5+ Rf7 28.Qd2 Rd7! 29.Qc2 Rd3-+ ; Black has to be more creative after 26.Ne6 with 26...Bf6!! 27.Nxf8 Kxf8 28.Rc2 (28.Qc2 c4 29.Qd2 Rb3-+ ) 28...Rb3 29.Rhc1 Nc6 threatening 30...Nb4, and after 30.Qxd5 Bxc3+ 31.Rxc3 Qb2# ) 26...Rb4! (Less spectacular, but very effective is 26...Rf6 27.Nfxd5 Nxd5 28.Qxd5+ Kf8 29.Bb5 Rfb6 30.Qd2 Be5! threatening 31...Rxb5.) 27.Nfxd5 (27.Ne6 Rfb8 28.Nxg7 Rb2 29.Rc2 Qxa2+ 30.Nxa2 Rb1# ) 27...Rd8!! (Veresov suggested only 27...Qxc1+ 28.Qxc1 Nxd5 which is not as clear after 29.a3 ) 28.Nxe7+ Kf7 29.Ned5 (29.Qc2 Bxc3+ 30.Qxc3 Qxc3+ 31.Rxc3 Rd1+ 32.Rc1 Rxc1# ) 29...Kf8!! and amazingly, white does not have a good defense to 30...Rxd5!, for example 30.Be2 Rxd5 31.Qc2 Rd3! 32.Bxd3 exd3 33.Qd2 Rb3 and there is no defense to 34...Rxc3 winning.]

20.g4!
In his book Studies for Practical Players, published by Russell Enterprises, the outstanding Russian chess composer Oleg Pervakov writes:" White has opened the h-file, and taken aim at the black king. It would be nice to push the queen over to h2 - but how? The d2-e1-g1-h2 route is pretty long and would grant Black time to whip up counterplay on the queenside. Larsen finds a cardinal solution to the problem." And indeed, Larsen's line-clearing on the second rank is remarkable.

20...Nxg4
[Now after 20...Bxc4 white plays 21.gxf5 and his attack is faster.]

21.f3! exf3 22.Bxf3 Ne5
[Larsen claims correctly that after 22...Nf6 23.Qh2 Rfe8 24.Nb5 Nc8 25.Bxf6 Bxf6 26.Qh7+ Kf8 27.Bd5 white wins quickly, e.g. 27...g5 28.Ng6+ Bxg6 29.Qg8+ Ke7 30.Rh7+ Bxh7 31.Qf7# ]

23.Qh2 Bxc4!?
[23...Rfe8 24.Nb5 Nc8 25.Qh7+ Kf8 26.Bd5 threatening 27.Nxg6+, white wins.]

24.bxc4 Nxf3 25.Qh7+ Kf7 26.Ncd5 Rg8 27.Nxe7 Rb8 28.Ka1
[28.Kc1 won less brilliantly, e.g. 28...Qxe7 29.Qxg6+ Kf8 30.Bxg7+ Qxg7 31.Ne6+ ]

28...Qxe7 29.Qxg6+ Kf8 30.Ne6+ Qxe6 31.Bxg7+!
[Sidestepping the last trick 31.Qxe6 Bxb2+ 32.Kb1 Ba3+ 33.Ka1 (33.Kc2 Rg2+ 34.Kd3 Ne5+-+ ) 33...Bb2+ and black draws.]

31...Ke7
Almost escaping, but Larsen nails down a magnificent finish.

32.Bf8+! Rbxf8 33.Rh7+
[33.Rh7+ Rf7 34.Rxf7+ Qxf7 35.Qxd6+ Ke8 36.Qd8# ] 1-0