Chess players from around the world seeking to pursue degrees in the American university system have a special home at the University of Texas - Dallas to show their special talents over the board also translate to success in other intellectual fields. Though not the only university with a penchant for chess, and chess players, it is certainly one of the most prominent.

The poster and official brochure
As befits it, an assortment of competitions are organized to promote the game, the department's visibility, and of course provide training for the players. During the Spring Break, it organized a particularly appealing idea by pitting its grandmaster team against a group of guests all of whom represent the very best of the US Juniors of the moment. On paper, the ratings averages of the teams seemed fair and favored even the more mature UTD team, but as one grandmaster put it, "I'm sure the UTD players are overjoyed at the idea of playing a bunch of underrated prodigies on the rise." The heavy-handed irony made it clear what he though would happen. Would his words prove to be prophecy?
The competition was as serious as could be, and designed as a double-round Scheviningen match, meaning each team member would play the other team twice, With five players on each team, that meant a total of ten games for each.
Team UTD

Bo.
|
Ti.
|
Name
|
FED
|
Rtg
|
1 |
GM |
Kritz Leonid |
GER |
2583 |
2 |
GM |
Iotov Valentin |
BUL |
2579 |
3 |
GM |
Margvelashvili Giorgi |
GEO |
2531 |
4 |
GM |
Holt Conrad |
USA |
2530 |
5 |
IM |
Kadric Denis |
BIH |
2500 |
Team US Juniors

Bo.
|
Ti.
|
Name
|
FED
|
Rtg
|
1 |
GM |
Troff Kayden W |
USA |
2532 |
2 |
GM |
Sevian Samuel |
USA |
2531 |
3 |
IM |
Yang Darwin |
USA |
2478 |
4 |
IM |
Xiong Jeffery |
USA |
2473 |
5 |
IM |
Chandra Akshat |
USA |
2459 |
After the first leg of five rounds, things looked about as balanced as could be, and though the US Juniors team came out ahead 13.0-12.0, it was by the slimmest of margins possible. The star of the juniors was Samuel Sevian with 3.5/5, but Akshat Chandra and Kayden Troff also posted plus scores with 3.0/5 each. In the UTD team, top-seed Leonid Kritz (2583) and Conrad Holt also fought hard with the only plus scores of their team with 3.0/5 each.

Playing the symbolic first move to start the competition on the board of GM Denis Kadric, a
first-year student in mathematics, against IM Akshat Chandra

The same privilege on the board of top-seed Leonid Kritz, studying business administration,
facing Kayden Troff. No, Kritz did not play 1.f4
The second leg of the competition did not show any remarkable improvement from UTD, as the Juniors were even more successful thanks very much to a rallying result from IM Darwin Young, who had started slow with only 1.5/5, but was the top scoring player on his team with 3.5/5 in the latter half. His result was matched by Giorgi Margvelashvili, who was the only plus score on UTD now, while Sevian and Troff both pulled their weight and then some leading to a 13.5-11.5 win in the second leg, and 26.5-23.5 overall win. Of special note on the UTD team was Conrad Holt who scored 5.0/10 but without one single draw! In other words his 50% score was comprised of five wins and five losses. No half measures for that young man.

GM Giorgi Margvelashvili, who is a graduate student in business administration, was the
highest scoring player on the UTD team. The preponderance of green jackets is because
they are the university colors.

The top scoring player of all the players was 14-year-old GM Samuel Sevian, whose play
showed great versatility and skill
Sevian - Iotov

After dominating his opponent for the entire game, they finally reached
this endgame of opposite colored bishops. Sevian found the way to victory
here, can you? White to play and win.
He entered the competition with 2531, but as a result of his performance gained 17 Elo and is now at 2548 on the virtual lists. The reason for this particular note is that he can still theoretically beat Wei Yi's record for the all-time youngest 2600 FIDE player, but would need to achieve this within two months. In all fairness, although he certainly seems to be playing well enough, it seems unlikely he will play enough games in that period to achieve it. That said, while these records and numbers are always fun to follow, far more interesting is the actual play of the player. Watch this gem of a game played in the last round against the top-seed Leonid Kritz.
Samuel Sevian vs Leonid Kritz
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
19.d5! cxd5 20.Nd4 Nc5 21.Qe2 f4?! 22.Nh5‼ 22.Ngf5 Nxf5 23.Nxf5 Kf7 22...Qe7 22...Nxh5? 23.Nxe6 Nxe6 23...Qe7 24.Bxc5 24.Qxe6+ Qe7 24...Be7 25.Bd4 Rf8 26.Qg6+ 25.Qg6+ Kd8 25...Qf7 26.Rfe1+ Be7 27.Rxe7+! Kxe7 28.Re1+ Kf8 29.Bc5+ 26.Rfe1 Qd7 27.Qxh5 23.Nxg7+ Bxg7 24.Rae1 Kf7? 25.Nf5! Qc7 25...Qf6 26.Nd6+ 26.Nxg7 Kxg7 27.Bd4+ 1–0
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Sevian,S | 2531 | Kritz,L | 2583 | 1–0 | 2015 | B01 | UT vs Juniors | 10.1 |
Please, wait...
Final standings

Solution to position:
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
34.g5‼ gxh5 34...hxg5 35.h6 Bf7 36.h7 35.gxh6 Bg6 36.Kf4 Kd7 37.Kg5 Bf5 38.Kf6 c6 39.Kg7 1–0
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Sevian,S | 2531 | Iotov,V | 2579 | 1–0 | 2015 | C10 | UT vs Juniors | 6.2 |
Please, wait...