Indians at the Isle of Man 2017

by Sagar Shah
10/15/2017 – We look back at IoM one more time, focusing on the many Indian players who performed admirably, first and foremost, Vishy Anand for his second place finish, scoring 7.0 / 9. The second was Vidit Gujrathi, who had a very solid +4 performance. However, his biggest achievement of the event was surely holding Magnus Carlsen to a draw. And the third, rather lesser known, was GM Swapnil Dhopade, with a rating of 2532, but who performed at an Elo of 2768. We got in touch with all the three high performers and try to understand the secrets of their success. Photos: | Alina l'Ami (Anand), Chess.com/Maria Emelianova (Vidit and Swapnil)

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!


Along with the ChessBase 14 program you can access the Live Database of 8 million games, and receive three months of free ChesssBase Account Premium membership and all of our online apps! Have a look today!

More...

Anand's solid second

After Vishy Anand lost to Anton Kovalyov in the second round of the World Cup 2017, many people started to speak about his retirement once again. I wonder why people do not learn their lesson. Every time Vishy has had a low in his career, he has fought back and come out stronger.

He did this once again at the Chess.com Isle of Man International 2017. It was a strong Open tournament where Anand was the fourth seed behind Carlsen, Kramnik and Caruana. Vishy scored five wins and four draws to finish with a solid 7.0 / 9, gaining two Elo points in the process. He finished joint second with Nakamura, half a point behind Magnus Carlsen.

A curious fact is that although the tournament had 13 players above the rating of 2700, Anand didn't face any. One could say he was a tad lucky with the pairings, but he did make most of the chances offered to him.

Vishy Anand

Players like Shirov, Fressinet, Hou Yifan, Grandelius and Sethuraman can beat the best in the business on their day and Anand managed to not only stave them off, but also scored 4.0 / 5 against them.

Let's take a closer look at Vishy Anand's scorecard:

Rd. Bo. SNo   Name Rtg FED Pts. Res.
1 3 74 IM Esserman Marc 2453 USA 3,5 w 1
2 3 59 IM Lampert Jonas 2514 GER 5,0 s ½
3 12 58 IM Lubbe Nikolas 2515 GER 4,0 w 1
4 4 31 GM Shirov Alexei 2630 LAT 6,5 s ½
5 5 28 GM Grandelius Nils 2653 SWE 5,5 w ½
6 6 33 GM Sethuraman S.P. 2617 IND 5,0 w 1
7 3 46 GM Lenderman Aleksandr 2565 USA 6,0 s ½
8 4 26 GM Fressinet Laurent 2657 FRA 5,5 s 1
9 2 22 GM Hou Yifan 2670 CHN 6,0 w 1

Pleased with his performance at Isle of Man | Photo: Alina l'Ami

After Anand was back from Isle of Man and before he left for Seychelles, ChessBase India contacted him and did a short interview. Here's the entire transcript and at the end of the article you will also find the full recording.

Sagar Shah (SS): Which was your favourite game from the event?

Vishy Anand (VA): That's a tough one! I would choose between Lubbe in the third round and Hou Yifan in the ninth. Both games are quite pretty. In one I am about to give a mate to the king on e4 and I like the Hou Yifan game also very much. I think it is a game of one piece.

Hou Yifan and Vishy Anand in Round 9

Not the Petroff, again! Vishy Anand played an excellent game to beat Hou Yifan (Annotated below) | Photo: Chess.com/Maria Emelianova

SS: What lessons did you learn from Gibraltar 2016 that you applied here?

VA: I think mainly the difference between Gibraltar and here is that I managed to remain calmer. In Gibraltar and even in World Cup 2017 I was unable to get into a calm state of mind, where you make sensible decisions at the board. In this tournament I managed to do this quite nicely. In fact I got into my groove in the last two games.

Gibraltar 2016 was a tough tournament for Anand where he lost a ton of rating points, but he learned his lessons and applied them at the Isle of Man | Photo: Sophie Triay 

SS: How did you prepare for this event after the World Cup?

VA: I couldn't do all that much of preparation after the World Cup. First of all I was not in the mood and second of all there wasn't much time. I tried to take a break. I enjoyed playing in the Isle of Man because it allows you a little bit of freedom to experiment. I believe this also is the case with Magnus. He seemed to happy to do stuff which he wouldn't be able to do at other places. I needed a little bit of luck against Fressinet in the eighth round. Otherwise the tournament wouldn't have ended so well.

Top players are able to try out different openings moreso than in top closed Round-Robins | Photo: chess.com/ Maria Emelianova

SS: Which are your next events?

VA: The next tournaments will be the London Chess Classic and in the new year Wijk Aan Zee Tata Steel event. I am looking forward to both.

A super tournament victory is something that has been missing for Anand for quite some time now. Will London 2017 change that? | Photo: Amruta Mokal 

Headline from Times of India: It's time for Viswanathan Anand to quit

SS: Did you read the article by IM Lanka Ravi for Times of India. Do you have anything to say about it? We received 153 comments for the contest where people had to quote the reason why you must not retire. The best 10 we published here. Can you say something to your fans who love you so much.

VA: I don't understand why all sorts of ridiculous people tell me that I should retire. I was very touched by what the readers have written. I think the ones who have written, look, if playing chess brings him pleasure and he enjoys it, then what's the reason for him not to do it! And I think they nailed the reason why I continue playing.

If I like playing, then I will play. That's all. 

SS: Lastly, how did you feel playing with 30 more Indians in the same playing hall?

Indian players at the closing ceremony

The best of Indian chess (almost!) captured in one frame! | Photo: Chess.com/Maria Emelianova

VA: I had also experienced this in Gibraltar, this sensation of playing 30 Indians. There are some practical problems. Because normally in a Round-Robin I can find my table very easily by looking for the Indian flag. But in Isle of Man I couldn't find my table at all that way. In fact I would look for my opponent's flag. That was much easier to find! It's nice to bump into my Indian colleagues, at the venue or while taking a walk. I wish I had the chance to know them better. Hopefully this will be the case in future.

Selfies and photos abounded on social media as Indians got a chance to take a picture with their role model. Clockwise from top left: Swapnil Dhopade, Fenil Shah, Swayams Mishra and Rakesh Kumar Jena. 

Audio interview with pictures

My Career Vol. 1

The first DVD with videos from Anand's chess career reflects the very beginning of that career and goes as far as 1999. It starts with his memories of how he first learned chess and shows his first great games (including those from the 1984 WCh for juniors). The high point of his early developmental phase was the winning of the 1987 WCh for juniors. After that, things continue in quick succession: the first victories over Kasparov, WCh candidate in both the FIDE and PCA cycles and the high point of the WCh match against Kasparov in 1995.
Running time: 3:48 hours

More...

Game Analysis

Anand selected two of his favourite games from the event. The first one was his third round win against Nikolas Lubbe and the second was his ninth round triumph over Hou Yifan. The Lubbe game is annotated in the replayable board below, while the Hou Yifan game is analyzed in the youtube video. 

Viswanathan Anand 1-0 Nikolas Lubbe (Annotated by IM Sagar Shah)

[Event "chess.com IoM Masters"] [Site "Douglas ENG"] [Date "2017.09.25"] [Round "3.12"] [White "Anand, Viswanathan"] [Black "Lubbe, Nikolas"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B90"] [WhiteElo "2794"] [BlackElo "2515"] [Annotator "Sagar Shah"] [PlyCount "83"] [EventDate "2017.09.23"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. a4 e5 7. Nf3 Be7 8. Bg5 Nbd7 9. Bc4 h6 10. Be3 Nb6 (10... Ng4 {Perhaps Anand would have given up his bishop on e3, but it would have been interesting to see how he did that.}) 11. Bb3 Be6 12. Qd3 Rc8 13. Bxb6 $5 {The start of an exchange operation to increase control on the d5 square.} Qxb6 14. a5 Qc7 15. Nd2 O-O 16. O-O Rfd8 17. Rfd1 Rd7 (17... d5 {White is threatening Nf1-e3 and so I really want to make this move work. But unfortunately it doesn't work out.} 18. exd5 $16) 18. Na4 $5 {The knight is coming to b6.} d5 19. Nb6 dxe4 20. Qf1 $5 Bg4 21. Nxd7 Qxd7 22. Nc4 $1 (22. Nxe4 Bxd1 23. Rxd1 $14 {also gives White an edge.}) 22... Qc7 23. Nb6 Rf8 24. Re1 {Anand has won an exchange and decides to keep his extra material.} Bb4 25. c3 Bxa5 26. Nd5 Nxd5 27. Bxd5 Rd8 28. Bxe4 (28. Qc4 $16) 28... Rd2 29. h3 Be6 30. Re2 Bc4 31. Rxd2 $1 {The queen sacrifice works well for White here and because of the opposite coloured bishops on the board, he is able to launch a strong attack on his opponent's king.} Bxf1 32. Rxf1 Kf8 {The king feels uncomfortable inside the box, but outside also it is not all safe.} 33. Rfd1 Ke7 34. Bf5 Kf6 35. Rd7 Qc4 36. Bd3 Qa4 37. Be2 Qb3 38. R1d6+ Kg5 39. g3 g6 40. h4+ Kf5 41. g4+ Ke4 42. Rf6 {[%csl Gd7,Re4,Gf6][%cal Ge2f3] The king is trapped in the centre and Bf3 would be a pretty mate! A very powerful game by Anand.} 1-0

Play the Sicilian Najdorf

In 60 minutes you will get a crash course how to play such a complicated opening like the Sicilian Najdorf by the hands of GM van Wely who knows by experience how the dangers look like! The contents:
• Video 1, 2, 3: how to survive versus whites most aggressive approach: 6. Bc4, 6. Be3 and 6 Bg5
• Video 4: how to deal with the latest fashion in the Najdorf 6. h3 and last but not least
• Video 5: how to play vs the more classical set ups 6. Be2 and 6. g3

More...

ChessBase India YouTube

Vishy Anand and Hikaru Nakamura congratulate each other on scoring 7.0/10 and finishing joint second | Photo: John Saunders


Vidit Gujrathi toe-to-toe with World Champion Magnus Carlsen

India's number three and the most upcoming player, Vidit Gujrathi, played against the World Champion Magnus Carlsen in the seventh round. The way that game went goes to show how much Vidit has progressed as a player. He kept the pressure right from the opening and was able to outplay the World Champion with the black pieces. If it was anyone else Vidit would have surely pushed on, but against Carlsen he decided to play it safe and simplify the game into a drawn endgame.
 
There are games that can change the direction of a chess career. And this is surely one of them. Vidit's confidence has increased by leaps and bounds after this draw against Magnus Carlsen. The 2721 rated 22-year-old from Nashik has started to believe that he too belongs right up there with the best. As this game has such great import, we decided to ask Vidit what he felt before, during and after the struggle. There is a short interview in this article, but before that you can replay the game below to get a better idea of what transpired.

Magnus Carlsen and Vidit

Confident Vidit shows he is ready to fight with the best! | Photo: Chess.com/Maria Emelianova

Magnus Carlsen ½-½ Vidit Gujrathi (Annotated by Sagar Shah)

[Event "chess.com IoM Masters"] [Site "Douglas ENG"] [Date "2017.09.29"] [Round "7.1"] [White "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Black "Vidit, Santosh Gujrathi"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A07"] [WhiteElo "2827"] [BlackElo "2702"] [Annotator "Sagar Shah"] [PlyCount "61"] [EventDate "2017.09.23"] 1. Nf3 {This move came as a bit of a surprise for Vidit, but in general he was expecting Magnus to play something off beat.} d5 2. g3 g6 3. Bg2 Bg7 4. O-O (4. d4 {In order to avoid what happened in the game, White players usually go for this move order.}) 4... e5 {I like Vidit's decision. He gets the centre and easy development. Magnus has to decide how he can make use of the extra tempo in this opposite coloured King's Indian Defence.} 5. d3 Ne7 6. e4 (6. c4 { is another way to play the position.}) 6... O-O 7. exd5 Nxd5 8. Re1 Nc6 { Black has excellent development and I would say has already equalized out of the opening.} 9. Nc3 (9. Nbd2 {with the idea of Nc4 to put more pressure on e5 is more logical it seems.}) 9... Nde7 10. Rb1 a5 11. b3 Re8 12. Bb2 Nf5 13. Nb5 {With this move Vidit got the counterplay flowing with the move a5-a4.} (13. a4 {could have been a slightly better possibility for White. Although Black seems to be perfectly fine here as well.}) 13... a4 14. c4 (14. b4 $5 Nxb4 15. Bxe5 $1 $14) 14... axb3 15. axb3 Nd6 $1 {[%cal Gf5d6] This was the move that Vidit liked very much and after this he did feel that Black had a very comfortable position. It is counterintuitive that instead of using the d4 square from f5, the knight jumped back to d6. But the priority was to eliminate the knight from b5.} 16. Ra1 $6 {This move really gives Black a very pleasant position.} ( 16. Nc3 Bg4 17. h3 Bxf3 18. Bxf3 Nd4 $11 {/=+}) 16... Rxa1 17. Bxa1 Nxb5 18. cxb5 Nd4 {White has nothing to show for his mangled pawn structure.} 19. Bxd4 ( 19. Nxd4 exd4 20. Rxe8+ Qxe8 $17) 19... exd4 20. Rxe8+ Qxe8 21. Qc1 {Until now Vidit has played all the best moves but now starts going wrong. He feels that Bd7 is the best move and goes for it. But in that process he exchanges his pretty good c7 pawn with White's weak b5 pawn. White's disadvantage is reduced. } Bd7 $6 {[%cal Gc8d7]} (21... Bf5 $1 $17) (21... Qe7 $1 $17) 22. Qxc7 Bxb5 23. Bf1 Bc6 24. Qf4 Bxf3 (24... Qd8 $15 {Maybe on some other ambitious day Vidit would have played this way. But in general he saw that he could easily make a draw by taking on f3, and went for it.}) 25. Qxf3 $11 Qc6 26. Qd1 b6 27. Bg2 Qe6 28. Bb7 Bf8 29. Qf3 Kg7 30. Qf4 Qf6 31. Qxf6+ {A draw against the World Champion with the black pieces is a great achievement.} 1/2-1/2

King's Indian Attack

The King’s Indian Attack is a unique opening system in that it offers White a dynamic and interesting game but without the need to know reams of theory. In addition to being easy to learn it has an excellent pedigree, leading exponents including great players such as Bobby Fischer, Tigran Petrosian, David Bronstein, Viktor Korchnoi, Leonid Stein and Lev Psakhis. It is playable as either a complete, self-contained opening system or as part of a regular 1.e4 repertoire. On this DVD Davies presents a complete repertoire for White as well as the lines he can use to supplement a King’s Pawn repertoire. Having had extensive experience in these positions he is able to communicate the plans and ideas in lucid fashion. Video running time: more than 5 hours.

More...

SS: What was your reaction when you got to know that you were going to play the World Champion Magnus Carlsen?

VG: Normally you would expect a player to be excited or nervous when he gets the opportunity to play the World Champion. But I was very chilled out. I was just happy that I was getting a chance to play against Magnus.

SS: How did you prepare for the game?

VG: When you play against Carlsen, you cannot really predict the opening. So I took more rest than usual and prepared myself mentally for a long fight.

SS: What openings were you expecting from him? 

VG: I looked at what Magnus would usually play, but in Isle of Man he was very unpredictable. He was more in the freestyle mode. So I did look at the normal lines and checked my notes there, but I was expecting him to play something different.

SS: Were you surprised when he played 1.Nf3?

VG: Of all the lines that I prepared before the game, I didn't spend so much time on 1.Nf3. So you could say that I was surprised to some extent!

 SS: You thought a lot before making your first move what were you thinking?

Magnus has made his move, and Vidit's time is ticking | Photo: Chess.com/Maria Emelianova

VG: I was not really thinking at that point. I didn't even know that he had made his move. I was just trying to get myself in the zone before the game.

SS: When did you start feeling comfortable during the game?

 

VG: When I made this move ...Nd6 I saw that all my pieces were well placed. At the same time he was taking a lot of time for his moves, from which I understood that he was not very happy with his position!

The opening went really well for Vidit and Magnus couldn't find a way to put even the slightest of pressure on his opponent | Photo: Chess.com/Maria Emelianova

SS: Do you think you showed too much respect for your opponent. Like if it was someone else you would have pressed harder?

VG: I think it was happening at a subconscious level. I didn't realize that the position was so much better, because I didn't look for it. Maybe, if it was someone else I would have looked harder and tried to find more resources. But I was happy to see ...Bd7 and that I had no problems. But yes, you are right, if it was someone else I would have tried harder. In hindsight it was clearly a big mistake and something to work on in the future.

 

This was the position where Vidit could have kept up the pressure with a move like 21...Qe7. Instead he went for 21...Bd7 and after 22.Qxc7 Bxb5 23.Bf1 White had fewer problems to solve.

SS: What did Magnus say after the game?

A relieved-looking Magnus Carlsen after the game | Photo: John Saunders

VG: We were just discussing the various positions after the game. We exchanged our ideas and thoughts. Many of our opinions matched and on some we disagreed. But overall it was a very healthy post-mortem analysis. 

SS: How was your feeling after drawing the game? 

VG: Initially I thought that I played a good game, which is true, but I think I could have played better. After coming back to the room, I checked with the computer and realized that I could have put pressure on him with something like ...Qd8 and even later I had many chances to push. To sum it up — I was happy with the game but the objective part of me said that I could have done better.

 

The move 24...Bxf3 in the above position showed too much respect for the World Champion. Against someone else Vidit would have gone for Qd8 with ideas like Qd5.

SS: What did Nigel Short say to you before the game? That photo has been liked by everyone a lot!

Readers are welcome to give their captions to this image in the comments section! | Photo: Chess.com/Maria Emelianova

VG: It was a nice picture indeed and a perfectly timed capture. I think some things are more fun if there is some mystery attached with it. So I think I will keep it that way! 

Learn from Vidit Gujrathi

Vidit's DVDs (part I and II) on Caro Kann is one of the best materials available out there on the opening. If you are interested to play the Caro Kann with black this is all that you need!

The Fashionable Caro-Kann Vol.1 and 2

The Caro Kann is a very tricky opening. Black’s play is based on controlling and fighting for key light squares. It is a line which was very fashionable in late 90s and early 2000s due to the successes of greats like Karpov, Anand, Dreev etc. Recently due to strong engines lot of key developments have been made and some new lines have been introduced, while others have been refuted altogether. I have analyzed the new trends carefully and found some new ideas for Black.

The dynamic play based on a strong strategic foundation has always fascinated me, and in these DVDs I have suggested the lines which I personally prefer and employ in practice.

More...


How did Swapnil Dhopade achieve a performance of 2768?

Swapnil Dhopade lost the last round of the National Challengers 2017 to Deepan Chakkravarthy and with it missed out on the championship title. It was a depressing moment for the Amravati lad, especially because he was completely dominating the tournament with a 8½ / 9. After the event, I felt that Swapnil would be devastated, but in an interview with Ankit Dalal, he seemed extremely calm. He objectively pin-pointed his error that had led to the last round defeat and looked determined to make a strong comeback. It was then that I knew that a powerful performance from Mr. Dhopade was on the cards. Which tournament it would be had to be seen. 

Swapnil chose Isle of Man to show to the world what he was capable off. And he couldn't have chosen a better event. In a star-studded tournament, where he faced seven grandmasters, six of them being above 2650, Swapnil scored 6½ / 9, with four wins and five draws. An astonishing performance of 2768 gaining 28 Elo points! This was by far the best performance of his career. We caught up with the man of the moment and did a small interview with him to decode his performance. What is it that is turning the tide in Swapnil Dhopade's chess career?

Swapnil Dhopade at Isle of Man

Rd. Bo. SNo   Name Rtg FED Pts. Res.
1 44 80 WGM Shvayger Yuliya 2442 ISR 4,5 s 1
2 27 121 IM L'ami Alina 2286 ROU 3,5 w 1
3 9 27 GM Granda Zuniga Julio E 2653 PER 6,0 s ½
4 9 20 GM Movsesian Sergei 2671 ARM 6,0 w ½
5 16 23 GM Jones Gawain C B 2668 ENG 5,5 s ½
6 18 41 GM Tari Aryan 2588 NOR 5,5 w 1
7 9 19 GM Rapport Richard 2675 HUN 6,5 s ½
8 11 14 GM Short Nigel D 2698 ENG 5,5 w 1
9 3 8 GM Eljanov Pavel 2734 UKR 6,5 s ½

Swapnil's scorecard at the Isle of Man International includes wins ver Shvayger, l'Ami, Tari and Short. All his draws were against 2650+ opponents. | Photo: Chess.com / Maria Emelianova

Sagar Shah (SS): 2768!! Swapnil, how were you able to perform so well at the event?

Swapnil Dhopade (SD): I cannot really point out one specific reason. As always is the case with such good performances it was a mixture of many reasons. I have been training hard for past several months with the goal of 2600 in mind. I think all my work was useful in this tournament. Also I performed well in National Challengers. I feel one of the main reasons might be my work with Jacob Aagaard. I attended his camp in August in Glasgow and I feel I have learned a lot of things with him.

Swapnil with his latest trainer Jacob Aagaard | Photo: Jacob Aagaard

SS: How did working with Jacob Aagaard help?

SD: Working with Jacob has really helped me a lot. First of all I have worked a lot with his books. I especially liked his books on calculation and positional play. In August I attended a camp of his. I learned a lot of things in the camp. He pushed us out of our comfort zones by giving really tough positions. The quality of his material is amazing. Also I learned the importance of physical fitness after working him. During the camp we used to go to the gym daily for two hours and play badminton. I feel working on fitness and energy helps one to perform better in the tournaments for sure. Jacob is one of the fittest chess players I have seen.

The training camp in Glasgow in the first week of August at Jacob Aagaard's residence was attended by two Indians Swapnil Dhopade and Tania Sachdev 

SS: Tell us something about your king walk against Aryan Tari! Were you inspired by Short-Timman?!

Swapnil offered his queen for exchange on g3 and then marched his king all the way up to g5 to weave a mating net around the black king

SD: I have obviously seen such king walks many times, especially in the end games. It just came very naturally to me, as we both already had less time. I just followed my intuition and took the king to g5. When you see many such ideas it gets stored in your mind subconsciously and pops up during the game automatically. Therefore studying classical games of great players is important. You get to learn many such interesting ideas.

Aryan Tari has been improving at a rapid pace and has reached an Elo of 2600 in the past. Swapnil was able to masterfully outplay him in the endgame! | chess.com/ Maria Emelianova

SS: Tell us some key analysis of the move e4 against Rapport. He is known as an aggressive player, but you were playing like him!

 

Play through the moves on the live diagram!

SD: Well Rapport always plays such aggressive chess! Before the game I thought I will play solid from the opening because he takes a lot of risk and I will get my chances anyway. When he played 15.Bf3 his idea was to take on g6 with the knight and play Qh4. But I felt something was wrong with the placement of Qg4-Bf3. So 15...e4 came to my mind with ideas like Ne5. But obviously after 16.dxe4 I cannot play Ne5 because he can simply play Bxe5. So I considered 16...Be5 when he has to play 17.c3 but then the d3 square becomes weak and I have 17...Nc5 exploiting the weak d3 square.

Once I imagined this position in my mind it became clear to me that Black is going to have a strong initiative. I checked some other lines after e4 and then went for it.

SS: Which was your favourite game from the tournament?

SD: My favorite game in this tournament was my win against Nigel Short.

Nigel Short in good spirits before the start of his game against Swapnil  | Photo: Chess.com/Maria Emelianova

SS: Nigel Short is a legend. How were you able to beat him in such smooth style?

SD: Nigel is of course a world class player. Before our game he had a series of draws so I felt he will try hard to win against me. That is why he went for a rare move in the Catalan. He just wanted to play a position over the board which is new for both of us.

But unfortunately the opening experiment backfired. I got a typical Catalan edge. I had control over the two most important breaks in the position which could free his pieces. The c5 and e5 squares. Without these breaks blacks position is always a bit cramped and uncomfortable.

I just put of my pieces on the right squares and I was better. I think the critical moment of the game was after he played Qb5.

I was hesitating to play a4 and I took a long time there. I had to assess the arising Rook knight vs rook knight Endgame which comes by force. In that Endgame which came in the game the weakness of the b7 pawn and the badly placed d8 knight gives white a clear advantage.

Another important moment was to gain space on the Kingside with h4-h5 and fix blacks Kingside pawns. Once his f5 square was weak, I just had to find a way to manoeuvre the knight to f5, after which it was just winning.

The final nail in the coffin — pushing the pawn to h5!

Swapnil S. 1-0 Nigel Short (annotated by IM Sagar Shah)

[Event "chess.com IoM Masters"] [Site "Douglas ENG"] [Date "2017.09.30"] [Round "8.11"] [White "Swapnil, S. Dhopade"] [Black "Short, Nigel D"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E04"] [WhiteElo "2532"] [BlackElo "2698"] [Annotator "Sagar Shah"] [PlyCount "145"] [EventDate "2017.09.23"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. g3 dxc4 5. Bg2 Nc6 6. Qa4 Bd7 {[%cal Gc8d7] This was Nigel's try to take the game into uncharted territory, but gives White a small and risk-free edge.} (6... Bb4+ {is the main move in this position.}) 7. Qxc4 Bd6 (7... Na5) 8. O-O O-O 9. Nc3 a6 10. Bg5 {Swapnil would like to eliminate the knight on f6 and then continue by putting his knight on e4 and creating a lot of pressure on the queenside with moves like Nc5, rooks coming to c1 and d1 and so on.} h6 11. Bxf6 Qxf6 12. Rac1 Rfc8 13. Ne4 Qe7 14. Nc5 Rab8 (14... Bxc5 15. Qxc5 Qxc5 16. Rxc5 $14 {looks like a small edge for White.}) 15. Rfd1 Be8 16. e3 Nd8 {This knight on d8 turns out to be the crucial factor in the game. It's Black's worst piece and he isn't able to improve it.} 17. a3 Bc6 18. b4 {[%csl Gb4,Gc5,Gd4][%cal Gf3e5]} Qe8 19. Qc3 Ra8 20. Nd2 Bxg2 21. Kxg2 a5 22. bxa5 Qb5 {[%cal Ge8b5]} 23. a4 Qxa5 24. Qxa5 Rxa5 25. Nc4 $1 Raa8 26. Nxd6 $1 {This exchange was an important one for White. It could lead to a position that is quite drawish in nature, but Swapnil had seen that he maintains a slight pull.} cxd6 27. Ne4 d5 28. Rxc8 Rxc8 29. Nc5 { [%csl Rb7,Gc5,Rd8]} e5 (29... b6 30. Nd7 $14) 30. Nd7 $1 exd4 31. Rxd4 Ne6 32. Rxd5 {White is a pawn up now. The conversion is by no means simple, but Swapnil manages to pull it through.} Rc4 33. a5 Rb4 34. h4 g5 35. h5 $1 { [%csl Rf5][%cal Gh4h5,Gd7f5] Fixing the pawn on h6.} Kg7 36. Ne5 Nf8 37. Nd3 Rb3 38. Nc5 Rb1 39. Ne4 b6 40. Nd6 $1 bxa5 41. Rxa5 {Now the f7 pawn is weak and Nf5+ is in the air. Black will lose another pawn.} Nd7 42. Nf5+ Kh7 43. Ra6 g4 (43... Rb6 44. Rxb6 Nxb6 45. g4 $18 {This looks like a winning knight endgame.}) 44. Rxh6+ Kg8 45. Ra6 Ne5 46. Ra5 f6 47. Ra4 Kh7 48. Ra7+ Kh8 49. Nh6 f5 50. Nf7+ $1 {This simplifies the game into a winning rook endgame.} Nxf7 51. Rxf7 Rb5 52. h6 Re5 53. Kf1 Kg8 54. Rg7+ Kh8 55. Kg2 Re6 56. Rg5 Rf6 57. e4 fxe4 58. Rxg4 Re6 59. Kf1 e3 60. f3 e2+ 61. Ke1 Re3 62. Rf4 Kh7 63. Rf6 Re5 64. g4 Re3 65. g5 Re5 66. f4 Re7 67. f5 Re5 68. Rf7+ Kg8 69. g6 Re8 70. f6 Ra8 71. h7+ Kh8 72. Rf8+ Rxf8 73. g7+ {A very nice finish, in the style of Philidor's quote - pawns are the soul of chess!} 1-0

The Catalan: A complete repertoire for White!

The Catalan is one of the most solid openings for White. It forms part of the large and strong fianchetto family in which White builds his strategy mainly around the bishop on g2. The current DVD covers all of Black’s replies to the Catalan, some of which can even transpose to other openings such as the Tarrasch System and the Queen’s Indian. The author’s idea is, as it was in previous DVDs he has published in this area, to help White against all classical setups for Black. Though the DVD is aimed at players of the white pieces, it still might be useful for those who have Black so that they will better understand the coming threats. It would make little sense to mention all the strong players who include the Catalan in their repertoire. Suffice it to say that the Catalan rules! Video running time: 5 hours 29 minutes.

More...

SS: How was it to have Vishy Anand playing in the same tournament?

SD: I was very excited to know that Vishy Anand was going to play. It would be the first time I was going to play in the same tournament as him. I didn't miss my chance to take a selfie with him [smiles]! He is a very humble and down to earth human being which I really admire about him. He is always calm during the game, something that every player should learn. He is a true inspiration for us all.

How can one pass the chance of taking a selfie with the five-time World Champion!

SS: Magnus won the tournament when he came with his girlfriend to the event. Are you thinking on these lines for future events?!

Carlsen with Synne Kristin Larsen — secret for his success? | Chess.com/Maria Emelianova

SD: Magnus won the tournament because he is a very strong player. First I have to focus on improving my game then start thinking along these lines [laughs]. I still make a lot mistakes!

 SS: Do you think this is the revival of your chess career and that you can now dream of 2600 and beyond?

SD: Yes this performance has really charged me up. I don't want to go too far but 2600 has been at the back of my mind for a long time. I hope to reach there soon.

Swapnil's next tournament will be the National Premier Championship beginning from the 27th of October 2017. It would be interesting to see if he can repeat his performance and give B. Adhiban, the top seed of the event, a run for his money!

Swapnil S. Dhopade | Photo: Chess.com/Maria Emelianova


These interviews of Indian players were originally published on ChessBase India. By bringing forth the stories of successful achievers ChessBase India hopes to give the young talents in India and all over the world an insight into what it means to be performing well at the highest level. True to its tagline it is trying to Power chess in India.

Links



Sagar Shah is an International Master from India with two GM norms. He is also a chartered accountant and would like to become the first CA+GM of India. He loves to cover chess tournaments, as that helps him understand and improve at the game he loves so much. He is the co-founder of the ChessBase India website.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/20/2017 05:05
@ Magic_Knight :

Don't get so excited !!

Especially as, in your last post, your positions seem to be quite close from mine...

I developed the question of Sagar Shah's enthusiasm only because you seemed to consider that the content of Sagar Shah's articles were biased, while I think that the problem is only about the relative quantity of "Indian articles". My meaning was only that it isn't clear that there is such a problem with the contents of these articles, but only with the fact that they are to numerous, in comparison with other similar articles. And my developments about Sagar Shah's enthusiasm were only there as a part of my reasoning on this subject.

About your last post, the gist of it seems to be, in my opinion, that Sagar Shah's articles about Indian players are indeed to numerous, and that, for you, the solution must be to have no more such articles. Indeed, explained like that, the choice of a solution is a matter of tastes, or of opinion ; as for myself, if ChessBase would publish a comparable quantity of articles about chess in other countries, it would suits me quite well, but it is quite possible also to simply prefer all these "countries-oriented" articles to disappear. Once more, it is a question of tastes, or of opinions...
Magic_Knight Magic_Knight 10/20/2017 03:26
Why do you seem to fixate yourself on the topic of "enthusiasm"?? For the second time I'm telling you this - it is not what I'm contesting. He can be as enthusiastic as he wants! Just don't publish so many indian articles on a general chessbase site. It has nothing to do with enthusiasm!

Yes, he has published ONE article on a chinese player Ding Liren.....but that was just one article about a non-indian player compared to maybe 6 or more (I can't keep count) other articles published on his native indian players. To say that Sagar isn't biased toward his native country of india is either naieve of you OR you're simply in denial. Just simple peruse through his countless articles about indian chess players.

Let me conclude once again by reminding you AGAIN the argument as nothing to do with enthusiasm!!!!
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/20/2017 12:19
@ Magic_Knight :

"(...) you're digressing from the point."

I must say that I don't agree on this !

In general, we agree on the fact that the balance between "Indian articles" and articles about chess in other countries is rather lopsided on ChessBase.

The difference is that you think that the heart of the problem is that there are to many "Indian articles" on ChessBase, whereas I consider that the best solution to this problem would be that ChessBase would publish the (approximate) same number of articles on chess in other countries, in comparison with the Indian-themed articles.

My reasoning is this : If Sagar Shah has a significant tendency to be quite enthusiastic about a whole variety of themes (I gave you as an example the article about Ding Liren), the problem isn't about the CONTENTS of Sagar Shah's "Indian articles" but about their NUMBER : it isn't possible to say he is biased about Indian chess and Indian players because he is enthusiastic about them, if he is very frequently enthusiastic about many other things.

You could perfectly well try to demonstrate that he is more (or even much more) enthusiastic about "Indian themes" that about anything else, but, for the moment, you didn't do that...

You could also perfectly well try to demonstrate that enthusiasm isn't a good thing in ANY chess article, but you didn't do that either for the moment...

So, for the moment, I consider that your positions on this matters aren't perfectly coherent...
Magic_Knight Magic_Knight 10/19/2017 04:33
Petrarlsen - you're digressing from the point. No one (including me) has any objections to enthusiasm. In fact, we all appreciated enthusiasm....when it is expressed in the appropriate place. Going back to the point of the argument: sagar's enthusiastic glorifying of indian chess is perfectly fine, when it is on a dedicated indian chessbase site as he has started. But when on the general chessbase site as we have here, then he needs to be more objective and shouldn't simply be writing articles praising indian chess day in & day out.
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/17/2017 11:05
@ Magic_Knight : "(...) the shear abundance of articles written by Sagar about re: the "success" of indian chess players makes it clearly obvious his biases."

But, if the same number of articles were published about chess in other countries, I don't see in which way the result would be biased ??

Yes, Sagar Shah's articles are quite enthusiastic about Indian players, but it must also be taken into account that, in my opinion, Sagar Shah is in general rather an enthusiastic person ; for example, in the article that I cited in my last post on this page about Ding Liren, it is quite possible, in my opinion, to perceive a real enthusiasm from Sagar Shah about Ding Liren, and Ding Liren isn't at all an Indian !

And, notably with the Elo ratings and rating performances, it is easy for everyone to have a clear and precise idea of the real level of performance of a given player, so, even with a particularly enthusiastic article, everyone can see everything exactly as it is ; it isn't at all, for example, as for music or painting, where it is MUCH more difficult to have an objective idea on the real value of the works of a given artist ; in chess, it is possible for everyone to evaluate everything rather easily. So, in my opinion, a certain dose of enthusiasm isn't really a problem for a chess article !

So I maintain that, for me, it would be quite a satisfying solution simply to have more articles about chess in other countries !...
Magic_Knight Magic_Knight 10/17/2017 10:33
Petrarlsen - The two articles you cited below on the Chinese players yes they were not by Sagar. So unless they were written by a Chinese author then I can't discount the objectivity of them (as the way Sagar's articles are). Furthermore, the shear abundance of articles written by Sagar about re: the "success" of indian chess players makes it clearly obvious his biases. Again, I can't emphasize enough that he is good at reporting....but I still stand by my same opinion that it would be appropriate for these indian-biased articles to be posted on the indian chessbase site.
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/17/2017 07:43
@ Magic_Knight :

Also, even if still completely maintain that I would like more articles about players of other countries, it is necessary to give Sagar Shah his due : his recent article about Ding Liren (http://en.chessbase.com/post/who-is-ding-liren) was excellent ; very interesting. But, personally, I would like to see more articles like this one !
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/17/2017 07:34
@ Magic_Knight :

Indeed, globally, what I would really like would be to have more ChessBase articles about players of other countries. Not less from India, but more from elsewhere !
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/17/2017 07:16
@ Magic_Knight :

As a preamble, I'm not Indian and I haven't any link with India whatsoever, so I have no specific reason to be biased in favor of Indian players, Indian chess, etc. !...

It is also necessary to distinguish the question of this specific article and the general question of the "Indian-linked" articles on ChessBase.

In my last post, my one and only meaning was that, for this specific tournament, to publish an article on the Indian players was objectively justified. And I DO indeed think it was justified : as the US and English federations had less players, globally, than just the total of GMs + IMs from the Indian federation, and as, for the German federation, there were not a single 2600+ GMs (let alone 2700+ or 2800+ GMs...), if an article about a specific national delegation was published, it was necessarily about the Indian delegation, in my opinion.

As for the more general question of the "Indian-themed" articles on ChessBase, in my opinion, the possible problem isn't that these articles are too numerous (I find them quite interesting, even if I haven't any link with India, and everyone can choose which article he wants to read), but rather that, proportionally, there are probably not enough articles on players from other countries.

Even if, when you say : "If Sagar wrote the same kind of article about the up & coming Chinese players (Wei Yi, Ding Liren, Yu Yangyi, etc) then one could truly believe that it was genuine and free of bias", it isn't in fact completely true : I remember, for example, that when Wei Yi became a GM, and when, after this, he passed the "2600 barrier", there were articles about it (http://en.chessbase.com/post/wei-yi-has-become-the-youngest-gm-in-the-world-010313, and http://en.chessbase.com/post/wei-yi--youngest-2600-gm-ever-011113). Yes, it wasn't Sagar Shah that wrote them, but they were on ChessBase, so the result was the same : we could read two articles about Wei Yi's achievements...
Magic_Knight Magic_Knight 10/17/2017 02:28
Petrarlsen, while what you have stated here is true.....the reason (if you've been reading chessbase.com long enough) is simpler than that --> Sagar is simply reporting/publishing in praise of his own country. So much so all the regular visitors here took notice and so he was pressured to start his own "chessbase india" website recently. Which is why I don't know articles like this one is still popping up on the general chessbase proper website.

Macauley, as I stated before...no disrespect for Sagar as I know he is a well-credited reporter in his own right. However, you have to consider that being this is chessbase.com (non-country specific) then the articles shown here should not be heavily in favor of any country....ESPECIALLY when the writer is from that respective country. Thereby giving reasonable suspicion for bias & as a result giving doubt over the true objectivity of the article. For example: If Sagar wrote the same kind of article about the up & coming Chinese players (Wei Yi, Ding Liren, Yu Yangyi, etc) then one could truly believe that it was genuine and free of bias. I think all of this goes without say.
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/17/2017 10:58
In fact, there is a quite simple reason for a specific article on the Indian players at the Isle of Man : the number of players and the numbers of GMs and IMs by federation.

There were 4 federations with more than 10 players participating :

- USA : 15 players, with 7 GMs and 6 IMs (GMs + IMs = 13 players).

- ENG : 19 players, with 5 GMs and 6 IMs (GMs + IMs = 11 players).

- GER : 28 players, with 5 GMs and 7 IMs (GMs + IMs = 12 players).

- IND : 30 players, with 12 GMs and 9 IMs (GMs + IMs = 21 players).

So the Indian chess federation is the first by number of players, with more than two times more GMs than the second one, the German chess federation. And the number of GMs + IMs is nearly the same for the USA, Germany, and England, while, for India, it is nearly twice the numbers of these three other federations. Also, the number of GMs + IMs for India is superior to the total number of players for England and for the USA ; only Germany has a total number of players superior to the number of Indian GMs + IMs. So the Indian chess federation is clearly the first federation as for the total number of players and of GMs and IMs.

And so, there is also an objective reason for a specific coverage of the Indian players' results.
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/16/2017 04:10
@ drcloak : I quite agree that, most of the time, the top-GMs seem to decline after 40 or 45.

But what I meant was precisely that, as, normally, a top-GM "shouldn't" still be at a 2750+ level after 45, it is a real feat to succeed in staying at such a level at this age !

Yes, for example, I find very impressive to see Praggnanandhaa becoming the youngest ever 2500+ IM, or Wei Yi becoming the youngest ever 2700+ GM, but I find also quite equally impressive the fact that Anand manages to stay in the "2750+ zone" several years after 45, when the oldest other 2750+ GM, Kramnik, is only 42.

I don't know for sure, but I think it is even possible that Anand would be the oldest ever player to keep a 2750+ rating... I find it a pity that no-one ever speak of that !

For me, disparaging words on the fact that Anand continues playing at this level at his age means more or less the same thing as if people had criticized Wei Yi for becoming a 2700+ GM at 15, stating that he was "too young" ; in my opinion, it is simply nonsense : if you play at this level, it means that you deserve to be a "top-level player" ; there is nothing more to add...

And the fact that a player stays longer at the highest level means : 1) That he will left more high-level games, and (perhaps more importantly still...) : 2) That he will left games against younger opponents, against whom he would normally not have played. (For example, if Anand would have retired from competitive chess at 40, he would never have played against a 2800+ Caruana, a 2800+ So, or a 2800+ Vachier-Lagrave. And perhaps not even at all either against a 2800+ Carlsen. And I find it very interesting that we can have these games between top-players of quite different generations, personnally...)
macauley macauley 10/16/2017 11:33
@Magic_Knight & KevinConnor - Constructive feedback is always welcome, but I'm a bit baffled by this sentiment. This is a well-crafted article about the former World Champion, and potential future-champions, which contains first-hand interviews with all participants and lucidly annotated games! We'd be mad not to publish it! There could be a very slightly increased percentage of articles related to India in some way due to our commercial relationship with ChessBase India, but it is certainly very slight. If you disagree, I'd encourage you to flesh out your argument in concrete terms and send the feedback to us via the "feedback to the editors" link (http://en.chessbase.com/feedback). Comments on this post specifically should remain on-topic. Thanks!
hserusk hserusk 10/16/2017 10:50
@KevinConnor, Thanks for such an informative, knowledgeable and lucid comment. Classy and elegant indeed.
KevinConnor KevinConnor 10/16/2017 08:26
Just click bait all those rubbish articles on Indian chess! But I guess that's what's important to Karsten Mueller and the rest of Chessbase!
drcloak drcloak 10/16/2017 08:07
@Petrarlsen

Mental acuity declines with age. There is a bell curve to show this. There are rare exceptions to this rule (Anand, Kramnik, Korchnoi) but for most mortals, once you pass a certain age; chess skills diminish. The same goes for athletic sports. How come there are no 45 year old American Football players? Why aren't there 50 year olds competing in MMA?
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/16/2017 08:07
About Anand, in the article : "One could say he was a tad lucky with the pairings, but he did make most of the chances offered to him."

Slightly lucky as for his tournament's ranking, yes, but his very good 2806 rating performance can't have anything to do with luck. And I think for example that to be 2nd with a 2806 performance, as Anand, is being less lucky than to be 4th with a 2660 performance, as Kramnik.

About Kramnik, it could really be said that he was lucky to be 4th with such a performance (the next player with a less than 2700 performance was Rodshtein, who was only 13th), while, as there where only 4 2800+ performances in the tournament (Carlsen, Anand, Nakamura, and Caruana), Anand's ranking was only marginally due to luck, in my opinion : he could have been 3d or 4th, but not more, whereas Kramnik could for example have been 10th without it being surprising at all, with such a performance rating... Even if, by the way, Kramnik nonetheless succeeded in making a splendid comeback in the last six games of this tournament (5 wins with only 1 draw and no losses) after his disastrous first three games (...2 losses out of 3 games !...).
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/16/2017 07:32
Erratum : When I wrote : "Anand is 47 ; the oldest 2750+ player, Kramnik, is 42", I meant : "Anand is 47 ; the oldest 2750+ player besides him, Kramnik, is 42".
Samuel Siltanen Samuel Siltanen 10/16/2017 06:59
More than every 6th person on Earth is Indian. I think that with these kind of articles Indian chess gets the attention it deserves. In comparison, US championships get a Chessbase article, although only every 23th person is American.
ulyssesganesh ulyssesganesh 10/16/2017 05:53
well done vidit! you were so close to catch him!!!
ulyssesganesh ulyssesganesh 10/16/2017 05:46
vishy must continue playing.....as long he has faith in his abilities .......even the game he lost against the Canadian GM, was due to vishy's making an ambitious (unnecessary) sacrifice of his knight.....he made a similar unnecessary exchange sac against carlsen in one of his world cup games ...... he played a hara kiri variation against nakamura (playing black) and lost quickly in the previous candidates ....where he had serious chances of winning it ..... i think what vishy needs is a chess psychologist/mentor...
SmartShark SmartShark 10/16/2017 05:00
Sagar writes with passion about Indian chess. His articles end up being so good that Chessbase wants to include them on the general website. That's not Sagar's fault at all. Maybe if we had more enthusiastic writers for other countries, their articles would be included. I like Sagar's articles. Chessbase is a free website for the most part. I find it laughable that people want free content and then whine about it. Maybe be willing to pay a $10 subscription fee a month and then Chessbase can pay better so more writers would be willing to contribute. Until then, you will have writers from countries like India, where the Dollar to Rupee or Pound to Rupee conversion rate will help Chessbase keep its content free and also ensure its writers are paid reasonably as per their own currency standards.
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 10/15/2017 09:26
In my opinion, saying that Anand HAS to retire from competitive chess is really completely absurd !

If he wasn't motivated anymore by the game, it would evidently be quite a different story, but as such isn't obviously the case, why would he retire ??

And, furthermore, his results haven't significantly slumped at all ; this isn't at all true : for each one of his World Titles from 2007 to 2012, he was in the 2750 to 2800 points "Elo zone". And on the last official list, he is 2783 : still in the same "Elo zone".

Also, in both the Sinquefield Cup and the Isle of Man Open, his performance rating was above 2800 (and, in the Sinquefield Cup, it must be noted that his performance rating - 2868 - was ABOVE the World n° 1 - Carlsen - rating, so he is still quite capable to play "absolute top-level" chess).

From time to time, it is true that he has a somewhat less good tournament, but why would it be a problem ? What really counts is only that he is still regularaly able to give us splendid results and splendid games... we wouldn't have all this if he would retire now !!

If, for example, an top-engineer can continue until the age of 60, 65, 70..., why would a chess player necessarily have to stop top-level chess at 40 or 45 ?? And, also, why wouldn't it be as interesting to manage to stay at the absolute top-level longer than everyone else than to obtain this level sooner than the other players (as Wei Yi, for example...) ? Anand is 47 ; the oldest 2750+ player, Kramnik, is 42 ; to be able to stay at this level at his age is a real feat, and it is a pity that the chess world isn't really fully giving Anand his due for that...

As for me, I hope that he will continue to play top-level chess for quite a long time still !!
Magic_Knight Magic_Knight 10/15/2017 08:37
Because of one person in particular --> Sagar Shah.

In my opinion, this article should be published only on chessbase india and not on the general chessbase site. It's clearly biased toward Indians as most of his online articles are, you'll find.

No disrespect to Sagar, but I just the abundance of his indian-biased articles should not be on the general website.
daftarche daftarche 10/15/2017 07:32
because they perform well and there is also india chessbase.
KevinConnor KevinConnor 10/15/2017 06:53
Why is there so much attention for Indian chess on Chessbase?
1