Morten Lillören's misdemeanor
By Einar S. Einarsson
I am proud of having been able to promote the Icelandic Theory outlined by
Mr. G.G. Thórarinsson and working with him on this most interesting matter.
I have approched the project in my own capacity like a missionary as I believe
that his hypothesis are very sound and solid, based on great knowlegde, many
historical facts and likely scenarios.

The 12th century Lewis chessmen, with king, queen, and
bishop in the top row, knight, rook, and pawn in the bottom
I am also happy that his views on the origins of these unique masterpieces
is now well preserved in books like the "Chess Masterpieces", newspapers
and magazines around the world and on many Internet sites plus Wikipedia –
the free encyclopedia. Thórarinsson's honesty and credibility is
inpeccable and he is held in high esteem among our countrymen for his contribution
to the Icelandic society and the good of chess.
Words and expressions used by Mr. Lilleören about Mr. Thorarinsson, like
mud-slinging, aspersions, egregious, specious, idiosyncratic, flaccid, fallacy,
facile, purported, intenable, saying that he does not even make historical sense
and calling his work riddled with mistakes, omissions, unsupported assertions,
misused sources with questionaable conclursions, seem to me to be very arrogant
and distasteful, to put it mildly.

Skálholt in the Middle Ages
This is not a level of arguing for intellectual debate from my point of view
nor is this perhaps the right forum. Should Mr. Lilleören and his countrymen
like to organise a Symposium on the Enigma of the Lewis Chessmen in Norway,
preferably Trondheim, like Thórarinsson and I did last August in Skálholt
with the participation of learned scholars on the subject, among others Dr.
David H. Caldwell from the Scotland National Museums and James Robinson of the
British Museum, I know that Mr. Thórarinsson would be happy to participate
and adress every point in this article. I wonder way nobody from Norway participated
in our seminar, and neither in Edinburgh last year although they were invited.
Furthermore I would just like to add for information, that:
Experts from the British Museum and the Scotland National Museums have reiterated
that the Icelandic Theory on the possible origins of the fabulous Lewis walrus
ivory chessmen is as plausible as any other. Even Dr. David H. Caldwell, archeologist
and historian, keeper of the Lewis Chessmen at the NMS in Edinburgh and author
of the recent work "The Lewis Chessmen Unmasked" has commented in
the New York Times last August: "I have an open mind about where the chessmen
were made. We said Trondheim when we did our exibithion, but that was really
just a guess. Now some colleagues are saying Iceland, and maybe that is the
case. I have still to hear incontrovertible evidence for it“.
At the Skálholt Symposium on the subject last autumn Dr. Caldwell commented
further on how there was still a lot to learn and understand about the Lewis
Chessmen, including how and where they were discovered and where they were made.
He hoped that the symposium would encourage participants to devise ways of testing
new ideas, for example by research excavations at key sites like Skálholt.
That would of course be the ultimate proof as cuttings from walrus ivory fitting
the Lewis Chess pieces might be hidden in the ruins of the old workshop there
and it's scrap heap. Who know's?
The
Skálholt Symposium – Iceland 2011
On the origins of the Lewis Chessmen and the Icelandic Theory
The Agenda for the Lewis Chessmen Symposium held at Skálholt last August
included lectures delivered by three esteemed scholars from overseas: David
H. Caldwell from the National Museum of Scotland, Mark A. Hall, Perth Museum
and James Robinson of the British Museum. All have recently authored books on
the enigma of the Lewis Chessmen. The Icelandic lecturers apart from Gudmundur
G. Thórarinsson who expounded his new theory were Thor Magnusson, former
State Antiquary, Kristinn Olason, Dean of Skálholt and Skúli Saeland,
historian. Conference host: Einar S. Einarsson. Here are Gudmundur Thórarinsson's
conclusive words at the Skálholt Symposium:
Ladies and gentlemen: It is generally agreed upon that the Lewis chessmen are
made in the years 1150-1200. One of the pieces on the board is a bishop. Do
we know of any nation that used bishop as a chess peace at that time? Yes, the
Icelanders. That is confirmed in our old manuscripts. Do we know of any other
nation using bishop as a chess piece at that time? No we don't.
The Lewis chess set is probably the only chess set in the world where the
rooks are berserkers or soldiers. Do we know of any nation that used soldiers
as rooks on the chessboard at this time? Probably the Icelanders and now I am
referring to the soldier found last month in northern Iceland, probably a chess
piece, with remarkable likeness to the Lewis chess pieces. Do we know of any
other nation using soldiers as rooks? No we don't.
Did the Icelanders have wealth enough to develop the art of carving and decoration?
Yes, read our annals from this time.
Did the Icelanders have walrus teeth available at that time? Yes, read our
annals.
Did the Icelanders have skilled artists to carve artifact s of this quality?
Yes, read the biographies of our bishops, contemporary writings of that time.
I am fully aware of the difficulties presenting evidence from this time, looking
through the clouds of centuries. But I am fully satisfied if the Icelandic theory
is considered at least to be as likely as other theories of their possible origins
that have been presented.
 |
Dr. David H. Caldwell of the National Museum of Scotland
commented on how there was still a lot to learn and understand about the
Lewis Chessmen, including how and where they were discovered and where they
were made. He hoped that the symposium would encourage participants to devise
ways of testing new ideas, for example by research excavations at key sites
like Skálholt. Until 1266 the Isle of Lewis was part of the Kingdom
of the Isles, ruled by a Scandinavian dynasty of kings. He thought it was
likely that the chessmen belonged to an important individual in that kingdom,
and pointed to evidence for other high quality artefacts from the region. |
|
|
 |
James Robinson of the British Museum stressed the need
to interrogate historical sources accurately rather than imaginatively.
He questioned the value of hypothesizing about the origin of the Lewis hoard
without sufficient evidence and felt that we should rest assured in the
knowledge that they are an outstanding achievement of medieval Scandinavian
culture. Given the dominance of Norway in the Scandinavian world when the
chessmen were made and their links with both Greenland (settlement and trade)
and the Isle of Lewis (sovereign and ecclesiastical), Norway is most likely
to be the place of production for the hoard, although this does not discount
other possibilities. |
Previous articles on the Lewis Chessmen
 |
The Lewis Chessmen on a Fantasy Iceland
02.12.2011 – Oh dear. The Icelandic-Norwegian
war over the origin of the Lewis Chessmen – they are a collection of chess
pieces, handcrafted in the 12th century from walrus tusks and whale teeth
and discovered on the Isle of Lewis – continues with unabated (academic)
vigor. In this installment it is Norway's turn to claim heritage over
the chessmen. CCGM
Morten Lilleøren explains. |
 |
Lewis Chessmen Symposium at Skálholt, Iceland
01.08.2011 – In the nineteenth century a collection
of chessmen, handcrafted in the twelfth century, was found on the Isle
of Lewis, and have become the most famous chess set in the world. This
year archaeologists discovered a new chess piece in Iceland, and the controversy
surrounding the exact origins of the Lewis Chessmen takes a new twist.
In August you can attend a symposium
on the subject. |
 |
On the origins of the Lewis Chessmen – A reply
31.03.2011 – Gudmundur. G. Thórarinsson, the
author behind the main material in The
Enigma of the Lewis Chessmen, a discussion on the origins of the world's
most famous chess set, was dismayed at the belligerent tone in an article
seeking to refute his hypotheses regarding its Icelandic roots. He replies
here and adds 'the potency of these arguments necessitates formidable
counter arguments'. |
 |
Norwegian-Icelandic war over the Lewis Chessmen?
05.03.2011 – Last year we
published an article on the famous Lewis Chessmen. The two Icelandic
authors claimed that the pieces were carved in their country. "With few
reservations parts of the chess world have adopted this theory," writes
Morten Lilleøren of Norway, who finds the article "filled with faults
and oversights." Lilleøren sets out to correct the facts and prove: the
Lewis Chessmen are from Norway. |
 |
The enigma of the Lewis chessmen
11.09.2010 – In 1831, in Edinburgh, Scotland,
a collection of chessmen found on the Isle of Lewis was displayed for
the first time. These 12th century handcrafted pieces made from walrus
tusks and whale teeth have since become iconic examples of our lasting
love for wargames. Their origins, however, is one of theory and controversy.
Here is an illustrated article on the world's
most famous chess set. |
Copyright
Einarsson/ChessBase