The last checkmate?

11/9/2010 – At the recent Chess Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk the team from Israel, one of the smallest nations, took Bronze, close behind the winners Ukraine and Russia. Not the first in a remarkable series of successes – but one which national chess captain Alon Greenfeld is sadly convinced will never be replicated. He explains the reasons for his pessimism in a well-written Jerusalem Post article.

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!


Along with the ChessBase 14 program you can access the Live Database of 8 million games, and receive three months of free ChesssBase Account Premium membership and all of our online apps! Have a look today!

More...

The last checkmate?

By David Horovitz

Jews are astoundingly over-represented in the pantheon of world chess greats, and today’s Israel is no chess-playing minnow. But on paper, the Jewish state could not reasonably have been expected to get near the medal podium at either Dresden, Germany 2008 or Khanty-Mansiysk, Russia 2010. Instead, it is the only country to have won a medal at both events – coming third to Ukraine, with Russia in second, this time, and losing out to Armenia, with the US in third place, two years ago.


The bronze medal team from Israel in Khanty-Mansiysk, with Ilia Smirin, Captain Alon
Greenfeld, Victor Mikhalevski, Emil Sutovsky, Maxim Rodshtein and Boris Gelfand

Israel really shouldn’t have had a chance, especially after, early in the tournament, it could only tie with the relatively weak Indonesians and then lost to host Russia’s third side. But the fantastic collective spirit pulled the team through, said Alon Greenfeld, the non-playing captain of the Israel team. And a constructive “collective spirit” in chess, which is an utterly individual sport, he elaborated, is a rare and precious commodity indeed. There was an almost “euphoric” readiness to give everything for the team in Russia, Greenfeld exalted, an all-for-one and one-for-all mindset that saw Israel reel off an improbable sequence of five straight victories, several against very strong nations like Holland, Hungary and the US, to claim the bronze spot.

Local headlines from the tournament focused largely on Yemen’s refusal to play against Israel – a no-show that gave the team an automatic first round victory. That early unearned win didn’t particularly help; it meant the players had no easy match in which to get acclimatized. Far more worryingly, it exposed the ongoing anti-Israeli politics that the international chess authorities allow to afflict the sport, he said – a virus that reached its height in 2004, when the authorities selected Libya to host the individual world championships and, entirely predictably but utterly disgracefully, Israel players were unable to participate.

He’s even more upset, though, by his inability to make headway, either, in combating what he sees as the inadequate way Israel handles its chess players – unique assets who, he says, have over the years won more medals and championships for the country than any other sport, and yet who are given desultory levels of funding. Increasingly, he says, the top players are resorting to coaching, usually overseas, in order to support themselves. Three of the five Olympiad stars are now headed in that direction. And he won’t be able to pick them, by definition, he says, if their main focus is on helping others rather than playing and improving their own game.

His solution: The nation’s top ten or so players should be paid a moderate salary, which would include an obligation to make themselves available for international team tournaments. It’s an enviable opening gambit by an astute chess tactician, but Greenfeld has been around for long enough on the local chess scene to know he has little chance of winning this particular game.

...

HOW IS it, I ask Greenfeld, that Israel is a major player on the world chess stage in the first place? Is it, I venture, some kind of Jewish thing? Well, kind of… The sabra former champion initially offers a one-word answer: aliya. Which he then expands to a six word answer: Aliya from the former Soviet Union.

Throughout the past decade, in all team competitions, Israel has been in or around the top ten, he says, and that’s despite what the state gives to chess. Before the aliya wave, Israel also ranked somewhere between seven and 11, but the world field was weaker in those days; for one thing, there was just a single Soviet Union, whereas now it has split up into at least seven chess powers.

Israel’s entire team at the Olympiad in Russia was made up of immigrants. And by the way, he adds, most of the players in the US team are of Soviet background too. The Ukrainian team that won just now? Two Jews. The Russian team? Greenfeld knows of one Jew, for sure, and thinks there could be another.

Look back into chess history and Jews are everywhere. “Jews were very dominant until the 60s and 70s,” he says. Incredibly, staggeringly dominant, actually. Of the sport’s first eight official world champions, from 1886 to 1961, a dazzling four were Jewish: Wilhelm Steinitz (the Pragueborn “father of modern chess” and first official world champion), Emanuel Lasker (his Prussian successor who held the title for a still unrivaled 27 years), Mikhail Botvinnik and Mikhail Tal. And that quartet were the kings of the world for about 50 of those 75 years. Since then, we’ve also had Fischer – though he denied his Jewishness – and Garry Kasparov, who held the title from 1985 to 2000 and is still widely regarded as the greatest ever player. “As in other fields, in the Diaspora, they had to excel to succeed,” posits Greenfeld. “It’s the same in music, of course.”

But that overwhelmingly, absurdly disproportionate dominance suggests there must be something more to the phenomenon, something about chess itself that resonates particularly with the Jews, with the Jewish condition? Greenfeld doesn’t really think so. “If so, it’s very deep,” he offers after a long pause. “Most of the [top Israeli] players don’t have a real connection to Judaism – not knowledge, not observance. If it’s something genetic? I don’t know.”

  • Read the rest of this thoughtful article here.

Nations ranked by the average rating of top ten players + top twenty Israelis

# Country Aver. GMs IMs Titled
1 Russia 2731 203 474 1982
2 Ukraine 2699 74 193 450
3 China 2652 27 19 102
4 France 2651 42 88 322
5 Israel 2642 35 48 149
6 USA 2640 69 116 532
7 India 2639 23 71 194
8 Hungary 2634 46 106 394
9 Azerbaijan 2632 18 15 66
10 Armenia 2631 32 19 74
11 Germany 2629 76 211 1134
12 Poland 2629 32 90 300
13 Bulgaria 2628 31 52 120
14 Netherlands 2624 24 75 272
15 England 2606 37 57 232
16 Georgia 2604 25 35 103
17 Spain 2595 34 99 433
18 Cuba 2593 17 41 263
19 Serbia 2590 52 99 513
20 Czech Rep. 2580 25 69 241
 # Name Ti. Rtng born
 1  Gelfand, Boris  g  2741  1968
 2  Sutovsky, Emil  g  2695  1977
 3  Smirin, Ilia  g  2654  1968
 4  Rodshtein, Maxim  g  2649  1989
 4  Roiz, Michael  g  2649  1983
 6  Avrukh, Boris  g  2625  1978
 7  Postny, Evgeny  g  2604  1981
 8  Mikhalevski, Victor  g  2602  1972
 9  Erenburg, Sergey  g  2600  1983
 10  Huzman, Alexander  g  2598  1962
 11  Golod, Vitali  g  2582  1971
 12  Alterman, Boris  g  2569  1970
 13  Greenfeld, Alon  g  2564  1964
 14  Kogan, Artur  g  2535  1974
 15  Nabaty, Tamir  m  2529  1991
 16  Psakhis, Lev  g  2524  1958
 17  Kosashvili, Yona  g  2520  1970
 18  Yudasin, Leonid  g  2519  1959
 19  Oratovsky, Michael  g  2517  1974
 20  Gofshtein, Leonid  g  2513  1953

Source: FIDE


Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register