
The hour of the holy men
By Siegfried Hornecker
The Dutch chess composer and former world-class practical player Jan Hendrik Timman is a fan of checkmates by bishop, as can be seen in the announcement to his 65th birthday composing tourney, still open for submissions until July 1st.

Jan Timman analysing endgames with Yochanan Afek in 2005
Coincidentally, we will look in the next two months at studies where a bishop is the hero of the day. Of course, we have incidences where a real reverend was such a hero, such as Fernando Saavedra or Henry Loveday, but here we talk about the chess piece. As a small gift to Timman we will today have three joint studies of the month with a theme from his birthday tourney – the checkmate of the bishop and the fight against it.
David Bronstein had a brillant, yet unconvential, mind. A chess composer with the first half of his last name can claim the same for himself.
Vladimir Bron (1909-1985) was according to Wikipedia a scientist in Sverdlovsk, “one of the leading scientists of the refractory materials industry”. The German Wikipedia, naming Russian sources, calls him a doctor of engineering, having published not only a large number of chess studies and received the title of grandmaster for chess composition, but also over 150 scientific studies.
1.g7+! 1.Ba3+? Kg7! 2.Bf3 2.d5? Nxh1 3.Bb2+ Kxg6 4.Bxh8 h2 5.Be5 Ng3!-+ 2...h2 3.d5 Kxg6= 1...Bxg7 1...Kxg7 2.d5+ 2.Bf3+- 2...Kg6 2...Kg8 3.Bxh8 Nxh1 4.d6!+- 3.Bxh8 Nxh1 4.Be5+- 2.Ba3+ Kf7 3.Bd5+ Kg6! 4.Kf2 Nh1+! 4...Bxd4+ 5.Kxg3 h5 5...Be5+ 6.Kf3! h2 6...h5 7.Be4+ Kh6 8.Bc1++- 7.Be4+! Kg5 8.Be7+ Bf6 9.Bxf6+ Kxf6 10.Kf4+- 6.Be4++- 5.Bxh1 5.Ke3? Bxd4+ 6.Kxd4 Nf2 7.Ke3 Nxg4+ 8.Kf4 h5= 5.Ke3 Ng3 6.Kf2 Nh1+ 5...Bxd4+ 6.Kg3 Be5+ 7.Kh4! 7.Kxh3? h5 8.Be4+ Kg5! 9.Bc1+ 9.Be7+ Bf6 10.Bxf6+ Kxf6 9...Bf4 10.Bxf4+ Kxf4 11.gxh5 Kg5= 7...Bf6+! 8.Kxh3 h5 9.Be4+ Kh6 9...Kg5 10.Bc1# 10.g5+! Bxg5 10...Kxg5 11.Bc1# 11.Bf8# 1–0 - Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Bron,V | - | | - | 1–0 | 1967 | | Rustaveli MT 1967, 3rd special prize | |
Please, wait...
 You probably know that you can move pieces on our replay boards to analyse, and even start an engine to help you. You can maximize the replayer, auto-play, flip the board and even change the piece style in the bar below the board. At the bottom of the notation window on the right there are buttons for editing (delete, promote, cut lines, unannotate, undo, redo) save, play out the position against Fritz and even embed our JavaScript replayer on your web site or blog. Hovering the mouse over any button will show you its function. |
The Russian word “korol” means “king”. Of course the king of chess composers, at least by his name, must be Korolkov then. His study from Trud 1935 is very famous, but despite that I want to reproduce it as there might be someone who has indeed not seen it yet.
Vladimir Korolkov (1907-1987), son of a railroad engineer, was an electrical engineer, working in the legendary Kirov plant. He was, as the German Wikipedia tells us, citing Russian sources written by Korolkov himself, married to a rather unknown chess player, who however was twice Soviet Women Champion: Olga Semenova Tyan-Shanskaya. She was Master of Sport, a title given in the Soviet Union to extraordinary sports(wo)men.
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
1.d7! 1.Rb1? e2-+ 1.Rf7+? Kxf7 2.Ba6 Bd8 3.Kf4 3.Kf3 Bb6 4.g4 4.Bc4+ Kf6 5.Ke2 a5-+ 4...Ke6 5.g5 Kxd6 6.g6 Ke6-+ 3...Bb6 4.Kf5 e2 5.Bxe2 a5 6.Bc4+ Ke8 7.Ke4 a4 8.Kf3 Kd7-+ 1...Ke7 2.Rb8! 2.d8Q+? Kxd8 3.Rb8 Bxg3 4.Ra8 4.Kxg3 f1Q 5.Ba6+ Kc7 6.Rc8+ Kd7 4...Bb8! 5.Ba6 Kc7 6.Kh3 f1Q+ 7.Bxf1 Kb7= 8.Bg2?? e2-+ 2...Bxg3! 2...f1Q? 3.d8Q+ Kxd8 4.Ba6+ Kc7 5.Bxf1 Kxb8 6.gxh4+- 3.Ra8! 3.Kxg3? f1Q 4.d8Q+ Kxd8 5.Ba6+ Kc7 6.Rb7+ Kc8 7.Rb6+ 7.Rxa7+ Kb8 8.Rb7+ Ka8 7...Kc7 8.Rb7+ Kc8 9.Rxa7+ Kb8 10.Rb7+ Ka8= 3...f1Q 3...Bb8 4.Ba6+- 4.Rxb8? f1Q 5.d8Q+ Kxd8 6.Ba6+ Kc7= 4.d8Q+ Kxd8 5.Ba6+ Bb8! 6.Bxf1 6.Rxb8+? Kc7= 6...Kc7 7.Ba6 7.Be2? Kb7 8.Bf3 e2!= 7...e2! 8.Bxe2 Kb7 9.Bf3! Kxa8 9...a6!? 10.Bxc6+!+- 10.Bxc6# 1–0 - Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Korolkov,V | - | | - | 1–0 | 1935 | | Trud 1935, 1st prize | |
Please, wait...
The last selection of this month will show the battle against the bishops, a checkmate can only happen at a wrong move, but there is a highly tense battle worth watching. The composing hero is one that almost became unsung. Interestingly, the study took the second prize in the very same tourney.
Sergey Kaminer (1906-1938) also was engineer in the chemical industry. He was the earliest chess composer of the modern Soviet period, but his story is a rather sad one. One day in autumn 1937, when Botvinnik played the USSR championship against Levenfish in the hotel “National” in Moscow, Sergey Kaminer appeared after a phone call, gave Botvinnik his notebook in case something happens to him and with this took care that his studies were preserved. Unfortunately, the prediction turned out to be true, as those were the years of Stalin’s mass murder known as the “Great Purge”, to which Kaminer fell victim in 1938.
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
1.h7 Bh5 2.Nf4‼ 2.h8Q? Bxg6+ 3.Ka1 Be7! 3...Bf8 4.Nf3 Bg7+ 5.Ne5++- 4.Nf3 Bf6+ 5.Ne5+ Ke7= 2.Nh4? Kg7‼= 2...gxf4 2...Kg7 3.Nxh5++- 3.h8Q Bg6+ 4.Ka1 Be7! 5.Nf3 Bf6+ 6.Ne5+ Ke7 7.Qh4‼ Bxh4 8.Nxg6+ Kf6 9.Nxh4 1–0 - Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Kaminer,S | - | | - | 1–0 | 1935 | | Trud 1935, 2nd prize | |
Please, wait...
Of course, compared to the other two studies, this short battle might seem to lack in content, but it has an unexpected idea that in rare circumstances practical players can profit from. And of course isn’t such a move aesthetically highly pleasing?
Botvinnik kept the notebook, and it became one of the bases of the book “Selected Studies of Liburkin and Kaminer” by Kofman in 1981 (“Izbrannye etyudi Kaminera i Liburkina”, Fizkultura i Sport, Moscow 1981). I offer a good reward to anyone who can find the notebook of Kaminer and scan it to preserve the content permanently. Kaminer himself was rehabilitated by the USSR Supreme Court in 1956, but as a death sentence was carried out in 1938, this was mostly a symbolic act, one that could not restore the great talent, one possibly on par with the famous Soviet composers, undoubtedly destroyed by Stalin...
Reddit IAmA selection
From the Reddit IAmA here is a small selection of the questions that Yours Truly answered (shortened when necessary). The session is over, but you can always write questions into the ChessBase comments section, and if you’re lucky they will be read. And once in a blue moon they might even be replied to in the column. The same goes for your criticism.
Q: What is exactly a chess composer?
A: A chess composer is a person (at least, until computers manage to understand artistry) who creates chess puzzles, such as endgame studies (positions where a way to win or draw has to be found) or direct mates (positions where a checkmate in a specified number of moves has to be found). The positions might be similar to games but always should include an artisitic element, or in rare cases a contribution to endgame theory. An artistic element might be a paradox, for example, refusal to capture a piece or pawn.
Q: Have you ever considered doing the same for other abstract games (like Go, Hnefatafl etc.) or are you only composing for chess? And if so, why?
A: I understand only chess well enough to compose for it. Go is too difficult for me, and Shogi is too tactical, it amounts to just giving check each turn. Of course, there are fairy chess variations, but it is already difficult for me to compose for those, so I only compose for chess.
Q: What are your thoughts about endgame tablebases finding winning positions that take 500+ moves to mate? Does it have any effect on chess puzzles?
A: This is an excellent question that has been explored, of course, in extenso. The short answer is that tablebase positions, such as in the Nalimov and Lomonossov sets, are not regarded as anticipations to studies – or to chess compositions in general. The English founder of the magazine "EG", John Roycroft, has written an entire book about two such longest winning positions, trying to analyze them from a human point of view, and believes this to be contributing to endgame theory if someone actually takes the time to understand the endgames in-depth. He asks why one move fails but another not, or why two seemingly similar moves are different, so one must have a hidden defense somewhere. Of course, while that effort is to be lauded, I don't believe personally that such endgames, even with the narrative, can be generalized, to be made understandable in a general form for humans.
The effect it has on chess puzzles is more in the mutual zugzwang positions (abbreviated "mzz" or just "zz"). Those mzz positions can be easily "mined". Some composers are tempted to take such positions, add an introduction that leads to the position with either side to play, and publish this as an endgame study. But even in such cases, in my opinion all play before and after the mzz must be humanly understandable, i.e. it must be understandable why a situation is a zugzwang.
The other influence the tablebases had is that certain endgames that were deemed a draw, always or in special cases, now are shown to be always lost. A famous yet curious case is the endgame of KBB vs. KN (king and two bishops vs. king and knight) which was thought to be a draw by a fortress in certain situations, with the knight on b7. But the tablebases showed that the fortress can be broken and it can just be prevented to set it up on the other side of the board again, so the endgame is a general win. As a result of this, many studies have become unsound, i.e. defect, because the intended draw was none, or because there is another way to win now that is shown by the tablebases and was thought to be a draw back then.
 |
About the author
Siegfried Hornecker (*1986) is a German chess composer and member of the World Federation for Chess Composition, subcommitee for endgame studies. His autobiographical book "Weltenfern" (in English only) can be found on the ARVES website. He will present an interesting endgame study with detailed explanation each month.
|