Moscow Grand Prix R04: Mamedyarov wins and is 2801

by Albert Silver
5/16/2017 – It was another great round with tons of fighting chess. No sarcasm or irony in that statement either. All the players came ready to fight, and though the day ended with three decisive games, it could easily have been more since Ding Liren and Grischuk were both winning but drew in the end. Radjabov had not shown much fight for a while beat Vallejo but the game of the day was Mamedyarov's big win over Salem. Illustrated report with analysis by GM TIger Hillarp Persson.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Photos by Max Avdeev

Autograph hound

Hikaru Nakamura and Hou Yifan played an interesting game, which panned out to become a fairly standard King’s Indian Attack, with a tied up center, and both players trying to neuter each other on opposite wings.

Nakamura unleashed the King's Indian.... Attack!

Though the databases declare the novelty as of move 13, this is an opening that is more dictated by ideas than exact move orders. Hou showed excellent understanding, and managed to break through first on the queenside with black, and soon equalized in the center. The pieces came off and a draw was agreed on move 50.

Ding Liren came oh-so-close to winning a third game as he missed a win against Peter Svidler. The Chinese player has been in great form.

Ding Liren and Peter Svidler played a Symmetrical English that somehow did not work out for Black and he found himself down a pawn, always with not quite enough compensation. White then missed a chance to put the game away on move 22, which would have secured his lead, but alas, he missed his chance and they drew after 33 moves.

Ding Liren vs Peter Svidler

 

 

White had the chance to confirm his lead here, and would have after 22. Nb7! Qe5 23.Bxd4 Qxd4 24. Qc7! and now the threat of Qxe7 and Nd6 is deadly. (Note: you can move the pieces on the diagram)

It is always instructive to see how off the engines can be at times in an endgame, and few are as notorious as rook endgames. You may have heard the adage 'all rook endgames are drawn' an allusion to the number of times a saving maneuver has been found to save what seemed a lost position. Such was the case in the game betwwen Alexander Grischuk and Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. Of course, to be fair, Grischuk actually was dead won  for a good chunk of the game. Consider this position after 32 moves:

Alexander Grischuk vs Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

 

Black just played 32…Qh3 with the ‘threat’ of Ng4 and mate on h2. That said, it isn’t actually a threat yet since if Black played it now, White has the slightly inconvenient Re8 checkmate! Therefore White can just play 33. Re3 here with the idea of Nf5 and take home the bacon. This is hardly the only winning position or move, and is merely to point out that yes, if after the game, over a glass of beer, White complains bitterly he ‘was winning’, it will be a statement of fact and not some comment mired in sour grapes.  

Alexander Grischuk tried his best to win today, and came very close as he was completely winning

All that said, White did not play best, and Black managed to stay alive in the game in a long and tough battle. The curiosity took place in the final position where the players shook hands:

 

 

Am I about to tell a tale of mistaken draw? Not quite. On Skype, Alex Yermolinsky sent a concerned message:

Needless to say, he is dead right, as were the players. The engines do indeed claim absurd values ranging from +2.13 for Komodo 10 to +6.01 for Stockfish 8 (even with 72 plies) … without tablebases that is. A quick consult of the Lomonosov 7-piece tablebases instantly disabuses this idea and declares it a flat out draw.

Ian Nepomniachtchi (above), playing black, challenged Michael Adams to a duel in a Sicilian Najdorf with 6.g3 that the Englishman is known to specialize in. White failed to find a consistent plan, offering to repeat moves, but Nepomniachtchi showed he had more ambitious ideas and soon outplayed Adams and won the game.

Pentala Harikrishna played a brave game as he spun out a Benoni lline that is sharp and not the most reputable

Ernesto Inarkiev vs Pentala Harikrishna (annotated by Tiger Hillarp-Persson)

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 This used to be the favoured move order of Modern Benoni aficionados like De Firmian, Suba and Vugar Gashimov. The point is to wait for White to play either Nf3 or g3, before going for a Benoni structure. In this way Black avoids the Taimanov attack. 2...c5 3.d5 e6 4.Nc3 exd5 5.cxd5 d6 6.e4 g6 7.f4 Bg7 8.Bb5+ is the starting position of the Taimanov attack. This is probably better for White in some way, but in the last years lots of White players have avoided the critical Nfd7 9.a4 in favour of 9.Nf3 a6 10.Bd3 b5 11.0-0 White has a dangerous attack here after 0-0 12.Kh1 , but in another sense it is playing into Black's ball park. 3.g3 c5 I respect anyone who plays this quirky opening. What does the cards say? Asymmetrical pawn structure, ehhh. 4.d5 exd5 5.cxd5 g6 The Modern Benoni has a rather dodgy reputation. I sometimes find myself involved in discussion on the topic: "Which is the more dubious opening; the King's Indian or the Modern Benoni?" The answer fluctuates, but lately it seems the MBI has been more under a cloud than the KID. However, I believe there are few GM:S who would claim that the fianchetto is the most critical set-up against the MBI. The reason why so many strong players play it has more to do with that it suits their repertoire (early g3), or that it is less sensitive to theoretical novelties (I'm guessing now). So, from a MBI perspective, Black is already quite happy to have avoided the most challenging lines, while still being able to play the benoni structure. 6.Bg2 d6 Black can try to do without d6 for a while longer: 6...Bg7 7.Nc3 0-0 8.Nf3 8.d6 Nc6 is what Black is hoping to provoke. 8...Re8 8...b5 doesn't look too promising: 9.Nxb5 Qa5+ 10.Nc3 Ne4 11.0-0 Nxc3 12.bxc3 Qxc3 13.Rb1 d6 14.Bb2± although Black went on to win, in Genutis,M (2316)-Jobava,B (2707) Warsaw 2010. 9.0-0 and Black cannot avoid d7-d6 for much longer. After b6!? 9...Na6 10.d6!± 10.Re1 It is not clear how Black will benefit from b6. 7.Nf3 Bg7 8.Nc3 0-0 9.0-0 Re8 9...Na6!? will lead to the same positions as after 10... Na6, if White continues with 10.Bf4 . However, White can also try other move orders. 10.Nd2!? Nc7 11.Nc4 b5 12.Nxd6 Qxd6 13.Bf4 Qb6 14.d6 Ne6 15.Bxa8 Nxf4 16.gxf4 Bh3 is one way to have fun. 9...a6 10.a4 Nbd7 11.Bf4 Qe7 12.Rb1!? 9...Nbd7 10.Bf4 Qe7 11.a4! b6!? 11...a6 12.Rb1 is extensively analysed by Avrukh in the aforementioned book. The threat of b2-b4 is annoying: Re8 13.b4 cxb4 14.Rxb4 Nc5 15.Nd4 and although the engine will tell you that Black is only slightly worse, this is really not good. If we are to give up the d4-square thus in the MBI, we must at least have White play e2-e4 first, so that we have something to attack. Here White is solid and Black's pawn structure is... awkward. 12.h3 This is what Black is waiting for! 12.Rb1 is less promising here as Black might change his tack with Ba6 13.Re1 Rae8∞ 12...Nh5 13.Bg5 f6 14.Bd2 f5 15.Ng5?! f4! This idea would not be half as promising had White not played h3. 16.Ne6 fxg3 17.f4?! 17.Nxf8 Nxf8 would give Black fantastic compensation. 17...Ndf6 18.Nxf8 Bxf8 and Black's compensation was more than enough for the exchange, in Korchmar,V (2437)-Ponomariov,R (2715) Gjakova 2016. 10.Bf4 This move is recommended in Avrukh's "1.d4 The Catalan" and that is more than enough to qualify it as the current main line. White is making it harder for Black to develop naturally with Nbd7, so Black has to come up with something else: Bf5!? A novel development. Black has tried numerous alternatives. 10...Na6 11.Re1 Bg4 12.h3 12.Nd2 Nh5 13.Be3 Rxe3 14.fxe3 Qe7 12...Bxf3 13.Bxf3 Nd7 14.e4 14.Ne4! is recommended by Avrukh. 14...Ne5 15.Be2 c4 16.Bxe5 Bxe5 17.Bxc4 Nc5 Schandorff,L (2519)-Hillarp Persson,T (2546) Denmark 2016. The main line used to be 10...Ne4 or with a4/a6 thrown in, which comes to pretty much the same: 11.Nxe4 Rxe4 12.Nd2 Rxf4 13.gxf4 Bxb2 14.Rb1 Bg7 15.e4 I used to think that this was quite unclear, but Avrukh convincingly shows that e4-e5 is such a strong threat that Black is hard pressed to equalize. 11.Nh4 White has had an abyssmal score with 11.Nd2 , although Nh5 12.e4 12.Be3?! Nd7 13.Nc4 Nb6! Menezes,C (2291)-Kilgus,G (2421) Vienna 2015 12...Nxf4 13.gxf4 Bd7 14.a4 Na6 15.Nc4 Qf6 16.Qf3 Nb4 17.Qg3 Nc2 looked less than completely clear, in Kozul,Z (2591)-Zhigalko,S (2647) Gjakova 2016. 11.Nb5 Bf8 11...Bc8 12.Qd2 If White plays 12.Nf3 Bf5 13.Nh4 there ought to be a 0,25-0,75 score. 12...a6 Usually the MBI is all about White's "weak" e4-pawn; Black tries to undermine it with b5, or f5,or just play around it on the dark squares. The upside of the fianchetto, is that there is nothing obvious for Black to aim the forces at. Here a6 is rather a must; a way to keep White's knight out of b5. 13.a4 Qe7 Black prepares to develop with Nbd7. 14.h3 14.Rfe1 Nbd7 15.Nf3 Rb8 16.e4 Ng4 17.Qe2?! 17.a5 b5 18.axb6 Rxb6 17...Nde5 18.a5 b5 19.axb6 Rxb6 20.Ra2 Nxf3+ 21.Bxf3 Ne5 22.Bg2 Qb7 23.h3 Bd7 and Black hed a light-square-bonanza, in Georgiadis,N (2470)-Bok,B (2613) Biel 2016. One could make a case for Avrukh's 14.Rab1 -idea here, but perhaps the queen is not all that well off on d2. For instance: Nbd7 15.b4 cxb4 15...b6 16.Rfc1 16.Rxb4 Nc5 17.a5 Qd8!? 18.Ra1 18.Rb6 Nfd7! 18...Rb8∞ ought to be investigated. 14...Nbd7 Black should be happy here. He has lost two tempi with the bishop on c8, but otherwise he has only played natural moves. White needs to make Nh4 look good, since the retreat will leave the queen looking silly on d2. 15.e4 After 15.Bh6 Bxh6! 16.Qxh6 Rb8 17.a5 b5 18.axb6 Rxb6 19.Ra2 Ne5 Black has plenty of counterplay. 15...Rb8 16.Nf3 b5 If Black can play this and White isn't able to counter it with b2-b4, then something has gone wrong for White. 17.axb5 axb5 18.Rfe1 b4 19.Na4 Bb7 There is nothing wrong with this move, but it looks rather un-Benoni-ny to me. There were two interesting alternatives: 19...Nxe4!? 20.Rxe4 Qxe4 21.Re1 Qxe1+! 22.Nxe1 Ra8 23.b3 23.Qd1 b3! 24.Nxc5 dxc5 23...Rxa4! 24.bxa4 Bc3 25.Qd3 Rxe1+ 26.Kh2 looks to be balanced. It is an important factor that White's king is out of harms way whereas Black's king can get into trouble o the back rank. Otherwise Black would just be better: Ne5 26...Bd4 27.Bxd6 27.Qb5 Kg7 28.a5 Bf5 29.Qb8 c4! We are moving into the "fiction" area now... 30.a6 b3 31.a7 Ra1 32.Bh6+ Kxh6 33.Qf8+ Kg5 34.Qe7+ Kh6 35.Qf8+= 19...Nh5!? is another challenging move, taking e4-e5 out of the picture: 20.Be3 Bb7 , or, no? 21.e5!? Bxe5! 22.g4 Ng7 23.Bg5 Qf8 24.Nxe5 Rxe5 25.Rxe5 dxe5 26.b3 20.e5! Considering that he was getting into time trouble, this was a good, forcing move from Inarkiev, . 20.Qc2!? Nxe4 20...h6 21.g4 21.Ng5 f5 22.Nxe4 fxe4 23.Rxe4 Qf8 24.Re6 Ne5∞ 20...Nxd5 21.exd6 Qf8 22.Ne5 It was also possible to play 22.Rxe8 Rxe8 23.Ne5 Bxe5 24.Bxd5 Ba8 25.Bxa8 Bxf4 26.Qxf4 Rxa8 27.b3 c4 28.Re1 cxb3 29.Qxb4 Qb8= 22...Rxe5! The tactics start, but there are not many ways to get off the main track. There is a draw at the end of the tunnel. 23.Bxe5 Nxe5 24.Nxc5 24.Bxd5?! Qxd6 25.Red1 Rd8 26.Bxf7+ Nxf7 27.Qxd6 Nxd6 28.Nxc5 Bf3 28...Bxb2 29.Rab1 Ba3 30.Rb3 29.Ne6 Bxd1 30.Nxd8 Bf3 31.Ra4 is about equal, but Black can play on. 24...Bc6 25.Ra6 25.Nd3!? is favoured by the engine. I am afraid that I would never start calculating the concequences of such a move (getting a rook and pawn fro two minor pieces), but here it makes a lot of sense, since White's king is safe and the d-pawn is strong. Black should play Bh6 26.Qd1 Nxd3 27.Qxd3 Qxd6 28.Red1 Rb5 29.Ra8+ Bf8 30.Ra6 Rc5 with equality. That's some tight rope though. 25...Qxd6 I was trying to figure out the consequences of 25...Nb6!? during the game, but didn't get half as far as my engine did inten seconds: 26.Bxc6 Nxc6 27.d7 27.Rxb6!? Rxb6 28.Nd7 Nd4! 29.Qf4 Qxd6 30.Re8+ Bf8 31.Qh6 Nf3+ 32.Kg2 Ne1+ 33.Kf1 Qd3+ is a draw, due to 34.Kxe1 Re6+ 35.Rxe6 Bxh6 27...Qxc5 28.Re8+ Bf8 29.Rxb8 Nxb8 30.d8Q Nxa6 I would have expected such a position to be somewhat better for Black, but if White i able to exchange a pair of queens and win the b-pawn, then coordination could be a problem for the minor pieces when the b2-pawn comes running. 26.Rxc6 Qxc6 27.Qxd5 Qxd5 28.Bxd5 Rd8 This should not become terribly exciting if White can make a few exact moves... 29.Rd1 Bf8 30.Ne4 Be7 31.Bb3?! 31.b3= and there is no way to make use of the pin. However, it is quite possible that Inarkiev foresaw that he would hold the endgame easily. 31...Rxd1+ 32.Bxd1 Nd3 33.Bb3 Nxb2 34.Kf1 Nd3 35.Bd5 Kg7 36.Ke2 Ne5 37.f4 Nd7 38.g4 f5 38...Nf8!? 39.f5 gxf5 40.gxf5 Nd7 looks like a better way to create some problems for White. 39.gxf5 gxf5 40.Ng3 Kf6 41.Nh5+! Kg6 42.Bc6! b3 42...Kxh5 43.Bxd7 Kg6 44.Be6= 42...Nc5 43.Be8+ Kh6 44.Ng3= 43.Bxd7 b2 44.Ng3 b1Q 45.Bxf5+ Qxf5 46.Nxf5 Kxf5 47.Kf3 Bc5 The h-pawn is of the wrong colour, so draw ageed. ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Inarkiev,E2727Harikrishna,P2750½–½2017A62FIDE Grand Prix4

One of the news bits that stood out in round four was the win by Teimour Radjabov over Francisco Vallejo Pons. At the recent Gashimov Memorial, Radjabov had shown very little (i.e. none) desire to actually make a fight of the game, but round four at the Moscow Grand Prix didn‘t leave him with a lot of choice. The opening went badly for the Spaniard and he soon found himself facing a slow painful death at the board. Rather than face this fate, he chose to try to confuse matters with a piece sacrifice and energetic measures, but the Azeri had seen the one line of defense and converted his advantage.

Francisco Vallejo Pons vs Teimour Radjabov

 

Here Black played the only winning move 29...Bxc4! and if 30. dxc4 then Rd7! is decisive.

Jon Hammer had a good game against Anish Giri, managing to reach a rook endgame up a pawn, but there was no light at the end of the tunnel, and a draw was the correct result.

Finally, we reach the game of the day, the epic win by Shakhriyar Mamedyarov over Saleh Salem. Mamedyarov, playing black, had played a strong, albeit complicated Fianchetto Grunfeld but could not quite seem to shake off his opponent who alternated between lost and equal.

An excellent murderous look by Saleh Salem, except that it needs to be pointed out it is pretty much impossible to intimidate a player such as Mamedyarov, famed for his fearless play, who furthermore is having the run of his life

In the end, White correctly went for a line that should have yielded a perpetual check, but he was led astray and lost in the queen endgame.

This netted more than a share of first place for Shakhriyar Mamedyarov with Ding Liren, it also took him to a historic 2801 on the Live Ratings list. Fantastic.

Standings after four rounds

Rk SNo Ti. Name FED Rtg Pts rtg+/-
1 4 GM Ding Liren CHN 2773 3,0 6,6
  5 GM Mamedyarov Shakhriyar AZE 2772 3,0 6,2
3 6 GM Svidler Peter RUS 2755 2,5 2,7
  13 GM Radjabov Teimour AZE 2710 2,5 7,5
5 1 GM Vachier-Lagrave Maxime FRA 2795 2,0 -4,2
  2 GM Nakamura Hikaru USA 2786 2,0 -4,8
  3 GM Giri Anish NED 2785 2,0 -4,5
  7 GM Nepomniachtchi Ian RUS 2751 2,0 -4,9
  8 GM Grischuk Alexander RUS 2750 2,0 -2,4
  12 GM Gelfand Boris ISR 2724 2,0 2,1
  15 GM Tomashevsky Evgeny RUS 2696 2,0 3,2
  16 GM Hou Yifan CHN 2652 2,0 6,7
  17 GM Salem A.R. Saleh UAE 2633 2,0 6,8
  18 GM Hammer Jon Ludvig NOR 2621 2,0 7,1
15 9 GM Harikrishna P. IND 2750 1,5 -7,5
  14 GM Vallejo Pons Francisco ESP 2710 1,5 -2,5
17 10 GM Adams Michael ENG 2747 1,0 -8,4
  11 GM Inarkiev Ernesto RUS 2727 1,0 -9,7

Pairings for round five

Bo. No.   Name FED Rtg Pts. Result Pts.   Name FED Rtg No.
1 5 GM Mamedyarov Shakhriyar AZE 2772 3   3 GM Ding Liren CHN 2773 4
2 6 GM Svidler Peter RUS 2755   GM Radjabov Teimour AZE 2710 13
3 1 GM Vachier-Lagrave Maxime FRA 2795 2   2 GM Salem A.R. Saleh UAE 2633 17
4 3 GM Giri Anish NED 2785 2   2 GM Nakamura Hikaru USA 2786 2
5 7 GM Nepomniachtchi Ian RUS 2751 2   2 GM Gelfand Boris ISR 2724 12
6 16 GM Hou Yifan CHN 2652 2   2 GM Grischuk Alexander RUS 2750 8
7 15 GM Tomashevsky Evgeny RUS 2696 2   2 GM Hammer Jon Ludvig NOR 2621 18
8 9 GM Harikrishna P. IND 2750   1 GM Adams Michael ENG 2747 10
9 14 GM Vallejo Pons Francisco ESP 2710   1 GM Inarkiev Ernesto RUS 2727 11

Links

You can use ChessBase 14 or any of our Fritz compatible chess programs to replay the games in PGN. You can also download our free Playchess client, which will in addition give you immediate access to the chess server Playchess.com.


Born in the US, he grew up in Paris, France, where he completed his Baccalaureat, and after college moved to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. He had a peak rating of 2240 FIDE, and was a key designer of Chess Assistant 6. In 2010 he joined the ChessBase family as an editor and writer at ChessBase News. He is also a passionate photographer with work appearing in numerous publications, and the content creator of the YouTube channel, Chess & Tech.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.