Huffington: Chess Triumphs and Blunders

2/6/2014 – Magnus Carlsen finished the Zurich Chess Challenge undefeated, a full point ahead of his nearest rival. Carlsen's victory seemed easy, but, in fact there was a swing game against American Hikaru Nakamura, who should have won but lost instead. In his Huffington Post column GM Lubomir Kavalek shows us how even the world's best players can be vulnerable to one-move blunders.

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!


Along with the ChessBase 14 program you can access the Live Database of 8 million games, and receive three months of free ChesssBase Account Premium membership and all of our online apps! Have a look today!

More...

Chess Triumphs and Blunders

By GM Lubomir Kavalek

Magnus Carlsen won the Zurich Chess Challenge, the first tournament he played as the world champion. It was an amazing event, a chess triathlon, with the superstars showing their skills in blitz, rapid and classic chess, the latter being the most important. Undefeated, with three wins and two draws, the Norwegian grandmaster finished the classic part a full point ahead of the Armenian Levon Aronian.


Looking at the crosstable, Carlsen's victory may seem easy, but, in fact, it was hanging on one game – a swing game against the American Hikaru Nakamura, who was rated for the first time as number three in the world. A loss by Carlsen would have injected a new life into the event.

Nakamura never beat Carlsen in classical chess, but he came close in Zurich. Choosing the same variation against the Nimzo-Indian Defense that gave Carlsen problems in the world championship match against Vishy Anand, Nakamura outplayed his opponent. There were no obvious blunders on Carlsen's part, perhaps just a string of inaccurate moves, a strategic plan going slightly awry – but it was enough to land him in trouble.

[Event "Zurich Chess Challenge 2014"] [Site "?"] [Date "????.??.??"] [Round "3"] [White "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Black "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E20"] [WhiteElo "2789"] [BlackElo "2872"] [Annotator "GM Lubomir Kavalek/The Huffington Post"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "4r1k1/1p3pPp/6q1/2pPpNP1/p1n1P3/P6Q/7R/K7 w - - 0 37"] [PlyCount "50"] [EventDate "2014.02.01"] {Nakamura's last winning chance came after 36 moves, four moves before the time control. Unfortunately, he took the wrong path.} 37. d6 $2 {The pawn advance wins a piece, but not the game.} ({The computers suggest} 37. Qf1 $1 b5 {and white has a choice:} (37... Na5 38. Qb5 $18) {The quiet and astonishing} 38. Ka2 $1 {This positional zugzwang is far more beautiful. White has to realize that black doesnâ []t have a good move, for example} ({Tactical fireworks:} 38. Rxh7 $1 Qxh7 (38... Kxh7 39. Qh1+ $18) 39. Nh6+ $18) 38... Nd6 (38... f6 39. gxf6 Qxf6 40. Nh6+ Kxg7 41. Rg2+ $18) 39. Rh6 $18) 37... Nxd6 38. Nxd6 Rd8 $1 {A complete turnabout! Not only is the open d-file more important than the knight, but white doesn't have many options. Hikaru had either overlooked black's last move or he underestimated the consequences.} 39. Nc4 $6 ({According to cyber-machines, the far leap} 39. Nc8 $1 {should have been played, for example} Kxg7 40. Qh6+ (40. Ne7 Rd1+ 41. Ka2 Qe6+ 42. Qxe6 fxe6 43. Rh6 Rd7 44. Nc8 Rd2+ 45. Kb1 Rg2) 40... Qxh6 41. gxh6+ Kg6 42. Ne7+ Kg5 $11 43. Rg2+ Kf4) ({There is a problem: white gets mated after} 39. Nf5 $2 Rd1+ 40. Ka2 Qe6+ 41. Kb2 Qb6+ 42. Kc2 Qb1+ 43. Kc3 Qb3#) 39... Qxe4 40. Qh5 $2 ({The saving move} 40. Ne3 {was not easy to find just before the time control. It leads to a draw after} Qd3 41. Nf5 Qd1+ 42. Kb2 Rd2+ 43. Rxd2 Qxd2+ {and black has a perpetual check.}) 40... Rd3 $1 41. Rh4 Qf5 42. Qe2 b5 43. Nd2 Qxg5 44. Qxd3 Qxh4 45. Ne4 Kxg7 {Black has simply too many pawns for the knight.} 46. Qf3 (46. Nxc5 Qd4+ $1 {and black can't cope with the distant h-pawn.}) 46... Qf4 47. Qg2+ Kf8 48. Kb2 h5 49. Nd2 h4 50. Kc2 b4 51. axb4 cxb4 52. Qa8+ Kg7 53. Qxa4 h3 54. Qb3 h2 55. Qd5 e4 56. Qh5 e3 57. Nf3 e2 58. Kb3 f6 59. Ne1 Qg3+ 60. Ka4 Qg1 61. Qxe2 Qa7+ 0-1

Asked how he could have survived, Carlsen said that he tried to keep the game going one move at a time. "If you keep fighting, you will be rewarded," he explained.

Carlsen's best game – a beautiful, simple composition – was against Fabiano Caruana. The American-Italian grandmaster won the last day's rapid tournament, sharing second place with Aronian behind Carlsen in the combined classic and rapid events. Carlsen shared first place with Aronian in the blitz tournament on the opening day.

There is a new trend in chess sponsorship as more and more rich Russians underwrite major chess events such as the World Cup and the World Championship. Oleg Skvortsov was the main sponsor in Zurich.

The newly elected president of the Russian Chess Federation, Andrey Filatov, staged the 2012 World Championship match between Vishy Anand and Boris Gelfand at the State Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow. Following his example, the Dutch organizers also connected chess and art last month, moving one round of the traditional Tata Steel tournament to the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam.

The grandmasters in front of Rembrandt's Night Watch: Van Wely, Naiditsch, Dominguez,
Nakamura, So, Harikrishna, Gelfand, Aronian, Karjakin, Caruana, Giri, Rapport

On that special day, two highest rated players of the event, Aronian and Nakamura, played against each other.

[Event "76th Tata Steel Masters"] [Site "Wijk aan Zee NED"] [Date "2014.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Aronian, Levon"] [Black "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E92"] [WhiteElo "2812"] [BlackElo "2789"] [Annotator "GM Lubomir Kavalek/The Huffington Post"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "8/8/4kp2/pK2pN1p/P3P3/5P1P/3b4/8 b - - 0 40"] [PlyCount "8"] [EventDate "2014.01.11"] {The position looks favorable to White as he dominates the board and threatens to pick up the pawn on a5. Black has one thing going for him: he can try to infiltrate the kingside. Unfortunately, his king runs the other way, unable to recover.} 40... Kd7 $2 (40... Kf7 {was correct and after} 41. Nd6+ Kg6 42. Nc4 $6 ({After} 42. h4 Be1 43. Nf5 Kf7 {white can't make progress.}) 42... Be1 43. Nxa5 Kg5 44. Nc6 Kh4 {black has the edge, for example:} 45. Nb4 (45. a5 Bxa5 ( 45... Kxh3) 46. Kxa5 Kxh3 47. Nxe5 fxe5 48. f4 exf4 49. e5 f3 50. e6 f2 51. e7 f1=Q 52. e8=Q Qf5+ $17) 45... Kxh3 46. a5 h4 47. a6 Bf2 48. Nd5 Kg3 49. Nb6 Bxb6 50. Kxb6 h3 51. a7 h2 52. a8=Q h1=Q $17) 41. Ng7 h4 42. Nf5 Be1 43. Ne3 Ke6 44. Nc4 ({It is too late now. After} 44. Nc4 Kf7 45. Nxa5 Kg6 46. Nc6 Kg5 47. Nb4 Kf4 48. Nd3+ {wins.}) 1-0

Aronian dominated the Tata Steel tournament and led by two points before the last round. Although having had the possibility to increase his lead and setting a performance record of the event, he collapsed against Loek van Wely. Even the world's second best player can be vulnerable to a one-move blunder.

[Event "76th Tata Steel Masters"] [Site "Wijk aan Zee NED"] [Date "2014.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Aronian, Levon"] [Black "Van Wely, Loek"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A80"] [WhiteElo "2812"] [BlackElo "2672"] [Annotator "lk"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "3R4/p5bk/6qp/2pQ4/4rpnB/2P1PN2/PP4P1/6K1 b - - 0 37"] [PlyCount "3"] [EventDate "2014.01.11"] {White is threatening 38.Qg8 mate, but Van Wely can cover it and create his own threats.} 37... Re6 $1 38. exf4 $2 {A losing blunder.} ({White had to retreat:} 38. Ne1 Nxe3 39. Qf3 Qb1 40. Qxf4 Nf5 {with roughly equal game.}) 38... Bd4+ $1 (38... Bd4+ 39. cxd4 Qb1+ 40. Be1 Rxe1+ ({or} 40... Qxe1+) 41. Nxe1 Qxe1#) 0-1

Sometimes the players don't even notice that something went wrong and others cover up their crime. When a former world champion and the all-time best woman made mistakes, their blunders disappeared. Here is the tale:

In early February 1993, I went to Lucerne to represent Nigel Short at the FIDE bidding for his world championship match against Garry Kasparov. The results were not encouraging: Kasparov's supported bid of one million Swiss francs came from the Galician town of Santiago de Compostela. But there was an incredible bid of $5 million from Jezdimir Vasiljevic. It was the same amount Vasiljevic put up for the 1992 match between Bobby Fischer and Boris Spassky.

I flew to Budapest to check it out since Vasiljevic was the main sponsor of the match between Spassky and Judit Polgar. He came to the lobby of the hotel with his bodyguards. I asked him: "Are you really going to sponsor the match Kasparov-Short?"

He laughed: "Oh, Kasparov, Kasparov. He should be careful. One day he may try to cross a street and he may not make it to the other side." Vasiljevic was never going to sponsor anything Kasparov. That was clear. His phantom bid was used by Campomanes to gain time for the upcoming offers from England.

Polgar played well and clinched the match victory early. Spassky won the meaningless last game, narrowing the loss to 4.5 to 5.5. Afterward he told me: "I think I did something today I shouldn't have done. I switched the moves, but I was not punished." The punishment could have been swift: a bishop sacrifice would have won material, forcing immediate resignation. The game would have lasted just three minutes, surely a record among top grandmaster games.

I wrote about it in my Washington Post column, but I later found out that the moves were altered. Perhaps not to embarrass the players, the organizers put out another version of the game, the one you can find in the databases. In their account the horrific blunders were eliminated and made my story not credible.

Fortunately, Judit Polgar came to the rescue. In her new book From GM to Top Ten, published by Quality Chess, she acknowledged what happened:

[Event "Budapest m"] [Site "Budapest"] [Date "1993.??.??"] [Round "10"] [White "Polgar, Judit"] [Black "Spassky, Boris "] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "C95"] [WhiteElo "2595"] [BlackElo "2565"] [Annotator "lk"] [PlyCount "24"] [EventDate "1993.01.??"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "10"] [EventCountry "HUN"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 Nb8 10. d4 Nbd7 11. Nbd2 Re8 $4 {Diagram [#]} 12. Nf1 $4 {I played this move without hesitation. It was as if I was coming home from the grocery store on the same road I had travelled so many times before, without noticing there was a new traffic sign forbidding my access. I believe Boris realized that he had blundered right away. This is a common situation, but I am very surprised that I was not aware of the missed opportunity until the end of the game!} ({With his last move, Spassky allowed the simple combination:} 12. Bxf7+ $1 Kxf7 13. Ng5+ Kg8 14. Ne6 {,trapping the queen. Boris might have thought that he had already played Bc8-b7, which would free the queen for its cage,' writes Polgar.}) 12... Bb7 {'The game transposed to our main line and soon became quite interesting. Boris sacrificed a knight for my two central pawns and eventually won, although later analysis showed that I could have held a draw.} 0-1

Polgar's chess is impressive in her new book, the second tome of her three-volume manual. It is also spiced up with amazing stories. And you would not expect less from a lady who got a marriage proposal on Machu Pichu.

Images by Maria Emelianova and Alina l'Ami

Original column hereCopyright Huffington Post


The Huffington Post is an American news website and aggregated blog founded by Arianna Huffington and others, featuring various news sources and columnists. The site was launched on May 9, 2005, as a commentary outlet and liberal/progressive alternative to conservative news websites. It offers coverage of politics, media, business, entertainment, living, style, the green movement, world news, and comedy. It is a top destination for news, blogs, and original content. The Huffington Post has an active community, with over over a quarter of a billion visits per month (according to Quantcast), making it the number 73 ranked web site in the world (Alexa, January 2014)..


Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register