ChessBase Christmas Puzzles 2015 (4)

by Frederic Friedel
12/28/2015 – In our previous puzzle article we showed you a complex endgame which Garry Kasparov had shown a young chess prodigy. The former World Champion also explained a number of important endgame concepts to the lad, who went on to annotate the game for us. If you go through his notes carefully you will learn quite a bit about chess endings and tempos. Don't miss it – it will add some Elo points to your rating!

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!


Along with the ChessBase 14 program you can access the Live Database of 8 million games, and receive three months of free ChesssBase Account Premium membership and all of our online apps! Have a look today!

More...

December 28, 2015: The Pervakov study

By Frederic Friedel

Yesterday we told you how Garry Kasparov had given ten-year-old chess prodigy Vincent Keymer a study to solve, one that looked deceptively simple. After that the lad got a very subtle and instructive endgame lesson from the 13th World Champion, in form of a study which we asked you to solve.

Olge Pervakov, 4.p Moscow Sports Committee Ty Bulletin 1986

White to play and draw

After forcing Vincent to work on it in his head, in the end in fact without the pieces,
Garry sat down with the boy to analyse the study, and to explain important endgame concepts.

These are really lessons of the highest possible calibre, deeply inspiring to the chess prodigy

Vincent understood the study, and when we asked him to annotate it for us he did so without any problems. Our intention was to give you his analysis as the solution, but there was one problem: his notes were a bit difficult for normal amateurs to follow. The ten-year-old assumes that anyone can understand his evaluations, like "...leading to a draw" (but how, Vincent??). So we asked an experienced chess teacher, ChessBase editor Sagar Shah, to add some explanatory notes, for less experienced students and amateurs. If you now go through the following solution carefully you will learn quite a bit about chess endings and tempos. Don't miss it – there is no harm in adding some Elo points to your rating!

[Event "4.p Moscow Sports Committee Ty Bulletin"] [Site "?"] [Date "1986.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Pervakov, Oleg"] [Black "White to play and draw"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [Annotator "Keymer,Vincent/Shah,Sagar"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "8/k5p1/2Pb4/8/7p/4K3/3B4/8 w - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "15"] [EventDate "1986.??.??"] {It is obvious that the white king has to move towards the black g and h-pawns. But which square to choose, f2 or f3? It is impossible to decide without deep calculation.} 1. Kf2 $1 (1. Kf3 $2 {The most natural move turns out to be a mistake. Why is it you may ask? The answer is pretty simple once you have seen the main line - the white king is just one tempo too far from the g1 square.} h3 2. Bh6 {This pretty idea, which you will encounter in the main line, doesn't work here.} gxh6 $1 3. Kf2 Bh2 $1 4. Kf3 h5 $1 {[%csl Gg1,Gg2,Gg3,Gg4] and all the squares for the white king have been blocked.}) 1... h3 $1 { Black cannot allow Kg2-h3 and hence this move is sort of forced.} (1... Kb6 2. Kg2 Kxc6 3. Kh3 Be7 4. Be1 g5 5. Bd2 Kd5 6. Bxg5 $11) 2. Bh6 $3 {The key to the entire problem. This is the move that secures a draw: White has to lure the pawn to g6 in order to win it with his king in the following variations.} ( 2. Be3+ {loses:} Ka6 3. c7 Bxc7 4. Bh6 ({or} 4. Kf3 Kb5 5. Bg1 h2 6. Bxh2 Bxh2 7. Kg4 Be5 {and Black protects his g-pawn.}) 4... g6 5. Be3 Kb5 6. Kf3 Kc4 7. Bg1 Kd5 {and Black has gained a critical tempo.}) 2... g6 (2... gxh6 3. Kg1 $11 {is a standard draw. White king will keep shuffling between h1 and g1.}) 3. Be3+ $1 {An important move not giving the b6 square to the black king.} (3. Kf3 {fails. The variation is quite pretty.} Kb6 4. Be3+ Kxc6 5. Bg1 Kd5 6. Kg4 Ke4 7. Kxh3 Kf3 $1 {And there is absolutely no way to stop the march of the g-pawn followed by evicting the white bishop from the g1-a7 diagonal. You can check this for yourselves.}) 3... Ka6 4. c7 (4. Kf3 {works as well.} Kb5 5. Bg1 $1 Kxc6 (5... h2 6. Bxh2 Bxh2 7. Kg4 $11) 6. Kg4 Bc5 $1 (6... Be5 7. Kxh3 $11) 7. Bh2 $1 $11 {and it's a draw.} (7. Kxh3 $2 Bxg1 8. Kg4 Be3 $18)) 4... Bxc7 5. Kf3 Kb5 6. Bg1 h2 (6... Kc4 7. Kg4 {and White can pick up the g6 pawn in time. Of course} Bd8 8. Kxh3 {is a draw.}) 7. Bxh2 Bxh2 8. Kg4 $1 {and now the black pawn cannot be defended – since it is on g6 and not on g7!} 1/2-1/2

Now for the final problem Vincent was given during that memorable two-hour session in Berlin:

It was a delightful puzzle which everyone present in Garry's suite thoroughly enjoyed

White to play and win

Yes, White is in check, and he has just four legal moves (one of which, 1.Rf7, lead to an immediate mate with 1...Qxf7#. So which of the other three should White play? Try to work this out in your head, and remember: it is quite appropriate to grin in delight, as Vincent did, when you find the winning line.


Pal Benko's twins

The first mate-in-two problem published on the 26th was the following:

Pal Benko, 2015

White to play and mate in two.
The next twin involves moving the knight g1 to e3:

Pal Benko, 2015

Mate in two moves

Once again we ask our readers to solve the problem and then construct a new position by moving or inserting a single piece on a different square. The new problem must again be a mate in two, with a different solution. And it must have no "cooks" – multiple solutions that will spoil an chess problem.



Editor-in-Chief of the ChessBase News Page. Studied Philosophy and Linguistics at the University of Hamburg and Oxford, graduating with a thesis on speech act theory and moral language. He started a university career but switched to science journalism, producing documentaries for German TV. In 1986 he co-founded ChessBase.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

JoachimIglesias JoachimIglesias 12/29/2015 11:48
A personnal, longer ( better ?) version of the study shown by Kasparov :
W : Bc4 Rd8 Be7 Ke8 pg4 Rh3 Qh8
B: Qa4 Kg6
1.Bb5 Qxb5 2.Rd7 Qb8 3.Bd8 Qe5 4.Re7 Qb5 5.Kf8 Qf1 6.Rh3 Qxf3 7.Qf6 +-
bro bro 12/28/2015 01:16
pawn c2 is unnecessary for position.
Dev01 Dev01 12/28/2015 12:06
OHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

A Trick ONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1