Champions Showdown: Carlsen stays on top

by André Schulz
11/15/2017 – The last day of the match between Magnus Carlsen and Ding Liren continued the trend of the previous days: Ding had chances but failed to realise them. Carlsen, however, was able to exploit chances he did not really seem to have. No wonder Carlsen won the blitz-match by a huge margin. | Photo: Lennart Ootes

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Carlsen won some games, Ding lost some games

"Sometimes Lasker won, sometimes Janowski lost", is a witticism of the Austrian chess journalist Georg Marco about the one-sided World Championship match between Emanuel Lasker and Dawid Janowski, 1910 in Berlin, a match in which Janowski did not win a single game. The Champions Showdown match between Magnus Carlsen and Ding Liren was not that one-sided but Carlsen was still clearly superior.

It was one of four matches, in which eight top-players met on four days to battle it out in rapid chess, more rapid chess, even more rapid chess, and blitz chess. Or, to quote the time-controls: 30-minute games, 20-minute games, 10-minute games, and 5-minute games. All games with a very classical time-control, that is without additional time per move, the so-called increment. This led to good old clock-bashing, mistakes, blunders, and lots of drama. Wonderful! 

Let's start! | Photo: Lennart Ootes

One can only hope that no one will hit on the idea to come up with a new rating-list for each of these time-controls. For some time now the FIDE has kept three separate rating lists - one for games with classical time-control, one for rapid games, and one for blitz.

Magnus Carlsen leads all three lists and the less time he has the better is his rating and the higher is the distance to his rivals. In blitz Carlsen has an Elo-rating of 2948 and is about 60 points ahead of Sergey Karjakin, currently number two on the blitz-rating list. But Carlsen only needs 52 points to reach a rating of 3000 points, and some spectators thought that Carlsen would try to do his very best on the fourth and final day of his match against Ding Liren to reach this milestone.

But arbiter Tony Rich quickly pointed out that according to FIDE rules the blitz games on day 4 would not be rated  because the match had already been decided.

Black was OK

Rated or not rated, Carlsen and Ding still played the twelve blitz games with ambition. Carlsen won six of them, five were drawn, and only one, the third, was won by Ding Liren. Admittedly, Ding had more chances than the final result indicates, and had a couple of very good positions which he could not convert. Time was crucial here - and Carlsen simply played faster.

Ding Liren, Magnus Carlsen | Photo: Lennart Ootes

The World Champion came well-prepared to the blitz battle against Ding. After all, after his handicap simul in Hamburg he played an inofficial blitz match (1 against 5 minutes) against Lawrence Trent, the commentator of the handicap simul.

No easy task for Carlsen: Playing with 1 minute Lawrence Trent's 5 minutes | Photo: André Schulz

If you count in classical fashion (1 point for a win, ½ point for a draw and 0 for a loss) Carlsen won the match against Ding with 22-8. The Chinese could only win two of the 30 games played in the match, Carlsen won 16 of these 30 games. But the games at the Champions Showdown in Saint Louis counted differently: a win in the 5-minute games netted 2 points, a win  in the 10-minute games brought 3 points, in the 20-minutes it gave you 4 points, and in the 30-minute games the players received 5 points for a win. But no matter how clear or how close the match was, the winner always received 60,000$ while the loser had to content himself with 40,000$.

Six of the seven decided games in the blitz-match between Ding Liren and Magnus Carlsen were won by Black. 1.e4 was played in two of the twelve games (in both cases Carlsen had White), and in no less than four games Carlsen opted for the King's Indian with Black - despite the fact that Ding is considered to be a King's Indian expert. But Carlsen still won all four games.

Bologan: "If you study this DVD carefully and solve the interactive exercises you will also enrich your chess vocabulary, your King's Indian vocabulary, build up confidence in the King's Indian and your chess and win more games."

Snapshots

 
Ding-Carlsen, game 2, after 29...Kf8
Black has rook, minor piece and a passed pawn for the queen - enough for a win

 

 
Ding-Carlsen, game 4, position after 21...Bf6
White played 22.e5? but after 22...Ld8! he was lost.

 

 
Ding-Carlsen, game 6, position after 27...Re3
A position you do not want to have against Carlsen.


In game 8 Ding Liren was clearly winning against Carlsen's King's Indian but then gave the game away:

 
Ding-Carlsen, game 8, position after 46...a3

 

Webcast

The blitz games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 c5 2.e3 Nf6 3.d4 e6 4.c4 d5 5.cxd5 exd5 6.Bb5+ Bd7 7.Bxd7+ Nbxd7 8.0-0 D30: Queen's Gambit Declined: Systems without Nc3 c4 LiveBook: 4 Games 9.a4 a6N Predecessor: 9...Rc8 10.a5 Bd6 11.Nc3 a6 12.Qa4 0-0 13.Bd2 Qe7 14.b3 Qe6 15.Rfb1 Ne4 16.bxc4 Rxc4 0-1 (83) Markus,R (2586) -Wang,H (2643) Khanty-Mansiysk 2007 10.a5 Bd6 11.b3 Rc8 12.bxc4 dxc4 13.Qa4 0-0! 14.Ba3 b5 15.axb6! Nxb6 16.Qc2 Nbd5 17.Nc3 Nxc3 18.Qxc3 Rc6 18...Nd5= 19.Qc2 Bxa3 20.Rxa3 c3 19.Bxd6 19.Ne5± Rc7 20.Rfc1 20.Nxc4 Bxa3 21.Rxa3 Qd5 19...Qxd6 20.Ne5       White is in control. Rc7 21.Qa3 Not 21.Nxc4 Qd5 21...Qxa3 22.Rxa3 c3 22...Nd5 23.Rc1 c2 24.Kf1 Rb8 25.Rxa6 h5 White should prevent ...Rb1. 26.Ra2?
26.Ke2± keeps the pressure on. 26...Rb1 27.Nd3 Rc3 28.Raxc2 Rxc1+ 29.Rxc1 Rxd3       Endgame KRN-KR 30.Ke2 Ra3 31.Rc2 g6 32.Kf3 Kg7 33.h3 g5 34.Rc5 34.Rb2 was worth a try. 34...Kg6 34...g4+-+ and Black stays clearly on top. 35.Ke2 Ra2+ 36.Ke1 Ne4 37.Rxh5 Kg6 38.hxg4 Nxf2 35.Rc6 h4 35...Ra5 36.g4 h4 36.g4 hxg3 37.Kxg3 Kf5 38.Rc5+ Kg6 38...Ke6!? 39.Re5+ Kd6 39.Rc6 Kg7 40.h4! g4 41.h5! Nxh5+ 42.Kxg4 Nf6+ 43.Kf3 Nd5 44.Rc5 Nb4 45.Rb5 Nc6
Hoping for ...Nxd4+. 46.Ke4 Ne7 47.Rb7 Kf6 48.Rb6+ Kg7 49.Rb7 Kf6 50.Rb6+ Precision: White = 53%, Black = 52%.
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L2772½–½2017A04Champions Showdown MCDL 201719
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017E62Champions Showdown MCDL 201720
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L27720–12017B23Champions Showdown MCDL 201721
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017A05Champions Showdown MCDL 201722
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L2772½–½2017A45Champions Showdown MCDL 201723
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017A56Champions Showdown MCDL 201724
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L2772½–½2017A25Champions Showdown MCDL 201725
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017A56Champions Showdown MCDL 201726
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L2772½–½2017B51Champions Showdown MCDL 201727
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017A40Champions Showdown MCDL 201728
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L27721–02017A05Champions Showdown MCDL 201729
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M2826½–½2017D37Champions Showdown MCDL 201730

All games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Nf3 0-0 5.Bg5 c5 6.e3 cxd4 7.exd4 d5 8.Be2 B14: Caro-Kann (Panow-Angriff) 8.cxd5 exd5 9.Be2 h6 10.Bxf6 Qxf6 11.0-0 Bxc3 12.bxc3 Nc6 13.Re1 b6 14.Nd2 Be6 15.Nf1 Na5 16.Ne3 Rac8 0-1 (28) Mamedyarov,S (2800)-Carlsen,M (2832) Paris 2017 8...dxc4 9.0-0 LiveBook: 3 Partien h6 10.Bh4 b6N Vorgänger: 10...Nbd7 11.Bxc4 Bxc3 12.bxc3 b6 13.Rc1 Bb7 14.Re1 Qc7 15.Bd3 Nh5 16.Bb5 Bc6 17.Bxc6 Qxc6 18.c4 Nhf6 19.Qe2 0-1 (36) Rogozenco,D (2430)-Nisipeanu,L (2515) Bucharest 1996 11.Ne5 Bxc3 11...Bb7= 12.bxc3       Bb7 13.Nxc4 Nbd7 14.Nd6 Bc6 15.c4 Qe7 16.Bg3 Rfd8 17.d5 17.a4 17...exd5= 18.Nf5 Qe8 19.Bc7 dxc4 19...Nc5!= 20.Bxd8 Rxd8 20.Bxd8± Rxd8 21.Bf3 21.Bxc4± Nc5 22.Qe2 21...Ne5 22.Bxc6 Nxc6 Nicht 22...Rxd1? 23.Bxe8 Rxa1 24.Rxa1+- 23.Qa4 Ne5 24.Qxa7 Qe6       Weiss steht unter Druck. 25.Qc7 Re8       Schwarz hat Kompensation. 26.Ne3 Rc8 27.Qb7 Nd3 28.Rad1 Ne4 Weiss muss nun ...Tc5 beachten. 29.Qd5
Dxe6 ist eine echte Drohung. 29...b5!       30.h3 Günstiger ist 30.a4= bxa4 31.Qxe6 fxe6
32.Nxc4!       Nexf2 33.Nd6
30.Qxb5 Nexf2 30...Qe8 Und ...Sc3 würde nun gewinnen. 31.Rxd3! Die Stellung ist ausgeglichen. cxd3 32.Qxd3 Rd8 33.Nd5 Qe5 34.Nf6+! Qxf6 35.Qxe4 g6 36.a4 bxa4 Precision: Weiß = 52%, Schwarz = 46%.
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L2772½–½2017E21Champions Showdown MCDL 20175
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017E49Champions Showdown MCDL 20176
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L2772½–½2017C50Champions Showdown MCDL 20177
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017A28Champions Showdown MCDL 20178
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L27721–02017C84Champions Showdown MCDL 20179
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M2826½–½2017E06Champions Showdown MCDL 201710
Carlsen,M2837Ding,L27740–12017B48Champions Showdown MCDL 201711
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017A06Champions Showdown MCDL 201712
Carlsen,M2837Ding,L27741–02017B40Champions Showdown MCDL 201713
Ding,L2774Carlsen,M28370–12017E10Champions Showdown MCDL 201714
Carlsen,M2837Ding,L27741–02017C90Champions Showdown MCDL 201715
Ding,L2774Carlsen,M2837½–½2017E11Champions Showdown MCDL 201716
Carlsen,M2837Ding,L27741–02017C84Champions Showdown MCDL 201717
Ding,L2774Carlsen,M28370–12017D37Champions Showdown MCDL 201718
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L2772½–½2017A04Champions Showdown MCDL 201719
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L27720–12017B23Champions Showdown MCDL 201721
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017A05Champions Showdown MCDL 201722
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L2772½–½2017A45Champions Showdown MCDL 201723
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017A56Champions Showdown MCDL 201724
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L2772½–½2017A25Champions Showdown MCDL 201725
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017A56Champions Showdown MCDL 201726
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L2772½–½2017B51Champions Showdown MCDL 201727
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017A40Champions Showdown MCDL 201728
Carlsen,M2826Ding,L27721–02017A05Champions Showdown MCDL 201729
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M2826½–½2017D37Champions Showdown MCDL 201730
Ding,L2772Carlsen,M28260–12017E62Champions Showdown MCDL 201720

On-demand playlist

Illustrating the effect of no increment time control, last week GM commentators Alejandro Ramirez and Christian Chrila played a trio of bullet games.

You can also find each days complete commentary in the playlist menu (click or tap the icon in the upper left of the video player).

2017 Champions Showdown playlist | Source: CCSCSL on YouTube

Translation from German: Johannes Fischer

Links


André Schulz started working for ChessBase in 1991 and is an editor of ChessBase News.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.