Best ‘Chess Constructs’ by ChessBase readers

by Azlan Iqbal
7/26/2014 – Chess constructs are basically an intermediate form of composition or chess problem, lying somewhere between brilliancies from chess history – and artistic chess problems, between real game sequences and traditional award-winning compositions. A month ago Dr Azlan Iqbal explained the concept asked our readers to submit compositions of their own. Here are the winners.

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!

More...

ChessBase Chess Construct Contest

By Azlan Iqbal, Ph.D.

In a previous article, I introduced the concept of ‘chess constructs’ which are basically an intermediate form of composition or chess problem that lies somewhere between real game sequences and traditional award-winning compositions. A construct has a stipulation, is economical, is interesting or educational, and of some aesthetic merit. It is not constrained by adherence to traditional composition conventions and is simple enough to be composed by average players and amateur composers. It does not try or need to be ‘too clever’. Part of an interesting game you once played could be the inspiration for a good construct that others can also easily enjoy.

ChessBase was kind enough to sponsor a contest inviting readers to compose their own construct and for me to judge them. A total of 14 submissions were received over the two-week period of the contest. Fig. 1 below shows the winner, the first and the second runner-up. Solutions are provided at the end of the article.

Winner: Roland Kensdale
ChessBase Chess Construct Contest July 2014

White to play and mate in three

First Runner-Up: Z. Mendlowitz
ChessBase Chess Construct Contest July 2014

White to play and mate in three
 
Second Runner-up: Henk van der Velde
ChessBase Chess Construct Contest July 2014

White to play and mate in three

Constructs are generally easier to solve than traditional award-winning compositions because they tend to resemble real games more. The reader might notice that the winner of this contest is a position that actually starts with White being in check: sacrilege of a major traditional composition convention, yet a notable difference between constructs and traditional compositions.

It is also no coincidence across all domains (real games, constructs, traditional compositions) that knights tend to feature more prominently than other pieces when it comes to chess aesthetics. Perhaps it has something to do with their unique and often-overlooked movement style. The constructs above won because they met all the basic criteria specified in the previous article, exhibited creativity and aesthetics, and were not too complicated or cumbersome for the average player to enjoy and learn from. Below are two more constructs submitted as ‘worthy mentions’.

First Worthy Mention: Roland Kensdale
ChessBase Chess Construct Contest July 2014

White to play and mate in three
 
Second Worthy Mention: Henk van der Velde
ChessBase Chess Construct Contest July 2014

White to play and mate in three

The worthy mentions above did not make the top three, but they are still good examples of constructs that do not require line upon line of variations analysis to properly fathom. The solution is simple, direct and clear. The variations can be figured out as easily as one might be able to do in a real game. They also feature structures and substructures that one is more likely to come across and remember in an actual game.

I would like to thank all those who took the time to compose a valid construct for submission. I would also like to thank ChessBase for providing you with incentives for doing so. Enjoy your prizes. I hope to write more on the subject of constructs in the near future so stay tuned.

Replay all solutions

Select games from the dropdown menu above the board

Prizes

The first prize was a Fritz 14 chess program signed by most of the best players in the world – the participants of the 2014 Zurich Chess Challenge (Carlsen, Aronian, Nakamura, Caruana, Anand, Gelfand, and as a bonus Hou Yifan. The award goes to Roland Kensdale. The runner-up prizes – a Fritz Trainer of their choice – go to Z. Mendlowitz and Henk van der Velde. Please send us your choices and addresses.

Previous articles by the author

  • 6/29/2014 – Azlan Iqbal: Introducing ‘Chess Constructs’
    People love brilliancies from chess history – and artistic chess problems. But there is a big gap between the two. Positions from games demonstrate the natural beauty of actual play, while chess problems are highly technical, with little practical relevance. The author of this interesting article suggest an intermediate form, one you can try your hand at – and win a prize in the process.

  • 9/2/2009 – Can computers be made to appreciate beauty?
    Or at least to identify and retrieve positions that human beings consider beautiful? While computers may be able to play at top GM level, they are not able to tell a beautiful combination from a bland one. This has left a research gap which Dr Mohammed Azlan Mohamed Iqbal, working at Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia, has tried to close. Here's his delightfully interesting PhD thesis.

  • 12/15/2012 – A computer program to identify beauty in problems and studies
    Computers today can play chess at the grandmaster level, but cannot tell a beautiful combination from a bland one. In this research, which has been on-going for seven years, the authors of this remarkable article show that a computer can indeed be programmed to recognize and evaluate beauty or aesthetics, at least in three-move mate problems and more recently endgame studies. Fascinating.

  • 2/2/2014 – A new, challenging chess variant
    Ever since desktop computers can play at its highest levels and beat practically all humans, the interest of the Artificial Intelligence community in this game has been sagging. That concerns Dr Azlan Iqbal, a senior lecturer with a PhD in AI, who has created a variant of the game that is designed to rekindle the interest of computer scientists – and be enjoyable to humans as well: Switch-Side Chain-Chess.

  • 5/11/2014 – Kasparov in Malaysia
    He was mobbed, but in a good way: a large number of chess fans and autograph hunters sought close contact to the legendary World Champion, who officiated the opening of the PMB National Age Group Championship 2014, and took time to discuss a variety of topics with an expert on aesthetics-recognition technology in chess, our author Dr Azlan Iqbal – who sent us a big pictorial report.

Topics Azlan Iqbal

Dr. Azlan Iqbal has a Ph.D. in artificial intelligence from the University of Malaya and is a senior lecturer at Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Malaysia, where he has worked since 2002. His research interests include computational aesthetics and computational creativity in games. He is a regular contributor at ChessBase News.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

azlan azlan 7/28/2014 04:25
Vernunft, the "canons of composition construction", as you put it, are virtually impossible to achieve in a real game. This is why constructs are more realistic and more palatable to a wider audience of chess enthusiasts. Constructs in no way spell the end of the traditional composition. There is room for all.
azlan azlan 7/28/2014 01:59
Jones, you are correct about the alternative solution to the first worthy mention. However, constructs tend to resemble positions that occur in real games more and are not bound by traditional composition conventions (e.g. being 'cooked'). Having another key move that also wins in three does not necessarily detract from a construct's educational or aesthetic merit. The original stipulation is also still valid.
jones_michaelt@hotmail.com jones_michaelt@hotmail.com 7/27/2014 04:34
Doesn't the first Worthy Mention have an alternative solution? 1. h5 Kh7 (1... gxh5 2. Bg7+ Kh7 3. g6# is the given solution with moves transposed) 2. hxg6+ Kh8 3. Bg7#
Uri Uri 7/27/2014 04:02
johnnyt,

check again: the winning composition has only one correct key move, but there are many duals (for example, after 1...Ra8 white mates in 2 not only with 2.e8=Q+ but also with 2.d8=N+ Rxd8 3.exd8=N#). Actually both 2.d8=N+ and 2.e8=Q+ (and also 2.e8=N, 2.e8=R, 2.exf8=Q+, 2.exf8=B) are threats after white's first move, so 1...Ra8 and 1...Kxe6 aren't really defenses - they don't defend against all threats. Black has no move which defends against all 6 threats - only moves which eliminate some of them.
Vernunft Vernunft 7/27/2014 04:16
None of these are more realistic than compositions normally are. This seems to be an excuse to violate canons of composition construction for the lazy. Boring.
genem genem 7/26/2014 11:28
It is interesting that the winning construct uses a scenario where a promotion has necessarily occurred, because that is another feature which is frowned upon by composition creators (in addition to the in-check feature Dr. Iqbal mentioned).

Inasmuch as one knight is no different than any other, perhaps a third knight adds less novelty than would added by a second dark squared bishop (or a second light squared bishop). I doubt I have ever seen such a puzzle. I wonder whether there is anything interesting to mine with that type of novel bishop?

Of these five constructs, my favorites are the second runner-up and the first worthy mention. They are less busy than the others, and more clearly avoid belonging to the complex composition category.

I played around with simplifying shot puzzle #452 from Fred Reinfeld's book 1001 Winning Chess Sacrifices and Combinations, which is from the game A.Denker - H.Avram 1939, after the actual moves 17. Ne6-g5+ (+2.1) Kf7-g8? (+4.5).

---- Next, Actual position (remove the spaces)
r4bkr/ ppp3pp/ 8/ 3qn1N1/ 2pp2P1/ 8/ PPP2P1P/ R1BQR1K1 w - - 0 18



---- Next, Decluttered "construct" position (remove the spaces)
5bkr/ 6pp/ 8/ 3qn1N1/ 3p4/ 8/ 2P5/ 2BQR1K1 w - - 0 18



Winning shot sequence, in each diagram, then goes:
18. R:e5/N! Q:e5/R
19. Qf3 Black resigned, but analysis could go on:
19. ... Qf6
20. Qd5+ White mates on next move.

By the way, the newly updated edition of F.Reinfeld's classic shot puzzle book can be found at (remove the spaces)

h ttp:// ww w.CastleLong .com/ essay/ Essay-FredReinfeld-Updated2014-1001WCSaC -Review-by-GeneM-20140627 .shtml

Thanks. GeneM. 2014-July-26.
1