Altibox Norway Rd5: Back to normal

by Albert Silver
6/11/2017 – It was a fairly quiet day overall, and after all the action from the previous round, round five was a return to normality. This isn’t to say that the five draws were entirely devoid of interest though. The two that really struck a note were the ones between Kramnik and Nakmaura, who battled it out in a Sicilian, while Caruana played a Petroff against Karjakin with a novelty that sacrificed an exchange. Illustrated report with analysis by GM Tiger Hillarp-Persson.

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

Round five

All photos by Lennart Ootes

Round 5: June 11, 2017 in Clarion Hotel Energy
Magnus Carlsen
½-½
Anish Giri
Vishy Anand
½-½
Wesley So
M. Vachier-Lagrave
½-½
Levon Aronian
Sergey Karjakin
½-½
Fabiano Caruana
Vladimir Kramnik
½-½
Hikaru Nakamura

All images in this article are high resolution. Click on them to see them full-sized.

The game between Magnus Carlsen and Anish Giri was a fairly tame Italian in which both played very proper, with careful piece maneuvers that aimed to neutralize more than to destabilize. Even the light tactics at the end with 31. Qb4 seemed so well under control that the flurry of exchanges that followed left little doubt as to the result. It was no big surprise though, as Carlsen was still licking his wounds from the previous round, while Giri was more than happy to take the draw with black against the world champion.

For aficionados of the Ruy Lopez Marshal, a new leaf was turned in one of the main lines (they almost all seem to be a main line nowadays) between Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and Levon Aronian. Aronian is a well-known expert of the defense and plays it regularly, though more often than not it seems more like his choice to guarantee a draw, unless White is so bold as to try for more, in which case: watch out. They repeated 19 moves of a previous game they played in…. Norway 2017. No, not a joke, this was their blitz game in the drawing of lots competition, which they also drew. It should be noted that the Marshall is sort of Sofia Rule proof, since with a regular 20+ moves of rote theory, if a draw is planned, it means 10 moves or fewer of actual play. You certainly wouldn’t get that with the St George Defense (1.e4 a6)!

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave was certainly not surprised by Aronian's choice of the Marshall as they repeated 20 moves from their blitz game in the Opening Ceremony competition

The game between Vishy Anand and Wesley So was also an Italian, and also a game from the Blitz event the previous week between Caruana and Aronian. There was a small twist, worth noting, and it was the conspicuous delay of d6 by Black. Instead he waited for White to commit 7.c3 and pushed 7…d5 straight away, equalizing as a result as well since White is one tempo behind in his piece development. The queens were off by move 15, and by move 23 it was a completely symmetrical rook and bishop endgame with nothing to grope for, and they shook hands on move 33.

In terms of theory, the game between Sergey Karjakin and Fabiano Caruana was certainly a surprise to viewers and pundits. Not only did Caruana swap his Berlin for the Petroff with black, but they followed a line that has barely been taken out of the theoretical basement in years, with the most recent essays by Nisipeanu in the 2015 World Cup. That might not seem so long ago, prior to that, for top players, you need to go back to 2007, with Ivanchuk and Kramnik giving it a one-time spin.

Fabiano was dying to try out a novelty he had prepared, involving an exchange sac, and after careful analysis, Sergey took up the gauntlet

Caruana had a nifty exchange sac in mind to explain his desire to roll back the clocks, and Karjakin was willing to take up the gauntlet, after making sure this would have a better fate than Carlsen when Aronian sacked his exchange. The Russian gave it back at the right moment, and emerged in a rook endgame up a pawn, but with strong drawing chances for Black. Caruana’s technique passed the test, and they drew after 73 moves.

Sergey Karjakin was in form and replied well to Fabiano's novelty. He came out ahead, but was unable to do more.

Sergey Karjakin vs Fabiano Caruana

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.d4 d5 6.Bd3 Bd6 7.0-0 0-0 8.c4 c6 9.Re1 Bf5 10.Qb3 Qd7 11.Nc3 Nxc3 12.Bxf5 Qxf5 13.Qxb7
13...Ne4N 13...Qd7 14.Qxd7 Nxd7 15.c5 Bxh2+ 16.Nxh2 Ne4 17.Bf4 Rfe8 18.f3 1/2-1/2 (53) Svidler,P (2728) -Ivanchuk,V (2750) Morelia/Linares 2007 14.Qxa8 Qd7! 15.cxd5 Nf6! 16.Re3! Nxd5 17.Rb3! Nb4! 18.Rxb4! 18.a3? for example, with big eyes on the b7 square, is just the sort of mistake Black would dream of, but knows he is unlikely to get. Nc2 19.Rb1 Qe6 and here White would need to play 20.Bf4! The precipitated 20.Qb7? would be severely punished by Nxd4! 21.Re3 Nxf3+ 22.gxf3 Qg6+ winning the rook on b1. 20...Bxf4 before trying to get out with 21.Qb7 18...Bxb4 19.Be3! Bd6! 20.d5! c5! 21.b4! cxb4 22.Rc1 Rd8 23.Qxa7 Qxa7 24.Bxa7 Nd7 25.Bd4 Ra8 26.Kf1 Ra5 27.Rc8+ Bf8 28.d6 Rd5 29.Ne5 Nxe5 30.Bxe5 f6 31.Bg3 Kf7 32.Rb8 Bxd6 33.Bxd6 Rxd6 34.Rxb4 Rd2 35.a4 Ra2
The dust has settled, and Black is down a pawn in a rook endgame, but his rook is all-powerful, secure behind the pawn, and with great activity. In rook endgames, activity is often the difference between a draw or defeat. 36.h4 h5 37.g3 Kg6 38.Rf4 Kf7 39.Ke1 Ke6 40.Rb4 Kf5 41.Kd1 Ke5 42.Ke1 Kf5! 43.Kf1 Kg6 44.Rc4 Kh6 45.Rf4 Kg6 46.Ke1 Kf7 47.Kf1 Kg6! 48.Kg2 Ra3 49.Kh3 Ra2 50.g4 Ra3+ 51.f3 hxg4+ 52.Kxg4 Ra1 53.Rc4 Ra2 54.h5+ Kh6 55.f4 Rg2+ 56.Kf5 Rh2 57.Ke6 Rxh5 58.f5 Rh1 59.Rc5 Kg5 60.Kf7 Rh7 61.a5 g6+ 62.Ke6 Rh1 63.a6 Ra1 64.fxg6+ Kxg6 65.Rc6 f5 66.Kd6 Kg5 67.Kc7 f4 68.Kb7 f3 69.Rc2 Kf4 70.a7 Kg3 71.a8Q Rxa8 72.Kxa8 f2 73.Rxf2 Kxf2
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Karjakin,S2781Caruana,F2808½–½2017C42Altibox Norway Chess 20175

The battle between Kramnik and Nakamura was also chosen as the game of the day by Tiger Hillarp-Persson, and though also a draw as they all were, it was a good fight between the two players as usual.

An excellent fight once again, and Nakamura maintains the lead at the midway point

Vladimir Kramnik vs Hikaru Nakamura (annotated by GM Tiger Hillarp-Persson)

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Nc3 The point of this move is to get Black to put the knight on f6 before playing d4. In this way White avoids some of Black's most popular antidotes. 3.d4 cxd4 4.Qxd4 and Black has three main options: a6 4...Nc6 5.Bb5 Bd7 (Compare this position to the one that arises after 5... Nc6 later.) 6.Qd3 is one of those awkward lines that are aimed at getting a Maroczy setup, even at the price of playing some strange moves. 6.Bxc6 Bxc6 7.Nc3 , is similar to the game, but here Black can also play h6 , intending e7-e5 and Nf6. 6...g6 7.0-0 Bg7 8.c4 Nf6 9.Nc3 0-0 10.h3 a6 11.Bxc6 Bxc6 12.Nd4 could be called a tabiya. 4...Nf6 has become more popular lately and White usually continues 5.Bb5+ Bd7 6.c4!? 6.Bxd7+ Qxd7 7.c4 Nc6 8.Qd3 Qg4 9.Nc3 9.0-0 Qxe4 10.Qb3 Rb8? 10...Ne5! and White has little to show for having squandered the center. 11.Nc3 Bozinovic,B (1969)-Vucinic,G (2294) Veliko Gradiste 2016 9...Qxg2 10.Rf1 Rc8 was good for Black, in Carlsen,M (2855)-Vachier Lagrave,M (2789) Leuven 2016. 6...g6 7.Nc3 Bg7 8.0-0 0-0 9.Qd3 with another typical Maroczy/ Bb5+-Sicilian. 5.c4 Nc6 6.Qe3!? The let's-put-the-queen-on-a-strange-square has gone so far that "strange" has aquired a different meaning. If it works it is good and works it does. g6 7.h3 Bh6 8.Qc3 Qa5 9.Qxa5 Nxa5 10.Bxh6 Nxh6 11.Nc3 Be6 12.b3 12.Nd5! 12...0-0 13.Nd4 Nc6 14.Nxe6? fxe6 0-1 (49) Muzychuk,M (2528)-Edouard, R (2636) Cap d'Agde 2015 3...Nf6 After 3...a6!? White's only decent way to avoid the Najdorf is 4.g3!? when Black can choose between a dragon set-up and a more traditional Taimanov- or Najdorf-fianchetto. 4.d4 cxd4 5.Qxd4 a6 White is hoping for 5...Nc6 6.Bb5 Bd7 7.Bxc6 Bxc6 8.Bg5 e6 9.0-0-0 which is a whole different ball game. Last I checked theory seemed to agree that Black is all right here, but with the rise of the machines it is quite possible that this verdict has changed. Be7 10.Qd3 Qa5 11.h4 leads to a sharp game, but whether it is balanced I don't know. 6.e5! Otherwise Black gets a perfect Sicilian with Nc6 on the next move. Nc6 7.Qa4 dxe5 8.Nxe5 Bd7 9.Nxd7 Qxd7 White has gained the bishop pair, but Black has a harmonious position and develops fast. Intuitively I would not evaluate this position as "better for White", as my silicon friend does, but the more I look at it the more I feel that I perhaps should. 10.Bd2 A logical move that paves the way for 0-0-0, but there is also something to be said for the alternative, more positional way: 10.Be3 White is aiming to play g3, Bg2, Rd1 and then take it from there. Black cannot sit idly by and wait, but needs to find a way to put a stick into White's wheel. e6 10...g6?! 11.Rd1 Qc7 12.g3 Bg7 13.Bg2 0-0 14.0-0 Rac8 15.Bf4 Qb6 16.Qb3 Qxb3 17.axb3 11.Rd1 Qc7 12.g3 Bb4 12...Be7?! 13.Bg2 Rc8 14.0-0 0-0 15.Bf4 Qb6 16.Qb3 and again White gets a comfortable engame advantage. 13.Bg2 0-0 14.Qb3 Ng4 15.Bf4 e5 16.Be3 Bxc3+ 17.Qxc3 Nxe3 18.fxe3 Rad8 and Black is closing in on equality. Still, this line clearly shows that Black is under some pressure. 10.Bg5 is less logical since it is Black's queenside that ought to be attacked. After e6 11.g3 Bb4 White cannot play 12.Bg2?? due to b5 13.Qb3 Nd4! 10...g6 With white's king evacuating towards the queenside, it is a good idea to aim the bishop towards b2. 11.0-0-0 Bg7 12.Bg5 This is a new move. 12.Be3 Qc8 13.h3?! 13.g3!? is more to the point, but I feel Black should be fine here. 13...0-0 14.g4 This arrangement is too slow for White as it does not threaten the king while Black is not afraid to have the knight kicked away from f6. b5 15.Qb3?! Na5 15...e6! 16.Qb4 was unclear, in Blehm,P (2420)-Janssen,R (2345) Calicut 1998. 12...Qg4 12...Qf5 is more ambitious. Perhaps Nakamura wanted to avoid Kramnik's preparation, thinking "he probably thought I would keep the queens on, so I'll swap them!". Maybe not. 13.h4 13.Bxf6? Qxf6 is absolutely horrendous for White 13...0-0 14.f3 b5 15.Qf4 Qxf4+ 16.Bxf4 Rad8 and with Black's pieces are working very well together. 13.Bxf6 From a general which-piece-ought-to-be-swapped point of view, this move is a bit surprising, but it soon becomes obvious that it is a good move. Qxa4 14.Nxa4 Not 14.Bxg7? Qf4+ 15.Kb1 Rg8-+ 14...Bxf6 15.c3! This move restricts both the knight and the bishop. Black has no equivalent move to neutralize White's minor pieces and thus Black's queenside comes under pressure. e6 At some point Black must take control of d5 and this is as good a time as any. The active 15...b5 doesn't solve Black's problems: 16.Nc5 16.Nb6 Ra7 17.g3 e6 18.Bg2 Nb8!? 19.Rd3 0-0 20.Rhd1 16...0-0 and although there are other ways to get some advantage, the principled 17.Nd7 seems the simplest. After Rfe8 18.Nxf6+ exf6 19.g3 Ne5 20.h3 Rac8 21.Kb1 Black's knight is not quite at par with the bishop. 15...Rc8 16.g3 Rc7 17.Nb6 e6 16.g3 Rc8 17.Bg2 Be7 18.Rd2 h5! Since there is no way to exchange ones way out of the pressure, priority number one becomes to get some counterplay. 18...0-0 19.Nb6 Rc7 20.Rhd1 Rd8 21.Rxd8+ Nxd8 22.Kc2 and White has terrific pressure on the queenside. 19.Rhd1 19.h4? would reduce White's winning chances significantly as the kingside pawns are set to be chewed on by Black's bishop. 19...h4 20.Nb6 20.g4? Bg5 20...Rc7 21.Na8 This kind of repetition saves time and also sends a message to the opponent about who is in the drivers seat. Rc8 22.Nb6 Rc7 22...Rd8 23.b4 hxg3 24.hxg3 Rxd2 25.Rxd2 Rh2 26.Bxc6+ bxc6 27.a4 , followed by Nc4, is difficult for Black as both a6, c6 and - at some point - f7 are weak. 23.f4! hxg3 24.hxg3 Rh5 24...g5?! 25.f5! exf5 26.Nd5 Rc8 27.Rf2 is just awful for Black. Observe that Rh2? fails due to 28.Nb6! followed by Bxc6+ and Rxh2. 25.Na8! Rc8 26.Rd7! A wonderful concept built on the strength of the unopposed bishop. Rh2 26...Rxa8 27.Rxb7 Rc8 27...Nd8 28.Rxe7+ Kxe7 29.Bxa8± 28.Bxc6+ Rxc6 29.Rb8+ and Black has to give the bishop. 27.Be4! Re2 28.Bxc6? This move ruins it for Kramnik. The best move is 28.Bf3! The point is that if Black plays Re3 , then 28...Rh2 29.Nb6 Rd8 30.Rxb7± 29.Bxc6 bxc6 30.Nc7+ Kf8 31.Rh1 Bf6 32.Rh7 Bg7 looks almost exactly like the game, with the exception of the placement of Black's active rook. In the game it is on e2, but here it is on e3. But how can this be better for White? Now the rook is not just active but also threatening a pawn! However, what is most important is that the rook is not just on a casual stroll, windowshopping for g-pawns, but on an important mission to protect the e6-pawn. If the rook moves away White will strike with Nxe6! So, White can continue with 33.Kd2! and the rook ends up in a pickle: Re4 33...Rxg3! might be the best still although 34.Nxe6+ fxe6 35.Rdxg7 Rg2+ 36.Kc1! 36.Ke3 Rxb2 37.Ra7 Kg8 is less clear. 36...Rg1+ 37.Kc2 Rg2+ 38.Kb3 Rb8+ 39.Rb7 Rxb7+ 40.Rxb7 Rg4 41.Ra7 Rxf4 42.Rxa6 g5 43.Rxc6 Kf7 44.a4 g4 45.Rd6 and White should win. 34.b3 c5 35.Rh1 c4 36.b4 e5 37.f5! gxf5 38.Rh5 Rg4 39.Rxf5 Rxg3 40.Ke2! f6 41.Kf2 Rg4 41...Rxc3? 42.Ne6+ 42.a4 with complete domination. 28...bxc6 29.Nc7+ Kf8 30.Rh1 Bf6 31.Nxa6 Ra8! Black's activity is no less valuable than White's extra pawn. 32.Nb4 32.Rh7? Rxa6 33.Rhxf7+ 33.Rdxf7+ Kg8 33...Ke8 32...c5 33.Nd3 Rxa2 34.Kb1 Ra8! 35.Nxc5 Rb8 36.Rb7 Rxb7 37.Nxb7 Rg2 38.Rh3 g5! Improving the scope of the bishop and opening up a road towards g4 for the king. 39.fxg5 Bxg5 40.Nc5 Be7! If White's knight goes to d3, the bishop will control if from d6. If the knight goes to e4, then the bishop is already in the right spot and Black can play f7-f5. 41.Nd3 Bd6 42.Nf4 Rf2 43.Rh4 43.b4 Ke7! and White cannot go forward with the pawns without the support of the king. 43...Bxf4 44.gxf4 Rxf4 45.Kb2 Ke7 46.Kb3 f5 also works, but there is no reason for Black to hurry with such an exchange. 43...Ke7 44.Rg4 Rf1+ 45.Kc2 Rf2+ 46.Kb3 Rd2 47.Rg8 Rf2 48.Rg4 Rd2 49.Rg8 Rf2 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Kramnik,V2808Nakamura,H2785½–½2017B53Altibox Norway Chess 20175

Standings after five rounds

(click image for full size)

Pairings and results of Norway Chess 2017

Round 1: June 6, 2017 in Clarion Hotel Energy
Hikaru Nakamura
1-0
Anish Giri
Levon Aronian
½-½
Fabiano Caruana
Magnus Carlsen
½-½
Wesley So
M. Vachier-Lagrave
½-½
Vishy Anand
Vladimir Kramnik
½-½
Sergey Karjakin
Round 2: June 7, 2017 in Clarion Hotel Energy
Hikaru Nakamura
½-½
Levon Aronian
Anish Giri
½-½
Sergey Karjakin
Fabiano Caruana
½-½
Magnus Carlsen
Wesley So
½-½
M. Vachier-Lagrave
Vishy Anand
0-1
Vladimir Kramnik
Round 3: June 8, 2017 in Clarion Hotel Energy
Levon Aronian
½-½
Anish Giri
Magnus Carlsen
½-½
Hikaru Nakamura
M. Vachier-Lagrave
½-½
Fabiano Caruana
Sergey Karjakin
½-½
Vishy Anand
Vladimir Kramnik
½-½
Wesley So
Round 4:  June 10, 2017 in Clarion Hotel Energy
Hikaru Nakamura
1-0
M. Vachier-Lagrave
Anish Giri
1-0
Vishy Anand
Levon Aronian
1-0
Magnus Carlsen
Fabiano Caruana
½-½
Vladimir Kramnik
Wesley So
½-½
Sergey Karjakin
Round 5: June 11, 2017 in Clarion Hotel Energy
Magnus Carlsen
½-½
Anish Giri
Vishy Anand
½-½
Wesley So
M. Vachier-Lagrave
½-½
Levon Aronian
Sergey Karjakin
½-½
Fabiano Caruana
Vladimir Kramnik
½-½
Hikaru Nakamura
Round 6: June 12, 2017 in Clarion Hotel Energy
Hikaru Nakamura Sergey Karjakin
Anish Giri Wesley So
Levon Aronian Vladimir Kramnik
Fabiano Caruana Vishy Anand
Magnus Carlsen M. Vachier-Lagrave
Round 7: June 14, 2017 in Stavanger Concert Hall
Wesley So Fabiano Caruana
Vishy Anand Hikaru Nakamura
M. Vachier-Lagrave Anish Giri
Sergey Karjakin Levon Aronian
Vladimir Kramnik Magnus Carlsen
Round 8: June 15, 2017 in Stavanger Concert Hall
Hikaru Nakamura Wesley So
Anish Giri Fabiano Caruana
Levon Aronian Vishy Anand
Magnus Carlsen Sergey Karjakin
M. Vachier-Lagrave Vladimir Kramnik
Round 9: June 16, 2017 in Stavanger Concert Hall
Fabiano Caruana Hikaru Nakamura
Wesley So Levon Aronian
Vishy Anand Magnus Carlsen
Sergey Karjakin M. Vachier-Lagrave
Vladimir Kramnik Anish Giri

Links

You can use ChessBase 14 or any of our Fritz compatible chess programs to replay the games in PGN. You can also download our free Playchess client, which will in addition give you immediate access to the chess server Playchess.com.


Born in the US, he grew up in Paris, France, where he completed his Baccalaureat, and after college moved to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. He had a peak rating of 2240 FIDE, and was a key designer of Chess Assistant 6. In 2010 he joined the ChessBase family as an editor and writer at ChessBase News. He is also a passionate photographer with work appearing in numerous publications, and the content creator of the YouTube channel, Chess & Tech.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.