It's Lenderman!

by ChessBase
8/14/2017 – Lenderman wins the U.S. Open in Norfolk, Virginia, with 8.0/9. From considering quitting professional chess a few months ago, to qualifying for the 2018 U.S. Championship, it's been a stark turnaround for the 27-year-old grandmaster from Brooklyn. “Apparently the game of chess doesn’t want me to leave yet.” | Photos: Vanessa Sun

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Clear first with a stellar 8.0/9

This year, the U.S. Open was held in Norfolk, Virginia, home of the largest naval base in the world. With stunning river views, no one could deny that it was a beautiful environment to hold the tournament.

Norfolk

The river view is beautiful at all hours of the day

For the past two years, GM Alexander Shabalov qualified for the United States Chess Championship by winning the U.S. Open, a unique one section tournament with class prizes that takes place in conjunction with U.S. Chess Federation meetings and FIDE seminars.

Alex Shabalov

Multi-time U.S. Open winner, and former U.S. Champion Alex Shabalov | Photo: Vanessa Sun

One grandmaster decided that it was time to end Shabalov’s reign and followed through accordingly. Aleksandr Lenderman placed an impressive clear first above 15 other grandmasters, his best result after playing in the Open 7 times. With this tournament victory, Lenderman qualifies to the 2018 U.S. Championship, where he last competed in 2016.

When the dust settled in Norfolk, GM Lenderman was the sole player to score 8/9 points. He finished ahead of players such as GMs Illya Nyzhnyk, Sergei Azarov, and Joel Benjamin. One of Lenderman’s most exciting games was his win against Shabalov:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
1.e41,165,57054%2421---
1.d4946,47455%2434---
1.Nf3281,31256%2441---
1.c4181,93756%2442---
1.g319,68856%2427---
1.b314,23654%2427---
1.f45,88648%2377---
1.Nc33,79651%2384---
1.b41,75348%2380---
1.a31,19754%2403---
1.e31,06848%2408---
1.d394850%2378---
1.g466246%2361---
1.h444653%2374---
1.c342651%2425---
1.h327956%2416---
1.a410860%2468---
1.f39147%2431---
1.Nh38966%2508---
1.Na34262%2482---
1.c4 g6 I was hoping to be the first one to surprise Shabalov with 1.c4, since I play 1.d4 more frequently, but in fact Shabalov surprised me first with 1...g6. 2.g3!? Normally I would play 2.d4 here automatically, but every time I played Shabalov in the past, he's had some nasty surprise in store for me, with good practical value, at least for one game, so this time I wanted to have none of that, and just play a chess game where we both are sort of on our own. Bg7 3.Bg2 e6 A very interesting hybrid, which strong GM Vladimir Malakhov uses quite frequently in his games, especially against lower-rated players. Black's idea is to play Ne7, d5 and develop harmony that way. This setup is pretty logical here, since I haven't played d4 yet, and can't have a huge advantage in the center. A stem game to study, of what can happen if White gets control of the center, can be a recent one between the young Russian Andrey Esipenko and the USA's Ruifeng Li, in the recently passed Match of the Millennials. 4.Nf3 d5 5.0-0 Ne7 6.d4 0-0 7.Qc2 b6 8.Rd1 I didn't want to take on d5 yet, since I didn't want to give Black an additional option with Bf5. 8.cxd5 exd5 9.Nc3 Bf5 8...Bb7 9.cxd5 exd5 Black has to go for this structure because otherwise I get a stong center with e4. 10.b3 Here I wasn't sure what the best setup for me is. a5 11.Nc3 Na6 12.Bb2 Nb4 13.Qd2 Nf5 14.a3 Actually I didn't particularly want to play this move, since I thought in the long run that weakens my pawn structure. However, I felt like that knight on b4 had to go. 14.Rac1 I wanted to play this first, but I didn't play this because of a concrete reason. Ba6 And now I was worried that it's hard to meet the Bh6 threat. However, it turned out I was afraid of ghosts. 15.Ne5 15.g4!? 15...Bh6 15...c5 16.Nxd5! Nxd5 17.dxc5+- 16.f4 And I'm just much better. Black is now poorly coordinated. It's hard for him to defend d5. 16.e3 f6? 17.Nc6 Also works. 16...Bb7 17.a3 Na6 18.Nxd5 Bxd5 19.e4 Bxb3 20.exf5± 14...Na6 15.Qc2 Re8 16.e3 Qe7 17.Rac1 Rad8 18.Ne2 Perhaps this isn't the most accurate move. 18.Ne5 I didn't like this because of c5 with counterplay. However, I could've improved on this idea. c5 18.Bh3! Nd6 19.Ne5 And only now Ne5, and now it's slightly awkward for him, and it's not so easy for him to get c5 in comfortably. c5 19...f6 20.Nd3 20.dxc5 18...c5 19.Nf4 Here I had lots of choices, but here I used psychology to play this move, and it worked! : ) c4? 19...cxd4 Of course I expected this move. But Shabalov is an aggressive player, and really dislikes playing symmetrical positions without much going on, especially if there is a little bit of suffering. Plus, I knew he really needed the win to keep his US Open hopes alive, since his tiebreaks were bad thanks to earlier draws, so 7.5 for him would never be sufficient. 20.exd4 I was thinking to play this, thinking I was slightly better. I misevaluated this, though, since I don't get in Ne5, and he has a strong move, Bh6, after which only Black can be better. 20.Nxd4 Nxd4 21.Bxd4 I didn't think this was good enough for anything in the meanwhile. 21.exd4 Bh6 21...Bxd4 22.Rxd4 Qxa3 I didn't think I can be better here. The problem is, Rc8 is a huge threat. 23.Qd1 Rc8= 20...Bh6! 20.Ne5 20.bxc4 dxc4 21.d5 Even this would be enough for a huge advantage. c3 22.Bxc3 Rc8 23.Qb2 20...b5 20...f6 21.Nexg6 hxg6 22.Nxg6 Qd7 23.bxc4 I saw this line and I thought I have a huge initiative here, and indeed that's true. 21.bxc4 bxc4 21...dxc4 22.Nc6 Bxc6 23.Bxc6 is hopeless for Black. 22.Bc3 Probably more precise than Qa4 because... 22.Qa4 Bxe5 23.dxe5 Nc5 I thought gives Black more practical chances. 22...Qxa3 23.Nxc4 I thought a while here, but still ended up making the wrong dynamic choice. 23.Ra1 This was better. Qe7 23...Qd6 24.Rxa5 Nc7 25.Rb1± This is bad for Black. My pieces are too active and his pieces are in awkward spots. 24.Rxa5 Bxe5 25.dxe5 Nc7 26.Ra7+- and I'm just winning. 23...dxc4 24.Bxb7 Nb4 25.Bxb4 I couldn't help being materialistic. I thought this was simplest, but maybe not objectively best. 25.Qd2 Originally I thought this was best, but I missed the sneaky move, Na2! which gives some practical chances still. Na2 26.Ra1 Qxc3 27.Rxa2± is better for me, but I thought the other way was cleaner. 25...axb4 26.Qxc4 26.Ra1 would be a mistake because of a nice shot, which thankfully I saw. Nxe3! 27.fxe3 Qxe3+ 28.Kg2 Rxd4= with a roughly equal game suddenly. 26...Nd6 27.Qa6 Nxb7 28.Qxb7 Rb8 29.Qd5 29.Qc6 b3 29...Red8 30.Qe4 b3 31.Ra1 Qd6 31...Qb2 I expected this or Qb4, trying to keep the queen in closer contact with the passed pawn. White is better, but it's still not so easy to convert. 32.Rab1 Rb5 33.Rb2 Now my plan is simply to try to win the pawn on b3. Bf8 34.Rdb1 Qb6 35.Qd3 Rb8 36.Ra1 Stopping Ba3. Qb7 37.Ne2 h5 38.h4 Stopping any counterplay. Bd6?! This is time pressure inaccuracy. It only helps me. 38...g5 39.Nc3 Doesn't work for Black. 38...Rb6 38...Qf3± 39.Nc3 Rb6 40.Ne4 Qe7 41.Rab1 Bc7 41...Ba3 42.Rxb3 Rxb3 43.Rxb3 Rxb3 44.Qxb3 Qxe4 45.Qxa3+- Is a hopeless endgame for Black. I consolidate no matter what Black tries. Qb1+ 45...g5 46.Qc5+- 46.Kh2 Qc2 47.Qa8+ Kg7 48.Qf3 42.Ng5 I thought it's simplest to not allow any g5 counterplay. Qb4 42...Qa3 43.Qc4 Is the point. This fork on c7 and f7 is deadly for black. 43.Rxb3 And black resigned since after Qxb3 Rxb3 Rxb3, Qc4 forks c7 and f7. A very important win for me, and especially nice since I thought it was a decent game for me against a great fighter like Shabalov, who has given me a very hard time in the last few decisive games we've played :) 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Lenderman,A-Shabalov,A-1–02017A13US Open8

Essentially, the English Opening usually leads to reversed positions in which the first player enjoys the extra tempo. Then why not meet this 1.c4 move with 1…e5 and play the reversed Sicilian? In this 60 Minutes video, you will find a complete repertoire for Black based on the move 1…e5 against White’s most popular approach - the Reversed Dragon setup. Bulgarian GM Dejan Bojkov uses very recent top GM games to highlight the trends in the line and to explain the ideas behind Black’s development.

Shabalov could not hope to regain his title after this eighth round loss, but his last round win meant he still tied for third.

Lenderman’s strong finish was crucial to his success, emerging from a group of players whose last few rounds results were subpar. One favorite to win the tournament was GM Yaro Zherebukh. He was the top seed in the tournament and competed in this past U.S. Championship as the wildcard, placing sixth with an impressive win over GM Fabiano Caruana.

Zherebukh

Zherebukh accepted an award on behalf of the SLU Chess Team for their third place finish at the President’s Cup/Final Four Collegiate Championship | Photo: Vanessa Sun

At first, Zherebukh was one of the leaders in the traditional nine-day schedule, with 5 points going into Round 6. As the highest rated highest rated player he tended to receive more challenging pairings than his rivals, often playing grandmasters while others played lower titled masters. This eventually took its toll, and by the time the weaker four-day schedule merged with the six and nine-round groups, he had lost his lead. [In U.S. open tournaments it's common to have multiple playing schedules for the early rounds -Ed.]

Zherebukh yielded too many draws and eventually decided to withdraw from the tournament following a loss against GM Sergey Erenburg. He may still qualify to the U.S. Championship by rating and will try to make up the deficit at the U.S. Masters tournament, which starts August 23rd.

Another favorite to win the U.S. Open was grandmaster Ruifeng Li who took the lead when the multiple playing schedule's merged. Going into the eighth round with 6½/7, he was pursued by GMs Shabalov, Dmitry Gordievsky and a few others on 6.0/7.

Li and Lenderman

Ruifeng Li vs. Alex Lenderman | Photo: Vanessa Sun

Li needed a last round win in order to at least tie for first in the tournament, however Lenderman destroyed that dream, just like he did Shabalov’s!

Ruifeng was outplayed by GM Alex Lenderman in the last round, guaranteeing Lenderman at least a tie for first, which eventually became clear first, as the remaining players with 7/8 came up short.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
1.e41,165,57054%2421---
1.d4946,47455%2434---
1.Nf3281,31256%2441---
1.c4181,93756%2442---
1.g319,68856%2427---
1.b314,23654%2427---
1.f45,88648%2377---
1.Nc33,79651%2384---
1.b41,75348%2380---
1.a31,19754%2403---
1.e31,06848%2408---
1.d394850%2378---
1.g466246%2361---
1.h444653%2374---
1.c342651%2425---
1.h327956%2416---
1.a410860%2468---
1.f39147%2431---
1.Nh38966%2508---
1.Na34262%2482---
1.b3 This move didn't come as a surprise, in fact I sort of expected it. As of late, 1.b3 is one of Ruifeng's main weapons, and he's had some success with it. e5 2.Bb2 Nc6 3.e3 3.Nf3!? He's also played this interesting move in some games. 3...d5!? The first small surprise. The most common way to play is Nf6 followed by Bd6, but I wanted to play something that is quite sound but also not so well-known. Luckily after 1.b3 Black has a lot of ways to get fresh positions, which might not always be familiar for the opponent. 3...Nf6 4.Bb5 Bd6 5.Na3 is considered a main line these days. Na5 5...a6 4.Bb5 Bd6 5.f4 This perhaps is considered the "refutation" of this straightforward development for Black. However luckily for me I had some time to look at this before my game, and realized that Black is doing quite well here. 5.Nf3 is also possible. f6 5...Qe7 with interesting play. 5...f6 6.Nh3!? An interesting try by Ruifeng Li, played after a long think. 6.fxe5?! The main point lies in this line. fxe5 7.Bxe5? 7.Nf3 Nh6! I actually analyzed this briefly before the game. Black is better here in all lines according to Stockfish. 7...Qh4+! 8.g3 Qe4 9.Bxg7 Qxh1 10.Qh5+ Ke7 11.Qh4+ Kf7 12.Bxh8 Qxg1+-+ And Black ends up winning. 6.Qh5+ g6 7.Qh4 exf4 8.exf4 is another interesting line, where the position is probably roughly equal but I slightly prefer black. Kf7 This was my intention here. 8...Qe7+ This is also possible. 6...Nh6 The most logical move and probably the best in the position. 7.Qh5+ Nf7 8.Nc3 So far Ruifeng is play precisely. 8.fxe5 fxe5 9.0-0 g6 Here g6 is important. 9...0-0?! 10.Rxf7 Rxf7 11.Ng5 g6 12.Nxf7 gxh5 13.Nxd8 Nxd8 14.Nc3 10.Qf3 0-0! I didn't actually see this line during the game. 11.Qxd5 Nb4 12.Qe4 Bxh3! 13.gxh3 Ng5! and I have initiative. 8...a6 Challenging his bishop and asking him a difficult question. 9.Be2 9.Bxc6+ bxc6 Would be quite comfortable for me. 9...Be7 10.fxe5?! This is a concrete move, but this ends up only helping me, since white doesn't have anything convincing to compensate for giving up the center. 10.Qf3= Would be better, leading to a very complex battle. 10.0-0-0 Even this is possible. 10...fxe5 11.0-0 g6! The move order is very important here. 11...Be6 12.Bg4! g6 12...Qd6? 13.Ba3 is even worse for Black, just losing in fact. 12...Qd7? 13.Qxf7++- 13.Bxe6 gxh5 14.Bxf7+ Kd7 15.Nxd5 is a line I saw, and knowing how strong and creative Ruifeng is dynamically, I knew I didn't want to give him this kind of a position with long-term initiative. 15.Bxd5 12.Qf3 Be6 13.e4 Nd4 Another important move, misplacing the white queen. 14.Qd3 Nxe2+ 14...c6 I also considered this, the computer's top choice. However I wasn't totally convinced because of a very interesting reply, Nf4!? 15.Nf4 Bd7 16.Nfxd5 And again, I wanted to avoid giving my opponent the initiative. cxd5 17.Nxd5 15.Nxe2 15.Qxe2 Actually I expected this. d4 16.Nd5!? Bxd5 17.exd5 Qxd5 18.Rae1 with some compensation for the pawn, but possibly not enough. 15...d4 And here I was very happy, since I knew my opponent has to sacrifice, otherwise he's strategically lost, since I have a huge space advantage, not to mention two bishops, and his pieces are restricted. 16.c3 c5 17.cxd4 cxd4 18.Nhf4! The only move, otherwise as I mentioned White is strategically lost. exf4?! I decided to accept the challenge. 18...Qd7 Maybe it was better to play this and keep a slight advantage. 19.Nxe6 Qxe6 I am better thanks to my space. His bishop on b2 is restricted. 19.Nxf4 Qd7 I spent 25 minutes here. This was a very critical position. 19...Qb6 This is the move I was really spending a lot of time on, but I calculated that it should only lead to a draw, and I wanted to win the game, so I declined going into this line. 20.Bxd4 Bc5 21.Nxe6 Bxd4+ 22.Qxd4! 22.Nxd4? Rd8-+ Is winning for black. 22...Qxe6 23.Rf6! Qe7 24.Rxf7! Kxf7 25.Rf1+ Kg8 26.Qd5+ Kg7 27.Qd4+ Kh6 28.Rf3 And sadly for me, I couldn't find a way out of a perpetual check here, and indeed the computer says it's a draw, so I'm happy I didn't miscalculate this line. 19...Bd7 20.Nd5 I felt is also a dangerous initiative for White. 20.Qxd4 Rg8?! 20...Qxd4+ 21.Bxd4 is inconvenient for Black since two of my pieces are hanging now. Bg4 22.Bxh8 Nxh8 23.Nd5 20...Rf8 Perhaps this was better. 21.Qg7 0-0-0 Since here I can just castle long. 21.Qb6?! Ruifeng played this quickly, but maybe it's not the most accurate. 21.Nd5 I was most afraid of this move. Now I would have to make a difficult choice. I think practically White is much better here. Bxd5?! 21...Rc8 Is probably the best, however, I didn't like this. 22.Nf6+ 22.Qe3 is also good, keeping the tension. 22...Bxf6 23.Qxf6 And I thought with opposite colored bishops, White has huge initiative. 22.exd5 Rd8? 23.Rae1 I actually wanted to play this with Black, but this is just losing for Black it turns out. 21.Qe3 Here also White has good compensation. 21...Nd8 Maybe Ruifeng missed this move, since backward defensive moves are very easy to miss. 22.Rac1?! 22.Nd5 Now this was the best move, keeping the balance. 22...Qd6 23.Qe3 Rf8 23...Bg5? would be a wrong move order because of Rc5! or Qg3! 24.Rc5 24.e5 probably only makes things worse. Qd7 25.d4 25.Qb6 Rc8 26.Rxc8 Qxc8 27.Rc1 Qd7 28.Rc7 Qxd2 Maybe Ruifeng missed this line for Black. 25...Bg5 26.Ba3 Rf5 More precise than Rf7, as I'm preserving the f7 square for the queen. 27.Qe4 Qf7-+ Now I knew I was winning. 28.g3 A very sad move to have to play. However, it is forced. 28.Nxe6 Bxc1-+ Sadly for White just doesn't work tactically. 29.Rxf5 gxf5 28...Bxf4 29.Rxf4 Rxf4 30.Qxf4 Qxf4 31.gxf4 Rc8 The simplest. 32.Kf2 32.Rxc8 Bxc8 33.d5 Bf5-+ Will net me another pawn. 32...Rxc1 33.Bxc1 Nc6 34.Ke3 Kd7 35.Ba3 Bd5 36.Bd6 Ke6 37.Kd3 Kf5 38.Kc3 Ke4 And here he resigned. I simply dominate the light squares and there is absolutely nothing White can do. I was very happy to win this nice battle against such a strong player like Ruifeng and overall it seemed like a well-played game, considering how complicated the game was. 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Li,R-Lenderman,A-0–12017A01US Open9

Expect to see Lenderman continue his fighting spirit next year's U.S. Championship. Despite experience as a professional player, in recent years, it has been hard to surive playing alone. Last year, Alex had the opportunity to coach the U.S. Olympiad team, which won gold in Baku. He discussed this at length along with many other topics on Ben Johnson's excellent Perpetual Chess Podcast last February:

Lenderman also does plenty of lecturing and game review sessions at Continental Chess Association tournaments. Just a few months ago, he considered abandoning his professional playing to focus on coaching full time. With this recent qualification, though, he says he's had a change of heart.

“Now it’s my responsibility to prepare as hard as I can for the U.S. Championship and try to do the best I can there… I enjoy teaching these days more than playing so… in the long run I might still steadily switch into chess teaching. But I won’t actively pursue that yet.”

For now, GM Lenderman is no doubt happy and celebrating his big tournament win and qualification, but still looking forward to progress and continuing hard work, as he prepares to stack as many strong tournaments as possible over the next few months, including the FIDE World Cup and Isle of Man tournament. 

Lastly, the U.S. Open is more than just a single tournament. It's a place where important figures in American chess gather and do business. One legend of the past made an rare appearance:

Grandmaster William "Father Bill" Lombardy was one of Bobby Fischer's seconds in his 1972 World Championship match in Reykjavik, and a former World Junior Champion. He has more recently fallen on hard times.

Links


Reports about chess: tournaments, championships, portraits, interviews, World Championships, product launches and more.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.