2017 Tata Rd5: So takes lead; Adhiban stuns Karjakin

by Albert Silver
1/20/2017 – It isn’t every day that so many astonishing things happen in a single round, but such was the case in round five. The news came on several fronts, notably Eljanov losing to Aronian, and thus relinquishing his top position. Carlsen wasn’t the one to snatch it after a draw by Nepomniachtchi, but rather Wesley So, who defeated Harikrishna. Bottom seed Adhiban smashed Karjakin in a French Defense. Today’s report includes a Masters thesis by Alex Lenderman on the French Defense.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

The elite Tata Steel tournaments in Wijk aan Zee are underway and take place from January 13-29, with two main tournaments, the Masters with both Magnus Carlsen and Sergey Karjakin as headliners, as well as Wesley So, Levon Aronian, Anish Giri, Baskaran Adhiban, Radoslaw Wojtaszek, Ian Nepomniachtchi, Richard Rapport, Dmitri Andreikin, Wei Yi, Pavel Eljanov, and Loek van Wely. All rounds in Wijk aan Zee begin at 1.30pm, except for the last round on 29 January 2017, which begins at 12.00pm. Both rounds on the Chess On Tour days start at 2.00pm.

All photos by Alina L'Ami for the official site

Rest Day

On the night before the rest day, there was the traditional simul, held once again by Jorden Van Foreest, though his opponents had some GM help as can be seen with Erwin L'Ami and Anish Giri at the rear.

Jorden enjoyed the help of his little brother Pieter Van Foreest

It might be awfully cold there now, but Wijk aan Zee is not lacking on gorgeous sunsets

The official rest day would hardly be complete without Ye Olde Football Game. Loek Van Wely and the other players got the full shebang with young wannabes accompanying them on to the pitch.

Still, what a place to play: a full-fledged professional stadium!

And the game is afoot, with a showdown between Jorden Van Foreest and Magnus Carlsen

Chaos ensues

 

A small video of the some of the Grandmasters playing a friendly game of football at the Telstar stadium in IJmuiden. They were accompanied by some of Telstar's finest.

Indoors children were treated to a number of activities including...

... a simul

Round five

Masters tournament

Round 5 - Thursday, January 19
Eljanov, P.
0-1
Aronian, L.
Karjakin, S.
0-1
Adhiban, B.
So, W.
1-0
Harikrishna, P.
Wojtaszek, R.
1-0
Van Wely, L.
Andreikin, D.
½-½
Rapport, R.
Wei, Y.
½-½
Giri, A.
Nepomniachtchi, I.
½-½
Carlsen, M.

 

Video impressions of round five

Quick recap of round five by Daniel King

The opening wasn't exactly typical fare for Magnus as he gave a pawn for piece activity. He used his development to keep White at bay, and drew against Nepomniachtchi.

Levon Aronian not only scored his first win, but did so at the expense of leader, and man-in-form Pavel Eljanov

 

Levon Aronian speaks to Anna Rudolf about his win over former leader Pavel Eljanov

This round was held in Rotterdam, as part of the Chess on Tour initiative. Note that only the Masters group toured, while the Challengers remained in Wij aan Zee.

Wesley So played a very fine game against Pentala Harikirshna, and took the sole lead. Will he repeat his fantastic 2016 now in 2017?

It was a tough blow for the very likable Pentala Harikrishna, but he was avenged in a way by his compatriot...

... Baskaran Adhiban who brought in the cavalry and smashed...

... Sergey Karjakin with Black using the French Defense!

Our guest analyst Aleksandr Lenderman, a specialist in the French Defense sent in notes so detailed they could constitute a book on the line. Well worth the time invested though you can also just play through the powerful game by the Indian.

Aleksandr Lenderman analyzes Sergey Karjakin vs Baskaran Adhiban

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
1.e41,170,31954%2421---
1.d4949,86755%2434---
1.Nf3282,62856%2440---
1.c4182,73156%2442---
1.g319,74556%2427---
1.b314,34754%2427---
1.f45,91748%2377---
1.Nc33,81651%2384---
1.b41,75948%2379---
1.a31,22254%2404---
1.e31,07349%2409---
1.d395550%2378---
1.g466646%2361---
1.h444953%2374---
1.c343551%2426---
1.h328356%2419---
1.a411460%2465---
1.f39346%2435---
1.Nh39066%2505---
1.Na34262%2482---
Welcome everyone! This is GM Aleksandr Lenderman with the analysis of the round 5 Game of the Day from the 2017 Tata Steel tournament. This round there were many interesting games, and also a big shake up in the standings, as the leader after 4 rounds, GM Pavel Eljanov got ambitious against Levon Aronian and ended up getting outplayed and lost, while GM Wesley So continued his great form, with a nice win against GM Pentala Harikrishna. However, for Game of the Day, I decided to choose Adhiban's win against GM Sergey Karjakin because very rarely do we see a player as strong as Sergey Karjakin lose with white in such a convincing matter, and I also thought the game had theoretical significance. 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.f4 c5 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Be3 Be7 8.Qd2 a6!? Even though in the last 3 years I've been almost primarily a French player, somehow this move order involving Be7 followed by a6 or vise versa slipped out of my view. I always thought that normally after White plays 7. Be3, and then Black either plays a6 followed by b5, or Be7 followed by 0-0. But this move order, while used less often, has been used by great players, in particular Hikaru Nakamura with black a few times, and more recently GM Anton Korobov and one of the biggest French specialists that I know, GM Matthias Bluebaum. 8...0-0 This is more standard and leads to sharp games often and has been seen quite often in practice 9.a3 This seems like the most popular move now in this position, possibly because Kramnik played it against Meier in the 2016 Baku Olympiad. However, other moves are certainly possible and deserve separate analysis. 9.Bd3!? was used by Fabiano against Hikaru in the St Louis Showdown 2015. b5 10.0-0 Qb6 10...c4!? Maybe it was better to gain a tempo and close the structure, though of course this type of position requires deep analysis as it's not a type of position that the computer has a good grasp on right away in terms of evaluating its long term prospects. 11.Be2 Nb6 11.dxc5 11.Qf2!? Perhaps this is more precise to try to induce c4. 0-0?! 12.f5! 11...Bxc5 12.Bxc5 Nxc5 13.Qf2 Nd7?! I already don't like this decision, I feel like the endgame will be better for White. 13...b4 14.Ne2 a5 Possibly this is an important to try to trade off the bishop on a6. 14.a3 Ke7 15.Qxb6 Nxb6 16.Ne2 Bd7 Here we can clearly see the endgame is better for White because Black did not solve the problem of his typical bad French bishop on d7. 17.b3 f6 18.Ned4 Nxd4 19.Nxd4 fxe5 20.fxe5 h6 21.Kf2 Rhf8+ 22.Ke3 Rxf1 23.Rxf1 Be8 24.Bh7 Bf7 25.Nc6+ Ke8 26.Bd3 Rc8 27.Nb4 Nd7 28.Kd4 Nb8 29.Nxa6 Nc6+ 30.Kc5 30.Ke3 30...Ke7 31.Kxb5 Nxe5 32.Kb6 Be8 33.a4 Kd6 34.Rf2 Nxd3 34...Nd7+ 35.cxd3 Bg6 36.d4 e5 37.dxe5+ Kxe5 38.b4 d4 39.b5 d3 40.Nb4 Kd4 41.Nc6+ Ke3 42.Rf3+ Ke2 43.Nd4+ Ke1 44.Rg3 Be4 45.Re3+ Kf1 46.Rxe4 d2 47.Nf5 Rc3 48.Rd4 Ke1 49.a5 g6 50.Nd6 1-0 (50) Caruana,F (2787) -Nakamura,H (2793) Saint Louis USA 2015 9.Be2 was played by Maxime Vachier Lagrave b5 10.0-0 b4 10...0-0 Maybe something has to be said about starting with 0-0 11.Nd1 11.Na4 Possibly this is an improvement for White 11...0-0 12.c3 a5 13.Bf2 a4 13...f6!? This was tried by Bluebaum and he got a good position against a theoretician, Ragger 14.Ne3 fxe5 15.fxe5 Ba6 16.Nc2 Qc8 17.Bxa6 Qxa6 18.Be3 bxc3 19.bxc3 cxd4 20.cxd4 Nb4 21.Bg5 Bxg5 22.Nxg5 h6 23.Rxf8+ Nxf8 24.Nf3 Nxc2 25.Qxc2 Rc8 26.Qd2 Qb6 27.h4 Rc4 28.h5 Rb4 29.Kh2 Rb2 30.Qe1 a4 31.Qc3 Qb5 32.Nh4 Qe2 33.Qf3 Qxf3 34.Nxf3 a3 35.Nh4 Kf7 36.Rc1 Rxa2 37.Rc7+ Ke8 38.Ng6 Nxg6 39.hxg6 Rd2 40.Rxg7 Kf8 41.Ra7 Rxd4 42.Rxa3 Re4 43.Ra7 Rxe5 44.g7+ Kg8 45.Rd7 Rg5 46.Re7 e5 47.Kg1 h5 48.Kf2 h4 49.Rd7 d4 50.Re7 d3 51.Kf1 Kh7 52.Kf2 Kg8 53.Kf1 Kh7 54.Kf2 d2 55.Rd7 Rxg7 56.Rxd2 Kg6 57.Rd8 Kf5 58.Rh8 Rg4 59.Kf3 Rf4+ 60.Ke3 Re4+ 61.Kf3 Rf4+ 62.Ke3 Ra4 63.Rf8+ Ke6 64.Rh8 Ra3+ 65.Ke4 Ra4+ 66.Ke3 Kf6 67.Rf8+ Kg6 68.Re8 Kf6 69.Rf8+ Kg7 70.Re8 Ra3+ 71.Ke4 Kf6 72.Rf8+ Kg7 73.Rf5 Ra2 74.Rxe5 Rxg2 75.Rh5 Ra2 76.Kf3 h3 77.Rxh3 Ra3+ 78.Kg2 Rxh3 79.Kxh3 1/2 (79) Kryvoruchko,Y (2693)-Bluebaum,M (2626) Baku AZE 2016 14.cxb4 Nxb4 15.Ne3 Qa5 I think here Black more than solved his opening problems, and even though he later lost, it had nothing to do with the opening. 16.Rfc1 Nc6 17.Qxa5 Rxa5 18.dxc5 Nxc5 19.Nd1 Bd7 20.Nd4 Rc8 21.Nc3 g5 22.g3 Nb4 23.Ncb5 gxf4 24.gxf4 Rb8 25.Nd6 a3 26.bxa3 Nbd3 27.Bxd3 Nxd3 28.Rc7 Nxf2 29.Kxf2 Rb2+ 30.Kg1 Bh4 31.Rf1 Bd8 32.Rxd7 Bb6 33.Kh1 Bxd4 34.f5 Rxa3 35.f6 h5 36.Rd8+ Kh7 37.Nxf7 Raxa2 38.Ng5+ Kh6 39.Nf3 Bc5 40.Rh8+ Kg6 41.Rg8+ Kf7 42.Rg7+ Kf8 43.Rh7 Rf2 44.Rg1 Rxh2+ 45.Nxh2 Bxg1 46.Kxg1 1-0 (46) Vachier Lagrave,M (2811)-Korobov,A (2687) Bastia FRA 2016 9.g3 Seems also interesting 0-0 10.Bh3 f5?! 10...b5 Perhaps after simply b5 though Black is fine. 11.exf6 Nxf6 12.dxc5 Kh8?! 12...e5 Perhaps this should be tried but here also the compensation for Black is not clear 13.Bxc8 Rxc8 14.Nxe5 d4 15.Nxc6 dxc3 16.Qxd8 Bxd8 17.Nxd8 Rfxd8 18.bxc3 Re8 19.Kd2 Ne4+ 20.Ke2 Nxc5 21.Kf3 And white is pressing in the endgame 13.0-0-0 Qa5 14.Kb1 14.Rhe1! White was clearly better here. 14...Bxc5 15.Bxc5 Qxc5 16.Rhe1 Re8 17.g4 Rf8 18.Ng5 Qd6 19.f5 exf5 20.gxf5 d4 21.Nf3 Bd7 22.Nxd4 Nxd4 23.Qxd4 Qxh2 24.Rh1 Qc7 25.a3 Rad8 26.Qh4 Bc6 27.Rhg1 Rxd1+ 28.Rxd1 Qh2 29.Rd3 Re8 30.Qg5 h6 31.Qg6 Re1+ 32.Ka2 Be8 33.Qg3 Bf7+ 0-1 (33) Hou Yifan (2649) -Korobov,A (2687) Bastia FRA 2016 9.dxc5 Nxc5 10.0-0-0 has also been tried by a few strong players. Here though Black should have good counterplay with Qa5 Qa5 11.Kb1 b5 12.Bd3 Bd7 13.Bxc5 Bxc5 14.f5 Bb4 From here on it looks like it's white who has to be careful not to be worse 15.Qg5 Bxc3 16.Qxg7 0-0-0 17.bxc3 d4 18.Nxd4 Nxd4 19.cxd4 Qb4+ 20.Kc1 Rhg8 21.Qxf7 Rxg2 22.fxe6 Qa3+ 23.Kb1 Qb4+ 24.Kc1 Qa3+ 25.Kb1 Qb4+ 1/2 (25) Nepomniachtchi, I (2720)-Meier,G (2654) Dortmund GER 2015 9...0-0 10.dxc5 Nxc5 11.Qf2 Nd7!?N According to my database, this is the first novelty of the game and quite interesting. Before this game, White seemed to have the upper hand in all the games. Also Adhiban played it almost instantly which almost certainly means it is still his opening preparation. After Nd7!?, Sergey Karjakin thought for about 10 minutes, so he was probably surprised. 11...b6 This move seems like the most logical but now we see the whole point of the move 9. a3!? 12.b4 In fact I faced this idea once also in a slightly different variation of the classical French against an Indian GM and I ended up getting a very unpleasant position and was very lucky not to lose. Vishnu, Prasanna-Lenderman London 2015 Nd7 12...f6!? Bluebaum, perhaps knowing about the Meier game (after all they play for the same team at the Olympiad, Germany), might've analyzed Nd7 not to be satisfactory and came up with the very interesting piece sacrifice. 13.bxc5 bxc5 13...fxe5!? According to stockfish this also has to be analyzed. 14.Bxc5 Qa5 The next few moves are nearly forced according to the computer 15.Bd4 fxe5 15...Bd7!? Comp says this might be playable too 16.Nxe5 Nxd4 17.Qxd4 Rxf4 18.Nc6 Bc5 19.Qe5 Bd6 20.Qxg7+ Kxg7 21.Nxa5 Be5 22.Kd2 So the dust settled, white remained up a piece but Black has tremendous compensation due to very active pieces, two strong bishops and a very strong central control. Very deep analysis of this position requires to know if this is enough for Black. It's possible both Karjakin and Adhiban knew about the Kramnik-Meier and Ragger-Bluebaum games, and possibly this is good for White, and therefore Adhiban decided to take an independent route. Rf2+ 23.Kd3 Bf4 24.Ne2 Bh6 25.c4 Kg8 26.Rd1 Bd7 27.Nc3 Rc8 28.Be2 Rc5 29.cxd5 Rxa5 30.dxe6 Bxe6 31.Rdf1 Rxf1 32.Rxf1 Rxa3 33.Rf6 Rxc3+ 34.Kxc3 Bg7 35.Bxa6 Bxf6+ 36.Kd3 Kg7 37.Ke4 Bc3 38.Be2 Kf6 39.Kf3 Bd5+ 40.Kf2 Bd4+ 41.Kg3 Be5+ 42.Kf2 Kg5 43.Kg1 Bd4+ 44.Kh1 Kf4 45.Bf3 Be6 46.Bc6 Ke3 47.Bb7 Bf5 48.Bc6 Bd3 49.Bb7 h5 50.g3 Kf2 51.Bc6 Be2 52.Bb7 Bf3+ 53.Bxf3 Kxf3 54.h3 Kxg3 55.h4 Kh3 1/2 (55) Ragger,M (2694)-Bluebaum,M (2641) Novi Sad SRB 2016 13.Bd3 Now White develops comfortable while Black finds his pieces to be a bit restricted. Therefore, he tries to free them all up with... f6 14.Qg3! But White doesn't oblige, and Black is in a difficult situation here already. d4 15.0-0-0!? Possibly not the only way to play but it's definitely the most ambitious! dxe3 15...dxc3 16.Bxh7+ Kxh7 17.Qh3+ would also lead to a dangerous attack for White 16.Bxh7+ Kxh7 17.Qh3+ Kg8 18.Qxe6+ Kh8 19.Qxc6 Ra7 20.Nh4! I wouldn't be surprised if this is all Kramnik's preparation but either way, brilliant, whether brilliant preparation or brilliant play over the board. Qe8 21.Nd5 21.e6!? 21...Kh7 22.Nxe7 Qxe7 23.Nf5 Nxe5 23...Qe8!? 24.Nxe7 Nxc6 25.Nxc6 Rc7 26.Nd4 Re8 27.Rd3 Bb7 28.Re1 Bxg2 29.Rdxe3 Rxe3 30.Rxe3 and White quickly converted this into a win. Bd5 31.Nf5 g5 32.fxg5 fxg5 33.Re5 Bf7 34.Kb2 b5 35.Nd4 Kg6 36.Nf3 g4 37.Rg5+ Kf6 38.Rxg4 1-0 (38) Kramnik,V (2808)-Meier,G (2654) Baku AZE 2016 11...Qa5!? is also a very logical move which has been tried before, and also computer likes it, at least at first. As far as I can see after brief analysis there is nothing particularly wrong with it and it should lead to interesting play. 12.0-0-0 Bd7 12...Nd7!? Maybe this strange move here is possible, in order to prepare b5 b4, also deserves attention 13.Bd3 b5 14.Nd4 Qc7?! But this move I don't like because I think after this move White gets free initiative. 14...Nxd4 15.Bxd4 b4 I think Black should play more directly here and now it's anyone's game, and in fact computer at a lower depth prefers Black. 16.axb4 Bxb4 17.f5 exf5 17...Nc5 18.f6 Nxd3+ 19.cxd3 Bd7 Is very unclear 15.Nf5 exf5 16.Nxd5 Qa5 17.Bd2 Bc5 18.Nf6+ Nxf6 19.Qxc5 Qc7 20.exf6 Be6 21.g4 Rfd8 22.gxf5 Rd5 23.Qg1 g6 24.fxe6 Rxd3 25.Qc5 Qd6 26.Qg5 Rh3 27.exf7+ Kxf7 28.Bc3 Qe6 29.Rhe1 Re3 30.f5 1-0 (30) Salem, A (2650)-Svane,R (2552) Douglas ENG 2016 13.f5 d4 Otherwise White gets a free initiative. 14.Bxd4 14.f6!? It's possible that this is the problem move for Black. dxe3 14...dxc3 15.fxe7 cxb2+ 16.Kxb2 Na4+ 17.Kc1 Nxe7 18.Rxd7 Qc3 19.Bd3 And it's not clear right away whether Black gets enough initiative for the piece or not. 15.Qg3 g6 16.Qh4 14...exf5 15.Bc4 Be6 16.Bxe6 fxe6 Here Black solved his opening problems. 17.Qe2 b5 18.Kb1 Rab8 19.Bxc5 Bxc5 20.Na2 Qc7 21.Nc1 Be7 22.Rd3 Rfd8 23.Rhd1 Rxd3 24.Nxd3 b4 25.a4 b3 26.cxb3 Rxb3 27.Qc2 Qb6 28.Nd2 Nd4 29.Qc8+ Kf7 30.Nxb3 Qxb3 31.Rd2 Qxa4 32.Qc3 Nb5 33.Qc2 Qe4 34.Re2 Qd4 35.Re1 g6 36.g3 h5 37.Qb3 g5 38.Rc1 Qe3 39.Qc4 h4 40.gxh4 gxh4 41.Rf1 Ke8 42.Re1 Qb6 43.Qb3 Bg5 44.Qb4 Kf7 45.Ka2 h3 46.Qb3 Qa5+ 47.Kb1 Qd2 48.Qd1 Qxd1+ 49.Rxd1 Kg6 50.Rg1 Kh5 51.Rg3 Kh4 52.Nf2 Bf4 53.Rxh3+ Kg5 54.Nd3 Nd4 55.Rh8 Be3 56.h4+ Kg4 57.h5 Kg5 58.b4 f4 59.h6 f3 60.h7 Kg6 61.Kb2 Kg7 62.Rf8 Kxh7 63.Kc3 Kg6 64.Nc5 f2 65.Rf6+ Kh5 66.Kd3 Nf5 67.Ke2 Bg5 68.Rf8 Be7 69.Ra8 Nd4+ 70.Kxf2 Nc6 71.Re8 a5 72.Rxe7 Nxe7 73.bxa5 Kg5 74.a6 Nd5 75.a7 Nb6 76.Ke3 Kf5 77.Kd4 Na8 78.Nd7 1-0 (78) Sethuraman,S (2633)-Korobov,A (2687) Czech Republic CZE 2016 12.Nd4 Logical move, trying to control the d4 outpost square and trying to steer the game to positional waters. Nxd4 13.Bxd4 f6 This is almost a must. Otherwise White will simply play Bd3, 0-0 and slowly apply an unpleasant positional squeeze. 13...b5 14.Bd3 Bb7 15.0-0 Qc7 16.b4! And thanks to this useful b4 move, Black doesn't even get a chance to get the knight to c5 and dislodge the bishop from d4. His bishop on b7 is dead, and Black might be borderline strategically lost here. 14.exf6 Bxf6! It's important to continue playing dynamically, and threaten ideas like Bg5 and e5 and make it uncomfortable for White. At least now White is forced to calculate concrete lines and he can't apply the positional squeeze for free. 15.Bxf6 An underestandable decision by Sergey, to try to play a simpler and safer move to avoid playing against very strong Adhiban's preparation 15.0-0-0 This move might be a critical test to the line though after all. Possibly Sergey didn't want to allow extra possibilities like Bg5 or e5, or even just b5 with a straight forward attacking plan for Black, but possibly they are not as scary as they seem objectively. b5 15...e5 16.Bc5! The only move for White but a good once. Ideally he doesn't want to give up a bishop pair to Black but here the d5 square weakens quite a bit. Nxc5 17.Qxc5 exf4 18.Nxd5 18.Bc4!? 18.Qxd5+!? 18...Bg4 19.Nxf6+ Qxf6 20.Rd6 Qe7 21.Bd3 And perhaps White can play for some advantage here in this line. 15...Bg5 This move seems pretty harmless because White can just go back 16.Be3 Bf6 17.Qd2 And Black has nothing better than to go back and now white has at least a more pleasant position and he can go Bd4 next move once his queen got out of the pin. 16.Be2 Here the top computer choice by far for White is Be2, trying to simply play Rhe1 and Bg4 and pressure on Black's weakness on e6, and still Black doesn't have anything convincing it seems. Rb8 16...e5 17.Bc5 17.Rhe1 b4 18.axb4 Rxb4 19.Bg4 Bxd4 20.Bxe6+ Kh8 21.Rxd4 Qb6 22.Rd2 Nc5 23.Bxd5 Rxb2 24.Qg3! It's very hard to evaluate this position. The computer gives White some edge, but from a practical standpoint of view it is probably easier to play Black because he has the initiative. Also in between there are many pitfalls and White has to find lots of accurate moves just to get to this position. So it seems like it's very good practical preparation by Adhiban. But now that it's been played, it's unclear whether there will be too many followers of this interesting idea, now that there is less surprise value now, and professionals will be able to analyze this position now deeply with their engines which are more powerful than mine. 15...Qxf6 16.g3 g5! The whole point of Black's play. Black continues to not let White consolidate. Now White is forced to play a sharp game. 17.0-0-0 This seems fine, sacrifising the pawn for initiative but it had to be followed up correctly. 17.Bh3 17.Qg2 were also alternatives but they don't seems very promising for White. 17...gxf4 18.Kb1 Played after about a 7-minute think. This move still is not a mistake according to the computer, getting the king out of checks along the c1-h6 diagonal. But perhaps White had an interesting alternative here. 18.Rd4!? Of course now if f3, White doesn't have to play Kb1 anymore. fxg3 18...f3 19.Rf4 Qh6 20.Kb1 And with the strong defensive rook on f8 traded, White will have more initiative than he did in the game. Rxf4 21.gxf4 Qxf4 22.Rg1+ Kh8 23.Ne2! Is an example of how White develops a very strong attack. Qf7 24.Rg3 Ne5 25.Qd4 Qf6 26.Ng1!+- Is a nice sample variation 19.Qxg3+ Possibly even this isn't completely forced. Kh8 20.Rh4! Rg8 21.Qh3 Nf8 22.Bd3 Qg7 23.Rh5 And according to the engine White's initiative is still more than enough for the pawn. Black has to play very precisely here to hold the balance. Bd7! Possibly the only move. 24.Re1 Be8 25.Rhe5 d4 26.Nb1 Qg4 27.Qxg4 Rxg4 28.Be4 Should be close to equal. 18...f3 Still played instantly by black! 19.g4? And this is already White's first real mistake of the game, after which White's initiative really loses steam and Black takes over the momentum. Rd4 was seemingly forced now. He tries to go for a sort of desperate attack, but it doesn't work well for him, in particular because his knight on c3 is really not being utilized to its maximum, and you can basically say that about almost all of White's pieces. White's best plans involved at some point to activate his knight on c3. 19.Rd4! Ne5 20.Rf4 Qg7 21.Na4 Perhaps Sergey missed this unusual positional resource, which is easy to miss when seemingly play goes around Black's king. However, here the white knights finds a nice way to penetrate into Black's position and White still has enough compensation. Bd7 22.Nc5 Rae8 23.Bh3 19...Ne5 This was the first real think for Adhiban. 20.g5 Qg7 21.g6?! Objectively probably not the best but at this point it's already hard to find an active plan for White. 21.Na4 This move again probably should've been tried to try to activate the knight on c3 at least, which right now is just not doing anything. 21.h4 This was also possible and here white still has a little bit of compensation for the pawn. 21...hxg6 22.Bd3 Bd7-+ Now Black just completely consolidated and he's up two pawns. White would have compensation if his knight on c3 was somewhere on the kingside, but in this position White can't hope for much since his pieces are not being utilized to the maximum. 23.Rdg1 Nxd3 Removing the last semi-dangerous pieces for white 24.cxd3 Rf5 25.Rg4 Raf8 26.Rhg1 Be8 27.Nd1 A little too late now. Rh5 28.h4 Re5 29.Ne3 Bb5! Nice tactical point to try to activate his bishop. 30.Rd4 Now the white rook is in less than an ideal position 30.Rxg6 Bxd3+ 30...Re4?! It's hard for me to criticize a move which led to a win the very next move, but objectively I feel like it allowed unnecessary chances. 30...Kh7 was maybe more solid. 31.Rxg6?! Basically resigning. 31.dxe4 White had a slight faint hope of survival with dxe4 and trying to create a mess near Black's king. Qxd4 32.Rxg6+ Kf7 Suddenly the only move. 32...Kh7?? 33.Rh6+ Kxh6 34.Ng4+± And suddenly it's White who is better. 33.h5 And surprisingly even though Black should be winning, he still has to be careful. Qxe4+ 34.Ka1 Ke7! And already here this move is by far the best, which honestly speaking to me, is far from obvious. 35.Ng4 d4 36.Rg7+ Kd6-+ If Adhiban calculated to this position and saw he's winning by force, then it's brilliant, but to me from a human standpoint of view, I would be a bit afraid to put my king like this all the way to d6, since in a position like this, a single misstep can suddenly change the evaluation of the position. But I will give him the benefit of the doubt here. 31...Bxd3+ And White loses more material and is completely lost so he resigned. As a regular French player myself, I cannot help but wonder why the French defence is not played more often at the elite level. And it seems like when it does get played, more often than not Black seems to get very interesting games, and very often the opening is a success for Black. That's why I was very happy to see a game like this where the French defence proved to be alive and kicking, and what's more: against a super-elite player, one of the best 1. e4 players of the current generation, and a player who just played for the World Championship match and must've prepared deeply for every opening. If even someone as strong and well-prepared as Sergey Karjakin can be humbled like this in this French maze, I still wonder why the French is not a more frequent guest at the top level. Possibly games like this will make it more popular! 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Karjakin,S-Adhiban,B-0–12017C11Tata Steel Masters5

If this game, and the extensive notes by Lenderman inspired you to take up the French, then do not miss the great DVD by GM Nicholas Pert, himself a lifelong practitioner, who crammed seven hours of material into it, highlighting the choice of 'fighting lines'.

The French Defence for the Tournament Player

by Nicholas Pert

Languages: English
ISBN: 978-3-86681-392-2
Delivery: Download, Post
Level: Tournament player, Professional
€29.90 or €25.13 without VAT (for Customers outside the EU) $28.39 (without VAT)

This French Defence DVD is a complete attacking opening repertoire for Black after 1.e4 e6. GM Nick Pert has played the French Defence his whole life and provides all his latest and most up-to-date analysis crammed into a single DVD. Nick has spent thousands of hours studying the best French lines, and he explains the pick of the bunch – all for the cost of a DVD. It almost seems like daylight robbery! In addition to the usual video explanations of the French there are some interactive clips where the viewer is tested on a range of theoretical questions and tactics arising from French Defence games.

• Video running time: seven hours
• With interactive training including video feedback
• Exclusive database with 100 essential games
• Including CB 12 Reader

Order Nicholas Pert's French Defence DVD in the ChessBase Shop

 

No less inspired, GM Daniel King also named it his Game of the Day, and brings in his own analysis. Enjoy!

Game of the day: Karjakin v Adhiban

 

A delighted Adhiban shares his impressions after his victory

Anish Giri had another promising game, though not quite as crushing as in round four, but was unable to convert it. It must be said Wei Yi's play had been incredibly sharp.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Position not in LiveBook
1.e4 0 e5 1:02 2.Nf3 0 Nc6 6 3.Bc4 30 Nf6 10 4.d3 0 Be7 30 5.0-0 30 0-0 30 6.Nc3 30 d6 30 7.a3 30 Be6 30 8.Nd5 30 Qd7 30 9.Bg5 30 Bxd5 30 10.exd5 30 Nd4 30 11.Nxd4 30 exd4 30 12.Qf3 30 Rae8 0 13.Rae1 30 Bd8 30 14.h3 30 Qa4 30 15.Qd1 30 Qd7 30 16.Bd2 30 h6 30 17.b4 30 Re5 30 18.Qa1 30 Nxd5 30 19.Qxd4 30 Rxe1 30 20.Rxe1 30 Nb6 30 21.Bb3 30 Re8 30 22.Rxe8+ 30 Qxe8 0 23.Qe4 30 Qxe4 30 24.dxe4 30 Nd7 30 25.g3 30 b5 30 26.a4 30 Ne5 30 27.Kf1 30 bxa4 0 28.Bxa4 30 Nc4 30 29.Be1 30 c5 30 30.Ke2 30 cxb4 30 31.Bb3 30 Nb6 30 32.Bxb4 30 Bc7 0 33.f4 30 Nd7 1:28:49 34.Kd3 1:33:36 g5 5:33 35.Kd4 1:41 a5 3:28 36.Bd2 0 Bb6+ 45 37.Kc4 16 Nf6 30 38.e5 3:52 Ne4 1:07 39.Be1 23 gxf4 2:03 40.gxf4 0 dxe5 1:01 41.fxe5 9:43 Ng5 3:22 42.Bd2 27:01 Kg7 0 43.h4 17 Nf3 1:03 44.Bc3 18 Kg6 5:24 45.h5+ 1:04 Kf5 31 46.Kb5 2:54 Bc7 5:13 47.Bxf7 4:02 Bxe5 0 48.Bg6+ 1:24 Kg5 1:10 49.Bxa5 4:31 Nd4+ 18 50.Kc4 3 Nxc2 4 51.Kd3 3 Nd4 1:02 52.Ke4 25 Kf6 0 53.Kd5 24 Kg7 8 54.Bc3 20 Bf6 5 55.Bxd4 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Andreikin,D2736Rapport,R2702½–½2017C5579th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Masters5
Nepomniachtchi,I2767Carlsen,M2840½–½2017A2179th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Masters5
Eljanov,P2755Aronian,L27800–12017E0579th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Masters5
Wojtaszek,R2750Van Wely,L26951–02017E8179th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Masters5
Karjakin,S2785Adhiban,B26530–12017C1179th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Masters5
So,W2808Harikrishna,P27661–02017A3479th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Masters5
Wei,Y2706Giri,A2773½–½2017B1979th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Masters5

Current Masters standings

Challengers tournament

Round 5 - Thursday, January 19
Smirin, I
½-½
Grandelius, N.
Tari, A.
1-0
Guramishvili, S.
Bok, B.
0-1
Jones, G.
Ragger, M.
½-½
Lu, S.
van Foreest, J.
1-0
Dobrov, V.
l'Ami, E.
½-½
Hansen, E.
Xiong, J.
1-0
Tingjie, L.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 0 Nf6 13 2.c4 0 g6 0 3.Nc3 0 Bg7 8 4.e4 0 0-0 35 5.Be3 6:19 d6 26 6.f3 0 c5 28 7.Nge2 4 Qa5 1:16 8.Nc1 6 cxd4 11 9.Nb3 6 Qc7 0 10.Nxd4 43 Nc6 10 11.Be2 16:04 Nxd4 15 12.Bxd4 12 Be6 6 13.b3 6:36 Nd7 20 14.0-0 6:01 Rfc8 0 15.Kh1 2:33 Bxd4 3:44 16.Qxd4 8 Qc5 58 17.Qd2 57 Nf6 3:36 18.Rac1 7:16 Bd7 3:12 19.Rfd1 14:04 Bc6 0 20.Bf1 4:30 a5 4:46 21.Qd4 5:08 Nd7 5:50 22.g3 14:05 Qh5 7:51 23.Bg2 0 Re8 6:09 24.Qe3 3:48 Qc5 4:00 25.Qxc5 7:14 Nxc5 17 26.Rb1 1:58 Red8 12:50 27.Kg1 1:39 f5 3:44 28.exf5 0 gxf5 7 29.Rd2 6:56 Kf7 1:05 30.Rbd1 32 h5 4:24 31.h4 5:56 Rg8 0 32.Kf2 5 Rg6 45 33.Bh3 1:01 Rag8 1:20 34.Ne2 26 Rf6 6:47 35.Rb1 1:18 e5 1:15 36.a3 30 e4 1:37 37.b4 25 Re8 1:22 38.Rd4 37 exf3 1:32 39.Nc3 21 axb4 1:10 40.axb4 0 Ne4+ 1:25 41.Nxe4 53 fxe4 0 42.Ke3 10:00 Ra8 3:47 43.Rdd1 17:46 Ra3+ 4:35 44.Kd4 8 e3 58 45.Rd3 4 Rxd3+ 26 46.Kxd3 1 e2 0 47.Ke3 1:19 b5 4:28 48.g4 11:34 hxg4 5:06 49.Bxg4 10 bxc4 9 50.b5 8 Bxb5 4:00 51.Bxf3 39 c3 0 52.Bxe2 2:25 Re6+ 1:48 53.Kd4 5 Bxe2 8 54.Kxc3 5 Re5 1:19 55.Kd4 54 Ke6 48 56.Rb8 30 Bh5 0 57.Rg8 2:11 Ra5 34 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Bok,B2608Jones,G26650–12017E8179th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Challengers5
L'Ami,E2605Hansen,E2603½–½2017D8579th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Challengers5
Ragger,M2697Lu,S2612½–½2017B9079th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Challengers5
Smirin,I2667Grandelius,N2642½–½2017B8579th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Challengers5
Tari,A2584Guramishvili,S23701–02017B5179th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Challengers5
Van Foreest,J2612Dobrov,V24991–02017B1279th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Challengers5
Xiong,J2667Lei,T24671–02017D1179th Tata Steel Chess 2017-Challengers5

Current Challengers standings

Schedule, pairings, and results

Tata Steel Masters 2017

Round 1 - Saturday, January 14
Harikrishna, P.
½-½
 Aronian, L.
Adhiban, B.
½-½
 Van Wely, L.
Eljanov, P.
1-0
 Rapport, R.
Karjakin, S.
½-½
 Giri, A.
So, W.
½-½
 Carlsen, M.
Wojtaszek, R.
½-½
 Nepomniachtchi, I.
Andreikin, D.
½-½
 Wei, Y.
Round 2 - Sunday, January 15
Aronian, L.
½-½
Wei, Y.
Nepomniachtchi, I.
½-½
Andreikin, D.
Carlsen, M.
1-0
Wojtaszek, R.
Giri, A.
½-½
So, W.
Rapport, R.
½-½
Karjakin, S.
Van Wely, L.
0-1
Eljanov, P.
Harikrishna, P.
1-0
Adhiban, B.
Round 3 - Monday, January 16
Adhiban, B.
½-½
Aronian, L.
Eljanov, P.
½-½
Harikrishna, P.
Karjakin, S.
1-0
Van Wely, L.
So, W.
1-0
Rapport, R.
Wojtaszek, R.
½-½
Giri, A..
Andreikin, D.
½-½
Carlsen, M.
Wei, Y.
1-0
Nepomniachtchi, I.
Round 4 - Tuesday, January 17
Aronian, L.
½-½
Nepomniachtchi, I.
Carlsen, M.
1-0
Wei, Y.
Giri, A.
½-½
Andreikin, D.
Rapport, R.
½-½
Wojtaszek, R.
Van Wely, L.
0-1
So, W.
Harikrishna, P.
½-½
Karjakin, S.
Adhiban, B.
0-1
Eljanov, P.
Round 5 - Thursday, January 19
Eljanov, P.
0-1
Aronian, L.
Karjakin, S.
0-1
Adhiban, B.
So, W.
1-0
Harikrishna, P.
Wojtaszek, R.
1-0
Van Wely, L.
Andreikin, D.
½-½
Rapport, R.
Wei, Y.
½-½
Giri, A.
Nepomniachtchi, I.
½-½
Carlsen, M.
Round 6 - Friday, January 20
Aronian, L.
 
Carlsen, M.
Giri, A.
 
Nepomniachtchi, I.
Rapport, R.
 
Wei, Y.
Van Wely, L.
 
Andreikin, D.
Harikrishna, P.
 
Wojtaszek, R.
Adhiban, B.
 
So, W.
Eljanov, P.
 
Karjakin, S.
Round 7 - Saturday, January 21
Karjakin, S.
 
Aronian, L.
So, W.
 
Eljanov, P.
Wojtaszek, R.
 
Adhiban, B.
Andreikin, D.
 
Harikrishna, P.
Wei, Y.
 
Van Wely, L.
Nepomniachtchi, I.
 
Rapport, R.
Carlsen, M.
 
Giri, A.
Round 8 - Sunday, January 22
Aronian, L.
 
Giri, A.
Rapport, R.
 
Carlsen, M.
Van Wely, L.
 
Nepomniachtchi, I.
Harikrishna, P.
 
Wei, Y.
Adhiban, B.
 
Andreikin, D.
Eljanov, P.
 
Wojtaszek, R.
Karjakin, S.
 
So, W.
Round 9 - Tuesday, January 24
So, W.
 
Aronian, L.
Wojtaszek, R.
 
Karjakin, S.
Andreikin, D.
 
Eljanov, P.
Wei, Y.
 
Adhiban, B.
Nepomniachtchi, I.
 
Harikrishna, P.
Carlsen, M.
 
Van Wely, L.
Giri, A.
 
Rapport, R.
Round 10 - Wednesday, January 25
Aronian, L.
 
Rapport, R.
Van Wely, L.
 
Giri, A.
Harikrishna, P.
 
Carlsen, M.
Adhiban, B.
 
Nepomniachtchi, I.
Eljanov, P.
 
Wei, Y.
Karjakin, S.
 
Andreikin, D.
So, W.
 
Wojtaszek, R.
Round 11 - Friday, January 27
Wojtaszek, R.
 
Aronian, L.
Andreikin, D.
 
So, W.
Wei, Y.
 
Karjakin, S.
Nepomniachtchi, I.
 
Eljanov, P.
Carlsen, M.
 
Adhiban, B.
Giri, A.
 
Harikrishna, P.
Rapport, R.
 
Van Wely, L.
Round 12 - Saturday, January 28
Aronian, L.
 
Van Wely, L.
Harikrishna, P.
 
Rapport, R.
Adhiban, B.
 
Giri, A.
Eljanov, P.
 
Carlsen, M.
Karjakin, S.
 
Nepomniachtchi, I.
So, W.
 
Wei, Y.
Wojtaszek, R.
 
Andreikin, D.
Round 13 - Sunday, January 29
Andreikin, D.
 
Aronian, L.
Wei, Y.
 
Wojtaszek, R.
Nepomniachtchi, I.
 
So, W.
Carlsen, M.
 
Karjakin, S.
Giri, A.
 
Eljanov, P.
Rapport, R.
 
Adhiban, B.
Van Wely, L.
 
Harikrishna, P.
 

Tata Steel Challengers 2017

Round 1 - Saturday, January 14
Jones, G.
½-½
Grandelius, N.
Guramishvili, S.
½-½
Lu, S.
Smirin, I
½-½
Dobrov, V.
Tari, A.
½-½
Hansen, E.
Bok, B.
1-0
Tingjie, L.
Ragger, M.
1-0
Xiong, J.
van Foreest, J.
1-0
l'Ami, E.
Round 2 - Sunday, January 15
Grandelius, N.
½-½
l'Ami, E.
Xiong, J.
1-0
van Foreest, J.
Tingjie, L.
0-1
Ragger, M.
Hansen, E.
½-½
Bok, B.
Dobrov, V.
½-½
Tari, A.
Lu, S.
½-½
Smirin, I
Jones, G.
1-0
Guramishvili, S.
Round 3 - Monday, January 16
Guramishvili, S.
0-1
Grandelius, N.
Smirin, I
1-0
Jones, G.
Tari, A.
0-1
Lu, S.
Bok, B.
0-1
Dobrov, V.
Ragger, M.
1-0
Hansen, E..
van Foreest, J.
0-1
Tingjie, L.
l'Ami, E.
½-½
Xiong, J.
Round 4 - Tuesday, January 17
Grandelius, N.
0-1
Xiong, J.
Tingjie, L.
0-1
l'Ami, E.
Hansen, E.
1-0
van Foreest, J.
Dobrov, V.
0-1
Ragger, M.
Lu, S.
1-0
Bok, B.
Jones, G.
1-0
Tari, A.
Guramishvili, S.
0-1
Smirin, I
Round 5 - Thursday, January 19
Smirin, I
½-½
Grandelius, N.
Tari, A.
1-0
Guramishvili, S.
Bok, B.
0-1
Jones, G.
Ragger, M.
½-½
Lu, S.
van Foreest, J.
1-0
Dobrov, V.
l'Ami, E.
½-½
Hansen, E.
Xiong, J.
1-0
Tingjie, L.
Round 6 - Friday, January 20
Grandelius, N.
 
Tingjie, L.
Hansen, E.
 
Xiong, J.
Dobrov, V.
 
l'Ami, E.
Lu, S.
 
van Foreest, J.
Jones, G.
 
Ragger, M.
Guramishvili, S.
 
Bok, B.
Smirin, I
 
Tari, A.
Round 7 - Saturday, January 21
Tari, A.
 
Grandelius, N.
Bok, B.
 
Smirin, I
Ragger, M.
 
Guramishvili, S.
van Foreest, J.
 
Jones, G.
l'Ami, E.
 
Lu, S.
Xiong, J.
 
Dobrov, V.
Tingjie, L.
 
Hansen, E.
Round 8 - Sunday, January 22
Grandelius, N.
 
Hansen, E.
Dobrov, V.
 
Tingjie, L.
Lu, S.
 
Xiong, J.
Jones, G.
 
l'Ami, E.
Guramishvili, S.
 
van Foreest, J.
Smirin, I
 
Ragger, M.
Tari, A.
 
Bok, B.
Round 9 - Tuesday, January 24
Bok, B.
 
Grandelius, N.
Ragger, M.
 
Tari, A.
van Foreest, J.
 
Smirin, I
l'Ami, E.
 
Guramishvili, S.
Xiong, J.
 
Jones, G.
Tingjie, L.
 
Lu, S.
Hansen, E.
 
Dobrov, V.
Round 10 - Wednesday, January 25
Grandelius, N.
 
Dobrov, V.
Lu, S.
 
Hansen, E.
Jones, G.
 
Tingjie, L.
Guramishvili, S.
 
Xiong, J.
Smirin, I
 
l'Ami, E.
Tari, A.
 
van Foreest, J.
Bok, B.
 
Ragger, M.
Round 11 - Friday, January 27
Ragger, M.
 
Grandelius, N.
van Foreest, J.
 
Bok, B.
l'Ami, E.
 
Tari, A.
Xiong, J.
 
Smirin, I
Tingjie, L.
 
Guramishvili, S.
Hansen, E.
 
Jones, G.
Dobrov, V.
 
Lu, S.
Round 12 - Saturday, January 28
Grandelius, N.
 
Lu, S.
Jones, G.
 
Dobrov, V.
Guramishvili, S.
 
Hansen, E.
Smirin, I
 
Tingjie, L.
Tari, A.
 
Xiong, J.
Bok, B.
 
l'Ami, E.
Ragger, M.
 
van Foreest, J.
Round 13 - Sunday, January 29
van Foreest, J.
 
Grandelius, N.
l'Ami, E.
 
Ragger, M.
Xiong, J.
 
Bok, B.
Tingjie, L.
 
Tari, A.
Hansen, E.
 
Smirin, I
Dobrov, V.
 
Guramishvili, S.
Lu, S.
 
Jones, G.
 

Links

The games are being broadcast live on the official web site and on the chess server Playchess.com. If you are not a member you can download a free Playchess client there and get immediate access. You can also use ChessBase 14 or any of our Fritz compatible chess programs.


Born in the US, he grew up in Paris, France, where he completed his Baccalaureat, and after college moved to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. He had a peak rating of 2240 FIDE, and was a key designer of Chess Assistant 6. In 2010 he joined the ChessBase family as an editor and writer at ChessBase News. He is also a passionate photographer with work appearing in numerous publications, and the content creator of the YouTube channel, Chess & Tech.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.