|
(1) Mieses,J - Alekhine,A [C22]
Scheveningen Scheveningen (3), 29.07.1913
[Mueller, Karsten]
1.e4
e5
2.d4
exd4
3.Qxd4
Nc6
4.Qe3
Be7
5.Bd2
Nf6
6.Nc3
0-0
7.0-0-0
d5
8.exd5
Nxd5
9.Qg3
Bh4
10.Qf3
Be6
11.Be3
Nxc3
12.Rxd8
Nxa2+
13.Kb1
Raxd8
14.Be2
Nab4
15.Nh3
Rfe8
16.Nf4
Bf5
17.Rc1
g6
18.g4
Be4
19.Qh3
Bf6
20.Bf3
Bxf3
21.Qxf3
Ne5
An interesting moment for the assessment of Black's positional queen sacrifice has arisen. Mieses did not dare to take the b7 pawn as this opens an attacking road for Black's rook.
22.Qe2
[ But Kasparov sheds new light on this (see page 345):"According to Alekhine, 22.Qxb7!?
would have lost due to the combined attack of the f6 bishop and the rook on the b-file. However after 22...Rb8
( Hübner: 22...Nec6
23.c3
Rb8
24.Qxc7
Be5
25.Qd7
Red8
26.Qxd8+
Rxd8
27.cxb4
Nxb4
28.Ne2
and the position is equal.) 23.Qg2!
Huebner: The move 23...g5
does not contribute to the clarification of the situation, e.g. 24.Nh5 Bh8 25.Qf1 etc. (see lines below) ( 23...Nc4
24.c3
Nxb2
( 24...Na6
25.Qc6!
Rxb2+
26.Ka1
Reb8
27.Qxc4
R2b5
28.Rc2
; 24...Na2
25.Kxa2
Rxb2+
26.Ka1
) 25.cxb4!
So I ask the readers: How to evalute this position?) 24.Nh5
( 24.Bxa7
Nc4
25.Bxb8
Nd2+
26.Ka1
Rxb8
27.Nh5
Bxb2+
28.Kxb2
Nd5+
29.Ka3
Ra8+
) 24...Bh8
25.Qf1
( 25.Rd1
Nc4
26.Qf3
Na3+
27.bxa3
Nd3+
28.Ka2
Rb2+
) 25...Nf3
26.Qh1
Rxe3
27.fxe3
Nd2+
28.Ka1
Kf8
29.Qg2
Nd3
30.Rd1
Bxb2+
31.Ka2
Nc1+
32.Rxc1
Bxc1
33.Qd5
Rb2+
34.Ka1
Rb1+
35.Ka2
Rb2+
and in all cases Black draws by perpetual check.
When you have doubts about this or another analysis in Kasparov's work, please write. Garry welcomes all suggestions!]
22...c5
23.Rg1
c4
24.h4
Nd5
25.Nxd5
Rxd5
26.f4
Nd3
27.Qf3
Rb5
28.cxd3
Rxb2+
29.Kc1
cxd3
30.Kd1
Rc8
31.g5
Rcc2
32.Ke1
Rb1+
33.Qd1
Bc3+
0-1
Click on the moves to replay the game
|