Match of the Century in Reykjavik
From Frank Brady's book Bobby Fischer, Batsford 1974
As we reported
yesterday the World Championship Challenger, grandmaster Bobby Fischer from
USA, made an extraordinary move in the first game against Boris Spassky: instead
of going for a safe draw – which would have been his first with the black
pieces against the Russian – Fischer captured a "poisoned" pawn,
a move that left cost him a bishop for two pawns and put him in grave danger
of losing the game. US chess columnist Robert Byrne said: "Fischer is playing
desperately for a draw." GM Larry Evans felt Fischer had drawing chances,
"perhaps." Yugoslav chess GM Svetozar Gligoric thought Fischer's chances
were "slim." But Russian delegation chief Nikolai Krogius said it
was "...probably a draw," which left Fischer fans with reasons to
hope. We hand over once again to Frank Brady, who watched the second day of
the game unfold.

Fischer analyzed the position through the night and appeared for the adjournment,
looking tired and worried, just two minutes before Schmid opened the sealed-move
envelope. Schmid made Spassky's move for him on the board, showed Fischer the
score sheet so he could check that the correct move had been made, and activated
his clock. Fischer responded within seconds, and a few moves were exchanged.

Right at the start of game one Fischer glares at the TV camera...

... gets up from his chair and walks over to arbiter Lothar Schmid to protest...

Stills from the Liz Garbus documentary "Die
Legende Bobby Fischer" in Arte TV
Fischer then pointed to the camera aperture that he had complained about the
day before, and quickly left the stage with his clock running. Backstage, he
vehemently complained about the camera, and said he wanted it dismantled before
he continued play. ICF officials quickly conferred with Chester Fox, owner of
the film and television rights, who agreed to remove the camera. All of this
took time, and Fischer's clock continued running while the dismantling went
on.

Schmid finally went back to Fischer's dressing room and knocked at his door.
"Bobby, the cameras have been removed," he called. "You're a
liar," Fischer snapped. Schmid, furious, went back to the stage. Eventually,
Saemunder Paalsson, the policeman who had been acting as Fischer's unofficial
bodyguard, assured Bobby that he had personally checked that the camera was
no longer in operation. When Fischer returned to the stage, thirty-five minutes
had elapsed on his clock.

Fischer began fighting for a draw, but Spassky's moves were a study in precision
and his position became stronger as they played on. Eventually, it became clear
that Spassky could queen a Pawn. Instead of making his fifty-sixth move, Fischer
stopped the clock and offered his band in resignation. He wasn't smiling. Spassky
did not look him in the eye as they shook, but continued to study the position.
Fischer signed his score sheet, made a helpless gesture as if to say "What
am I supposed to do now?" and left the stage. It is not difficult to guess
his emotional state.

Fischer resigns the first game against Boris Spassky after 60 moves

Though
there have been a number of world's championship matches where the loser of
the first game went on to win the match, including Spassky-Petrosian, 1969 (and
Euwe-Alekhine, 1935, Petrosian-Botvinnik, 1963 and Stenitz-Tchigorin, 1892),
there is no question that Fischer considered the loss of the first game almost
tantamount to losing the match itself. Not only had he lost, but he had been
unable to prove to himself and to the public that he could win a single game
from Spassky. Their lifetime score stood at four wins for Spassky, two draws,
and no wins for Fischer. Bobby undoubtedly descended into a rage of self-doubt
and uncertainty. Since an inner-directed revenge was unthinkable, the cameras
were to blame for his loss, not Spassky's superior – or his own inferior
– play.
The above text was taken from the Batsford edition of Frank Brady's 1974
book, of which we possess (and treasure) a rare copy. There appears to be one
available at AbeBooks,
but probably our readers will find more.

[Event "World Championship 28th"] [Site "Reykjavik"] [Date "1972.07.11"] [Round
"1"] [White "Spassky, Boris V"] [Black "Fischer, Robert James"] [Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E56"] [WhiteElo "2660"] [BlackElo "2785"] [Annotator "ChessBase"] [PlyCount
"111"] [EventDate "1972.07.11"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "21"] [EventCountry
"ISL"] [Source "ChessBase"] [SourceDate "1999.07.01"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3.
Nf3 d5 4. Nc3 Bb4 5. e3 O-O 6. Bd3 c5 7. O-O Nc6 8. a3 Ba5 9. Ne2 dxc4 10. Bxc4
Bb6 11. dxc5 Qxd1 12. Rxd1 Bxc5 13. b4 Be7 14. Bb2 Bd7 15. Rac1 Rfd8 16. Ned4
Nxd4 17. Nxd4 Ba4 18. Bb3 Bxb3 19. Nxb3 Rxd1+ 20. Rxd1 Rc8 21. Kf1 Kf8 22. Ke2
Ne4 23. Rc1 Rxc1 24. Bxc1 f6 25. Na5 Nd6 26. Kd3 Bd8 27. Nc4 Bc7 28. Nxd6 Bxd6
29. b5 Bxh2 30. g3 h5 31. Ke2 h4 32. Kf3 Ke7 33. Kg2 hxg3 34. fxg3 Bxg3 35.
Kxg3 Kd6 36. a4 Kd5 37. Ba3 Ke4 38. Bc5 $1 a6 39. b6 f5 40. Kh4 f4 {[#]} 41.
exf4 Kxf4 42. Kh5 Kf5 43. Be3 Ke4 (43... g6+ 44. Kh6 Kf6 45. Bd2 Kf5 46. Bg5
e5 47. Bd2 Kf6 48. Be3 Kf5 49. Bg5 $18 {Zugzwang. Pachmann} ) 44. Bf2 (44. Bc1
$18 {Botvinnik} Kf5 (44... Kd3 $2 45. Kg6 Kc2 46. Kxg7 $1 Kxc1 47. Kf6 $18)
(44... Kd5 45. Kg6 Kc5 46. Be3+ Kb4 47. Kf7 (47. Kxg7 $2 Kxa4 48. Kf6 Kb5 49.
Kxe6 Kc6 $10 {Wade}) 47... Kxa4 48. Kxe6 Kb5 49. Kd7 a5 50. Kc7 Ka6 51. Bd4
g5 52. Bf6 g4 53. Be5 a4 54. Bd6 $18 {Purdy}) 45. Bg5 e5 46. Bc1 e4 47. Be3
{Vgl. Partie}) 44... Kf5 45. Bh4 e5 46. Bg5 e4 47. Be3 Kf6 48. Kg4 Ke5 49. Kg5
Kd5 50. Kf5 a5 (50... Kc4 51. Kxe4 Kb4 52. Kd5 Kxa4 53. Kd6 {/\ 54... Kc7 Byrne})
51. Bf2 {Zugzwang} g5 52. Kxg5 Kc4 53. Kf5 Kb4 54. Kxe4 Kxa4 55. Kd5 Kb5 56.
Kd6 (56. Kd6 a4 57. Kc7 Ka6 58. Bc5 Kb5 59. Bf8 Ka6 60. Be7 $18) 1-0
Was 29...Bxh2 an amateur-level blunder?
There has been much speculation on what is certainly one of the most famous
moves of all time, the 29...Bxh2 cannonball that ultimately cost Fischer the
first game and almost the entire match. What led Fischer to the kamikaze action
and

[Event "World Championship 28th"] [Site "Reykjavik"] [Date "1972.07.11"] [Round
"1"] [White "Spassky, Boris V"] [Black "Fischer, Robert James"] [Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E56"] [WhiteElo "2660"] [BlackElo "2785"] [PlyCount "111"] [EventDate
"1972.07.11"] [EventType "match"] [EventRounds "21"] [EventCountry "ISL"] [Source
"ChessBase"] [SourceDate "1999.07.01"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. Nc3 Bb4
5. e3 O-O 6. Bd3 c5 7. O-O Nc6 8. a3 Ba5 9. Ne2 dxc4 10. Bxc4 Bb6 11. dxc5 Qxd1
12. Rxd1 Bxc5 13. b4 Be7 14. Bb2 Bd7 15. Rac1 Rfd8 16. Ned4 Nxd4 17. Nxd4 Ba4
18. Bb3 Bxb3 19. Nxb3 Rxd1+ 20. Rxd1 Rc8 21. Kf1 Kf8 22. Ke2 Ne4 23. Rc1 Rxc1
24. Bxc1 f6 25. Na5 Nd6 26. Kd3 Bd8 27. Nc4 Bc7 28. Nxd6 Bxd6 29. b5 Bxh2 {[#]Anatoly
Karpov has suggested that Spassky was afraid of Fischer and wanted to show that
he could draw with the white pieces, and that Fischer wanted to disprove that
as the game headed for a stale draw. This move is one that few players above
master level would have chosen, since it is obvious that 30.g3 traps the bishop
and that the h-pawn cannot save it from capture.} 30. g3 h5 31. Ke2 h4 32. Kf3
Ke7 ({According to Garry Kasparov Fischer was probably planning} 32... h3 33.
Kg4 Bg1 {but overlooked that} 34. Kxh3 Bxf2 {keeps the bishop trapped. Svetozar
Gligoric reports that Fischer made his move very quickly and thinks that he
simply overlooked the intermediate move} 35. Bd2 {which prevents the black bishop
from escaping via the e1 square.}) 33. Kg2 hxg3 34. fxg3 Bxg3 35. Kxg3 Kd6 36.
a4 Kd5 37. Ba3 Ke4 38. Bc5 a6 39. b6 {Owing to unusual features in the position,
Fischer had good drawing chances despite having only two pawns for the bishop.
However, the position became hopeless after he made at least one more bad move
before the adjournment, which took place after move 40. Fischer could still
have drawn the game by the correct 39th or 40th move.} f5 40. Kh4 f4 41. exf4
Kxf4 42. Kh5 Kf5 43. Be3 Ke4 44. Bf2 Kf5 45. Bh4 e5 46. Bg5 e4 47. Be3 Kf6 48.
Kg4 Ke5 49. Kg5 Kd5 50. Kf5 a5 51. Bf2 g5 52. Kxg5 Kc4 53. Kf5 Kb4 54. Kxe4
Kxa4 55. Kd5 Kb5 56. Kd6 1-0
Many modern chess engines show interest in playing 29...Bxh2, at least in the
first seconds of their computations. And they do it not because they are going
to try to save the bishop – simply sacrifice it for two pawns and hold
the draw.

It would be interesting if we could, today, 40 years after the historic move
was made, get some final analysis by the most powerful computers in the world.
How about a communal Let's Check analysis session, where everyone looks at lines
that have not yet been analysed to a great depth. Our suspicion: it will turn
out that Fischer's move was playable, and that he could have and would have
held the draw – if his situation in Reykjavik had not been so full of
anguish and frustration.
Copyright
Brady/ChessBase
Links
 |
Match of the Century begins in Reykjavik
11.07.2012 – That could have been the headline
of our newspage, exactly forty years ago this afternoon, when after
some harrowing manoeuvring the US Challenger Bobby Fischer sat down
to the first game of the World Championship match against Boris Spassky
in Iceland. It was a very tense encounter and has been beautifully recreated
by Frank Brady, who was an eye-witness
at the scene. |
 |
Brady – Bobby Fischer's Game of the Century
29.05.2011 – We recently published a review
by Sean Marsh on Frank Brady's new biography of Bobby Fischer. In the
meantime we have received the handsome volume from the author and are
actually reading it – with immense pleasure. To give you an impression
of the quality of this book we bring you a short excerpt of a story you
know. Read how wonderfully Dr Brady weaves
the well-known tale.
|
 |
Bobby Fischer’s Remarkable Rise and Fall...
25.04.2011 – ... from America’s Brightest Prodigy
to the Edge of Madness. That's the full title of a fascinating book we
are currently reading, one which was written by Dr Frank Brady, who knew
Fischer from his early youth onwards. It is going to take us some time
to go through all 402 pages, so for now we bring you, courtesy of the
English magazine CHESS,
an in-depth
review by Sean Marsh.
|