The Norway Chess 2013 Super Tournament is one of the strongest super tournaments ever and is held from May 7th to 18th 2013 in several different locations in the Stavanger-region of Norway: Quality Residence Hotel, Sandnes (six rounds); Stavanger Konserthus, Stavanger (one round); Fabrikkhallen til Aarbakke AS, Bryne (one round); Flor & Fjære, Sør-Hidle (one round).
Tourney structure: nine-round round robin Time control: 100 minutes/40 moves + 50 minutes/20 moves + 15 minutes + 30 seconds/move starting with the first move Game start: daily 15:00 (server time), last round 12:00 Rest day: 11th May and 16th May Rules & Tiebreak Rules: The “Sofia rules” will apply. A tie for first place will be decided by a blitz match.
What a round it was, and no one could possibly have predicted its results unless they were oracles or madmen. Anyone hoping to have the tournament defined by now will have to wait until tomorrow for the grand finale where you can be assured of exciting chess.
The start of the day was understandably quiet, but those watching the live video feed from the official site were rewarded with some wonderful insights into Norwegian culture as today was May 17th. For non-Norwegians, this is a meaningless statement other than the date itself, but for Norwegians it is their National Day, to celebrate the creation of their constitution 199 years ago on May 17, 1814. Just as in many other countries, people from around the nation celebrate it by wearing clothes to honor their country. In the US for example, aside from festivities, the red, white, and blue colors and the flag itself are found everywhere, whereas in Norway, people and youths wear traditional Norwegian garb.
Norwegian girls show their support of the National Day by wearing traditional clothes. When asked they said that all their friends would be similarly dressed.
Even the tournament director wore traditonal clothing
That is, youths up to seventeen years old. Why not eighteen? That particular lot is getting ready to face their final high school exams to enter college and are part of a very different and quite unique Norwegian tradition: the Russ. The Russ prepare their exams the way all wild teenagers in the world would like to: an endless three-week party. From April 26 to May 17, the National Day, participants wear colored overalls, drive matching cars, vans, or buses, and celebrate almost continually during this period. Drunkenness, and public disturbances are regularly linked to the celebration. Several Russ came to visit the tournament, displaying their clothes, and even singing some choice songs such as … The Spice Girls. A lot of fun, and incredibly charming.
This group of Russ sung Spice Girls for the audience without even a soundtrack
The pants bore all manner of decoration, including patches of events, things they support, and signatures and messages by friends.
The string she is holding bore knots along its length, each from events and places they had been to.
It bears mentioning that if the Chess Olympiad next year in Norway is held during any period other than Russfeiring, protests and boycotts can be expected.
The first game to end was also the only lackluster bout of the day. Veselin Topalov and Levon Aronian played the Rubinstein variation of the Nimzo-Indian and followed the game Grischuk-Leko played just a month ago. By the time they stopped following their example, eighteen moves had been played and the endgame left was as lifeless as in the reference. They repeated moves a dozen moves later and that was that.
The next game to end was Vishy Anand against Jon Hammer. Contrary to Magnus Carlsen who had been more or less forced to depend on an error by his compatriot, the world champion chose a very different road. Although the opening can be classified as a Gruenfeld, there was not much about the game that warranted being called that, and even Jon Hammer after the game said he preferred to just call it a fight. Vishy began by sacrificing one pawn, then a second and went all out on the attack. It was a very positive approach to the fight that warmed one’s heart. He admitted after that despite tremendous amounts of calculations, at some point he thought he might be losing control of the game, and the variations that had seemed great at first were now seeming like draws. It was beginning to seem a bit strained when an opportunity came up, rewarding him for his vivacious play, and a Nxf7 came down like a bolt of lightning, defining the game for good. He kept it simple and brought home the bacon for a sensational win bringing him to 5.0/8.
It is worth mentioning that this morning, before the game, Jon had posted in his Twitter that in honor of the Norwegian National Day, it would be nice to beat the world champion. Sadly for him, this post did not have the effect desired, and instead of causing Anand to tremble in fear, it brought down the wrath of Siddhartha on the board.
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "?"] [White "Anand, V."] [Black "Hammer, J."] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D85"] [Annotator "GM Gilberto Milos"] [PlyCount "89"] [EventDate "2008.05.03"] [EventRounds "13"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [EventCategory "8"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. Bd2 Bg7 6. e4 Nxc3 7. Bxc3 c5 8. d5 Bxc3+ 9. bxc3 O-O 10. Qd2 e6 11. d6 {An important decision. Anand decides to attack and keep the passed pawn instead of developing.} e5 12. h4 $1 Be6 13. Nh3 {A novelty.} ({Before White had played} 13. h5 g5 14. h6) 13... Qxh4 { Hammer accepts the challenge and takes all the pawns.} ({White would be better after} 13... Nc6 14. Ng5 ({or} 14. h5)) 14. O-O-O Qxe4 15. Bd3 (15. Ng5 {would be answered by} Qf4 16. Nxh7 Rd8) 15... Qa4 16. Ng5 (16. Qh6 Bxh3 {with the idea} 17. Rxh3 Qf4+) 16... Qxa2 17. Qe3 Qa3+ 18. Kd2 Qb2+ 19. Bc2 Bf5 (19... Bb3 20. Rc1 Rd8 {was possible and White should continue with} {but not} 21. Nxf7 $4 (21. Ne4 Nc6 22. Qh6 Rxd6+ 23. Ke1 (23. Nxd6 Rd8 $15) 23... Rad8 24. Bxb3 Qxb3 25. Qxh7+ Kf8 26. Qh6+ Ke8 27. Qh8+ Ke7 28. Qh4+ $11 {with a perpetual check}) 21... Bxf7) 20. Rc1 Rd8 $2 {the decisive mistake.} (20... h5 {is not good enough} 21. g4 $1 Bxc2 (21... Bxg4 22. Ne4 Nd7 23. Rcg1) 22. Rxc2 Qb3 23. Ne4 Nd7 24. Qh6) ({Black was better after} 20... Nc6 $1 {This is the natural development move and leaves Black with a clear advantage after} 21. Nxh7 (21. g4 Na5) 21... Rfd8 22. d7 (22. Nf6+ Kg7 23. Nd5 Rh8 $19) 22... Rxd7+ 23. Ke1 Rd6 24. Nf6+ Kg7 25. Bxf5 Kxf6 $17) 21. Nxf7 $1 {Sudenly White has a decisive attack and his king is protected in the center.} Kxf7 22. Qxe5 {Black has no good defense.} Rxd6+ (22... Kg8 23. Qd5+ Kh8 24. Rxh7+ Kxh7 25. Qf7+ Kh6 26. Rh1+ Kg5 27. Qe7+ Kf4 28. Qe3+ Kg4 29. Qg3#) 23. Qxd6 Nc6 24. Rxh7+ Kg8 25. Rd7 $1 {Another brillant move threatening Qd5.} Re8 (25... Bxd7 26. Qxg6+ Kf8 27. Qf6+ Kg8 28. Rh1) 26. Qf6 Bxd7 27. Qxg6+ Kf8 28. Qf6+ Kg8 29. Rh1 {Now Black starts his counterplay and saves the mate but not the game.} Re2+ 30. Kxe2 Nd4+ (30... Qxc2+ 31. Ke3 {and there are no more checks.}) 31. cxd4 Qxc2+ 32. Ke3 Qc3+ 33. Kf4 Qxd4+ 34. Qxd4 cxd4 35. Ke4 {This endgame is easy. White blocks Black's pawns with the king and advances his pawns supported by the rook. You may appreciate Vishy's technique...} a5 36. Kxd4 a4 37. Kc3 b5 38. Kb4 Kf7 39. Rh7+ Ke6 40. g4 Be8 41. f4 Kf6 42. Rh6+ Kg7 43. g5 Bg6 44. Rh3 Bf5 45. Re3 1-0
The next game was the wonderfully complicated struggle between Hikaru Nakamura and Teimour Radjabov. With Radjabov’s run of terrible form, it was not exactly a shock to find Nakamura on the winning side, but it was not as simple as that, and the Sicilian Kalashnikov they played was full of dynamic twists and turns that enthralled. Though the American missed the spectacular win 34.Nf5!! it did not change the outcome and Nakamura scored the point.
Hikaru Nakamura is on +1 so far, a respectable result in such a field
By the time all this had taken place, two games were left, Svidler-Karjakin and Carlsen-Hao, and both seemed destined for a draw. They say lightning never strikes the same place twice, but today it did.
In the popular Berlin variation of the Ruy Lopez, Peter Svidler played some last minute preparation that he came up with a half hour before the round began. Needless to say, one can only imagine the wonders he could produce with 45 minutes. As it was, the move he found for black (he was white) was precisely what Sergey Karjakin played, and the game was pretty much equal by move ten. Perhaps this was what Svidler needed as he punched back with creativity and came up with the strong idea 14.a4. Sergey was not easily taken down, and the fight swung back and forth with both players holding the advantage at different moments as Karjakin held queen, rook and two passed pawns against Svidler’s queen and two bishops.
It was a tough day for Sergey Karjakin, but he still retains his lead going into the last round.
The decisive mistake came with 47...Rc3? which sealed the fate of Karjakin after which Svidler found all the right moves. The game had been so stressful and complicated, that when Svidler appeared in the pres conference, Simen Agdestein asked him if he wanted anything, such as coffee perhaps. Peter replied, “A new head would do.” This loss left Karjakin on 5.5/8, leaving Carlsen a chance to catch up with him for the last round.
At this juncture, with both Magnus Carlsen and Wang Hao deep in thought, another guest was brought to the table, and quite an unexpected one: Lars Monsen. For those who do not know who he is, Lars Monsen is a famous adventurer and journalist who has not only made many extreme hiking expeditions, such as crossing Canada through to Alaska on foot, much of which he documented both in book and film, later edited in documentaries. He regaled the audience with his stories involving his extensive experience with bears, from grizzly bears, black bears, and even polar bears, as well as what to do. He even has a book detailing this. More importantly to all this, was not simply a talk show with a fascinating personality, but the fact that he is a genuine chess buff who plays online every day, and during his expeditions always carries a set and book to peruse in his tent at night or during storms.
Lars Monsen: famous adventurer, journalist, author, and true chess buff
When asked about his opinion of the royal game, and the rekindled debate in Norway on whether it is a sport or not, he showed a perfect understanding of the reality of professional play, and said that even from a purely physical perspective, it was clear that the player with the best physical shape would be best prepared to face the toils of long events and the inevitable exhaustion that would sink in at the end. As he left, the game between Carlsen and Hao was reaching its crux.
Magnus Carlsen wrote on Twitter: Tough loss in @NorwayChess, now sharing 2.place with Anand before last round. Too many bad decisions today, got what I deserved in the end.
The game between Magnus Carlsen and Wang Hao seemed to be a typical game by the Norwegian. The opening was nothing unusual as they played a Symmetrical English with neither side getting anything special. It was fairly balanced and went into an endgame where Carlsen hoped to outplay his opponent as he has done to so many others. Somehow, that is not at all what happened, and Magnus went deeply astray as he lost a pawn, but even so the general feeling was that Carlsen would suffer but draw. Most grandmasters were not especially interested in the foregone conclusion and merely awaited the expected result to be announced. Instead, Magnus went on to badly misplay the ending and found himself in a very iffy position. His final and deciding mistake was 64.Kg2? which left the Chinese player with a choice between two winning moves, and the rest he was able to calculate to the end.
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "8"] [White "Anand, Viswanathan"] [Black "Hammer, Jon Ludvig"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D85"] [WhiteElo "2783"] [BlackElo "2608"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "89"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0} g6 {0} 3. Nc3 {0} d5 {0} 4. cxd5 {7} Nxd5 {0} 5. Bd2 {4} Bg7 {117} 6. e4 {19} Nxc3 {6} 7. Bxc3 {5} O-O {93} 8. Qd2 {280} c5 {186 } 9. d5 {20} Bxc3 {656} 10. bxc3 {24} e6 {6} 11. d6 {89} e5 {336} 12. h4 {248} Be6 {290} 13. Nh3 {615} Qxh4 {958} 14. O-O-O {134} Qxe4 {893} 15. Bd3 {776} Qa4 {111} 16. Ng5 {134} Qxa2 {422} 17. Qe3 {301} Qa3+ {935} 18. Kd2 {11} Qb2+ {38} 19. Bc2 {112} Bf5 {340} 20. Rc1 {55} Rd8 {108} 21. Nxf7 {138} Kxf7 {127} 22. Qxe5 {26} Rxd6+ {187} 23. Qxd6 {8} Nc6 {12} 24. Rxh7+ {420} Kg8 {5} 25. Rd7 { 552} Re8 {178} 26. Qf6 {261} Bxd7 {11} 27. Qxg6+ {12} Kf8 {1} 28. Qf6+ {10} Kg8 {4} 29. Rh1 {41} Re2+ {192} 30. Kxe2 {11} Nd4+ {11} 31. cxd4 {5} Qxc2+ {7} 32. Ke3 {17} Qc3+ {11} 33. Kf4 {6} Qxd4+ {17} 34. Qxd4 {4} cxd4 {9} 35. Ke4 {4} a5 {40} 36. Kxd4 {11} a4 {8} 37. Kc3 {6} b5 {20} 38. Kb4 {10} Kf7 {40} 39. Rh7+ {7 } Ke6 {6} 40. g4 {6} Be8 {20} 41. f4 {2976} Kf6 {2976} 42. Rh6+ {0} Kg7 {0} 43. g5 {0} Bg6 {0} 44. Rh3 {0} Bf5 {0} 45. Re3 {0} 1-0 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "8"] [White "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Black "Wang, Hao"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A30"] [WhiteElo "2868"] [BlackElo "2743"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "158"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. c4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {6} Nc6 {0} 3. Nc3 {10} e5 {0} 4. d3 {37} d6 {71} 5. a3 {84} a5 {123} 6. g3 {24} Nge7 {191} 7. Bg2 {23} g6 {7} 8. Bg5 {19} Bg7 {136} 9. Bxe7 {46} Qxe7 {167} 10. O-O {17} O-O {9} 11. Nd2 {87} Be6 {105} 12. Rb1 {329} Rfc8 {424} 13. Nd5 {389} Qd8 {19} 14. b4 {62} axb4 {95} 15. axb4 {6} Bxd5 {32} 16. Bxd5 {3} cxb4 {7} 17. Ne4 {268} Rc7 {446} 18. Qd2 {506} Kh8 {282} 19. Ra1 { 399} Rb8 {594} 20. Rfb1 {107} h6 {19} 21. Bxc6 {501} bxc6 {151} 22. Rxb4 {5} d5 {275} 23. Rxb8 {416} Qxb8 {18} 24. Nd6 {167} e4 {1630} 25. Ra6 {188} exd3 {536} 26. exd3 {465} Kh7 {209} 27. Kg2 {699} dxc4 {270} 28. dxc4 {10} Rd7 {176} 29. c5 {307} Bf8 {132} 30. Rb6 {542} Qc7 {178} 31. Rb3 {155} Qa7 {64} 32. Rc3 {842} Bxd6 {132} 33. cxd6 {2} Qa5 {8} 34. h4 {221} Rxd6 {58} 35. Qe3 {62} Qd5+ {49} 36. Qf3 {18} h5 {198} 37. Qxd5 {50} cxd5 {4} 38. Kf3 {7} Kg7 {12} 39. Rc7 {15} Kf6 {17} 40. Ke3 {9} Ra6 {155} 41. Rd7 {333} Ke6 {0} 42. Rb7 {0} Ra3+ {107} 43. Kf4 {0} Ra4+ {0} 44. Ke3 {0} Re4+ {27} 45. Kd3 {0} Re1 {81} 46. Rb6+ {196} Kf5 {0} 47. Rb7 {116} f6 {34} 48. Rd7 {155} Re5 {239} 49. f3 {680} Ke6 {486} 50. Rg7 {0} g5 {0} 51. Rh7 {386} g4 {270} 52. fxg4 {321} hxg4 {0} 53. Rg7 {0} f5 { 37} 54. Rg6+ {79} Kf7 {0} 55. Ra6 {42} Re1 {76} 56. Kd2 {365} Rg1 {777} 57. Ra3 {0} Rg2+ {0} 58. Ke1 {0} Kf6 {0} 59. Kf1 {63} Rc2 {49} 60. Ra6+ {189} Ke5 {45} 61. h5 {1040} Rh2 {1732} 62. h6 {5} d4 {42} 63. Kg1 {65} Rh3 {9} 64. Kg2 {0} d3 {0} 65. Ra5+ {0} Kd4 {0} 66. Ra4+ {0} Kc3 {0} 67. Ra6 {0} d2 {0} 68. Rc6+ {0} Kd3 {0} 69. Rd6+ {0} Kc2 {0} 70. Rc6+ {0} Kd1 {0} 71. Rd6 {0} f4 {0} 72. gxf4 { 0} Ke2 {0} 73. Re6+ {0} Re3 {0} 74. Rxe3+ {0} Kxe3 {0} 75. h7 {0} d1=Q {0} 76. h8=Q {0} Qf3+ {0} 77. Kg1 {0} Qf2+ {0} 78. Kh1 {0} Qf1+ {0} 79. Kh2 {0} g3+ {0} 0-1 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "8"] [White "Topalov, Veselin"] [Black "Aronian, Levon"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "E53"] [WhiteElo "2793"] [BlackElo "2813"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "82"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0} e6 {0} 3. Nc3 {0} Bb4 {0} 4. e3 {0} O-O {1} 5. Bd3 {1} d5 {21} 6. Nf3 {7} c5 {6} 7. O-O {7} cxd4 {8} 8. exd4 {5} dxc4 {4} 9. Bxc4 {5} b6 {3} 10. Qe2 {273} Bb7 {28} 11. Rd1 {90} Nbd7 {17} 12. d5 {91} Bxc3 {13} 13. dxe6 {35} Bxf3 {6} 14. gxf3 {120} fxe6 {17} 15. bxc3 {78} Qc7 {3} 16. Bxe6+ {58} Kh8 {25} 17. Qc4 {4} Qb7 {5} 18. Bxd7 {46} Nxd7 {42} 19. Qd5 {8} Qxd5 {54} 20. Rxd5 {7} Nc5 {17} 21. Be3 {10} Rxf3 {16} 22. Re1 {10} Ne6 {227} 23. a4 {23} Rf7 {311} 24. a5 {589} h6 {33} 25. axb6 {502} axb6 {3} 26. Bxb6 {24} Nf4 {16} 27. Ra5 {682} Rb8 {1136} 28. Bd4 {1002} Rb2 {127} 29. Ra7 {72} Rxa7 {28} 30. Bxa7 {7} Rc2 {40} 31. Bd4 {346} Kh7 {6} 32. h4 {375} g5 {79} 33. hxg5 {348} hxg5 {9} 34. Re5 {469} Kg6 {37} 35. Kh2 {4} Nd3 {65} 36. Re6+ {38} Kf5 {25} 37. Re8 {265} Kg4 {34} 38. Re4+ {259} Nf4 {64} 39. Re1 {44} Ne2 {53} 40. Kg2 {23} Nxc3 {34} 41. Bxc3 {3018} Rxc3 {2975} 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "8"] [White "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Black "Radjabov, Teimour"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B32"] [WhiteElo "2775"] [BlackElo "2745"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "81"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} Nc6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} e5 {0} 5. Nb5 {5} d6 {0} 6. N1c3 {43} a6 {10} 7. Na3 {5} b5 {10} 8. Nd5 {7} Nf6 {5} 9. c4 {23} b4 {130} 10. Nxf6+ {588} Qxf6 {96} 11. Nc2 {6} Be7 {16} 12. g3 {63} h5 { 216} 13. h3 {283} Qg6 {1090} 14. Bg2 {38} h4 {546} 15. g4 {78} O-O {573} 16. O-O {188} Be6 {328} 17. Ne3 {137} Rac8 {496} 18. b3 {398} Rfd8 {957} 19. a3 {39 } bxa3 {241} 20. Nf5 {145} Bg5 {629} 21. Rxa3 {65} a5 {211} 22. Bb2 {170} Rd7 { 478} 23. Bc3 {41} Bd8 {4} 24. Kh1 {759} Qh7 {148} 25. f4 {467} Bb6 {218} 26. Ra2 {24} Bc5 {100} 27. Rd2 {502} f6 {223} 28. Nxd6 {83} Rb8 {4} 29. fxe5 {152} fxe5 {9} 30. Nf5 {200} g6 {70} 31. Nh6+ {411} Kh8 {7} 32. Rf6 {8} Rxd2 {103} 33. Bxd2 {250} Qd7 {8} 34. Qe1 {440} Kg7 {23} 35. Rf1 {291} Rxb3 {6} 36. Bg5 { 30} Qd3 {88} 37. Nf7 {168} Qg3 {29} 38. Qd2 {104} Bxc4 {27} 39. Bf6+ {83} Kf8 { 4} 40. Nxe5 {85} Qxh3+ {64} 41. Bxh3 {2975} 1-0 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "8"] [White "Svidler, Peter"] [Black "Karjakin, Sergey"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C65"] [WhiteElo "2769"] [BlackElo "2767"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "113"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. e4 {0} e5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} Nc6 {0} 3. Bb5 {0} Nf6 {0} 4. d3 {0} Bc5 {0} 5. c3 {0} O-O {1} 6. O-O {1} d6 {6} 7. h3 {19} Ne7 {88} 8. d4 {9} Bb6 {6} 9. Re1 {6} d5 {190} 10. Nxe5 {32} Nxe4 {14} 11. Nd2 {163} Nxd2 {975} 12. Bxd2 {80} f6 {23} 13. Nd3 {590} Bd7 {1089} 14. a4 {87} c6 {1177} 15. a5 {20} Bxa5 {10} 16. Nc5 {7 } Bc8 {18} 17. Bd3 {36} Bb6 {177} 18. Ne6 {154} Bxe6 {16} 19. Rxe6 {3} Ng6 {298 } 20. Qh5 {867} Re8 {161} 21. Rae1 {1250} Rxe6 {36} 22. Rxe6 {12} Nf8 {296} 23. Re3 {41} Bc7 {285} 24. g3 {27} b5 {300} 25. h4 {506} Bd6 {183} 26. b3 {389} a5 {419} 27. c4 {24} bxc4 {78} 28. bxc4 {17} Bb4 {5} 29. Bc1 {415} a4 {110} 30. Bb1 {17} Qb6 {225} 31. cxd5 {357} Bd6 {246} 32. Ba2 {303} c5 {7} 33. Re7 {237} Kh8 {100} 34. Rf7 {464} Kg8 {93} 35. Re7 {142} Kh8 {8} 36. Qf7 {472} Bxe7 {12} 37. d6 {1} Ng6 {69} 38. dxe7 {21} Nxe7 {18} 39. Qxe7 {12} cxd4 {6} 40. Qe4 {192 } Rc8 {422} 41. Bf4 {464} Rd8 {902} 42. Qe7 {1080} Rc8 {212} 43. Qe4 {167} Rd8 {0} 44. Qe7 {104} Rc8 {0} 45. h5 {482} Qd8 {325} 46. Qb7 {70} h6 {162} 47. Be6 {313} Rc3 {699} 48. Qf7 {190} a3 {52} 49. Bd6 {83} Qa8 {270} 50. Bd5 {51} a2 { 91} 51. Bxa8 {27} a1=Q+ {0} 52. Kh2 {0} Qe1 {18} 53. Kh3 {0} Rc8 {213} 54. Bf8 {0} Rxf8 {0} 55. Qxf8+ {0} Kh7 {0} 56. Bd5 {0} Qf1+ {0} 57. Kh4 {0} 1-0
Select games from the dropdown menu above the board
Pictures by the official site
The games are being broadcast live on the official web site and on the chess server Playchess.com. If you are not a member you can download a free Playchess client there and get immediate access. You can also use ChessBase 12 or any of our Fritz compatible chess programs.
As reported Gata Kamsky and Alejandro Ramirez tied for first in the 2013 US Championship, each scoring 6.5/9 points. Both players had drawn their face-to-face battle in round eight; Kamksy was undefeated with four wins and five draws, while Ramirez had a loss but also one more win. All this necessitated a playoff for the title.
The playoff took place on Monday, May 13. In all three hours of competition, and for more than 150 moves, Gata Kamsky (above) was the aggressor, but he found himself unable to break through the stalwart and creative endgame defense of Ramirez – until the waning moments. “It feels a bit awkward,” Kamsky said. “I consider us equals. Someone just got luckier than the other.”
The suprise challenger to Kamsky's supreme dominance in the 2013 US Championship was Alejandro Tadeo Ramírez Álvarez. Ramirez was born in San José, Costa Rica, June 21, 1988 and at the age of 15, he became the first Centro-American to achieve the Grandmaster chess title, and at the time also became the second youngest chess grandmaster in the world. Alej started playing chess at the age of four after watching the movie "Searching for Bobby Fischer", and with the guidance of his father and mentor Jorge Ramírez, made rapid progress. At the age of 13 he earned a notable draw against Russian super grandmaster Alexander Morozevich during the Chess Olympiad 2002 in Bled.
The first grandmaster norm was obtained at the age of 14 by scoring 7.0/9 at the Capablanca in Memoriam Tournament in La Habana in May 2003. The second norm was obtained at the age of 15, when he tied for first place in the Zonal Tournament in Guayaquil, Ecuador. In this tournament Alejandro also got the right to participate in the World Chess Championship 2004, becoming the only centro-American ever to participate in such a magnum event, which was held in Libya. He obtained his third norm at the age of 15, gaining seven points in the Los Inmortales Tournament at Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic in November 2003.
Ramírez won first place in the Morelia Open 2008 and first place in the US Chess Open 2010 held in Irvine, California. In January 2011 he stopped representing Costa Rica, and is now listed as a US Chess player. He lives in Dallas, Texas, where he graduated from the University of Texas with a Masters Degree in Arts & Technology / Design and Production of Videogames. He is now a co-editor of the ChessBase news site, where his technical expertise, quick-witted personality and entertaining writing style are greatly appreciated. He has recorded three training DVDs so far – the first was published at the beginning of this year, the other two will follow in the coming weeks.
Games one and two of the playoff for the 2013 US Championship were played at a time control of 25 minutes per player with a five second increment per move. Ramirez seemed determined not to get behind on the clock, but an early misstep allowed Kamsky to embed a knight on d5. Shortly after, Black’s pawns were crippled, but Ramirez found all the necessary countermeasures to prevent any white pawn from reaching paydirt. Of the many players who were spectating, GM Robert Hess said Kamsky did not need to be so quick to exchange his best piece.
Things getting really tense – Kamsky attacking, Ramirez defending precisely
[Event "USA Championship 2013 tiebreak"] [Site "Saint Louis"] [Date "2013.05.13"] [Round "2"] [White "Ramirez, Alejandro"] [Black "Kamsky, Gata"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C88"] [WhiteElo "2551"] [BlackElo "2741"] [Annotator "Ramirez,Alejandro"] [PlyCount "127"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "USA"] {Trying to beat Kamsky is not an easy task, but I thought I would have a better shot at it in the Spanish than on his a6 Slavs. Also, I didn't think he would be expecting 1. e4} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. a4 Bb7 9. d3 d6 10. h3 {I didn't really know what I was doing, this move seemed natural enough.} Qd7 11. Nc3 Na5 12. Ba2 b4 13. Nd5 (13. Ne2 {was another possibility.}) 13... Nxd5 14. Bxd5 c6 15. Ba2 c5 16. c3 Bc6 17. Bd5 $6 {This is the beginning of all my problems. As soon as I played it I thought about asking for a takeback...} (17. d4 c4 $5 18. dxe5 Bxa4 {I thought was complex, but the engine says I have Qd5 with an advantage.}) 17... bxc3 18. bxc3 Bxd5 19. exd5 Rab8 20. c4 {Unfortunately my position is not great as my a-pawn is rather weak and I don't have anything going on anywhere on the board. Thankfully through some tactics I'm able to solve the first problem.} Nb3 21. Rb1 Nxc1 22. Qxc1 Qxa4 23. Ra1 Qb3 24. Ra3 $1 {An important intermediate move. The a6 pawn won't be going anywhere soon and White can take it at leisure.} Qb7 25. Qa1 f5 26. Rxa6 Ra8 27. Ra2 $1 Rxa2 28. Qxa2 Ra8 29. Rb1 Rxa2 30. Rxb7 Bf6 {Here I started getting worried about e4. I saw the alternative g4 but I thought it was a bit too risky. Without that move the position became very uncomfortable though.} 31. Rb8+ (31. g4 $1 e4 32. dxe4 fxe4 33. g5 Bd4 34. g6 $1 hxg6 35. Rb8+ Kf7 36. Ng5+ $11) 31... Kf7 32. Rb7+ Ke8 33. Rb1 Kd7 34. Rd1 {A little passive but I thought I was holding.} h5 35. g4 $5 hxg4 36. hxg4 e4 $1 {Kamsky shuts down the e4 square from my knight.} ( 36... fxg4 37. Nd2 $1 {And once the knight jumps to e4 White has no problems at all.}) 37. dxe4 fxg4 38. e5 $1 {And I push it open right back!} gxf3 39. exf6 gxf6 40. Rc1 f5 41. Rc3 {Here I thought the game was easily drawn, but Kamsky shows great technique and puts on the pressure.} Ke7 42. Re3+ Kf6 43. Re6+ Kg5 44. Rxd6 Rc2 45. Rc6 Kf4 46. Rh6 (46. Rxc5 {is the computer move, but it looked scary!} Rc1+ 47. Kh2 Rf1 48. d6 Rxf2+ 49. Kg1 Ra2 50. Rc8 $1 {but Black only has a draw here of course.} Rd2 51. c5) 46... Kg5 47. Rh8 Rxc4 48. d6 Rd4 49. Rc8 Rxd6 50. Rxc5 {With the pawns traded off, the draw becomes clearer.} Kg4 51. Rc4+ Kh3 52. Rc1 Rg6+ {By this point I was beyond exhausted. I briefly considered playing 53. Kf1 which gets mated by Kh2. Oops :)} 53. Kh1 Rg2 54. Rc2 {I know Kamsky was tired too - he was surprised at this move!} Rg7 55. Rc3 Kg4 56. Rc4+ f4 57. Rc8 Kf5 58. Rc3 Ke4 59. Rc4+ $1 {Of course Blak has no way to break through, but I calculated this line to a draw.} Kd3 60. Rxf4 Ke2 61. Ra4 {Rook on the long side is a draw in Lucena positions.} Kxf2 62. Ra2+ Kg3 63. Kg1 Rb7 64. Rg2+ $1 {The only drawing move, but sufficient. Kamsky also missed this move, he shook his head when I played it, smiled at the audience and offered me a draw.} 1/2-1/2
Draw agreed in game one
After a short break, the players switched colors and resumed the rapid play. This time Kamsky broke through on the queenside, and probed Ramirez’s position with his rook. The minor pieces traded and another rook-and-pawn ending was reached, with Kamsky having all the chances.
One again Ramirez was up to the task, using a stalemate tactic to extend the tiebreak
The rare ending to a grandmaster game caused the supremely focused Kamsky to look at the crowd and laugh. Later, he said he had almost the same ending at the World Cup in 2011 against GM Ian Nepomniachtchi, but was able to win that game.
[Event "ch-USA Playoff 2013"] [Site "Saint Louis USA"] [Date "2013.05.13"] [Round "1"] [White "Kamsky, Gata"] [Black "Ramirez, Alejandro"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A46"] [WhiteElo "2741"] [BlackElo "2551"] [Annotator "Ramirez,Alejandro"] [PlyCount "126"] [EventDate "2013.05.13"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. g3 cxd4 4. Nxd4 {e5/d5 is supposed to be the refutation of this early system, but I decided to play more cautiously.} g6 5. Bg2 Bg7 6. O-O O-O 7. c4 Qc7 {I just kind of made this up during the game. I'm attacking c4 and forcing b3.} 8. Na3 d6 9. b3 a6 10. Bb2 Nc6 11. Qd2 Bd7 12. Rac1 Nxd4 13. Bxd4 {White's awkward knight on a3 means that Black has good chances at equality.} Bc6 14. Nb5 {But with this he fixes it. Now he is slightly better.} Qd7 15. Nc3 Bxg2 16. Kxg2 b5 17. Bxf6 Bxf6 18. Nd5 Rac8 19. cxb5 Qxb5 20. Nxf6+ exf6 21. e3 Rc6 22. Rxc6 Qxc6+ 23. Kg1 Rc8 24. Rd1 {White's structure is far superior to Black's, so I get to be tortured for forever now.} Qc2 25. Qxc2 Rxc2 26. a4 (26. Rxd6 Rxa2 27. Rxf6 Kg7 28. Rb6 h5 $1 {is an endgame that I was pretty sure I could hold.}) 26... Rc6 27. Rd4 Kf8 28. Rb4 Ke7 29. Rb7+ Ke6 30. a5 Rc2 (30... h5 $1 {was so much better than what I did. I still get to suffer, but much less.}) 31. g4 h5 32. gxh5 gxh5 33. Kg2 f5 34. Rb6 Rb2 35. Kf3 Ke5 {White is a lot better, but it's unclear exactly how he is going to make progress.} 36. Rxa6 Rxb3 37. Ra8 Ra3 38. a6 f4 39. a7 Kf5 40. Ke2 fxe3 41. fxe3 h4 42. h3 Ra4 {White's rook is stuck, so now Kamsky will try to zugzwang my king back.} 43. Kd3 Kf6 44. Kc3 Ke7 45. Kb3 Ra1 46. Kc4 Ra5 47. Kb4 Ra1 48. Kb5 Rb1+ 49. Kc6 Rc1+ 50. Kd5 Rc5+ 51. Ke4 Ra5 52. Kf4 Kf6 53. Kg4 Ra4+ 54. Kh5 Kf5 55. e4+ Kf6 56. Kxh4 d5 57. Kg3 dxe4 {now the draw is obvious, as the endgame is drawn even without Black's e and f pawns.} 58. Kf4 Kg7 59. h4 Kh7 60. h5 Kg7 61. h6+ Kh7 62. Ke3 f5 63. Kf4 Ra6 {I survived!} 1/2-1/2
The rules dictated that in case of a 1-1 tie, the playoff would end in an Armageddon match, where players bid for time and color. In sealed envelopes, Ramirez wrote the time 19:45, while Kamsky’s envelope read 20 minutes even. Ramirez thus got 19:45 to Kamsky’s 45 minutes, while Ramirez had black and draw odds.
The two reprised the opening from their first rapid game. Kamsky, needing to win, decided to keep all the minor pieces on the board this time. He slowly increased his square domination while Ramirez listlessly shuffled pieces round the last two ranks. Eventually Kamsky pushed forward, and Ramirez, getting low on time, decided to take his chances in an opposite-colored bishop endgame.
With Ramirez playing only on increment, he could not defend once Kamsky got his third passed pawn. Ramirez resigned after Kamsky denuded black’s best defenders. After the game, Kamsky told Ramirez that 37…e5 was the critical mistake, without which Black should hold. Ramirez agreed, explaining that he did not see 39…g4 in his calculations. “I was starting to get really nervous,” Kamsky said. “It wasn’t clear until the last move.”
[Event "ch-USA Playoff 2013"] [Site "Saint Louis USA"] [Date "2013.05.13"] [Round "3"] [White "Kamsky, Gata"] [Black "Ramirez, Alejandro"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "A46"] [WhiteElo "2741"] [BlackElo "2551"] [Annotator "Ramirez,Alejandro"] [PlyCount "103"] [EventDate "2013.05.13"] {Going into the Armageddon I can't really describe how I felt. It was a combination of exhausted and nervous and happy and excited. Here we go!} 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. g3 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. Bg2 Bg7 6. O-O O-O 7. c4 Qc7 {This random move worked last time so I played it again.} 8. Na3 d6 {Kamsky spent a good ten minutes in this position, which made me very nervous. If he could play 9.Nab5 I would probably be slightly worse.} 9. Ndb5 (9. Nab5 Qxc4 10. Be3 Na6 11. b3 Qc5 $1 {seems like Black holds though.}) 9... Qd8 10. Bg5 Nc6 11. Qd2 a6 12. Nc3 Bf5 13. e4 Be6 14. Nd5 Nd7 15. Rac1 Rc8 16. b3 Re8 17. h3 {The computer thinks I'm fine, but this position is quite unpleasant under time pressure, as Black has no constructive plan.} Nde5 18. Kh1 Rb8 19. Nc2 Qd7 20. Nb6 (20. f4 h6 21. Bh4 g5 22. Bxg5 hxg5 23. fxe5 Nxe5 24. Qxg5 Bxh3 {is very unclear, Kamsky wants to keep the pressure without allowing counterplay.}) 20... Qd8 21. Be3 Nd7 22. Nd5 Nc5 23. f4 b5 24. cxb5 axb5 25. f5 Bxd5 $6 (25... Bd7 {was preferable, but I was worried about} 26. Bg5 {since f6 is a dangerous threat.}) 26. exd5 Ne5 27. Nb4 Qa5 28. Bxc5 dxc5 29. Rxc5 Rbc8 $2 {Kamsky spent a lot of time again on this move, but he found a really nice sequence.} ( 29... Nd3 $1 30. Qxd3 Qxb4 {would have made White's task incredibly hard. He is up a pawn but the opposite colored bishops and Black's activity gives him chances to hold.}) 30. Rxc8 $1 Rxc8 31. fxg6 hxg6 32. Qf4 $1 {I underestimated this powerful move. Now Black has no way of stopping the knight coming to c6 and giving White a strong passed pawn.} Qc7 (32... g5 $2 33. Qf5 $1 {is lights out.}) 33. a4 bxa4 34. bxa4 f5 35. Nc6 Nxc6 36. Qxc7 Rxc7 37. dxc6 {This endgame is very difficult for Black, but it might be a draw. I haven't fully analyzed it yet, but I didn't think I'd survive during the game. That being said here came my blunder.} e5 $4 {In time pressure, I completely forgot that White can play g4.} 38. Bd5+ Kf8 39. g4 {and now the game is over. Black can't allow his pawns to be blockaded and his bishop to become passive. Here I jettisoned my pawns, but it's not enough.} Ke7 40. gxf5 gxf5 41. Rxf5 Kd6 42. Bf3 Ra7 43. Rg5 e4 {desperation, but the e-pawn was rather useless anyways.} 44. Bxe4 Be5 45. Rg6+ Kc5 46. Bf3 $1 {Most precise, now the a-pawn is untouchable.} Kb6 (46... Rxa4 47. c7 Bxc7 48. Rc6+) 47. Rg5 Ra5 48. h4 Kc7 49. h5 Kd6 50. h6 Rxa4 51. Rxe5 Kxe5 52. c7 {and I had to resign. A masterful performance by Kamsky, who gave me no chances in the entire playoff.} 1-0
Ramirez said the experience of playing worse positions was “torture”, then he was reminded that he still pockets $20,000. “I’ve never won that much in chess, ever,” he said.
Photos by Tony Rich, Saint Louis Chess Club
The reverse also has a reverse – Japanese proverb
In his parable The garden of forking paths the writer Jorge Luis Borges examines the relationship between past, present and future. What has gone before is stored up as facts, the future is a developing and dynamic process in which – in whatever manner – one of the logically possible continuations is selected.
This is a metaphor which quite fits the development of a game of chess over time. In chess it is the players who at each fork in the path take decisions as to what course their journey will take. They make these decisions by following with their imagination some of the possible ramifications to as great a depth as they can, by constructing according to their experience an evaluation of the position which will have been reached, and thus coming to a decision about their next move based on calculation and intuition.
The choice of just about each move is the result of evaluations which take some steps in time into the future of the actual position. Thus it is understandable that a manœuvre can sometimes be refuted by another one which arose on the basis of a more far-reaching vision of the future, and that the latter in its turn can be refuted by even deeper analysis, etc.
Position 202 with all its apparent latent energy is an illustration of this process of successive refutations by ever deeper mining operations. On seeing this landscape on the board, one irresistibly thinks that the end is nigh – but whose end?
N. N.–N. N., 1944 Black to move
Black acutely had to worry at once about the threatened mate on h7 and came up with the multi-purpose move 1...Rc7!!. White spontaneously resigned, since he had hallucinations about losing a rook. He spotted the sad fact that taking the agent provocateur leads to mate: 2.Qxc7 Qf3+ 3.Kg1 Qg2# or, even worse, 2.Rxc7 Qd1#.
The subtle counter to the rook move by 2.b5!! with the threat of 3.Bf8+ and mate did not occur to him. In analysis it was thought that Black would then have nothing better than seeking salvation in a draw with 2...Qd1+! 3.Rxd1 Rxb7. But there are also holes in this drawing idea, because the riposte 2.b5 was in its turn parried with a deeper insight into the microstructure of the position: instead of 2...Qd1+ Black can play for a win with the counter-parry 2...Qe2!!, because after 3.Bf8+ Kh5 4.Rxh7+ Kg4 White is mated in four moves at most. An operation which appears to win the day for Black.
But once again there is a reversal of fate: White does not make use of 3.Bf8+, but refutes Black’s winning attempt with the counter-offensive 3.Rxh7+!! Kung Fu fighting!! If Black now continues with his intended 3...Rxh7, then after 4.Bf8+ Kh5 5.Qxh7+ Kg4 6.Qxg6+ Kf3 7.Qh5+ Ng4 8.Qd5+ Kxf4 9.Bd6+ he has had it this time, because White wins the endgame. One flash of wit meets another!
But even then the last word has not yet been said: you see, Black’s best reply to the rook check 3.Rxh7+!! is 3...Kxh7! 4.Qxc7+ and he finally takes flight with 4...Kg8 into a position where he can expect a perpetual series of checks, because 4...Kh6 5.Bf8+ Kh5 6.Qh7+ Kg4 7.Qxg6+ Kf3 8.Qh5+ Ng4 9.Qd5+ Kxf4 10.Bd6+ would once more be favourable for White. So, all in all, a draw!
Is that the heart of the matter? Or can further deep-mining operations come up with something significantly different? The question remains open. But even as such, the above position is a metaphor for genuine fighting chess, a wild, good-going brawl with an open exchange of blows, in which every tempo demands the greatest of precision in positions loaded with dangers for both sides and where the analysis is marked by a series of delightful about-turns in the evaluation.
[Event "Christian Hesse"] [Site "?"] [Date "1944.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "N.N."] [Black "N.N."] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "2r5/1Q1R3p/1p4pk/7q/1P3P2/B3n3/7P/7K b - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "7"] 1... Rc7 $3 2. b5 $3 {with the threat Bf8 mate.} (2. Qxc7 Qf3+ 3. Kg1 Qg2#) (2. Rxc7 Qd1#) 2... Qe2 $3 (2... Qd1+ 3. Rxd1 Rxb7 $11) 3. Rxh7+ $3 (3. Bf8+ Kh5 4. Rxh7+ Kg4 {and White is mated in four moves at the most.}) 3... Kxh7 $1 (3... Rxh7 4. Bf8+ Kh5 5. Qxh7+ Kg4 6. Qxg6+ Kf3 7. Qh5+ Ng4 8. Qd5+ Kxf4 9. Bd6+ { and White wins the endgame.}) 4. Qxc7+ Kg8 {and Black can expect a series of perpetual checks.} (4... Kh6 5. Bf8+ Kh5 6. Qh7+ Kg4 7. Qxg6+ Kf3 8. Qh5+ Ng4 9. Qd5+ Kxf4 10. Bd6+ {would once more be favourable for White.}) 1/2-1/2
Christian Hesse holds a Ph.D. from Harvard University and was on the faculty of the University of California at Berkeley until 1991. Since then he is Professor of Mathematics at the University of Stuttgart (Germany). Subsequently he has been a visiting researcher and invited lecturer at universities around the world, ranging from the Australian National University, Canberra, to the University of Concepcion, Chile. Recently he authored “Expeditionen in die Schachwelt” (Expeditions into the world of chess, ISBN 3-935748-14-0), a collection of about 100 essays that the Viennese newspaper Der Standard called “one of the most intellectually scintillating and recommendable books on chess ever written.”
Christian Hesse is married, has an eleven-year-old daughter and an eight-year-old son. He lives in Mannheim and likes Voltaire's reply to the complaint: ”Life is hard” – “Compared to what?”.
This is an unforgettable intellectual expedition to the remotest corners of the Royal Game. En route, intriguing thought experiments, strange insights and hilarious jokes will offer vistas you have never seen before. The beauty, the struggle, the culture, the fun, the art and the heroism of chess – you will find them all in this sparkling book that will give you many hours of intense joy.
Christian Hesse is a Harvard-trained professor of Mathematics who has taught at the University of California, Berkeley (USA), and since 1991 at the University of Stuttgart. He has written a textbook called 'Angewandte Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie'. Chess and literature are his main hobbies, and he also likes fitness and boxing. His heroes are the ones who fall to the bottom and rise again, fall and rise again…
From the foreword by World Champion Vishy Anand: "A rich compendium of spectacular highlights and defining moments from chess history: fantastic moves, beautiful combinations, historical blunders, captivating stories, and all this embedded into a plentitude of quick-witted ideas and contemplations as food for thought."
The Neva Foundation in partnership with the Internation Chess Federation (FIDE) has organised the first leg of the official Women's Grand Prix series for the first time in Geneva. From May 3 to May 15, twelve of the best women players featuring current Women World Champion Anna Ushenina from Ukraine, will confront each other at the N'vY Manotel. The tournament is an eleven-round all-play-all at classical time controls.
Georgian IM and GM-to-be Bela Khotenashvili managed to play a draw against Anna Ushenina and won the tournament. Her nearest rival, Anna Muzychuk, had to win the game in order to catch the leader, but the Slovenian player didn’t get anything out of the opening and drew against Alexandra Kosteniuk.
“I’m very happy to win this tournament and consider this result as the best one in my career so far. I would like to thank Georgian chess federation, President of GCF Giya Giorgadze and our coach Davit Jojua for their help”, said Bela Khotenashvili at the final press conference.
It became clear in the final round how tired all players were, as they were making mistakes which don’t normally appear in their games.
Katerina Lagno overlooked the piece blunder of her opponent Batchimeg Tuvshintugs
Hou Yifan missed winning chances in the endgame and lost against Nana Dzagnidze
GM Tatiana Kosintseva (above right) had a very good position after the opening but spent a lot of time and lost against Chinese IM Ju Wenjun
Full summaries of round 11 games here
Select games from the dropdown menu above the board A full summary of all games is to be found here on the official tournament site.
Of the 66 games played in Geneva:
Information and photos supplied by FIDE Press Officer Anastasiya Karlovich
The awards ceremony took place after the last game was finished and was attended by the Director General of the United Nations Office in Geneva Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, the founder of Neva Fondation Elena Timtchenko, FIDE President Kirsan Iljumzhinov, and FIDE CEO Geoffrey Borg.
Bela Khotenashvili receives her trophy from Elena Timtchenko...
... and Anna Muzychuk her second place prize from UN Director in Geneva Tokayev
It is getting to the point where one must ask oneself whether there isn’t some hidden aspect of Norway that lends itself to higher than usual levels of testosterone and a strong inclination to fight. Whatever the case, the Viking spirit continues to reign in the Norway Chess tournament as three of the five games ended in a decisive result. So far more than 50% of the games have ended with only one king standing, to the delight of the spectators.
Though the weather refused to cooperate, this was the view outside
The round today was held on the beautiful island of Flor & Fjaere and the players had to reach it by boat. Unfortunately the weather was cold and rainy, but as can be seen in the pictures, in sunnier conditions it must be breathtaking. Though the players have all expressed understanding of the desire to share the event with more than one locale in the country, they have also noted over the rounds that the constant moving and changes have added an extra strain beyond the usual in such a tournament.
The players had to arrive to the venue by boat
Wang Hao and Levon Aronian played an interesting game as the Armenian took risks in against Hao’s Reti to provoke chances to fight for a win as black, though this was not without genuine danger to himself. Wang Hao acquired a good advantage, though not decisive, and Aronian fought back and eventually drew.
After yesterday’s missed win, Vishy Anand was able to close the deal this time as he steamrolled Teimour Radjabov with on the black side of a Catalan with an ease only possible due to numerous mistakes by the Azeri. Anand commiserated as he commented alone in the press conference, but be that as it may, it only ended as incisively as it did because of the contrasting precision by the world champion. Whatever it is that ails the Azeri, he has withdrawn from the forthcoming FIDE Grand Prix in Thessaloniki to be replaced by French GM Etienne Bacrot. As a result, Anand moves into third with 4.0/7.
A serene Anand had a very clear-cut win today and moves to third
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Radjabov, Teimour"] [Black "Anand, Viswanathan"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E04"] [WhiteElo "2745"] [BlackElo "2783"] [Annotator "GM Gilberto Milos"] [PlyCount "68"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0} e6 {0} 3. Nf3 {0} d5 {0} 4. g3 {14} dxc4 {0} 5. Bg2 {18} c5 {4} 6. Qa4+ {225} Bd7 {136} 7. Qxc4 {78} Bc6 {25} 8. O-O {183} Nbd7 {54 } 9. Nc3 {324} (9. Be3) 9... Rc8 {149} 10. Be3 $2 {It's difficult to say exactly when Radjabov lost this game but certainly this was the start.} ({He should have played} 10. Qd3) 10... b5 $1 {Anand wins a lot of space in the queenside with tempo and is already better.} 11. Qd3 {168} b4 {44} 12. Nb1 {65} c4 {36} 13. Qc2 {5} Be7 {334} 14. a3 {265} b3 {A difficult move. Most players would choose a5 controlling the square c3 but the world champion plans to control the light squares and ...b3 is in line with this plan.} 15. Qc1 {49} Nb6 {30} 16. Nc3 {25} Nfd5 {156} 17. Bd2 {142} O-O {41} 18. Ne5 {801} ({Perhaps } 18. Re1 {is better but Black is better after} Nxc3 19. Bxc3 Be4) 18... Nxc3 { 57} 19. Bxc3 {4} Bxg2 {44} 20. Kxg2 {2} Na4 {42} 21. Re1 {512} (21. e4 f6 $1 22. Nf3 f5 $1 {and soon the black queen will go to d5.}) 21... f5 $1 {50} 22. f3 {231} Bg5 {192} 23. e3 {20} Bf6 {37 Black controls the light squares and White's bishop on c3 is a bad piece.} 24. e4 {325} Bxe5 {699} 25. dxe5 {3} fxe4 {28} 26. Rxe4 {75} Qd3 {39} 27. Re3 {28} Qd5 {245} 28. Qe1 {126} Rfd8 {16} 29. Rc1 {153} Qb5 {55 To play the decisive ...Rd3.} 30. Rd1 {1291} Rd3 {after this move White has no defense. Black will use one of the central open lines to invade the position.} 31. Rexd3 {6} ({If} 31. Rc1 Rcd8 32. h4 (32. Bb4 Nxb2) 32... Rxe3 33. Qxe3 Rd3 34. Qxa7 Nxc3 35. Rxc3 Rxc3 36. bxc3 h5 {avoiding perpetuals and the b-pawn wins the game.}) 31... cxd3 {9} 32. Bd4 {2} Qc4 {25} 33. Be3 {807} Nxb2 {15} 34. Rc1 {3} d2 {11 A great strategic game by Anand!} ( 34... d2 35. Qxd2 ({If} 35. Bxd2 Nd3 $1 36. Rxc4 Nxe1+ 37. Bxe1 Rxc4 {and the pawn will queen.}) 35... Qxc1 36. Qxc1 Rxc1 37. Bxc1 Nd3 38. Bg5 b2) 0-1
Peter Svidler and Veselin Topalov played a Sicilian Moscow that has been quite popular of late though it quickly degenerated into an endgame. Svidler had hoped to play for an edge, and was quite critical of himself in the post-mortem, as he explained that his gut had been to play 24.b4 instead of 24.f4 as in the game, but for whatever reason he talked himself out of it, which he was not happy about.
Sergey Karjakin is not about to relinquish his pole position without a fight
Tournament leader Sergey Karjakin played Hikaru Nakamura and after his close call against Anand the day before, his state of mind was unclear. The two played a Sicilian Najdorf, with a Dragon flavor, in which the American started out with good chances, but missed the most precise continuation such as 15…Rac8. Nakamura’s inaccuracies led to a very bad position where he gave up the queen for rook and knight and could only wait to see how long it would take Karjakin to put him out of his misery. The Russian did and secured his lead with an anxious Carlsen breathing down his neck.
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Karjakin, Sergey"] [Black "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B94"] [WhiteElo "2767"] [BlackElo "2775"] [Annotator "GM Gilberto Milos"] [PlyCount "117"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} Nf6 {0} 5. Nc3 {0} a6 {0} 6. Bg5 {6} Nbd7 {5} 7. Qe2 {23} g6 {A strange but playable mix between Najdorf and Dragon.} 8. O-O-O {165} Bg7 {23} 9. f4 {540} Qa5 {485} 10. g3 {1182} h6 {357} 11. Bxf6 {397} Nxf6 {25} 12. Bg2 {386} Bg4 {469} 13. Bf3 {14 } Bxf3 {4} 14. Qxf3 {67} O-O {200} 15. Rhe1 {24} Nd7 {576} 16. Nb3 {237} Qc7 { A necessary retreat since after} (16... Qd8 17. e5 {is strong.}) 17. Nd5 {24} Qd8 {4} 18. h4 $1 {Slow but very good. If Black plays h5 then White can play g4 later otherwise White will advance this pawn and open Black's king.} Rc8 { 172} (18... h5) 19. h5 {421} e6 {535} 20. Nc3 {20 Curious. Krajakin is not worried about doubling pawns.} (20. Ne3 {seems more natural.}) 20... Bxc3 {138} 21. bxc3 {8} Qf6 {1} 22. hxg6 {203} fxg6 {338} (22... Rxc3 {was the computer option}) 23. Rxd6 {310} Ne5 $2 {A serious and maybe decisive mistake.} (23... Rxc3 {was necessary.}) 24. Qh1 {108} (24. Qd1 {was also strong.} Nc4 25. e5) 24... Nc4 {7} 25. e5 {8} Qf7 {1} 26. Rd4 {229} h5 {23} 27. Qe4 {With this pawn structure, control of the open line, and a centralized queen, White is winning. } b5 {173} 28. Red1 {150} Rc7 {728} 29. Nc5 $1 {26 The decisive move, forcing the penetration on the seventh rank.} Rxc5 {There is no solution for Black.} ( 29... Nb6 30. Nxe6 Qxe6 31. Rd6 {and the knight on b6 is falling as well as the g6 pawn.}) 30. Rd7 {21} Rc7 {2} (30... Qe8 31. Qb7 Rf7 32. Rxf7 Qxf7 33. Rd8+ Kg7 34. Rd7) 31. Rxf7 {28} Kxf7 {2} 32. g4 {Though the White win is slow, it is also easy and Sergey does his job.} hxg4 {48} 33. Rh1 {153} Kg7 {95} 34. Qg2 {16} Rh8 {48} 35. Rxh8 {9} Kxh8 {2} 36. Qxg4 {12} Rh7 {12} 37. Qd1 {53} Rf7 {10} 38. Qd4 {135} Kg7 {124} 39. Kd1 {44} g5 {83} 40. fxg5 {179} Kg6 {98} 41. Qh4 {3009} Nxe5 {3043} 42. Qh3 {0} Kxg5 {93} 43. Qxe6 {0} Rf5 {0} 44. Qxa6 {0} Nc4 {0} 45. Ke2 {20} Re5+ {0} 46. Kf2 {0} Ne3 {0} 47. Qa7 {0} Ng4+ {0} 48. Kf3 {0} Rf5+ {0} 49. Ke2 {0} Re5+ {0} 50. Kd2 {0} Rd5+ {0} 51. Kc1 {0} Kf4 {0} 52. Qf7+ {0} Ke4 {0} 53. Qh7+ {0} Kf4 {0} 54. Qh4 {0} Re5 {0} 55. Kb2 {0} Kf3 {0} 56. c4 {0} Ne3 {0} 57. Qf6+ {0} Ke4 {0} 58. Qc6+ {0} Kd4 {0} 59. Qd6+ {0} 1-0
The Battle of the Vikings begins
Magnus Carlsen supposedly played his easiest opponent today, Jon Hammer, rated over 250 Elo less, but that was not the whole story. He has usually had trouble playing his best against his compatriot, and this was one of the greatest reasons the outcome was not as clear cut as one would expect. Hammer played an Open Catalan and accounted himself quite well as he never let Magnus show so much as the shadow of an advantage. As the time control approached, this changed, and several mistakes by Jon left him with a hopeless endgame and he resigned on move 40.
GM Daniel King provides video analysis of Karjakin vs Nakamura and Hammer vs Carlsen
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Svidler, Peter"] [Black "Topalov, Veselin"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "B51"] [WhiteElo "2769"] [BlackElo "2793"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "67"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. Bb5+ {0} Nd7 {0} 4. O-O {2} Ngf6 {0} 5. d4 {231} cxd4 {54} 6. Qxd4 {13} a6 {302} 7. Bxd7+ {117} Bxd7 {6} 8. Bg5 {57} e6 {7} 9. Nbd2 {561} Bc6 {489} 10. Rfd1 {494} Be7 {419} 11. e5 {742} dxe5 {27} 12. Qxd8+ {67} Rxd8 {18} 13. Nxe5 {6} Rd5 {515} 14. Ndf3 {51} Rxd1+ {183} 15. Rxd1 {7} Be4 {356} 16. Rd4 {661} Bxf3 {150} 17. Nxf3 {348} Nd5 {64} 18. c4 {503} Nb4 {51} 19. Bxe7 {79} Kxe7 {8} 20. Ne5 {16} Rd8 {1011} 21. Rxd8 {17} Kxd8 {4} 22. a3 {6} Nc6 {3} 23. Nxc6+ {35} bxc6 {7} 24. f4 {522} c5 {220} 25. b4 {16} a5 { 139} 26. b5 {25} f5 {19} 27. Kf2 {160} a4 {21} 28. Kg3 {64} g6 {16} 29. Kh4 { 163} h6 {11} 30. g4 {15} Kd7 {10} 31. gxf5 {13} exf5 {6} 32. Kg3 {3} Kc7 {10} 33. h4 {5} h5 {5} 34. Kf2 {4} 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Radjabov, Teimour"] [Black "Anand, Viswanathan"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E04"] [WhiteElo "2745"] [BlackElo "2783"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "68"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0} e6 {0} 3. Nf3 {0} d5 {0} 4. g3 {14} dxc4 {0} 5. Bg2 {18} c5 {4} 6. Qa4+ {225} Bd7 {136} 7. Qxc4 {78} Bc6 {25} 8. O-O {183} Nbd7 {54 } 9. Nc3 {324} Rc8 {149} 10. Be3 {715} b5 {850} 11. Qd3 {168} b4 {44} 12. Nb1 { 65} c4 {36} 13. Qc2 {5} Be7 {334} 14. a3 {265} b3 {154} 15. Qc1 {49} Nb6 {30} 16. Nc3 {25} Nfd5 {156} 17. Bd2 {142} O-O {41} 18. Ne5 {801} Nxc3 {57} 19. Bxc3 {4} Bxg2 {44} 20. Kxg2 {2} Na4 {42} 21. Re1 {512} f5 {50} 22. f3 {231} Bg5 {192 } 23. e3 {20} Bf6 {37} 24. e4 {325} Bxe5 {699} 25. dxe5 {3} fxe4 {28} 26. Rxe4 {75} Qd3 {39} 27. Re3 {28} Qd5 {245} 28. Qe1 {126} Rfd8 {16} 29. Rc1 {153} Qb5 {55} 30. Rd1 {1291} Rd3 {597} 31. Rexd3 {6} cxd3 {9} 32. Bd4 {2} Qc4 {25} 33. Be3 {807} Nxb2 {15} 34. Rc1 {3} d2 {11} 0-1 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Wang, Hao"] [Black "Aronian, Levon"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A06"] [WhiteElo "2743"] [BlackElo "2813"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "73"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. Nf3 {0} d5 {0} 2. g3 {0} Bg4 {5} 3. Bg2 {0} Nd7 {6} 4. c4 {5} e6 {15} 5. O-O {58} Ngf6 {43} 6. d3 {435} dxc4 {284} 7. dxc4 {7} Be7 {26} 8. Nc3 {369} O-O 9. Nh4 {172} c6 {343} 10. h3 {19} Bh5 {4} 11. g4 {50} Ne8 {142} 12. Nf3 {317} Bg6 {7} 13. Bf4 {33} f6 {1384} 14. Nd4 {589} Nc5 {226} 15. Be3 {354} a5 16. Nb3 { 872} Nd7 {550} 17. Na4 {30} Qc7 {990} 18. Nbc5 {362} Nxc5 {78} 19. Nxc5 {84} Bf7 {186} 20. Qd7 {614} Bxc5 {201} 21. Qxc7 {9} Nxc7 {3} 22. Bxc5 {6} Rfc8 {42} 23. f4 {149} e5 {110} 24. fxe5 {214} fxe5 {10} 25. b3 {8} Ne6 {34} 26. Be3 {10} Re8 {615} 27. Rad1 {167} Re7 {169} 28. a3 {512} h6 {265} 29. Rd6 {529} Rae8 { 144} 30. Be4 {121} Nf4 {339} 31. Bxf4 {28} exf4 {5} 32. Bd3 {45} g5 {295} 33. Rxh6 {6} Kg7 {20} 34. Rh7+ {396} Kg8 {8} 35. Rh6 {5} Kg7 {3} 36. Rh7+ {53} Kg8 {4} 37. Rh6 {3} 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Hammer, Jon Ludvig"] [Black "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E04"] [WhiteElo "2608"] [BlackElo "2868"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "80"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0} e6 {0} 3. Nf3 {0} d5 {44} 4. g3 {7} dxc4 {45} 5. Bg2 {7} Bb4+ {27} 6. Bd2 {9} a5 {9} 7. Qc2 {59} Bxd2+ {155} 8. Qxd2 {10} c6 {42 } 9. a4 {7} Ne4 {11} 10. Qc2 {803} Nd6 {23} 11. Nbd2 {334} Na6 {403} 12. Nxc4 { 167} Nb4 {6} 13. Nxd6+ {343} Qxd6 {6} 14. Qd2 {87} O-O {275} 15. O-O {5} Rd8 { 66} 16. Rfd1 {391} b6 {49} 17. Qc3 {301} Ba6 {112} 18. Rd2 {18} Rac8 {221} 19. Rad1 {40} Qe7 {552} 20. h4 {347} c5 {868} 21. dxc5 {194} Rd5 {347} 22. Rxd5 { 529} Nxd5 {50} 23. Qe5 {15} Qxc5 {1033} 24. Bh3 {865} Re8 {973} 25. Nd4 {370} Kf8 {1138} 26. Bf1 {167} Rc8 {171} 27. Nb5 {715} Bxb5 {36} 28. axb5 {6} Nf6 {83 } 29. Qd6+ {78} Ke8 {10} 30. Qd3 {262} Qd5 {37} 31. Qxd5 {105} exd5 {9} 32. e4 {462} Rc2 {94} 33. e5 {14} Ne4 {29} 34. Rxd5 {38} Rxb2 {4} 35. Rd4 {165} Rb4 { 63} 36. Rd1 {66} a4 {13} 37. Bg2 {17} Nc3 {44} 38. Bc6+ {12} Ke7 {2} 39. Rd7+ { 75} Ke6 {5} 40. Ra7 {4} Kxe5 {13} 0-1 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Karjakin, Sergey"] [Black "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B94"] [WhiteElo "2767"] [BlackElo "2775"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "117"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} Nf6 {0} 5. Nc3 {0} a6 {0} 6. Bg5 {6} Nbd7 {5} 7. Qe2 {23} g6 {303} 8. O-O-O {165} Bg7 {23} 9. f4 {540} Qa5 {485} 10. g3 {1182} h6 {357} 11. Bxf6 {397} Nxf6 {25} 12. Bg2 { 386} Bg4 {469} 13. Bf3 {14} Bxf3 {4} 14. Qxf3 {67} O-O {200} 15. Rhe1 {24} Nd7 {576} 16. Nb3 {237} Qc7 {77} 17. Nd5 {24} Qd8 {4} 18. h4 {595} Rc8 {172} 19. h5 {421} e6 {535} 20. Nc3 {20} Bxc3 {138} 21. bxc3 {8} Qf6 {1} 22. hxg6 {203} fxg6 {338} 23. Rxd6 {310} Ne5 {1191} 24. Qh1 {108} Nc4 {7} 25. e5 {8} Qf7 {1} 26. Rd4 {229} h5 {23} 27. Qe4 {87} b5 {173} 28. Red1 {150} Rc7 {728} 29. Nc5 {26} Rxc5 {167} 30. Rd7 {21} Rc7 {2} 31. Rxf7 {28} Kxf7 {2} 32. g4 {280} hxg4 {48} 33. Rh1 {153} Kg7 {95} 34. Qg2 {16} Rh8 {48} 35. Rxh8 {9} Kxh8 {2} 36. Qxg4 {12 } Rh7 {12} 37. Qd1 {53} Rf7 {10} 38. Qd4 {135} Kg7 {124} 39. Kd1 {44} g5 {83} 40. fxg5 {179} Kg6 {98} 41. Qh4 {3009} Nxe5 {3043} 42. Qh3 {0} Kxg5 {93} 43. Qxe6 {0} Rf5 {0} 44. Qxa6 {0} Nc4 {0} 45. Ke2 {20} Re5+ {0} 46. Kf2 {0} Ne3 {0} 47. Qa7 {0} Ng4+ {0} 48. Kf3 {0} Rf5+ {0} 49. Ke2 {0} Re5+ {0} 50. Kd2 {0} Rd5+ {0} 51. Kc1 {0} Kf4 {0} 52. Qf7+ {0} Ke4 {0} 53. Qh7+ {0} Kf4 {0} 54. Qh4 {0} Re5 {0} 55. Kb2 {0} Kf3 {0} 56. c4 {0} Ne3 {0} 57. Qf6+ {0} Ke4 {0} 58. Qc6+ {0 } Kd4 {0} 59. Qd6+ {0} 1-0
Georgian IM (and soon GM to be) Bela Khotenashvili confidently won her game against Katerina Lagno and is now half a point above Anna Muzychuk, who made a draw against Viktorija Cmilyte. Tatiana Kosintseva drew against Anna Ushenina and remains on the third place before the last round. Nana Dzagnidze defeated Ju Wenjun and shares the fourth place with Anna Ushenina, one point behind of Tatiana Kosintseva. Olga Girya and Tuvshintugs Batchimeg made a relatively quick draw while Alexandra Kosteniuk and Hou Yifan played for six hours to finish their game in a draw too.
Nana Dzagnidze (above) didn’t expect her opponent to choose the Dutch Defence and had prepared mainly for the Kings Indian. However, Ju Wenjun, who won with the Dutch against Anna Ushenina a few rounds ago, chose to play this opening again and got quite a comfortable position with black.
It was not the type of position which Nana enjoys playing, but when Ju Wenjun (above) played 21...b5 and let White’s pieces have more space for maneuvers, the Georgian player found good counterplay and later on managed to transfer the game into a winning endgame with opposite color bishops.
The longest and most complicated game of the round was between two former world champions. After the opening Alexandra Kosteniuk (above right) could not find the right plan and “was choosing strange moves”, as she pointed out during the press conference. She lost a pawn but was hoping to get some counter chances due to the pair of bishops. Chinese GM Hou Yifan missed some opportunities to get huge advantage and later on the players ended up in a very complicated endgame with unbalanced material (two bishops, knight and four pawns against rook, bishop and six pawns). After 95 moves the signed a peace agreement.
The famous chess trainer, who coached a number of participants of the Geneva Grand Prix from their pre-teen years, provides live commentary during the games.
[Event "Fondation Neva Women's Grand Prix"] [Site "Geneva"] [Date "2013.05.14"] [Round "10.1"] [White "Khotenashvili, Bela"] [Black "Lagno, Kateryna"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "E90"] [Annotator "MIKHALCHISHIN"] [PlyCount "89"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [WhiteClock "0:20:29"] [BlackClock "0:30:44"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. e4 d6 5. Nf3 O-O 6. h3 {Another successfull test of the Makogonov Variation by Bela Khotenashvili in this tournament.} Na6 $6 {This variation is very dubious, as other moves are more serious.} 7. Bg5 c6 8. Be2 ({Generally speaking the logical move here is} 8. Nd2) 8... e5 9. d5 h6 10. Be3 Nh5 11. dxc6 {Very interesting change of the central structure. The other options don't bring White any real advantage:} ({Maybe just} 11. Nh2 Nf4 12. Bf1 cxd5 13. cxd5 Bd7 14. Qd2 f5 15. g3 g5 16. h4 b5 17. hxg5 hxg5 18. f3 Nh5 19. Bxg5 Qb6 20. Be3 Qa5 21. Bh3 {promise something, Timofeev,A (2659) -Kokarev,D (2618)/Tomsk 2012}) 11... bxc6 12. Qd2 Nf4 13. O-O ({A bit dangerous, but castling on the other side was possible} 13. O-O-O $6) 13... Nxe2+ 14. Nxe2 Be6 ({The pawn sacrifice} 14... g5 15. Rad1 d5 16. cxd5 cxd5 17. exd5 f5 18. d6 Be6 {would promise some practical chances.}) 15. Bxh6 Bxc4 16. Bxg7 Kxg7 17. Rfd1 Qc8 $2 {After a long thought Kateryna makes a big mistake.} ({Playable, but slightly worse was} 17... Qf6 18. Ng3 Rfd8 19. Rac1 Bb5 20. b3 Nc5) 18. Ng3 {Now Qg5 threatens to conduct a terrific attack, and Black is forced to sacrifice a pawn.} Be6 ({Easily refuted was} 18... f6 19. Qc3 d5 20. Nxe5 fxe5 21. Qxe5+ Kh7 22. b3) 19. Qxd6 f6 20. Rac1 c5 21. Nxe5 $1 ({ Khotenashvili is very active player and she does not like the slow realization of extra pawn.} 21. b3) 21... fxe5 22. Qxe5+ Kh7 ({Or} 22... Rf6 23. Qg5 Rf7 24. Nh5+ Kh7 25. Nf4 Rxf4 26. Qxf4 {winning easily.}) 23. Rd6 Re8 24. Nh5 $1 { The simplest and most direct continuation of the attack.} gxh5 25. Qxh5+ Kg7 26. Rc3 Rg8 27. Rg3+ ({A much faster win was the unexpected} 27. Rf3) 27... Kf8 28. Rxg8+ Bxg8 29. Rf6+ $6 ({Simpler was} 29. Qh8 Ke7 30. Qf6+ Ke8 31. Qe5+ Kf8 32. Rf6+ Bf7 33. Rh6 Bg8 34. Qf6+ Ke8 35. Qg7 Bf7 36. Qe5+ Kf8 37. Rh8+ Bg8 38. Qf6+) 29... Ke7 30. Qg5 Be6 31. f4 Nc7 {Finally Black was able to return the knight into play - with White's help. But White retains a lot of attacking potential still.} 32. f5 Bf7 33. Re6+ Kf8 34. Rh6 ({An incredibly nice win was } 34. Qe7+ Kg8 35. Rg6+ Bxg6 36. fxg6 Qe6 37. Qh7+ Kf8 38. g7+) 34... Bg8 35. Rf6+ Bf7 36. Rh6 Bg8 37. Qf6+ Ke8 38. Qg7 Qd8 39. Qxg8+ Kd7 40. Qg4 Kc8 41. e5 Qd5 42. Qf4 Kb7 ({The endgame is simply lost} 42... Qd4+ 43. Qxd4 cxd4 44. Rh8+ Kd7 45. Rxa8 Nxa8 46. Kf1 Nb6 47. Ke2 Nc4 48. e6+ Kd6 49. Kd3 Kd5 50. e7 Nd6 51. h4 Ke5 52. g4 Kf6 53. Kxd4 Kxe7 54. Kd5) 43. Rd6 $1 {The decisive winning move.} Qxa2 44. Qe4+ Kc8 45. e6 1-0
Down to 50%: one of the favourites Kateryna Lahno
A new grandmaster: Bela Khotenashvili, with a 2703 performance in Geneva
Full summaries of other games here
The spectators enjoy a very intimate view of the elite event
If the sixth round could be summed up in a word, it would be ‘intense’, but to try and define it with one word, would be a slight of no small proportions to the players who gave it their all. They took risks, poured their inspiration and perspiration on the board, and essentially held nothing back. The poor commentators usually have only a game or two to center their focus on, giving brief highlights of the others as they progress, had no such luck today. GM Daniel King trying to make sense of so many sharp positions quailed jokingly “My brain is hurting.”
The first game to end was not a draw as one might expect, but an explosive Gruenfeld between Levon Aronian and Jon Hammer in which the Norwegian entered a line considered dubious, and paid the price for his temerity. Usually the price in such situations is significant suffering, but the Armenian took it on himself to get an early rest as he brought his d-pawn to the seventh rank by move 23 forcing resignation the move after.
A representative of the sponsor Lyse makes the first move
[Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2013.05.14"] [Round "?"] [White "Aronian, Levon"] [Black "Hammer, Jon"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D85"] [Annotator "GM Gilberto Milos"] [PlyCount "47"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. Nf3 Bg7 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. e4 Nxc3 7. bxc3 c5 8. Rb1 O-O 9. Be2 cxd4 10. cxd4 Qa5+ 11. Bd2 Qxa2 12. O-O Bg4 13. Rxb7 Nc6 { Theory considers this move a mistake.} ({Correct was} 13... Bxf3 14. Bxf3 Bxd4 {and the position is about equal.}) 14. d5 Bxf3 15. Bxf3 Nd4 16. Rxe7 {Now we have a fight between central pawn against a distant pawn. Here the central pawn is much more advanced and we can affirm that White is much better.} a5 17. d6 a4 18. e5 {White has to advance his central pawns because the a-pawn supported by the bishop on g7 is too strong.} Nxf3+ 19. gxf3 Qb2 {Probably the decisive mistake.} ({Black should have played} 19... a3 20. Bc3 Qc4 21. Qd4 $14 {and White is clearly better but the win is far from clear. A possible continuation could be} Qxd4 22. Bxd4 a2 23. Ra1 Rfb8 24. Kg2) 20. Be3 $1 {Very strong! Hammer probably missed this move in his analyses.} a3 ({The point is that Black can not capture the e-pawn.} 20... Bxe5 21. Qd5 Bg7 22. Rxf7 Rxf7 23. Qxa8+ Bf8 24. Rd1 {with an easy win because the advance of the d-pawn is supported and the a-pawn is under control.}) 21. Qd5 {Now it's over.} Rae8 ( 21... Rab8 {was suggested by Levon in the post-mortem analysis as a better defense but White still wins after} 22. e6 fxe6 23. Qxe6+ Kh8 24. Ra7 {and again the black pawn is under control. A possible continution could be} Qf6 25. Qd5 Qxf3 26. Qxf3 Rxf3 27. d7 Kg8 28. Rd1 Bf6 29. Rxa3) 22. Rxe8 Rxe8 23. d7 Rd8 24. Bg5 1-0
Veselin Topalov and Wang Hao played the only game that did not require warnings to people with heart conditions and played a main line Queen’s Gambit Accepted that led to nothing for either side. This ended in a draw after they had exhausted their options.
The soft-spoken Veselin Topalov and Wang Hao
Although Hikaru Nakamura and Peter Svidler played a draw that lasted one move less than the aforementioned game, it was an entirely different story. The American sprang the very rare grandmaster guest: the Ponziani, which although he has played before in 2007, and was even essayed by Carlsen this year at Wijk, could not have been the prime focus of Svidler’s preparation.
Hikaru Nakamura shows his support of his football team
As it turned out, the Russian was quite familiar with it, but was alarmed at the way his opponent was blitzing out his moves and kept trying to find a way to break away from theory without actually doing anything suicidal. His choice was 9…Bg4, which looked decidedly odd, but the result was an extremely sharp game that had ‘anything can happen’ written all over it. With both kings highly exposed, it was no shock to see it end in a forced repetition after a sacrifice.
The game by Viswanathan Anand and Sergey Karjakin was one of both beauty and tragedy. After his loss yesterday, a big question mark was how the Russian would respond to the setback. In a sense this seemed to presume he was calling the shots, and ignored his illustrious opponent, but the world champion quickly stamped his authority and who was who. Karjakin played the Ruy Lopez Berlin, usually synonymous of exchanged queens and a lot of maneuvering, but Anand was having none of it, and 4.d3 said the queens were invited to stay at the party.
It was an inspired game by Vishy Anand, who came 'oh so close' to drubbing Sergey Karjakin
The position was nevertheless quite controlled for the first twenty moves, and Vishy was the first to show his hand with a none-too-subtle 22.g4 followed by 23.Rg1, and the Russian responded well with Kf7 and g5 taking his king out of the line of fire, trying to blockade the belligerent intentions of the Indian. It was an inspired performance by Anand as he worked the position with great verve, and seemed headed towards a small masterpiece. Many of the threatened lines, as well as those supporting the moves played, were of great beauty, but a tragic oversight with 48.Rh1 allowed the one tempo Sergey needed to get his balance and after 48…Qb5 threatening …Qb3, the win was no more. A bittersweet moment for Anand who has been showing his brilliance but was unable to close the deal, and a huge relief for Karjakin who had been staring at a second defeat in a row, which he might not have recovered from.
Magnus Carlsen played a game against Teimour Radjabov that can easily be recognized as Classic Carlsen. He played an opening, a Tarrasch, and middlegame that garnered him little to nothing, and entered an endgame where he had a microscopic pull to work with and from there began to brew his potion. It took him no fewer than 40 moves to squeeze blood from a stone, but in the end he moved forward within just a half-point behind Sergey Karjakin and three rounds to go.
Magnus Carlsen has nearly caught up with Sergey Karjakin
GM Daniel King provides video analysis of Carlsen vs Radjabov
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.14"] [Round "6"] [White "Aronian, Levon"] [Black "Hammer, Jon Ludvig"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D85"] [WhiteElo "2813"] [BlackElo "2608"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "47"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+30"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. Nf3 Bg7 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. e4 Nxc3 7. bxc3 c5 8. Rb1 O-O 9. Be2 cxd4 10. cxd4 Qa5+ 11. Bd2 Qxa2 12. O-O Bg4 13. Rxb7 Nc6 14. d5 Bxf3 15. Bxf3 Nd4 16. Rxe7 a5 17. d6 a4 18. e5 Nxf3+ 19. gxf3 Qb2 20. Be3 a3 21. Qd5 Rae8 22. Rxe8 Rxe8 23. d7 Rd8 24. Bg5 1-0 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.14"] [Round "6"] [White "Topalov, Veselin"] [Black "Wang, Hao"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "D40"] [WhiteElo "2793"] [BlackElo "2743"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "63"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+30"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. Nc3 c5 5. e3 dxc4 6. Bxc4 a6 7. O-O b5 8. Be2 Bb7 9. dxc5 Qxd1 10. Rxd1 Bxc5 11. Nd2 Nbd7 12. Nb3 Bb4 13. Bd2 O-O 14. a4 bxa4 15. Nxa4 a5 16. Bxb4 axb4 17. Nac5 Bd5 18. f3 Rxa1 19. Rxa1 Rc8 20. Rc1 Bxb3 21. Nxb3 Rxc1+ 22. Nxc1 Nc5 23. Kf2 Nd5 24. e4 Nb6 25. Ke3 e5 26. b3 Kf8 27. Bd1 Ke7 28. Na2 Na6 29. Be2 Nc5 30. Bd1 Na6 31. Be2 Nc5 32. Bd1 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.14"] [Round "6"] [White "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Black "Svidler, Peter"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C44"] [WhiteElo "2775"] [BlackElo "2769"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "61"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+30"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. c3 d5 4. Qa4 Nf6 5. Nxe5 Bd6 6. Nxc6 bxc6 7. d3 O-O 8. Be2 Re8 9. Nd2 Bg4 10. Qd1 Bxe2 11. Qxe2 dxe4 12. dxe4 Nxe4 13. Nxe4 Qh4 14. g4 f5 15. Be3 Rxe4 16. gxf5 Qh3 17. f6 Qe6 18. fxg7 Rb8 19. b3 a5 20. Rd1 a4 21. Qf3 axb3 22. axb3 Re8 23. Rd4 Rxd4 24. cxd4 Qxb3 25. Qxc6 Rxe3+ 26. fxe3 Qxe3+ 27. Kf1 Qd3+ 28. Kf2 Qd2+ 29. Kf1 Qd3+ 30. Kf2 Qd2+ 31. Kf1 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.14"] [Round "6"] [White "Anand, Viswanathan"] [Black "Karjakin, Sergey"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C65"] [WhiteElo "2783"] [BlackElo "2767"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "114"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+2865"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. d3 Bc5 5. Bxc6 dxc6 6. Nbd2 O-O 7. Nc4 Nd7 8. Bd2 Re8 9. a4 f6 10. O-O Nf8 11. Be3 Ne6 12. Bxc5 Nxc5 13. Ne3 Ne6 14. Nh4 a5 15. b3 Qd4 16. Nhf5 Qc5 17. Qd2 Nd4 18. Nxd4 Qxd4 19. Qe2 Be6 20. Kh1 Rad8 21. Qe1 b6 22. g4 Kf7 23. Rg1 g5 24. h4 Rg8 25. Qe2 Ke7 26. Raf1 h6 27. Rg2 b5 28. Rh2 Rg7 29. hxg5 hxg5 30. Rb1 bxa4 31. bxa4 Qxa4 32. Qe1 Ra8 33. Qc3 Kd7 34. Nc4 c5 35. Rh6 Rf7 36. Ne3 Qc6 37. Qa3 a4 38. c4 Qd6 39. Kg2 Qf8 40. Rbh1 Qd6 41. Rh8 Rff8 42. R8h7+ Kc8 43. Nd5 Bxd5 44. cxd5 Rd8 45. Rc1 Rd7 46. Rh3 Ra5 47. Rc4 Qa6 48. Rh1 Qb5 49. Qc3 a3 50. Ra1 a2 51. Qd2 Rh7 52. Rcc1 Rh8 53. f3 Kd7 54. Rxa2 Rxa2 55. Qxa2 Qxd3 56. Rxc5 Qd1 57. Rxc7+ Kxc7 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.14"] [Round "6"] [White "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Black "Radjabov, Teimour"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "A35"] [WhiteElo "2868"] [BlackElo "2745"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "135"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+2960"] 1. c4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e3 e6 5. d4 d5 6. cxd5 exd5 7. Bb5 Bd6 8. O-O O-O 9. dxc5 Bxc5 10. b3 Bg4 11. Bb2 a6 12. Bxc6 bxc6 13. Rc1 Ba7 14. Ne2 Qd6 15. Be5 Qe7 16. Ned4 Bxf3 17. Nxf3 Rfc8 18. Qd3 a5 19. Bxf6 Qxf6 20. Rc2 Rd8 21. Rfc1 c5 22. e4 Qg6 23. Re1 dxe4 24. Qxe4 Qxe4 25. Rxe4 Rd1+ 26. Re1 Rxe1+ 27. Nxe1 Rd8 28. Kf1 a4 29. bxa4 Rd4 30. a5 Ra4 31. Rd2 Kf8 32. Nd3 f6 33. Nb2 Rxa5 34. Nc4 Ra4 35. Rc2 Ke7 36. Ke2 Ke6 37. Kd3 Kd5 38. a3 h5 39. h3 h4 40. Rc1 g6 41. Rc2 g5 42. Rc1 Ra6 43. Re1 Bb8 44. Re7 Bf4 45. Kc3 f5 46. Kb3 g4 47. a4 gxh3 48. gxh3 Rg6 49. a5 Rg1 50. a6 Rb1+ 51. Kc3 Rc1+ 52. Kd3 Rd1+ 53. Ke2 Ra1 54. Nb6+ Kd6 55. Rg7 Kc6 56. Rg6+ Kb5 57. Nd5 Be5 58. Rb6+ Kc4 59. Ne3+ Kc3 60. f4 Bd4 61. Nxf5 c4 62. Rc6 Rh1 63. Nd6 Rh2+ 64. Kf3 Kd3 65. Rxc4 Rxh3+ 66. Kg4 Rh1 67. Ra4 Bf2 68. Ra3+ 1-0
In all three hours of competition, and for more than 150 moves, Gata Kamsky (above) was the aggressor. Despite the constant pressure, he could not break through the stalwart and creative endgame defense of Ramirez until the waning moments. “It feels a bit awkward,” Kamsky said. “I consider us equals. Someone just got luckier than the other.”
The two went into a playoff by virtue of being tied after nine rounds of classical chess. Both players had 6.5/9; they drew their face-to-face battle in round eight. Kamksy was undefeated with four wins and five draws, while Alejandro Ramirez (above) had a loss but also one more win, thus necessitating Monday’s action.
Games one and two were played at a time control of 25 minutes per player with a five second increment per move. Ramirez seemed determined not to get behind on the clock, but an early misstep allowed Kamsky to embed a knight on d5. Shortly after, Black’s pawns were crippled, but Ramirez found all the necessary countermeasures to prevent any white pawn from reaching paydirt. Of the many players who were spectating, GM Robert Hess said Kamsky did not need to be so quick to exchange his best piece.
Live video coverage of the games, with Jennifer Shahade and Yasser Seirawan commenting
Maurice Ashley was providing computer and human brain assisted evaluations
[Event "ch-USA Playoff 2013"] [Site "Saint Louis USA"] [Date "2013.05.13"] [Round "1"] [White "Kamsky, Gata"] [Black "Ramirez, Alejandro"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A46"] [WhiteElo "2741"] [BlackElo "2551"] [PlyCount "126"] [EventDate "2013.05.13"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. g3 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. Bg2 Bg7 6. O-O O-O 7. c4 Qc7 8. Na3 d6 9. b3 a6 10. Bb2 Nc6 11. Qd2 Bd7 12. Rac1 Nxd4 13. Bxd4 Bc6 14. Nb5 Qd7 15. Nc3 Bxg2 16. Kxg2 b5 17. Bxf6 Bxf6 18. Nd5 Rac8 19. cxb5 Qxb5 20. Nxf6+ exf6 21. e3 Rc6 22. Rxc6 Qxc6+ 23. Kg1 Rc8 24. Rd1 Qc2 25. Qxc2 Rxc2 26. a4 Rc6 27. Rd4 Kf8 28. Rb4 Ke7 29. Rb7+ Ke6 30. a5 Rc2 31. g4 h5 32. gxh5 gxh5 33. Kg2 f5 34. Rb6 Rb2 35. Kf3 Ke5 36. Rxa6 Rxb3 37. Ra8 Ra3 38. a6 f4 39. a7 Kf5 40. Ke2 fxe3 41. fxe3 h4 42. h3 Ra4 43. Kd3 Kf6 44. Kc3 Ke7 45. Kb3 Ra1 46. Kc4 Ra5 47. Kb4 Ra1 48. Kb5 Rb1+ 49. Kc6 Rc1+ 50. Kd5 Rc5+ 51. Ke4 Ra5 52. Kf4 Kf6 53. Kg4 Ra4+ 54. Kh5 Kf5 55. e4+ Kf6 56. Kxh4 d5 57. Kg3 dxe4 58. Kf4 Kg7 59. h4 Kh7 60. h5 Kg7 61. h6+ Kh7 62. Ke3 f5 63. Kf4 Ra6 1/2-1/2
After a short break, they switched colors and resumed the rapid play. This time Kamsky broke through on the queenside, and probed Ramirez’s position with his rook. The minor pieces traded and another rook-and-pawn ending was reached, with Kamsky having all the chances.
[Event "ch-USA Playoff 2013"] [Site "Saint Louis USA"] [Date "2013.05.13"] [Round "2"] [White "Ramirez, Alejandro"] [Black "Kamsky, Gata"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C88"] [WhiteElo "2551"] [BlackElo "2741"] [PlyCount "127"] [EventDate "2013.05.13"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. a4 Bb7 9. d3 d6 10. h3 Qd7 11. Nc3 Na5 12. Ba2 b4 13. Nd5 Nxd5 14. Bxd5 c6 15. Ba2 c5 16. c3 Bc6 17. Bd5 bxc3 18. bxc3 Bxd5 19. exd5 Rab8 20. c4 Nb3 21. Rb1 Nxc1 22. Qxc1 Qxa4 23. Ra1 Qb3 24. Ra3 Qb7 25. Qa1 f5 26. Rxa6 Ra8 27. Ra2 Rxa2 28. Qxa2 Ra8 29. Rb1 Rxa2 30. Rxb7 Bf6 31. Rb8+ Kf7 32. Rb7+ Ke8 33. Rb1 Kd7 34. Rd1 h5 35. g4 hxg4 36. hxg4 e4 37. dxe4 fxg4 38. e5 gxf3 39. exf6 gxf6 40. Rc1 f5 41. Rc3 Ke7 42. Re3+ Kf6 43. Re6+ Kg5 44. Rxd6 Rc2 45. Rc6 Kf4 46. Rh6 Kg5 47. Rh8 Rxc4 48. d6 Rd4 49. Rc8 Rxd6 50. Rxc5 Kg4 51. Rc4+ Kh3 52. Rc1 Rg6+ 53. Kh1 Rg2 54. Rc2 Rg7 55. Rc3 Kg4 56. Rc4+ f4 57. Rc8 Kf5 58. Rc3 Ke4 59. Rc4+ Kd3 60. Rxf4 Ke2 61. Ra4 Kxf2 62. Ra2+ Kg3 63. Kg1 Rb7 64. Rg2+ 1/2-1/2
[Event "ch-USA Playoff 2013"] [Site "Saint Louis USA"] [Date "2013.05.13"] [Round "3"] [White "Kamsky, Gata"] [Black "Ramirez, Alejandro"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "A46"] [WhiteElo "2741"] [BlackElo "2551"] [PlyCount "103"] [EventDate "2013.05.13"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. g3 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. Bg2 Bg7 6. O-O O-O 7. c4 Qc7 8. Na3 d6 9. Ndb5 Qd8 10. Bg5 Nc6 11. Qd2 a6 12. Nc3 Bf5 13. e4 Be6 14. Nd5 Nd7 15. Rac1 Rc8 16. b3 Re8 17. h3 Nde5 18. Kh1 Rb8 19. Nc2 Qd7 20. Nb6 Qd8 21. Be3 Nd7 22. Nd5 Nc5 23. f4 b5 24. cxb5 axb5 25. f5 Bxd5 26. exd5 Ne5 27. Nb4 Qa5 28. Bxc5 dxc5 29. Rxc5 Rbc8 30. Rxc8 Rxc8 31. fxg6 hxg6 32. Qf4 Qc7 33. a4 bxa4 34. bxa4 f5 35. Nc6 Nxc6 36. Qxc7 Rxc7 37. dxc6 e5 38. Bd5+ Kf8 39. g4 Ke7 40. gxf5 gxf5 41. Rxf5 Kd6 42. Bf3 Ra7 43. Rg5 e4 44. Bxe4 Be5 45. Rg6+ Kc5 46. Bf3 Kb6 47. Rg5 Ra5 48. h4 Kc7 49. h5 Kd6 50. h6 Rxa4 51. Rxe5 Kxe5 52. c7 1-0
After the tense playoff, Kamsky (above being interviewed by Maurice Ashley after the playoff) seemed more relieved than elated. He flew in from a tournament in Switzerland just days before the championship, and he has less than one week until he competes against the world’s best in Greece. “I just want to get some sleep,” he said.
All photos by Tony Rich, Saint Louis Chess Club
Both leaders, Anna Muzychuk (Slovenia) and Bela Khotenashvili (Georgia), won their games in this round and continue to share the first place. The Georgian player defeated Olga Girya to complete her final GM norm. Tatiana Kosintseva (Russia) outplayed Katerina Lahno, while the Chinese derby Hou Yifan-Ju Wenjun finished in a draw, as did the games Ushenina-Dzagnidze and Cmilyte-Kosteniuk.
Bela Khotenashvili knew that draw in the game would give her the last GM norm and tried to play safely. As Black she didn’t face any problem in the opening and the position was about equal after 20 moves. Then her opponent Olga Girya played inaccurately and lost a pawn, after which White was suffering. Bela missed few chances to win, and after 74 moves the endgame knight against rook appeared on the board. After five and a half hours of play both opponents were really tired and didn’t play precisely. Olga Girya made a mistake on the 108th move and lost the game.
Tatiana Kosintseva beat Kateryna Lahno with black to move to third place
Second seed GM Anna Muzychuk in a fighting mood against...
... bottom seed Batchimeg Tuvshintugs, rated almost 300 points below
[Event "Neva Foundation GP"] [Site "?"] [Date "2013.05.14"] [Round "?"] [White "Muzychuk, A."] [Black "Batchimeg, Tugvinsug"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C91"] [Annotator "MIKHALCHISHIN"] [PlyCount "81"] [EventDate "2013.05.03"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 {Anna's strength is that she can chose different systems and does not repeat the Fischer Spanish second time, despite her clear success against Kosintseva.} Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. d4 Bg4 10. Be3 {Another Fischer pet line, in which he won great game against Viktor Korchnoi in 1961 in Stockholm.} exd4 11. cxd4 d5 12. e5 Ne4 13. h3 (13. Nc3 Nxc3 14. bxc3 Na5 15. Bc2 Nc4 16. Qd3 g6 17. Bh6) 13... Bh5 14. Nbd2 $5 {A very rare move, prepared by Anna. Practically all modern players use the direct} (14. Nc3 {which does not promise real advantage.}) 14... Na5 ( 14... Nxd2 15. Bxd2 ({Anna planned here to sacrifice an exchange:} 15. Qxd2 Bb4 16. Qc2 Bxe1 17. Qxc6 Bxf3 18. gxf3 Ba5 19. Bxd5 Rb8 20. Be4 {with huge compensation.}) 15... Nxd4 16. g4 Nxb3 17. Qxb3 Bg6 18. Ba5 $1 Qd7 19. Rad1 { White has some, probably unsufficient, compensation for the pawn: Jensen,A (2245)-Kovacs,L (2340)/Copenhagen 1982}) 15. Bc2 Nxd2 16. Bxd2 Nc4 17. g4 ({ Some GMs prefer to keep the bishop pair} 17. Bc1 Qd7 18. b3 Nb6 19. Qe2 (19. Bd2 Qe6 20. Rc1 $16) 19... Rae8 20. Bd2 f5 21. a3 Qe6 22. Qd3 {with clear advantage in Zaitsev,I (2390)-Gola,M (2375)/Moscow 1989.}) 17... Bg6 18. b3 ({ Here a retreat was possible too} 18. Bc1 $5) 18... Nxd2 ({White would keep a slight advantage, because of c-file problems after} 18... Bxc2 19. Qxc2 Nxd2 20. Qxd2 Qd7 21. Rac1 h5 22. Qf4 Rac8 23. Qf5) 19. Qxd2 c5 {I dont believe that Black can survive without this move. The great Capablanca taught us that pressure on c-file can be decisive.} 20. dxc5 Bxc5 21. Bf5 {Typical setup.} ({ White could play Capablanca's plan here too} 21. Rac1 Qb6 22. Bxg6 hxg6 23. Rc2 Rad8 24. b4 Be7 25. Rec1) 21... a5 $6 ({It was necessary to play more dynamically:} 21... Bxf5 22. gxf5 Qd7 23. Qf4 Rac8 24. Rac1 d4) 22. Re2 d4 23. Rd1 Qb6 24. Qf4 Rad8 25. Rd3 ({It was better to keep the possibility to double on the c-file.} 25. Qe4) 25... Rfe8 26. h4 {It is not clear wheather this is the best plan, as the central approach connected with the c-file was still possible.} (26. Rc2 a4 27. Qe4) 26... Qc7 27. Qe4 ({Anna refused to play on the queenside.} 27. Rc2) 27... Qe7 28. h5 ({A very strong way to attack would be} 28. Bxg6 hxg6 29. Ng5 {threatening f2-f4.} f6 30. exf6 Qxe4 31. Nxe4) 28... Bxf5 29. gxf5 Kh8 30. Qg4 ({Not bad was} 30. Qc6 b4 31. h6) 30... Ba7 31. Nh4 $6 {Anna tries to attack her opponent's king at any price.} ({Much more unpleasant for Black was the central strategy} 31. e6) 31... Qc7 32. f4 ({ Still was better} 32. e6) 32... f6 33. Nf3 Bb8 34. Kh1 a4 35. Rg2 ({It was better to use the power of central passed pawn even now} 35. e6 axb3 36. axb3 Qc1+ 37. Kg2 Bxf4 38. Rxd4 Rxd4 39. Nxd4 Be5 40. Nf3 Bf4 41. Kh3) 35... axb3 36. axb3 Qb7 $6 ({Better was} 36... Rg8) 37. h6 $1 {Now White starts the final attack.} gxh6 ({Did not help} 37... Rg8 38. Rxd4 Rxd4 39. Nxd4 fxe5 40. Ne6 g6 41. Qg5) 38. Qh4 $1 Rf8 ({Or another defensive try} 38... Qf7 39. Qxh6 fxe5 40. Ng5 Qg7 41. Qh5 Re7 42. Ne6 {winning.}) 39. Qxh6 fxe5 ({Or once more} 39... Rf7 40. Nh4) 40. Nh4 $1 {This typical move now wins easily.} Rg8 41. Qf6+ 1-0
On the free day GMs Alexandra Kosteniuk (above) and...
... Viktorija Cmilyte gave simultaneous exhibitions against youthful players
... an event that was enjoyed by one and all
How does one beat Vishy Anand in a world championship match? Since 2007, he has fended off challenges from three different players – Vladimir Kramnik, Veselein Topalov and Boris Gelfand. All the three matches were really close yet Anand managed to emerge on top. But now he has a completely different opponent. At 22, Magnus Carlsen is almost half of Anand’s age, is currently the World No 1 and has achieved the highest Elo rating for any player in the history of the sport.
Kramnik, who himself was a world champion for seven years and had achieved the distinction of beating Garry Kasparov (the only instance that Kasparov had been beaten in a World Championship match), believes that age and motivation are the biggest advantages for Carlsen against Anand.
“Chess is not like football or other sports, but still, when you are much older than your opponent, it works against you. (At 37) I consider myself to be quite old. Vishy is even older than me. So that makes it a bit difficult for him. Magnus has much more energy, more motivation as he hasn’t been a world champion yet. Those are his biggest advantages,” Kramnik told Firstpost at the Alekhine Memorial tournament in Paris. He also added that Magnus was probably the toughest opponent possible.
Kramnik said that in order to retain the title, Anand needs to be more relaxed during the match. “Vishy shouldn’t think about the outcome. He should just play and enjoy and try to show his best. If he is relaxed and doesn’t get too tense, he can win. However, lately, he is a little bit tense and nervous. He should try to be calmer and take it easy,” the Russian world No 3 remarked.
Kramnik predicted that the match would be really close. “A world championship match is always played by players who are very close. It cannot be otherwise. Magnus is very strong but Vishy is incredibly experienced in matches and he is a fantastic player. If he gets in best shape, he is capable of beating Magnus,” he added.
On how Carlsen can beat Anand, Kramnik, who had narrowly lost out to Carlsen at the Candidates Tournament, said that the best way was to deeply analyse the opponent’s recent games and build a strategy. “Quite a lot depends on preparation, not only related to chess but also psychological,” he said. When asked as to pick up his favourite in the match, Kramnik said that it’s too close to call. “I want to see a good match. If both prepare well, it is pretty equal. Generally speaking, I would like a player from my generation to do better. But this is nothing against Carlsen,” Kramnik said.
Source: Firstpost sport
Vladimir Kramnik, former world chess champion and one of the Candidates who was in race to challenge Viswanathan Anand for the world title, believes the Indian Grandmaster has a chance to beat Magnus Carlsen in the world championship match later this year if he stopped being scarred of the Norwegian challenger. “I believe that Anand definitely has his chances. It is absolutely realistic. The only problem that I think Anand is facing is that he – this is just my opinion – is somewhat intimidated by Carlsen. He is playing unconfidently against him – he's scared of him, I would say,” Kramnik said.
In an interview published recently, the Russian said Anand is afraid of Carlsen just like he used to be afraid of Garry Kasparov. “He was never seriously weaker than Kasparov, but just couldn’t play against him,” Kramnik said. “You know, age is taking its toll, so he (Anand) is playing a little worse than before, but he is still good enough. He loses very rarely, and it is extremely important for matches.” Told by the interviewer that Anand does not win too often these days, Kramnik said he does not have to to retain the world title. “One doesn’t have to win many games in a match. It is enough to win one game and to draw the rest. It is clear that he is now match oriented and not wasting energy on regular tournaments. Maybe he won’t be in his top form. His match against me (in 2008) was probably the pinnacle of his career. He was playing brilliantly back then. Even if he gets back to his normal 'good' form, he can still beat Carlsen, but only if he manages to solve his psychological problems. This is a must-do.”
Kramnik said Anand should not be intimidated by the world No 1. “He should relax and not be afraid of Magnus. One can face Carlsen and actually beat him. If Anand manages to prepare himself this way, then I think the chances will be equal. If not, then his chances will be very low. I would say that if he manages to hold the pressure of Magnus for at least six games (i.e., tie at 3-3), then Anand will become a favourite in my eyes.”
Source: Pune Mirror
16.5.2013 - Once a month Karsten Müller hosts the endgame magic show. The reknown endgame expert shows brilliant endgames from recent tournament games. Today Pascal Simon is his guest. Starting at 4pm. Become Premium Member!
15.5.2013 - The Norway Chess tournament is held for the first time with a super strong field of Grandmasters including Carlsen, Anand, Aronian and many more. Beginning at 4 pm Daniel King will analyse the games. Become Premium Member!
for Apple y Android.
From club players to World Champions - ChessBase 12 is every ambitious chess player’s Swiss army knife. The latest version leaves the competition in the starting blocks thanks to 64-bit capability and a host of innovative analysis and training features.
€269.90
Extra 153, with more than 24,000 current games and three classics: Dejan Bojkov, Larence Trent and Robert Ris present on video the fantastic duels Larsen-Stahlberg (Copenhagen 1958), Trent-Hebden, (London 2006) and Nezhmetdinov-Chernikov (Rostov 1962)
€12.99
Everything you need to create a complete and powerful repertoire: more than 5,200 opening surveys, 4,5 million games (about 80,000 of them annotated), 728 opening articles from CBMagazine and a 1 GB opening book with all statistics.
€99.90
The Philidor structure (White pawns on d4 and e4, Black pawns on d6 and e5), is a fundamental position in the open games. In his new training course, IM Sam Collins shows you just how much explosive power is packed into this apparently simple structure.
€27.90
The Najdorf Powerbook 2013 bases on an unbelievable amount of informations: 58 000 master games and more than 1 070 000 top class Najdorf games from the engine room on playchess.com are the basis for a must have product to any serious Najdorf player.
€9.90
See what the Réti System is all about in the English, King’s Indian Attack or Bird’s openings with this collection of master games, and prepare to launch surprise attack!
€29.90
What is the best way to use your pieces to their full potential in the endgame? GM Karsten Müller demonstrates “knight geometry”, and teaches you how to employ the “knight check shadow” in your own games!