Could Mind Sports help older adults improve cognitive performance and reduce the risk of Alzheimer’s
You’ve read the headline of this article. Interesting you think. You nod and move on. What if you notice that you forgot what you just had read a moment ago?
It’s those little things that begin to make you concerned – misplaced keys, forgetting to shut the refrigerator door, driving home forgetting which way you turn to get there. What happens when you cannot remember the person sitting across from you who happens to also be your spouse?
Many know this reality all too well – especially if you are a caregiver or have seen the devastation of Alzheimer’s in your immediate family. The never ending data is alarming and staggering.
Comparison of a normal aged brain and one of a person with Alzheimer's [Wiki]
Every 68 seconds, someone in the U.S. develops Alzheimer’s disease. One in three seniors dies with Alzheimer’s disease. The Alzheimer’s Association estimates that in 2013, 450,000 Americans will die with Alzheimer’s disease. Estimates are that 7 million Americans will have Alzheimer’s by 2025 – a 40 percent increase.
By 2050, cost of care for Alzheimer’s is projected to balloon from $203 billion in 2013 to $1.2 trillion, 70 percent of which will be covered by Medicare and Medicaid. Nearly 14.5 million caregivers provided more than 17.5 billion hours of unpaid care. Those numbers will rise over the next decade as well.
Age is the greatest risk factor for Alzheimer’s or dementia, so as our population continues to age the prevalence of the disease will continue to grow. Closer to home, almost 53,000 Alabama citizens are living with Alzheimer’s. In Alabama, by 2025 there will be a 31 percent increase in the disease.
The latest data underscore the need for an urgent global response, including a strong investment in research, to stop the emerging Alzheimer’s crisis. Fortunately, policy makers are recognizing this urgency about investment, research and education. The White House recently unveiled a $100 million dollar BRAIN Initiative and that will take a very important step toward the most dramatic breakthroughs in human health. Brain research is vital for Autism, Alzheimer’s, epilepsy, Parkinson’s, traumatic brain injury, mental health, and a host of other concerns.
What can be done to stop the disease or slow it down in the meantime? There exists an intriguing activity that could, indeed, slow or stop the disease. A recent National Institute of Health – National Institute on Aging publication, Preventing Alzheimer’s Disease: What Do We Know? is fascinating. The front cover of the document featured two seniors playing chess! The document affirms that, “Staying cognitively active … through mentally stimulating activities … such as playing games are linked to keeping the mind sharp.”
Further, it suggests that the reasons why an active brain prevents Alzheimer’s may be, “Such activities may protect the brain by establishing ‘cognitive reserve,’ the brain’s ability to operate effectively even when it is damaged or some brain function is disrupted.” Harvard Medical School last month noted, “...exposing the brain to novel activities in particular provided greater protection against Alzheimer’s disease than just aerobic exercise.”
"Chess-Players" by Honoré Daumier, 1867 [source: Wikipaintings]
Does playing chess or any mind sport prevent Alzheimer’s? Could this nearly 1800 year-old game hold a key to keeping your thinking healthy and engaged? Could chess or other mind sports be one of the “preventions” to ward off the 6th largest killer disease in the US?
Chess is in fact a particularly good brain builder! It is a fairly easy game to learn. It takes a little practice but you can play it very quickly and the possibilities of play are endless. Playing games like chess can stimulate our minds, increase our social interactions with others and possibly reduce stress, but when it comes to reducing risk of Alzheimer’s, the type, variety and frequency of the games we play is key.
I am going to suggest, based on my long experience and observations, that any game that is challenging and stimulating will be beneficial to an older adult. Mind sports lends itself to a variety of complexities from various patterns to calculations that stimulate players' brains. Research says that people who don't exercise their gray matter stand a chance of losing brain power when they age.
A “mind sport” doesn’t leave the game outcome to dice or chance or bluff. Although those games are fun and recreational – they do not confer to an individual the same lasting values as a mind sport.
Chess seems like a treatment that works. In fact, people over the age of 75 that partake in leisure activities that stimulate the brain were less likely to develop signs of dementia. Research shows that chess affects specific areas of the brain and the stimulation will shift with the problems that a chess player faces during the game.
We all know that games can be fun and challenging, but if we are interested in actually maintaining brain fitness, then mind sports stimulate all six cognitive areas of the brain at the same time and are the most beneficial.
Those six cognitive areas:
The emergence of mind sports as a tool to reduce our risk of Alzheimer’s is based on using and exercising all six cognitive areas of the brain and continuing the program over a period of time. Chess touches every one of those areas.
It can’t hurt to learn chess, checkers (there are dozens of different ways to play this very beautiful game), Bridge or another mind sport. Those games are easy to learn and are endlessly fascinating. The day may not be far off when doctors recommend a game of chess along with the physical exercise and a healthy diet for older adults! The recreational value will make for a memorable experience and a better life in the future – one you will want to remember.
You can also visit Michael's Facebook page, which has the above historical 3D chess photograph in its header. It can be views by gazing into the background and bringing the two images together; or if you are not able to use that technique you can use cross-eyed viewing using this image (in which we have reversed the plates).
Veterans from Tuscaloosa’s VA Medical Center are playing mind games. Actually, they are playing a game that will hopefully strengthen their minds. Chess. There has been some research to indicate that games like chess, which require a lot of brain power, can improve a person’s memory. It could also help to slow Alzheimer’s symptoms. Experts describe these “mind sports” has being like a Stairmaster for your brain. The idea is that when you stay cognitively active, your mind stays in shape.
Experts will be coming to the VA once a week to coach the veterans on how to play chess. For many, it’s their first trying the game. Instructors say they should be ready to play a full game on their own in four weeks. At that point, there has been some discussion about arranging for tournament play with the Birmingham-area VA Medical Center.
Source: CBS42.com
The American Continental Championship took place in Cochabamba, Bolivia from May 06th to May 15th. The tournament was especially important not only because of the presence of almost every top Latin American grandmaster, but also because the top four places qualified for the upcoming World Cup in Tromso, Norway that will start in August.
The Waca Waca (NOT Shakira's version), one of Bolivia's traditional dances, is a parody of Spanish bullfights. In the picture is another Bolivian dance, the "Tinku"
Performers dressed in typical Bolivian attire...
...and dazzling the players with their moves. Women's long dresses are known as polleras.
The tournament favourite was definitely Lazaro Bruzon, from Cuba, with an imposing 2707 and almost 50 points ahead of his nearest rival. However there was a significant presence of Latin American grandmasters as well as one American grandmaster, Alexandr Lenderman, who had to decline his participation in the concurrent American Championship due to personal reasons.
The Cuban team enjoying a meal with the beautiful rain forest in the background.
Despite a draw on this game against Costa Rican IM Bernal Gonzalez, Bruzon kept performing well throughout the first half.
The tournament saw relatively few surprises through the first half. Bruzon, Granda, Iturrizaga and Ortiz Suarez remained solidly on top and it seemed unlikely that anyone out of the starting top six players would make it to the qualifying spots.
GM Osvaldo Zambrana, Bolivia's best chess player, came half a point shy of the World Cup qualification.
Iturrizaga vs. Ortiz Suarez was a draw on round nine, and it seemed that they would both cruise towards the finish line
However things took a dramatic change in the final round. Bruzon was white against the much lower rated Jorge Cori and only needed a draw to qualify. The Peruvian would not let this happen as he took the game and the qualification spot for himself! Even more surprisingly, Jorge's sister Deisy was playing on board four against Iturrizaga, a GM 200 points ahead of her. The Peruvian spirit was strong that day as she also won her game and not only knocked out Iturrizaga from the top honors, but she herself qualified for the World Cup.
Deisy Cori's (above) claim to fame is her 2011 victory in the Women's Junior World Championship. Now she is one of two girls qualified for the Tromso World Cup, the other being Anna Ushenina who qualified by being the Women's World Champion.
As if that wasn't enough for the Peruvians, on board one Granda, who would have emerged victorious from the tournament with just a draw, won with black against Axel Bachmann and took first place a full point ahead of the field.
Granda showed his usual fighting chess and annihilated the opposition, earning him a cool USD $5000
Note that both Coris qualified despite finishing fourth and fifth because Granda had already qualified from the 2012 edition of this tournament. Third place went to Diego Flores. Both Bruzon and Iturrizaga will have a final opportunity to qualify for Tromso in their Zonal championship, which was supposed to be held last month.
All games were broadcasted live on the official web site and on the chess server Playchess.com. If you are not a member you can download a free Playchess client there and get immediate access. You can also use ChessBase 12 or any of our Fritz compatible chess programs.
Lothar Schmid was born on May 10th 1928 in Dresden, Germany. In 1941, at the age of 13 and at the beginning of his career, he won the Dresden Championship. In 1943, he took second in Vienna (German Junior Championship). In September 1948, at the age of 20, he tied for fourth/fifth place at the full German Chess Championship (12th GER-ch) in Essen. In May 1949 he took third in Bad Pyrmont (13th GER-ch, which was won by Efim Bogoljubow). In 1956 he won in Göteborg, in 1957 he took fourth in the Dublin Zonal. In 1964 he won in Wilderness and tied for fourth/fifth in Zürich. In 1968 he tied for second/third with Tigran Petrosian, behind Paul Keres, in Bamberg. In 1970 he won in Mar del Plata. These are only a few of the successes in a long chess career.
Lothar Schmid played for West Germany at eleven Chess Olympiads:
Schmid won four individual silver medals (1950, 1952, 1968, 1970) and two team bronze medals (1950, 1964). He played for German team at twelve Clare Benedict Cups, winning nine gold, one silver, and two bronze medals in 1957–1973. He won first German Correspondence Championship (1950–1952), the first Eduard Dyckhoff Memorial (1954–1956), and came second with in the second World Correspondence Championship in (1956–1959). Schmid was awarded the IM title in 1951, and the GM and GMC titles in 1959.
Lothar Schmid at the Chess Olympiad in Dresden 2008 – photo Frank Hoppe
Lothar Schmid died in Bamberg on May 18, 2013, of age-related illness.
In 2008, on his 80th birthday, we published a story by Elmer Dumlao Sangalang, a long-standing friend of Lothar. We reproduce this article here.
I love books. I love to read them. I love to have them. As a result, I have a growing library. And because chess ranks top among my few absorbing hobbies, most of my books are on chess. It is a genuine source of delight for an aficionado like me, that chess possesses an extensive literature which in content probably exceeds that of all other games combined. Each year I have some interesting new book to look forward to.
Whenever I sit back to relax and appreciate my modest chess book collection, I never fail to think fondly, specially on the occasion of his 80th birthday, of a friend elsewhere in the world who must be two-hundred times as joyous about his – for he is in possession and has direct access to any one of a vast collection of more than 50,000 chess books!
He is International Grandmaster Lothar Schmid, the celebrated bibliophile owner of the largest private chess library in the world. Born Lothar Maximilian Lorenz Schmid in Dresden, West Germany, on May 10, 1928, his love for books must have been enkindled by the fact that his family owned the large publishing firm, the Karl May Verlag, whose management passed on to him when his father died. It is not just the sheer number, but also the quality of his collection that is remarkable. For example, he owns one of only ten extant copies of the first printed chess book by Luis Lucena, entitled Discourse on Love and the Art of Chess with 150 Endings (in English translation), which appeared in 1497.
He also has all eight editions of Pedro Damiano’s book, Questo libro e da imparare giocare a scachi et de la partite (1512-64). About six feet of shelf-space in his library is taken up by all editions published in more than a century of Jean Dufresne’s famous little primer, Kleines Lehrbuch des Schachspiels (1881). These and many other fascinating features of GM Schmid’s legendary collection have been written about frequently. But does anybody know that it even has a Philippine section?
GM Schmid spent two and a half months of 1978 in Baguio City, the Philippines, as chief arbiter of the Karpov-Korchnoi match. He got to love the City of Pines and the famed Filipino hospitality. His stay, however, was abbreviated by pressing business concerns that required his physical presence in West Germany, so he was not in attendance at the match’s conclusion.
Schmid returned to our country fourteen years later to participate in the 1992 FIDE Congress held in Manila as member of the Commission on Chess Art and the Rules Commission. In the meantime, we became friends through correspondence that I had initiated with my request for an autographed picture in 1982. Along with it, GM Schmid sent me a souvenir booklet/program of the 100th Anniversary Celebration of the Bamberg Chess Club.
In genuine appreciation of his extraordinary thoughtfulness that I felt I had not deserved, I reciprocated by sending him several of our locally published chess booklets. I was gratified to learn from his response that he valued them even if, in my personal assessment, they were obviously inferior to most of the countless publications he was accustomed to. I was so impressed by such humility from a chess personality of his stature that I earnestly sought out all extant Philippine chess publications and sent them to him to augment his collection. Every time a new book of Philippine origin appeared, I made sure that GM Schmid promptly got his copy in mint condition. In due time his compilation grew in size to develop, according to him, into a noteworthy part of his library that he now refers to as the beloved “Philippine Section”.
Lothar Schmid (right) during the Spassky-Fischer match in 1972
Not to be outdone in generosity, GM Schmid has gifted me with some rare and precious titles such as Das Konigliche Spiel by Petzold and Schachspiel und Trictrac by Kluge Pinsker (Hg.). When he came to our country in 1992, he brought me a couple of limited-reprint vintage tournament booklets as souvenirs of his visit. I treasure and take great pride in them, together with all the letters and chess-inspired cards I have received from him through the years of our friendship. In mutual admiration, I call them my “Schmid Collection”.
Officiating at the Petrosian-Fischer Candidates Final in 1971
GM Schmid was consistently among the best three players of West Germany in the three decades following the Second World War. As an over-the-board (OTB) player, he represented West Germany in the Olympiads eleven times from 1950 to 1974, winning the silver medal on second board in Lugano 1968. He should have also won two more silver medals for his excellent debut performances on board two, in Dubrovnik 1950 and in Helsinki 1952, but medal honors, besides the gold, were not being awarded in the early years of the post-war Olympiads.
At the Fischer-Spassky Belgrade rematch in 1992
His most notable OTB achievement was shared second place with former World Champion Tigran Petrosian, half a point behind GM Paul Keres, but ahead of prominent contemporary GMs Wolfgang Unzicker, Borislav Ivkov, Jan Donner and Laszlo Szabo in the tournament held in his hometown Bamberg in 1968, to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Bamberg Chess Club.
A man of great chess talent, Lothar Schmid also excelled in postal chess, where he holds the title of International Correspondence Chess Grandmaster. He won the great Dyckhoff Memorial Correspondence Chess tourney in 1956 and subsequently took second place equal with ICCGM Lucius Endzelins, half a point after ICCGM Viacheslav Ragozin, in the 2nd World Correspondence Chess Championship, 1956-58.
But his most famous chess-related activity involved chess organization. GM Schmid was the chief arbiter of several world championship matches. With great tack and patience, IA Schmid refereed the 1972 Fischer-Spassky in Reykjavik, 1978 Karpov-Korchnoi in Baguio, 1986 Kasparov-Karpov in London-Leningrad and 1992 Fischer-Spassky in Sveti Stefan-Belgrade. His study of and training in law found relevant application in the officiation at the highest levels of chess competitions.
As my way of congratulating GM Schmid for having lived life to the full for eight decades of a century, I am presenting his favorite game. It is not one of his big wins against the world-class players GMs Paul Keres and Efim Bogolyubov and former World Champion Mikhail Botvinnik. What he relishes most is this game against his old friend and fellow Olympic Team member GM Klaus Darga in Frankfurt 1966, given with his light annotations.
[Event "Frankfurt"] [Site "?"] [Date "1966.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "Schmid, Lothar"] [Black "Darga, Klaus"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C78"] [PlyCount "73"] [EventDate "1966.??.??"] [SourceDate "2006.12.17"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O b5 6. Bb3 Be7 {Since Black has played 5...b5 one move earlier than usual, White does not answer Re1 followed by the typical maneuver Nb1-d2-f1-g3. Instead, he attacks the Queen's wing.} 7. d4 d6 8. c3 O-O 9. h3 h6 10. Be3 Re8 11. Nbd2 Bf8 12. d5 {It would have been possible to play 12.Nh2 with the idea f2-f4. The pawn e4 was safe because of the possibility Bd5.} Ne7 13. a4 Bb7 14. c4 {Maybe a little bit too aggressive. } ({Quite reasonable would have been} 14. Qe2) 14... c6 $1 15. dxc6 Nxc6 $1 { A fine pawn sacrifice that gives good prospects in the center.} ({A mistake would have been} 15... Bxc6 16. axb5 axb5 17. cxb5 Bxb5 18. Bxf7+ Kxf7 19. Qb3+ {wins.}) 16. axb5 axb5 17. cxb5 Nb4 $1 18. Qe2 Nxe4 $1 19. Bxh6 d5 {Black has two strong and mobile pawns in the center and could be rather satisfied. However, he has to take care because of the broken pillar h6.} 20. Be3 Nc5 21. Rxa8 Bxa8 22. Bxc5 Bxc5 23. Rc1 Bd6 24. h4 $1 g6 $1 25. Ng5 Kg7 $2 {It should have been better to complete the strong central position by f5! Now there will follow several surprises.} 26. Nde4 $1 Be7 ({Short of time on the clock it was difficult to find the variation} 26... dxe4 27. Nxf7 {which would have been relatively the best.}) 27. Qe3 $1 {From this sq uare the Queen looks to the left and right and demoralizes the opponent. As he does not move Qb8 he gets out of order.} Rh8 $2 28. Nc5 Qd6 29. f4 Bf6 30. Nce6+ $1 fxe6 31. Rc7+ $1 Qxc7 32. Nxe6+ Kh7 33. Nxc7 d4 34. Qd2 Be7 35. fxe5 d3 36. Ne6 Be4 37. Ng5+ {This is quite an exciting game throughout that was enjoyed even by the loser. I thought to myself that it was necessary to be ready for great risks to get winning chances against my good friend.} (37. Ng5+ Bxg5 38. hxg5 Nd5 (38... Nc2 39. Qf2 {and Black will be mated.}) 39. Qe1 {wins a piece.}) 1-0
Jan-Krzysztof Duda, born on April 26, 1998, in Krakow, Poland, learnt to play chess at the age of five. In a short time he began to achieve significant success in national and international arenas. He won tens of medals in Polish Junior Championships, in different age categories.
In 2005 he won the title of International Champion of Germany in the Under 8 section, in 2008 the gold medal in World Junior Championship Under 10 in Vung Tau. In 2009 he won a silver medal in World Junior Championship Under 12 in Antalya and was awarded the title of FIDE Master. In 2010 he won the bronze medal in World Junior Championship Under 12 in Porto Carras. In 2011 he won silver medal in European Junior Championship Under 14 in Albena.
In 2012 he won the Olomouc Chess Summer 2012 – Valoz Cup GM tournament in Olomouc an 8.5/11 score and with this his first GM norm. In 2012 he also won gold medal in European Junior Championship Under 14 in Prague and was awarded the title of International Master. In March 2013 he won the First Saturday tournament in Budapest with a score of 8.0/9 and with this his second GM norm. In April 2013 he was tenth in the Polish Chess Championship in Chorzów. In May 2013 he earned his third GM norm during the European Individual Chess Championship in Legnica, Poland.
The latest progress chart of Jan-Krzysztof Duda
This makes Jan-Krzysztof Duda the second-youngest GM in the world today
The youngest is Chinese GM Wei Yi, who is sill 13 and earned the title in March this year
Jan-Krzysztof Duda is the member of the professional chess team "Wojtaszek Comarch Team", together with GMs Radoslaw Wojtaszek and Dariusz Swiercz. The Wojtaszek Comarch Team is a project which aims to support the development of the most talented Polish chess players.
Information from Przemek Jahr, photos by Winicjusz Drozdowski
Child prodigies are a well-known phenomenon in chess, which is one of the few sports or intellectual activities where children can compete with adults on equal ground (another is computer games). The great Capablanca learned the game at four, and was one of the strongest players in Cuba in his early teens. Samuel Reshevsky also started at four and was giving simultaneous exhibitions at six.
Four-year-old Capablanca playing against his father, soon after learning the moves in 1892
Sammy Reshevsky playing Charles Jaffe at 11. He tied for third with Janowski, Bigelow and Bernstein.
In recent times we have seen the record for youngest grandmaster in the history of the game topple repeatedly. In 1991 Judit Polgar, a female at that, broke Bobby Fischer's 33-year-old mark by becoming a grandmaster a month earlier than he had done. In 1994 her record was broken by fellow-Hungarian Peter Leko, who a short time later was overtaken by Ukrainian Ruslan Ponomariov. The latter went on to become FIDE world champion. In 2001 14-year-old prodigy Teimour Radjabov, who hails from the same town as Garry Kasparov (Baku), became the second-youngest grandmaster in history.
But all these records were shattered on August 20, 2002, when Sergey Karjakin of Ukraine fulfilled his final grandmaster norm at the age of 12 years and seven months. He did so at the international chess tournament in Sudak, a town on the Crimea Peninsula. His FIDE rating at the time was 2523.
In the same year Sergey became one of the seconds of world champion Ruslan Ponomariov. This was another record he achieved before he had reached his teens. Although we must be cautious with such statements one must assume that his records will not be broken.
One extraordinary chess prodigy came close. In 2004 Magnus Carlsen of Norway, who is nine months younger than Karjakin, completed his GM norms eight months later than his rival had done. Carlsen, who at 18 trained for a while with Garry Kasparov, went on to become the top-ranked player in the world, crossing the magic 2800 mark as the youngest player by far to achieve both these feats.
Norwegian chess prodigy Magnus Carlsen
In January 2011 the youngest grandmaster in the world was Illya Nyzhnyk, who completed his title at the age of 14 years 3 months and 2 days.
Below we have compiled a list of the youngest grandmasters in history. In the future we may be updating this list, as new GMs under 15 years of age emerge.
Apart from the age at which they became grandmasters we are also interested in the question or how strong the juniors were at different ages. Garrett Kingman, who is an undergraduate at Harvard University studying and regenerative biology, prepared the following illuminating graph for us:
As we can see Magnus Carlsen was the highest ever rated starting from the age of fifteen. Anish Giri is the second-strongest sixteen-year-old in history, Sergey Karjakin the third strongest. From then on it is Karjakin, Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and Fabiano Caruana battling for the rank of second, third and fourth strongest 17- and 18-year-olds.
It is worth mentioning that although Judit Polgar only became an official GM at 15+, she was rated a whopping 2555 at the tender age of twelve (after her unbelievable 2694 performance at the Olympiad). We also believe that she was the youngest top 100 player in history.
Judit Polgar's dominance of women's chess back in 2006
Paul Morphy, 1837-1884, beat Johann Löwenthal 3-0 at age 12.
José Raúl Capablanca, 1888-1942, learned chess at the age of four, beat his country's chess champion in a match when he was 13, and eventually became world champion (see above).
Samuel Reshevsky, learned the rules at the age of 4, and gave simultaneous exhibitions at the age of six (see above).
Arturo Pomar played in the Spanish Championship at age 10 and became a master at age 13. He drew Alekhine in Gijon in 1944 at the age of 13.
Boris Spassky became an International Grandmaster at 18 and went on to become world champion.
Bobby Fischer became US Champion at the age of 14 and a world championship candidate at 15. He went on to become world champion.
Henrique Mecking of Brazil learned the game at 6, gave some simultaneous displays at 9, won the Brazilian championship at 13, and South American Zonal at 14, and became an IM at 15. He won two Interzonal Tournaments in a row, at 21 and 24.
Anatoly Karpov became a grandmaster at 18 and went on to become world champion.
Garry Kasparov became a grandmaster at 17 and went on to become the youngest ever world champion (at 22).
Nigel Short finished joint first in the British Championship at the age of 14.
Viswanathan Anand became India's first International Grandmaster at 18 and went on to become the FIDE knockout world champion.
Michael Adams became an International Master at 15 and a grandmaster at 17.
Pentala Harikrishna became India's youngest grandmaster at 15.
Gata Kamsky had an Elo rating of 2650 at the age of 16.
Luke McShane won the World Under-10 Championship at the age of eight.
Ruslan Ponomariov became the youngest ever FIDE knockout world champion at the age of 18.
Alejandro Ramirez became a grandmaster at 15, a month earlier than Fischer. He is the first grandmaster ever in Central America.
Magnus Carlsen became the second-youngest grandmaster in history at 13, and broke Fischer's record by becoming a world championship candidate at 15 years and one month.
As of this writing (January 2006) Parimarjan Negi has achieved five IM norms and one GM norm. He is twelve years old.
Mona Khaled achieved the WIM title and two WGM norms in 2005, when she was eleven years old. At the same time she won both the Arabian and the African Girls Junior Championship in the under 20 group in 2005, although she was the youngest player in both tournments.
In July 2006 Parimarjan Negi of India completed his final GM norm to become the second-youngest grandmaster in the history of the game.
In January 2007 David Howell became the youngest grandmaster in UK history, at sixteen years and one month, breaking Luke McShane's previous record set in 2000 by six months.
On December 7th 2007 Wesley So of the Philippines made his final grandmaster norm at the age of 14 years, one month and 28 days to become the seventh youngest GM in history.
In 2008 Hou Yifan, born February 27, 1994, in Xinghua, China, became the youngest ever female in history (at the age of 14 years 6 months 2 days) to qualify for the title of grandmaster.
Judit Polgar earned her GM title at age 15 years and five months, but was already clearly of GM strength at 12. At the 1988 Olympiads she scored 12.5/13 for the Hungarian team, with a 2692 performance. Judit was the youngest player to ever rank amongst the world's top 100, at the age of 12, with a rating of 2555 in 57th place.
At the Wijk aan Zee tournament on January 30, 2009 the Russian/Nepalese/Dutch player Anish Giri, born on June 28, 1994, completed his third and final GM norm, at the age of 14 years, 7 months and 2 days.
In October 2009 Ray Robson made his final GM norm, becoming the youngest US player ever to achieve this. He was 14 years, 11 months and 16 days old at the time. Ray was formally awarded the title in January 2010.
In April 2009 Dariusz Swiercz (born 31 May 1994), became a grandmaster, just days before his fifteenth birthday.
In March 2010 Hungarian prodigy Richard Rapport made his final GM norm at the Gotth' Art Cup, three weeks before his fourteenth birthday.
On December 29th 2010, three months after his 14th birthday, Ukrainian prodigy Illya Nyzhnyk drew his penultimate game at the Schaakfestival Open in Groningen to complete his final GM norm. His performance in the whole event was 2670.
James Satrapa of Canberra, Australia, provided us with the data of four additional players we had missed: Yangyi Yu of China, Le Quang Liem of Vietnam, Yaroslav Zherebukh of Ukraine and Samvel Ter-Sahakyan of Armenia. All have been duly added to our list. We welcome additions and corrections by our readers. James Satrapa sent us data which allowed us to insert Andrei Volokitin and Arkadij Naiditsch into the list. He also introduced us to the currently (July 2011) second youngest GM in the world: Daniil Dubov of Russia.
Suri Vaibhav, born 8 Feb 1997, became India’s latest grandmaster when he won the Luc Open in Lille, France on April 29, 2012. With this feat he now becomes the 27th youngest grandmaster at 15 years 2 months and 21 days.
On February 25, 2013, Chinese IM Wei Yi completed his third and final GM norm at the Reykjavik Open at the age of 13 years 8 months and 23 days. This makes him the fourth-youngest grandmaster in history (after Karjakin, Negi and Carlsen).
Copyright ChessBase
The Norway Chess 2013 Super Tournament was one of the strongest super tournaments ever and was held from May 7th to 18th 2013 in several different locations in the Stavanger-region of Norway: Quality Residence Hotel, Sandnes (six rounds); Stavanger Konserthus, Stavanger (one round); Fabrikkhallen til Aarbakke AS, Bryne (one round); Flor & Fjære, Sør-Hidle (one round).
Tourney structure: nine-round round robin Time control: 100 minutes/40 moves + 50 minutes/20 moves + 15 minutes + 30 seconds/move starting with the first move Game start: daily 15:00 (server time), last round 12:00 Rest day: 11th May and 16th May Rules & Tiebreak Rules: The “Sofia rules” will apply. A tie for first place will be decided by a blitz match.
The fleet of chessmobiles reserved and painted especially for the tournament
The auditorium where the games were played
With the build up that had been accumulating over the last rounds, to report that Sergey Karjakin won the Norway Chess tournament seems almost the surprise, even though he led the tournament through and through. The reason is not a lack of confidence in Karjakin’s undeniable talent, which led him to not only become the youngest grandmaster in history, but probably also the youngest world championship second. No, the reason is that by the last round, no fewer than three other players could hope to steal first either straight out, or by taking it to the blitz playoffs in case of a tie: Magnus Carlsen, Vishy Anand, and Hikaru Nakamura. At the very least, this all promised great fighting chess for the last round, and not an epidemic of short draws as is common in large swiss tournaments.
For those who prefer the more relaxed atmosphere of the live commentary...
... there was a large spacious area with a great view from all angles.
The technical crew responsible for the filming and the broadcasts
The first game to end was Radjabov-Svidler, who played a Gruenfeld Exchange, and very little took place as both seemed content to play it out and draw. The next was a curious one: Aronian-Carlsen. The two played a Queens Gambit Declined in which the pieces came off quite quickly, and ended up in an endgame with rooks and opposite-colored bishops. A draw was agreed by repetition. For Carlsen it meant having to wait and see whether Karjakin lost, in which case there would be a tiebreak, otherwise he would need to be content with second place.
Magnus Carlsen and Levon Aronian comment on their game
That was the end of the quieter games. With Carlsen drawing, and Karjakin’s game undefined still, Vishy Anand had to believe he could pull out a surprise from behind by beating Wang Hao. Sadly for him, the day of surprises was not over, and an ugly blunder on move 14 due to an oversight sealed his fate on move 16. He tried to find some creative way to salvage the draw, but the Chinese player held fast and went on to win.
GM Daniel King analyzes Wang Hao-Anand
This still left a chance for Hikaru Nakamura, though his was the most remote as he not only needed to win, but needed Karjakin to lose as well. Winning was the easier part of the equation as he played Jon Hammer, a player rated 150 Elo below him, but accidents can happen. The American made sure there were none, and he beat the Norwegian in a very high quality game, playing razor sharp from beginning to end.
Hikaru Nakamura came in third with 5.5/9
This left the last game still going, and the most important, Sergey Karjakin against Veselin Topalov. The two played a Sicilian Najdorf with Black’s kingside shattered, though not easily penetrated, and White’s advantage in space, also with little room to articulate anything. It seemed as if Karjakin was happy with the draw, which he made clear by shuffling his pieces as he waited for the Bulgarian to show something. Topalov should probably have not insisted as he began a dubious maneuver bringing his king to the queenside allowing White to start hoping for something. It was precisely when Sergey really had killer blows that he chose to repeat the position and accept the draw. One can perfectly well argue that he only needed a draw, and while true, the win was still there with little risk to him.
Sergey Karjakin drew Veselin Topalov for the biggest win of his career
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.18"] [Round "9"] [White "Karjakin, Sergey"] [Black "Topalov, Veselin"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "B96"] [WhiteElo "2786"] [BlackElo "2771"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "100"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+2385"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 e6 7. f4 Qc7 8. Bxf6 gxf6 9. Qd2 b5 10. a3 Bb7 11. Be2 h5 12. O-O-O Nd7 13. Kb1 Nb6 14. f5 e5 15. Nb3 Rc8 16. Nd5 Bxd5 17. exd5 Bh6 18. Qd3 Nc4 19. Bf3 h4 20. Rhe1 Kf8 21. Re4 Bg5 22. c3 Qb6 23. Na1 Kg7 24. Nc2 a5 25. Ka2 Rc7 26. Rg4 Kf8 27. Qe2 Qc5 28. Be4 Nb6 29. Kb1 Rg8 30. Qe1 Ke7 31. Qe2 Kd7 32. Bd3 Nc4 33. Bxc4 bxc4 34. Ne3 Rb8 35. Nxc4 a4 36. Qc2 Rb3 37. Ka1 Qb5 38. Qe2 Rc5 39. Re4 Ke7 40. Qd3 Qb7 41. Rg4 Qb5 42. Re4 Kd7 43. Qe2 Kc7 44. Qd3 Qb7 45. Rg4 Rbb5 46. Qc2 Qa8 47. Nd2 Ra5 48. Nc4 {At this point White chooses to repeat the position, precisely when the path to win is open.} (48. c4 $1 {Threatening Ne4 and the rook on c5 is trapped.} Bxd2 (48... Qxd5 $6 {looks strong but is bad due to} 49. Qc3 $1 ({ Not} 49. cxd5 Rxc2) 49... Qa8 50. Ne4 {and suddenly the black king is looking very vulnerable.}) 49. Qxd2 Qh8 50. Qe1 {and not only is Black's h-pawn falling, but White's h-pawn may go forward like a rocket afterwards.}) 48... Rab5 49. Nd2 Ra5 50. Nc4 Rab5 1/2-1/2
Nevertheless, it concluded what was the greatest tournament result in Sergey Karjakin’s career, taking sole first ahead of the world number one, the world number two, and the world champion all at the same time. Fantastic.
For the organizers and home fans, it was a small disappointment to not have their star holding the trophy, but by all means the tournament was a great success and was well used to develop chess and visibility for the country.
The venue made sure visitors had the opportunity to indulge in some chess
On the first rest day, the players visited a school to help promote the game among the children.
Magnus Carlsen dressed the role
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.18"] [Round "9"] [White "Radjabov, Teimour"] [Black "Svidler, Peter"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "D85"] [WhiteElo "2793"] [BlackElo "2747"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "62"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+30"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. e4 Nxc3 6. bxc3 Bg7 7. Nf3 c5 8. Rb1 O-O 9. Be2 cxd4 10. cxd4 Qa5+ 11. Bd2 Qxa2 12. O-O Bg4 13. Rxb7 Bxf3 14. Bxf3 Bxd4 15. Bb4 Nc6 16. Bxe7 Rfe8 17. Bg5 Bb6 18. h4 Nd4 19. Bf6 Qc4 20. Bxd4 Qxd4 21. Qxd4 Bxd4 22. Rd1 Rad8 23. g3 Kf8 24. Kf1 Bb6 25. h5 Rxd1+ 26. Bxd1 Rxe4 27. hxg6 hxg6 28. Bb3 f5 29. Bf7 Re7 30. Rxe7 Kxe7 31. Bxg6 Kf6 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.18"] [Round "9"] [White "Aronian, Levon"] [Black "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "D63"] [WhiteElo "2809"] [BlackElo "2872"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "60"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+30"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. Nc3 Nbd7 5. Bg5 Be7 6. e3 O-O 7. Rc1 a6 8. Qc2 dxc4 9. Bxc4 c5 10. Be2 b5 11. a4 b4 12. Ne4 cxd4 13. Nxf6+ Nxf6 14. Nxd4 Bb7 15. Nc6 Bxc6 16. Qxc6 Rc8 17. Qxc8 Qxc8 18. Rxc8 Rxc8 19. O-O a5 20. b3 Kf8 21. Bxf6 Bxf6 22. Rd1 Rc3 23. Bc4 h5 24. Kf1 Ke7 25. Ke2 Be5 26. h3 h4 27. Rd3 Rc2+ 28. Rd2 Rc3 29. Rd3 Rc2+ 30. Rd2 Rc3 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.18"] [Round "9"] [White "Hammer, Jon Ludvig"] [Black "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "D31"] [WhiteElo "2631"] [BlackElo "2767"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "66"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+30"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 c6 4. Nc3 dxc4 5. e3 b5 6. a4 Bb4 7. Bd2 a5 8. axb5 Bxc3 9. Bxc3 cxb5 10. b3 Bb7 11. bxc4 b4 12. Bb2 Nf6 13. Bd3 O-O 14. O-O Nbd7 15. Nd2 Qc7 16. f4 a4 17. Rb1 Rfd8 18. Qe2 b3 19. Ba1 Qd6 20. e4 Nc5 21. e5 Qc6 22. exf6 Nxd3 23. Qg4 g6 24. Rf3 b2 25. Qg5 bxa1=Q 26. Rxa1 Qb6 27. Rxd3 Rxd4 28. Rb1 Qd8 29. Rxb7 Rxd3 30. Nf3 a3 31. Rxf7 Qb6+ 32. c5 Qb1+ 33. Kf2 Rxf3+ 0-1 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.18"] [Round "9"] [White "Wang, Hao"] [Black "Anand, Viswanathan"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "A34"] [WhiteElo "2743"] [BlackElo "2783"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "75"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+50"] 1. c4 c5 2. Nc3 g6 3. Nf3 Bg7 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 Nc6 6. e3 Nf6 7. Be2 d5 8. cxd5 Nxd5 9. Nxc6 bxc6 10. Na4 O-O 11. O-O Bf5 12. g4 Be6 13. e4 Nb4 14. Nc5 Bxa2 15. Qa4 Qd4 16. Qa5 Rfd8 17. Kg2 Bc4 18. Rd1 Bxe2 19. Rxd4 Rxd4 20. Be3 Rc4 21. Re1 Bxg4 22. b3 Rxc5 23. Bxc5 Nd3 24. Re3 Nxc5 25. Qxc5 e5 26. Rd3 Rc8 27. Qxa7 Bf8 28. Qb7 c5 29. Rd5 f6 30. Rd2 Re8 31. Ra2 Re7 32. Qb6 Rf7 33. f3 Bh5 34. Ra8 Kg7 35. Rxf8 Rxf8 36. Qxc5 g5 37. b4 Ra8 38. b5 1-0 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.18"] [Round "9"] [White "Karjakin, Sergey"] [Black "Topalov, Veselin"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "B96"] [WhiteElo "2786"] [BlackElo "2771"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "100"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "6600+2385"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Bg5 e6 7. f4 Qc7 8. Bxf6 gxf6 9. Qd2 b5 10. a3 Bb7 11. Be2 h5 12. O-O-O Nd7 13. Kb1 Nb6 14. f5 e5 15. Nb3 Rc8 16. Nd5 Bxd5 17. exd5 Bh6 18. Qd3 Nc4 19. Bf3 h4 20. Rhe1 Kf8 21. Re4 Bg5 22. c3 Qb6 23. Na1 Kg7 24. Nc2 a5 25. Ka2 Rc7 26. Rg4 Kf8 27. Qe2 Qc5 28. Be4 Nb6 29. Kb1 Rg8 30. Qe1 Ke7 31. Qe2 Kd7 32. Bd3 Nc4 33. Bxc4 bxc4 34. Ne3 Rb8 35. Nxc4 a4 36. Qc2 Rb3 37. Ka1 Qb5 38. Qe2 Rc5 39. Re4 Ke7 40. Qd3 Qb7 41. Rg4 Qb5 42. Re4 Kd7 43. Qe2 Kc7 44. Qd3 Qb7 45. Rg4 Rbb5 46. Qc2 Qa8 47. Nd2 Ra5 48. Nc4 Rab5 49. Nd2 Ra5 50. Nc4 Rab5 1/2-1/2
Select games from the dropdown menu above the board
Pictures by the official site
Of the 45 games played in the nine rounds of the Norwegian Super-GM 2013
Number of decisive games:
The games are being broadcast live on the official web site and on the chess server Playchess.com. If you are not a member you can download a free Playchess client there and get immediate access. You can also use ChessBase 12 or any of our Fritz compatible chess programs.
The Norway Chess 2013 Super Tournament is one of the strongest super tournaments ever and is held from May 7th to 18th 2013 in several different locations in the Stavanger-region of Norway: Quality Residence Hotel, Sandnes (six rounds); Stavanger Konserthus, Stavanger (one round); Fabrikkhallen til Aarbakke AS, Bryne (one round); Flor & Fjære, Sør-Hidle (one round).
What a round it was, and no one could possibly have predicted its results unless they were oracles or madmen. Anyone hoping to have the tournament defined by now will have to wait until tomorrow for the grand finale where you can be assured of exciting chess.
The start of the day was understandably quiet, but those watching the live video feed from the official site were rewarded with some wonderful insights into Norwegian culture as today was May 17th. For non-Norwegians, this is a meaningless statement other than the date itself, but for Norwegians it is their National Day, to celebrate the creation of their constitution 199 years ago on May 17, 1814. Just as in many other countries, people from around the nation celebrate it by wearing clothes to honor their country. In the US for example, aside from festivities, the red, white, and blue colors and the flag itself are found everywhere, whereas in Norway, people and youths wear traditional Norwegian garb.
Norwegian girls show their support of the National Day by wearing traditional clothes. When asked they said that all their friends would be similarly dressed.
Even the tournament director wore traditonal clothing
That is, youths up to seventeen years old. Why not eighteen? That particular lot is getting ready to face their final high school exams to enter college and are part of a very different and quite unique Norwegian tradition: the Russ. The Russ prepare their exams the way all wild teenagers in the world would like to: an endless three-week party. From April 26 to May 17, the National Day, participants wear colored overalls, drive matching cars, vans, or buses, and celebrate almost continually during this period. Drunkenness, and public disturbances are regularly linked to the celebration. Several Russ came to visit the tournament, displaying their clothes, and even singing some choice songs such as … The Spice Girls. A lot of fun, and incredibly charming.
This group of Russ sung Spice Girls for the audience without even a soundtrack
The pants bore all manner of decoration, including patches of events, things they support, and signatures and messages by friends.
The string she is holding bore knots along its length, each from events and places they had been to.
It bears mentioning that if the Chess Olympiad next year in Norway is held during any period other than Russfeiring, protests and boycotts can be expected.
The first game to end was also the only lackluster bout of the day. Veselin Topalov and Levon Aronian played the Rubinstein variation of the Nimzo-Indian and followed the game Grischuk-Leko played just a month ago. By the time they stopped following their example, eighteen moves had been played and the endgame left was as lifeless as in the reference. They repeated moves a dozen moves later and that was that.
The next game to end was Vishy Anand against Jon Hammer. Contrary to Magnus Carlsen who had been more or less forced to depend on an error by his compatriot, the world champion chose a very different road. Although the opening can be classified as a Gruenfeld, there was not much about the game that warranted being called that, and even Jon Hammer after the game said he preferred to just call it a fight. Vishy began by sacrificing one pawn, then a second and went all out on the attack. It was a very positive approach to the fight that warmed one’s heart. He admitted after that despite tremendous amounts of calculations, at some point he thought he might be losing control of the game, and the variations that had seemed great at first were now seeming like draws. It was beginning to seem a bit strained when an opportunity came up, rewarding him for his vivacious play, and a Nxf7 came down like a bolt of lightning, defining the game for good. He kept it simple and brought home the bacon for a sensational win bringing him to 5.0/8.
It is worth mentioning that this morning, before the game, Jon had posted in his Twitter that in honor of the Norwegian National Day, it would be nice to beat the world champion. Sadly for him, this post did not have the effect desired, and instead of causing Anand to tremble in fear, it brought down the wrath of Siddhartha on the board.
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "?"] [White "Anand, V."] [Black "Hammer, J."] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D85"] [Annotator "GM Gilberto Milos"] [PlyCount "89"] [EventDate "2008.05.03"] [EventRounds "13"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [EventCategory "8"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. Bd2 Bg7 6. e4 Nxc3 7. Bxc3 c5 8. d5 Bxc3+ 9. bxc3 O-O 10. Qd2 e6 11. d6 {An important decision. Anand decides to attack and keep the passed pawn instead of developing.} e5 12. h4 $1 Be6 13. Nh3 {A novelty.} ({Before White had played} 13. h5 g5 14. h6) 13... Qxh4 { Hammer accepts the challenge and takes all the pawns.} ({White would be better after} 13... Nc6 14. Ng5 ({or} 14. h5)) 14. O-O-O Qxe4 15. Bd3 (15. Ng5 {would be answered by} Qf4 16. Nxh7 Rd8) 15... Qa4 16. Ng5 (16. Qh6 Bxh3 {with the idea} 17. Rxh3 Qf4+) 16... Qxa2 17. Qe3 Qa3+ 18. Kd2 Qb2+ 19. Bc2 Bf5 (19... Bb3 20. Rc1 Rd8 {was possible and White should continue with} {but not} 21. Nxf7 $4 (21. Ne4 Nc6 22. Qh6 Rxd6+ 23. Ke1 (23. Nxd6 Rd8 $15) 23... Rad8 24. Bxb3 Qxb3 25. Qxh7+ Kf8 26. Qh6+ Ke8 27. Qh8+ Ke7 28. Qh4+ $11 {with a perpetual check}) 21... Bxf7) 20. Rc1 Rd8 $2 {the decisive mistake.} (20... h5 {is not good enough} 21. g4 $1 Bxc2 (21... Bxg4 22. Ne4 Nd7 23. Rcg1) 22. Rxc2 Qb3 23. Ne4 Nd7 24. Qh6) ({Black was better after} 20... Nc6 $1 {This is the natural development move and leaves Black with a clear advantage after} 21. Nxh7 (21. g4 Na5) 21... Rfd8 22. d7 (22. Nf6+ Kg7 23. Nd5 Rh8 $19) 22... Rxd7+ 23. Ke1 Rd6 24. Nf6+ Kg7 25. Bxf5 Kxf6 $17) 21. Nxf7 $1 {Sudenly White has a decisive attack and his king is protected in the center.} Kxf7 22. Qxe5 {Black has no good defense.} Rxd6+ (22... Kg8 23. Qd5+ Kh8 24. Rxh7+ Kxh7 25. Qf7+ Kh6 26. Rh1+ Kg5 27. Qe7+ Kf4 28. Qe3+ Kg4 29. Qg3#) 23. Qxd6 Nc6 24. Rxh7+ Kg8 25. Rd7 $1 {Another brillant move threatening Qd5.} Re8 (25... Bxd7 26. Qxg6+ Kf8 27. Qf6+ Kg8 28. Rh1) 26. Qf6 Bxd7 27. Qxg6+ Kf8 28. Qf6+ Kg8 29. Rh1 {Now Black starts his counterplay and saves the mate but not the game.} Re2+ 30. Kxe2 Nd4+ (30... Qxc2+ 31. Ke3 {and there are no more checks.}) 31. cxd4 Qxc2+ 32. Ke3 Qc3+ 33. Kf4 Qxd4+ 34. Qxd4 cxd4 35. Ke4 {This endgame is easy. White blocks Black's pawns with the king and advances his pawns supported by the rook. You may appreciate Vishy's technique...} a5 36. Kxd4 a4 37. Kc3 b5 38. Kb4 Kf7 39. Rh7+ Ke6 40. g4 Be8 41. f4 Kf6 42. Rh6+ Kg7 43. g5 Bg6 44. Rh3 Bf5 45. Re3 1-0
GM Daniel King provides video analysis of Anand vs Hammer
The next game was the wonderfully complicated struggle between Hikaru Nakamura and Teimour Radjabov. With Radjabov’s run of terrible form, it was not exactly a shock to find Nakamura on the winning side, but it was not as simple as that, and the Sicilian Kalashnikov they played was full of dynamic twists and turns that enthralled. Though the American missed the spectacular win 34.Nf5!! it did not change the outcome and Nakamura scored the point.
Hikaru Nakamura is on +1 so far, a respectable result in such a field
By the time all this had taken place, two games were left, Svidler-Karjakin and Carlsen-Hao, and both seemed destined for a draw. They say lightning never strikes the same place twice, but today it did.
In the popular Berlin variation of the Ruy Lopez, Peter Svidler played some last minute preparation that he came up with a half hour before the round began. Needless to say, one can only imagine the wonders he could produce with 45 minutes. As it was, the move he found for black (he was white) was precisely what Sergey Karjakin played, and the game was pretty much equal by move ten. Perhaps this was what Svidler needed as he punched back with creativity and came up with the strong idea 14.a4. Sergey was not easily taken down, and the fight swung back and forth with both players holding the advantage at different moments as Karjakin held queen, rook and two passed pawns against Svidler’s queen and two bishops.
It was a tough day for Sergey Karjakin, but he still retains his lead going into the last round.
The decisive mistake came with 47...Rc3? which sealed the fate of Karjakin after which Svidler found all the right moves. The game had been so stressful and complicated, that when Svidler appeared in the pres conference, Simen Agdestein asked him if he wanted anything, such as coffee perhaps. Peter replied, “A new head would do.” This loss left Karjakin on 5.5/8, leaving Carlsen a chance to catch up with him for the last round.
At this juncture, with both Magnus Carlsen and Wang Hao deep in thought, another guest was brought to the table, and quite an unexpected one: Lars Monsen. For those who do not know who he is, Lars Monsen is a famous adventurer and journalist who has not only made many extreme hiking expeditions, such as crossing Canada through to Alaska on foot, much of which he documented both in book and film, later edited in documentaries. He regaled the audience with his stories involving his extensive experience with bears, from grizzly bears, black bears, and even polar bears, as well as what to do. He even has a book detailing this. More importantly to all this, was not simply a talk show with a fascinating personality, but the fact that he is a genuine chess buff who plays online every day, and during his expeditions always carries a set and book to peruse in his tent at night or during storms.
Lars Monsen: famous adventurer, journalist, author, and true chess buff
When asked about his opinion of the royal game, and the rekindled debate in Norway on whether it is a sport or not, he showed a perfect understanding of the reality of professional play, and said that even from a purely physical perspective, it was clear that the player with the best physical shape would be best prepared to face the toils of long events and the inevitable exhaustion that would sink in at the end. As he left, the game between Carlsen and Hao was reaching its crux.
Magnus Carlsen wrote on Twitter: Tough loss in @NorwayChess, now sharing 2.place with Anand before last round. Too many bad decisions today, got what I deserved in the end.
The game between Magnus Carlsen and Wang Hao seemed to be a typical game by the Norwegian. The opening was nothing unusual as they played a Symmetrical English with neither side getting anything special. It was fairly balanced and went into an endgame where Carlsen hoped to outplay his opponent as he has done to so many others. Somehow, that is not at all what happened, and Magnus went deeply astray as he lost a pawn, but even so the general feeling was that Carlsen would suffer but draw. Most grandmasters were not especially interested in the foregone conclusion and merely awaited the expected result to be announced. Instead, Magnus went on to badly misplay the ending and found himself in a very iffy position. His final and deciding mistake was 64.Kg2? which left the Chinese player with a choice between two winning moves, and the rest he was able to calculate to the end.
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "8"] [White "Anand, Viswanathan"] [Black "Hammer, Jon Ludvig"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "D85"] [WhiteElo "2783"] [BlackElo "2608"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "89"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0} g6 {0} 3. Nc3 {0} d5 {0} 4. cxd5 {7} Nxd5 {0} 5. Bd2 {4} Bg7 {117} 6. e4 {19} Nxc3 {6} 7. Bxc3 {5} O-O {93} 8. Qd2 {280} c5 {186 } 9. d5 {20} Bxc3 {656} 10. bxc3 {24} e6 {6} 11. d6 {89} e5 {336} 12. h4 {248} Be6 {290} 13. Nh3 {615} Qxh4 {958} 14. O-O-O {134} Qxe4 {893} 15. Bd3 {776} Qa4 {111} 16. Ng5 {134} Qxa2 {422} 17. Qe3 {301} Qa3+ {935} 18. Kd2 {11} Qb2+ {38} 19. Bc2 {112} Bf5 {340} 20. Rc1 {55} Rd8 {108} 21. Nxf7 {138} Kxf7 {127} 22. Qxe5 {26} Rxd6+ {187} 23. Qxd6 {8} Nc6 {12} 24. Rxh7+ {420} Kg8 {5} 25. Rd7 { 552} Re8 {178} 26. Qf6 {261} Bxd7 {11} 27. Qxg6+ {12} Kf8 {1} 28. Qf6+ {10} Kg8 {4} 29. Rh1 {41} Re2+ {192} 30. Kxe2 {11} Nd4+ {11} 31. cxd4 {5} Qxc2+ {7} 32. Ke3 {17} Qc3+ {11} 33. Kf4 {6} Qxd4+ {17} 34. Qxd4 {4} cxd4 {9} 35. Ke4 {4} a5 {40} 36. Kxd4 {11} a4 {8} 37. Kc3 {6} b5 {20} 38. Kb4 {10} Kf7 {40} 39. Rh7+ {7 } Ke6 {6} 40. g4 {6} Be8 {20} 41. f4 {2976} Kf6 {2976} 42. Rh6+ {0} Kg7 {0} 43. g5 {0} Bg6 {0} 44. Rh3 {0} Bf5 {0} 45. Re3 {0} 1-0 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "8"] [White "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Black "Wang, Hao"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "A30"] [WhiteElo "2868"] [BlackElo "2743"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "158"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. c4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {6} Nc6 {0} 3. Nc3 {10} e5 {0} 4. d3 {37} d6 {71} 5. a3 {84} a5 {123} 6. g3 {24} Nge7 {191} 7. Bg2 {23} g6 {7} 8. Bg5 {19} Bg7 {136} 9. Bxe7 {46} Qxe7 {167} 10. O-O {17} O-O {9} 11. Nd2 {87} Be6 {105} 12. Rb1 {329} Rfc8 {424} 13. Nd5 {389} Qd8 {19} 14. b4 {62} axb4 {95} 15. axb4 {6} Bxd5 {32} 16. Bxd5 {3} cxb4 {7} 17. Ne4 {268} Rc7 {446} 18. Qd2 {506} Kh8 {282} 19. Ra1 { 399} Rb8 {594} 20. Rfb1 {107} h6 {19} 21. Bxc6 {501} bxc6 {151} 22. Rxb4 {5} d5 {275} 23. Rxb8 {416} Qxb8 {18} 24. Nd6 {167} e4 {1630} 25. Ra6 {188} exd3 {536} 26. exd3 {465} Kh7 {209} 27. Kg2 {699} dxc4 {270} 28. dxc4 {10} Rd7 {176} 29. c5 {307} Bf8 {132} 30. Rb6 {542} Qc7 {178} 31. Rb3 {155} Qa7 {64} 32. Rc3 {842} Bxd6 {132} 33. cxd6 {2} Qa5 {8} 34. h4 {221} Rxd6 {58} 35. Qe3 {62} Qd5+ {49} 36. Qf3 {18} h5 {198} 37. Qxd5 {50} cxd5 {4} 38. Kf3 {7} Kg7 {12} 39. Rc7 {15} Kf6 {17} 40. Ke3 {9} Ra6 {155} 41. Rd7 {333} Ke6 {0} 42. Rb7 {0} Ra3+ {107} 43. Kf4 {0} Ra4+ {0} 44. Ke3 {0} Re4+ {27} 45. Kd3 {0} Re1 {81} 46. Rb6+ {196} Kf5 {0} 47. Rb7 {116} f6 {34} 48. Rd7 {155} Re5 {239} 49. f3 {680} Ke6 {486} 50. Rg7 {0} g5 {0} 51. Rh7 {386} g4 {270} 52. fxg4 {321} hxg4 {0} 53. Rg7 {0} f5 { 37} 54. Rg6+ {79} Kf7 {0} 55. Ra6 {42} Re1 {76} 56. Kd2 {365} Rg1 {777} 57. Ra3 {0} Rg2+ {0} 58. Ke1 {0} Kf6 {0} 59. Kf1 {63} Rc2 {49} 60. Ra6+ {189} Ke5 {45} 61. h5 {1040} Rh2 {1732} 62. h6 {5} d4 {42} 63. Kg1 {65} Rh3 {9} 64. Kg2 {0} d3 {0} 65. Ra5+ {0} Kd4 {0} 66. Ra4+ {0} Kc3 {0} 67. Ra6 {0} d2 {0} 68. Rc6+ {0} Kd3 {0} 69. Rd6+ {0} Kc2 {0} 70. Rc6+ {0} Kd1 {0} 71. Rd6 {0} f4 {0} 72. gxf4 { 0} Ke2 {0} 73. Re6+ {0} Re3 {0} 74. Rxe3+ {0} Kxe3 {0} 75. h7 {0} d1=Q {0} 76. h8=Q {0} Qf3+ {0} 77. Kg1 {0} Qf2+ {0} 78. Kh1 {0} Qf1+ {0} 79. Kh2 {0} g3+ {0} 0-1 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "8"] [White "Topalov, Veselin"] [Black "Aronian, Levon"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "E53"] [WhiteElo "2793"] [BlackElo "2813"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "82"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0} e6 {0} 3. Nc3 {0} Bb4 {0} 4. e3 {0} O-O {1} 5. Bd3 {1} d5 {21} 6. Nf3 {7} c5 {6} 7. O-O {7} cxd4 {8} 8. exd4 {5} dxc4 {4} 9. Bxc4 {5} b6 {3} 10. Qe2 {273} Bb7 {28} 11. Rd1 {90} Nbd7 {17} 12. d5 {91} Bxc3 {13} 13. dxe6 {35} Bxf3 {6} 14. gxf3 {120} fxe6 {17} 15. bxc3 {78} Qc7 {3} 16. Bxe6+ {58} Kh8 {25} 17. Qc4 {4} Qb7 {5} 18. Bxd7 {46} Nxd7 {42} 19. Qd5 {8} Qxd5 {54} 20. Rxd5 {7} Nc5 {17} 21. Be3 {10} Rxf3 {16} 22. Re1 {10} Ne6 {227} 23. a4 {23} Rf7 {311} 24. a5 {589} h6 {33} 25. axb6 {502} axb6 {3} 26. Bxb6 {24} Nf4 {16} 27. Ra5 {682} Rb8 {1136} 28. Bd4 {1002} Rb2 {127} 29. Ra7 {72} Rxa7 {28} 30. Bxa7 {7} Rc2 {40} 31. Bd4 {346} Kh7 {6} 32. h4 {375} g5 {79} 33. hxg5 {348} hxg5 {9} 34. Re5 {469} Kg6 {37} 35. Kh2 {4} Nd3 {65} 36. Re6+ {38} Kf5 {25} 37. Re8 {265} Kg4 {34} 38. Re4+ {259} Nf4 {64} 39. Re1 {44} Ne2 {53} 40. Kg2 {23} Nxc3 {34} 41. Bxc3 {3018} Rxc3 {2975} 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "8"] [White "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Black "Radjabov, Teimour"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B32"] [WhiteElo "2775"] [BlackElo "2745"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "81"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} Nc6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} e5 {0} 5. Nb5 {5} d6 {0} 6. N1c3 {43} a6 {10} 7. Na3 {5} b5 {10} 8. Nd5 {7} Nf6 {5} 9. c4 {23} b4 {130} 10. Nxf6+ {588} Qxf6 {96} 11. Nc2 {6} Be7 {16} 12. g3 {63} h5 { 216} 13. h3 {283} Qg6 {1090} 14. Bg2 {38} h4 {546} 15. g4 {78} O-O {573} 16. O-O {188} Be6 {328} 17. Ne3 {137} Rac8 {496} 18. b3 {398} Rfd8 {957} 19. a3 {39 } bxa3 {241} 20. Nf5 {145} Bg5 {629} 21. Rxa3 {65} a5 {211} 22. Bb2 {170} Rd7 { 478} 23. Bc3 {41} Bd8 {4} 24. Kh1 {759} Qh7 {148} 25. f4 {467} Bb6 {218} 26. Ra2 {24} Bc5 {100} 27. Rd2 {502} f6 {223} 28. Nxd6 {83} Rb8 {4} 29. fxe5 {152} fxe5 {9} 30. Nf5 {200} g6 {70} 31. Nh6+ {411} Kh8 {7} 32. Rf6 {8} Rxd2 {103} 33. Bxd2 {250} Qd7 {8} 34. Qe1 {440} Kg7 {23} 35. Rf1 {291} Rxb3 {6} 36. Bg5 { 30} Qd3 {88} 37. Nf7 {168} Qg3 {29} 38. Qd2 {104} Bxc4 {27} 39. Bf6+ {83} Kf8 { 4} 40. Nxe5 {85} Qxh3+ {64} 41. Bxh3 {2975} 1-0 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.17"] [Round "8"] [White "Svidler, Peter"] [Black "Karjakin, Sergey"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C65"] [WhiteElo "2769"] [BlackElo "2767"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "113"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. e4 {0} e5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} Nc6 {0} 3. Bb5 {0} Nf6 {0} 4. d3 {0} Bc5 {0} 5. c3 {0} O-O {1} 6. O-O {1} d6 {6} 7. h3 {19} Ne7 {88} 8. d4 {9} Bb6 {6} 9. Re1 {6} d5 {190} 10. Nxe5 {32} Nxe4 {14} 11. Nd2 {163} Nxd2 {975} 12. Bxd2 {80} f6 {23} 13. Nd3 {590} Bd7 {1089} 14. a4 {87} c6 {1177} 15. a5 {20} Bxa5 {10} 16. Nc5 {7 } Bc8 {18} 17. Bd3 {36} Bb6 {177} 18. Ne6 {154} Bxe6 {16} 19. Rxe6 {3} Ng6 {298 } 20. Qh5 {867} Re8 {161} 21. Rae1 {1250} Rxe6 {36} 22. Rxe6 {12} Nf8 {296} 23. Re3 {41} Bc7 {285} 24. g3 {27} b5 {300} 25. h4 {506} Bd6 {183} 26. b3 {389} a5 {419} 27. c4 {24} bxc4 {78} 28. bxc4 {17} Bb4 {5} 29. Bc1 {415} a4 {110} 30. Bb1 {17} Qb6 {225} 31. cxd5 {357} Bd6 {246} 32. Ba2 {303} c5 {7} 33. Re7 {237} Kh8 {100} 34. Rf7 {464} Kg8 {93} 35. Re7 {142} Kh8 {8} 36. Qf7 {472} Bxe7 {12} 37. d6 {1} Ng6 {69} 38. dxe7 {21} Nxe7 {18} 39. Qxe7 {12} cxd4 {6} 40. Qe4 {192 } Rc8 {422} 41. Bf4 {464} Rd8 {902} 42. Qe7 {1080} Rc8 {212} 43. Qe4 {167} Rd8 {0} 44. Qe7 {104} Rc8 {0} 45. h5 {482} Qd8 {325} 46. Qb7 {70} h6 {162} 47. Be6 {313} Rc3 {699} 48. Qf7 {190} a3 {52} 49. Bd6 {83} Qa8 {270} 50. Bd5 {51} a2 { 91} 51. Bxa8 {27} a1=Q+ {0} 52. Kh2 {0} Qe1 {18} 53. Kh3 {0} Rc8 {213} 54. Bf8 {0} Rxf8 {0} 55. Qxf8+ {0} Kh7 {0} 56. Bd5 {0} Qf1+ {0} 57. Kh4 {0} 1-0
As reported Gata Kamsky and Alejandro Ramirez tied for first in the 2013 US Championship, each scoring 6.5/9 points. Both players had drawn their face-to-face battle in round eight; Kamksy was undefeated with four wins and five draws, while Ramirez had a loss but also one more win. All this necessitated a playoff for the title.
The playoff took place on Monday, May 13. In all three hours of competition, and for more than 150 moves, Gata Kamsky (above) was the aggressor, but he found himself unable to break through the stalwart and creative endgame defense of Ramirez – until the waning moments. “It feels a bit awkward,” Kamsky said. “I consider us equals. Someone just got luckier than the other.”
The suprise challenger to Kamsky's supreme dominance in the 2013 US Championship was Alejandro Tadeo Ramírez Álvarez. Ramirez was born in San José, Costa Rica, June 21, 1988 and at the age of 15, he became the first Centro-American to achieve the Grandmaster chess title, and at the time also became the second youngest chess grandmaster in the world. Alej started playing chess at the age of four after watching the movie "Searching for Bobby Fischer", and with the guidance of his father and mentor Jorge Ramírez, made rapid progress. At the age of 13 he earned a notable draw against Russian super grandmaster Alexander Morozevich during the Chess Olympiad 2002 in Bled.
The first grandmaster norm was obtained at the age of 14 by scoring 7.0/9 at the Capablanca in Memoriam Tournament in La Habana in May 2003. The second norm was obtained at the age of 15, when he tied for first place in the Zonal Tournament in Guayaquil, Ecuador. In this tournament Alejandro also got the right to participate in the World Chess Championship 2004, becoming the only centro-American ever to participate in such a magnum event, which was held in Libya. He obtained his third norm at the age of 15, gaining seven points in the Los Inmortales Tournament at Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic in November 2003.
Ramírez won first place in the Morelia Open 2008 and first place in the US Chess Open 2010 held in Irvine, California. In January 2011 he stopped representing Costa Rica, and is now listed as a US Chess player. He lives in Dallas, Texas, where he graduated from the University of Texas with a Masters Degree in Arts & Technology / Design and Production of Videogames. He is now a co-editor of the ChessBase news site, where his technical expertise, quick-witted personality and entertaining writing style are greatly appreciated. He has recorded three training DVDs so far – the first was published at the beginning of this year, the other two will follow in the coming weeks.
Games one and two of the playoff for the 2013 US Championship were played at a time control of 25 minutes per player with a five second increment per move. Ramirez seemed determined not to get behind on the clock, but an early misstep allowed Kamsky to embed a knight on d5. Shortly after, Black’s pawns were crippled, but Ramirez found all the necessary countermeasures to prevent any white pawn from reaching paydirt. Of the many players who were spectating, GM Robert Hess said Kamsky did not need to be so quick to exchange his best piece.
Things getting really tense – Kamsky attacking, Ramirez defending precisely
[Event "USA Championship 2013 tiebreak"] [Site "Saint Louis"] [Date "2013.05.13"] [Round "2"] [White "Ramirez, Alejandro"] [Black "Kamsky, Gata"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "C88"] [WhiteElo "2551"] [BlackElo "2741"] [Annotator "Ramirez,Alejandro"] [PlyCount "127"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "USA"] {Trying to beat Kamsky is not an easy task, but I thought I would have a better shot at it in the Spanish than on his a6 Slavs. Also, I didn't think he would be expecting 1. e4} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. a4 Bb7 9. d3 d6 10. h3 {I didn't really know what I was doing, this move seemed natural enough.} Qd7 11. Nc3 Na5 12. Ba2 b4 13. Nd5 (13. Ne2 {was another possibility.}) 13... Nxd5 14. Bxd5 c6 15. Ba2 c5 16. c3 Bc6 17. Bd5 $6 {This is the beginning of all my problems. As soon as I played it I thought about asking for a takeback...} (17. d4 c4 $5 18. dxe5 Bxa4 {I thought was complex, but the engine says I have Qd5 with an advantage.}) 17... bxc3 18. bxc3 Bxd5 19. exd5 Rab8 20. c4 {Unfortunately my position is not great as my a-pawn is rather weak and I don't have anything going on anywhere on the board. Thankfully through some tactics I'm able to solve the first problem.} Nb3 21. Rb1 Nxc1 22. Qxc1 Qxa4 23. Ra1 Qb3 24. Ra3 $1 {An important intermediate move. The a6 pawn won't be going anywhere soon and White can take it at leisure.} Qb7 25. Qa1 f5 26. Rxa6 Ra8 27. Ra2 $1 Rxa2 28. Qxa2 Ra8 29. Rb1 Rxa2 30. Rxb7 Bf6 {Here I started getting worried about e4. I saw the alternative g4 but I thought it was a bit too risky. Without that move the position became very uncomfortable though.} 31. Rb8+ (31. g4 $1 e4 32. dxe4 fxe4 33. g5 Bd4 34. g6 $1 hxg6 35. Rb8+ Kf7 36. Ng5+ $11) 31... Kf7 32. Rb7+ Ke8 33. Rb1 Kd7 34. Rd1 {A little passive but I thought I was holding.} h5 35. g4 $5 hxg4 36. hxg4 e4 $1 {Kamsky shuts down the e4 square from my knight.} ( 36... fxg4 37. Nd2 $1 {And once the knight jumps to e4 White has no problems at all.}) 37. dxe4 fxg4 38. e5 $1 {And I push it open right back!} gxf3 39. exf6 gxf6 40. Rc1 f5 41. Rc3 {Here I thought the game was easily drawn, but Kamsky shows great technique and puts on the pressure.} Ke7 42. Re3+ Kf6 43. Re6+ Kg5 44. Rxd6 Rc2 45. Rc6 Kf4 46. Rh6 (46. Rxc5 {is the computer move, but it looked scary!} Rc1+ 47. Kh2 Rf1 48. d6 Rxf2+ 49. Kg1 Ra2 50. Rc8 $1 {but Black only has a draw here of course.} Rd2 51. c5) 46... Kg5 47. Rh8 Rxc4 48. d6 Rd4 49. Rc8 Rxd6 50. Rxc5 {With the pawns traded off, the draw becomes clearer.} Kg4 51. Rc4+ Kh3 52. Rc1 Rg6+ {By this point I was beyond exhausted. I briefly considered playing 53. Kf1 which gets mated by Kh2. Oops :)} 53. Kh1 Rg2 54. Rc2 {I know Kamsky was tired too - he was surprised at this move!} Rg7 55. Rc3 Kg4 56. Rc4+ f4 57. Rc8 Kf5 58. Rc3 Ke4 59. Rc4+ $1 {Of course Black has no way to break through, but I calculated this line to a draw.} Kd3 60. Rxf4 Ke2 61. Ra4 {Rook on the long side is a draw in Lucena positions.} Kxf2 62. Ra2+ Kg3 63. Kg1 Rb7 64. Rg2+ $1 {The only drawing move, but sufficient. Kamsky also missed this move, he shook his head when I played it, smiled at the audience and offered me a draw.} 1/2-1/2
Draw agreed in game one
After a short break, the players switched colors and resumed the rapid play. This time Kamsky broke through on the queenside, and probed Ramirez’s position with his rook. The minor pieces traded and another rook-and-pawn ending was reached, with Kamsky having all the chances.
Onec again Ramirez was up to the task, using a stalemate tactic to extend the tiebreak
The rare ending to a grandmaster game caused the supremely focused Kamsky to look at the crowd and laugh. Later, he said he had almost the same ending at the World Cup in 2011 against GM Ian Nepomniachtchi, but was able to win that game.
[Event "ch-USA Playoff 2013"] [Site "Saint Louis USA"] [Date "2013.05.13"] [Round "1"] [White "Kamsky, Gata"] [Black "Ramirez, Alejandro"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A46"] [WhiteElo "2741"] [BlackElo "2551"] [Annotator "Ramirez,Alejandro"] [PlyCount "126"] [EventDate "2013.05.13"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. g3 cxd4 4. Nxd4 {e5/d5 is supposed to be the refutation of this early system, but I decided to play more cautiously.} g6 5. Bg2 Bg7 6. O-O O-O 7. c4 Qc7 {I just kind of made this up during the game. I'm attacking c4 and forcing b3.} 8. Na3 d6 9. b3 a6 10. Bb2 Nc6 11. Qd2 Bd7 12. Rac1 Nxd4 13. Bxd4 {White's awkward knight on a3 means that Black has good chances at equality.} Bc6 14. Nb5 {But with this he fixes it. Now he is slightly better.} Qd7 15. Nc3 Bxg2 16. Kxg2 b5 17. Bxf6 Bxf6 18. Nd5 Rac8 19. cxb5 Qxb5 20. Nxf6+ exf6 21. e3 Rc6 22. Rxc6 Qxc6+ 23. Kg1 Rc8 24. Rd1 {White's structure is far superior to Black's, so I get to be tortured for forever now.} Qc2 25. Qxc2 Rxc2 26. a4 (26. Rxd6 Rxa2 27. Rxf6 Kg7 28. Rb6 h5 $1 {is an endgame that I was pretty sure I could hold.}) 26... Rc6 27. Rd4 Kf8 28. Rb4 Ke7 29. Rb7+ Ke6 30. a5 Rc2 (30... h5 $1 {was so much better than what I did. I still get to suffer, but much less.}) 31. g4 h5 32. gxh5 gxh5 33. Kg2 f5 34. Rb6 Rb2 35. Kf3 Ke5 {White is a lot better, but it's unclear exactly how he is going to make progress.} 36. Rxa6 Rxb3 37. Ra8 Ra3 38. a6 f4 39. a7 Kf5 40. Ke2 fxe3 41. fxe3 h4 42. h3 Ra4 {White's rook is stuck, so now Kamsky will try to zugzwang my king back.} 43. Kd3 Kf6 44. Kc3 Ke7 45. Kb3 Ra1 46. Kc4 Ra5 47. Kb4 Ra1 48. Kb5 Rb1+ 49. Kc6 Rc1+ 50. Kd5 Rc5+ 51. Ke4 Ra5 52. Kf4 Kf6 53. Kg4 Ra4+ 54. Kh5 Kf5 55. e4+ Kf6 56. Kxh4 d5 57. Kg3 dxe4 {now the draw is obvious, as the endgame is drawn even without Black's e and f pawns.} 58. Kf4 Kg7 59. h4 Kh7 60. h5 Kg7 61. h6+ Kh7 62. Ke3 f5 63. Kf4 Ra6 {I survived!} 1/2-1/2
The rules dictated that in case of a 1-1 tie, the playoff would end in an Armageddon match, where players bid for time and color. In sealed envelopes, Ramirez wrote the time 19:45, while Kamsky’s envelope read 20 minutes even. Ramirez thus got 19:45 to Kamsky’s 45 minutes, while Ramirez had black and draw odds.
The two reprised the opening from their first rapid game. Kamsky, needing to win, decided to keep all the minor pieces on the board this time. He slowly increased his square domination while Ramirez listlessly shuffled pieces round the last two ranks. Eventually Kamsky pushed forward, and Ramirez, getting low on time, decided to take his chances in an opposite-colored bishop endgame.
With Ramirez playing only on increment, he could not defend once Kamsky got his third passed pawn. Ramirez resigned after Kamsky denuded black’s best defenders. After the game, Kamsky told Ramirez that 37…e5 was the critical mistake, without which Black should hold. Ramirez agreed, explaining that he did not see 39…g4 in his calculations. “I was starting to get really nervous,” Kamsky said. “It wasn’t clear until the last move.”
[Event "ch-USA Playoff 2013"] [Site "Saint Louis USA"] [Date "2013.05.13"] [Round "3"] [White "Kamsky, Gata"] [Black "Ramirez, Alejandro"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "A46"] [WhiteElo "2741"] [BlackElo "2551"] [Annotator "Ramirez,Alejandro"] [PlyCount "103"] [EventDate "2013.05.13"] {Going into the Armageddon I can't really describe how I felt. It was a combination of exhausted and nervous and happy and excited. Here we go!} 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 c5 3. g3 cxd4 4. Nxd4 g6 5. Bg2 Bg7 6. O-O O-O 7. c4 Qc7 {This random move worked last time so I played it again.} 8. Na3 d6 {Kamsky spent a good ten minutes in this position, which made me very nervous. If he could play 9.Nab5 I would probably be slightly worse.} 9. Ndb5 (9. Nab5 Qxc4 10. Be3 Na6 11. b3 Qc5 $1 {seems like Black holds though.}) 9... Qd8 10. Bg5 Nc6 11. Qd2 a6 12. Nc3 Bf5 13. e4 Be6 14. Nd5 Nd7 15. Rac1 Rc8 16. b3 Re8 17. h3 {The computer thinks I'm fine, but this position is quite unpleasant under time pressure, as Black has no constructive plan.} Nde5 18. Kh1 Rb8 19. Nc2 Qd7 20. Nb6 (20. f4 h6 21. Bh4 g5 22. Bxg5 hxg5 23. fxe5 Nxe5 24. Qxg5 Bxh3 {is very unclear, Kamsky wants to keep the pressure without allowing counterplay.}) 20... Qd8 21. Be3 Nd7 22. Nd5 Nc5 23. f4 b5 24. cxb5 axb5 25. f5 Bxd5 $6 (25... Bd7 {was preferable, but I was worried about} 26. Bg5 {since f6 is a dangerous threat.}) 26. exd5 Ne5 27. Nb4 Qa5 28. Bxc5 dxc5 29. Rxc5 Rbc8 $2 {Kamsky spent a lot of time again on this move, but he found a really nice sequence.} ( 29... Nd3 $1 30. Qxd3 Qxb4 {would have made White's task incredibly hard. He is up a pawn but the opposite colored bishops and Black's activity gives him chances to hold.}) 30. Rxc8 $1 Rxc8 31. fxg6 hxg6 32. Qf4 $1 {I underestimated this powerful move. Now Black has no way of stopping the knight coming to c6 and giving White a strong passed pawn.} Qc7 (32... g5 $2 33. Qf5 $1 {is lights out.}) 33. a4 bxa4 34. bxa4 f5 35. Nc6 Nxc6 36. Qxc7 Rxc7 37. dxc6 {This endgame is very difficult for Black, but it might be a draw. I haven't fully analyzed it yet, but I didn't think I'd survive during the game. That being said here came my blunder.} e5 $4 {In time pressure, I completely forgot that White can play g4.} 38. Bd5+ Kf8 39. g4 {and now the game is over. Black can't allow his pawns to be blockaded and his bishop to become passive. Here I jettisoned my pawns, but it's not enough.} Ke7 40. gxf5 gxf5 41. Rxf5 Kd6 42. Bf3 Ra7 43. Rg5 e4 {desperation, but the e-pawn was rather useless anyways.} 44. Bxe4 Be5 45. Rg6+ Kc5 46. Bf3 $1 {Most precise, now the a-pawn is untouchable.} Kb6 (46... Rxa4 47. c7 Bxc7 48. Rc6+) 47. Rg5 Ra5 48. h4 Kc7 49. h5 Kd6 50. h6 Rxa4 51. Rxe5 Kxe5 52. c7 {and I had to resign. A masterful performance by Kamsky, who gave me no chances in the entire playoff.} 1-0
Ramirez said the experience of playing worse positions was “torture”, then he was reminded that he still pockets $20,000. “I’ve never won that much in chess, ever,” he said.
Photos by Tony Rich, Saint Louis Chess Club
The reverse also has a reverse – Japanese proverb
In his parable The garden of forking paths the writer Jorge Luis Borges examines the relationship between past, present and future. What has gone before is stored up as facts, the future is a developing and dynamic process in which – in whatever manner – one of the logically possible continuations is selected.
This is a metaphor which quite fits the development of a game of chess over time. In chess it is the players who at each fork in the path take decisions as to what course their journey will take. They make these decisions by following with their imagination some of the possible ramifications to as great a depth as they can, by constructing according to their experience an evaluation of the position which will have been reached, and thus coming to a decision about their next move based on calculation and intuition.
The choice of just about each move is the result of evaluations which take some steps in time into the future of the actual position. Thus it is understandable that a manœuvre can sometimes be refuted by another one which arose on the basis of a more far-reaching vision of the future, and that the latter in its turn can be refuted by even deeper analysis, etc.
Position 202 with all its apparent latent energy is an illustration of this process of successive refutations by ever deeper mining operations. On seeing this landscape on the board, one irresistibly thinks that the end is nigh – but whose end?
N. N.–N. N., 1944 Black to move
Black acutely had to worry at once about the threatened mate on h7 and came up with the multi-purpose move 1...Rc7!!. White spontaneously resigned, since he had hallucinations about losing a rook. He spotted the sad fact that taking the agent provocateur leads to mate: 2.Qxc7 Qf3+ 3.Kg1 Qg2# or, even worse, 2.Rxc7 Qd1#.
The subtle counter to the rook move by 2.b5!! with the threat of 3.Bf8+ and mate did not occur to him. In analysis it was thought that Black would then have nothing better than seeking salvation in a draw with 2...Qd1+! 3.Rxd1 Rxb7. But there are also holes in this drawing idea, because the riposte 2.b5 was in its turn parried with a deeper insight into the microstructure of the position: instead of 2...Qd1+ Black can play for a win with the counter-parry 2...Qe2!!, because after 3.Bf8+ Kh5 4.Rxh7+ Kg4 White is mated in four moves at most. An operation which appears to win the day for Black.
But once again there is a reversal of fate: White does not make use of 3.Bf8+, but refutes Black’s winning attempt with the counter-offensive 3.Rxh7+!! Kung Fu fighting!! If Black now continues with his intended 3...Rxh7, then after 4.Bf8+ Kh5 5.Qxh7+ Kg4 6.Qxg6+ Kf3 7.Qh5+ Ng4 8.Qd5+ Kxf4 9.Bd6+ he has had it this time, because White wins the endgame. One flash of wit meets another!
But even then the last word has not yet been said: you see, Black’s best reply to the rook check 3.Rxh7+!! is 3...Kxh7! 4.Qxc7+ and he finally takes flight with 4...Kg8 into a position where he can expect a perpetual series of checks, because 4...Kh6 5.Bf8+ Kh5 6.Qh7+ Kg4 7.Qxg6+ Kf3 8.Qh5+ Ng4 9.Qd5+ Kxf4 10.Bd6+ would once more be favourable for White. So, all in all, a draw!
Is that the heart of the matter? Or can further deep-mining operations come up with something significantly different? The question remains open. But even as such, the above position is a metaphor for genuine fighting chess, a wild, good-going brawl with an open exchange of blows, in which every tempo demands the greatest of precision in positions loaded with dangers for both sides and where the analysis is marked by a series of delightful about-turns in the evaluation.
[Event "Christian Hesse"] [Site "?"] [Date "1944.??.??"] [Round "?"] [White "N.N."] [Black "N.N."] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [SetUp "1"] [FEN "2r5/1Q1R3p/1p4pk/7q/1P3P2/B3n3/7P/7K b - - 0 1"] [PlyCount "7"] 1... Rc7 $3 2. b5 $3 {with the threat Bf8 mate.} (2. Qxc7 Qf3+ 3. Kg1 Qg2#) (2. Rxc7 Qd1#) 2... Qe2 $3 (2... Qd1+ 3. Rxd1 Rxb7 $11) 3. Rxh7+ $3 (3. Bf8+ Kh5 4. Rxh7+ Kg4 {and White is mated in four moves at the most.}) 3... Kxh7 $1 (3... Rxh7 4. Bf8+ Kh5 5. Qxh7+ Kg4 6. Qxg6+ Kf3 7. Qh5+ Ng4 8. Qd5+ Kxf4 9. Bd6+ { and White wins the endgame.}) 4. Qxc7+ Kg8 {and Black can expect a series of perpetual checks.} (4... Kh6 5. Bf8+ Kh5 6. Qh7+ Kg4 7. Qxg6+ Kf3 8. Qh5+ Ng4 9. Qd5+ Kxf4 10. Bd6+ {would once more be favourable for White.}) 1/2-1/2
Christian Hesse holds a Ph.D. from Harvard University and was on the faculty of the University of California at Berkeley until 1991. Since then he is Professor of Mathematics at the University of Stuttgart (Germany). Subsequently he has been a visiting researcher and invited lecturer at universities around the world, ranging from the Australian National University, Canberra, to the University of Concepcion, Chile. Recently he authored “Expeditionen in die Schachwelt” (Expeditions into the world of chess, ISBN 3-935748-14-0), a collection of about 100 essays that the Viennese newspaper Der Standard called “one of the most intellectually scintillating and recommendable books on chess ever written.”
Christian Hesse is married, has an eleven-year-old daughter and an eight-year-old son. He lives in Mannheim and likes Voltaire's reply to the complaint: ”Life is hard” – “Compared to what?”.
This is an unforgettable intellectual expedition to the remotest corners of the Royal Game. En route, intriguing thought experiments, strange insights and hilarious jokes will offer vistas you have never seen before. The beauty, the struggle, the culture, the fun, the art and the heroism of chess – you will find them all in this sparkling book that will give you many hours of intense joy.
Christian Hesse is a Harvard-trained professor of Mathematics who has taught at the University of California, Berkeley (USA), and since 1991 at the University of Stuttgart. He has written a textbook called 'Angewandte Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie'. Chess and literature are his main hobbies, and he also likes fitness and boxing. His heroes are the ones who fall to the bottom and rise again, fall and rise again…
From the foreword by World Champion Vishy Anand: "A rich compendium of spectacular highlights and defining moments from chess history: fantastic moves, beautiful combinations, historical blunders, captivating stories, and all this embedded into a plentitude of quick-witted ideas and contemplations as food for thought."
The Neva Foundation in partnership with the Internation Chess Federation (FIDE) has organised the first leg of the official Women's Grand Prix series for the first time in Geneva. From May 3 to May 15, twelve of the best women players featuring current Women World Champion Anna Ushenina from Ukraine, will confront each other at the N'vY Manotel. The tournament is an eleven-round all-play-all at classical time controls.
Georgian IM and GM-to-be Bela Khotenashvili managed to play a draw against Anna Ushenina and won the tournament. Her nearest rival, Anna Muzychuk, had to win the game in order to catch the leader, but the Slovenian player didn’t get anything out of the opening and drew against Alexandra Kosteniuk.
“I’m very happy to win this tournament and consider this result as the best one in my career so far. I would like to thank Georgian chess federation, President of GCF Giya Giorgadze and our coach Davit Jojua for their help”, said Bela Khotenashvili at the final press conference.
It became clear in the final round how tired all players were, as they were making mistakes which don’t normally appear in their games.
Katerina Lagno overlooked the piece blunder of her opponent Batchimeg Tuvshintugs
Hou Yifan missed winning chances in the endgame and lost against Nana Dzagnidze
GM Tatiana Kosintseva (above right) had a very good position after the opening but spent a lot of time and lost against Chinese IM Ju Wenjun
Full summaries of round 11 games here
Select games from the dropdown menu above the board A full summary of all games is to be found here on the official tournament site.
Of the 66 games played in Geneva:
Information and photos supplied by FIDE Press Officer Anastasiya Karlovich
The awards ceremony took place after the last game was finished and was attended by the Director General of the United Nations Office in Geneva Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, the founder of Neva Fondation Elena Timtchenko, FIDE President Kirsan Iljumzhinov, and FIDE CEO Geoffrey Borg.
Bela Khotenashvili receives her trophy from Elena Timtchenko...
... and Anna Muzychuk her second place prize from UN Director in Geneva Tokayev
It is getting to the point where one must ask oneself whether there isn’t some hidden aspect of Norway that lends itself to higher than usual levels of testosterone and a strong inclination to fight. Whatever the case, the Viking spirit continues to reign in the Norway Chess tournament as three of the five games ended in a decisive result. So far more than 50% of the games have ended with only one king standing, to the delight of the spectators.
Though the weather refused to cooperate, this was the view outside
The round today was held on the beautiful island of Flor & Fjaere and the players had to reach it by boat. Unfortunately the weather was cold and rainy, but as can be seen in the pictures, in sunnier conditions it must be breathtaking. Though the players have all expressed understanding of the desire to share the event with more than one locale in the country, they have also noted over the rounds that the constant moving and changes have added an extra strain beyond the usual in such a tournament.
The players had to arrive to the venue by boat
Wang Hao and Levon Aronian played an interesting game as the Armenian took risks in against Hao’s Reti to provoke chances to fight for a win as black, though this was not without genuine danger to himself. Wang Hao acquired a good advantage, though not decisive, and Aronian fought back and eventually drew.
After yesterday’s missed win, Vishy Anand was able to close the deal this time as he steamrolled Teimour Radjabov with on the black side of a Catalan with an ease only possible due to numerous mistakes by the Azeri. Anand commiserated as he commented alone in the press conference, but be that as it may, it only ended as incisively as it did because of the contrasting precision by the world champion. Whatever it is that ails the Azeri, he has withdrawn from the forthcoming FIDE Grand Prix in Thessaloniki to be replaced by French GM Etienne Bacrot. As a result, Anand moves into third with 4.0/7.
A serene Anand had a very clear-cut win today and moves to third
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Radjabov, Teimour"] [Black "Anand, Viswanathan"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E04"] [WhiteElo "2745"] [BlackElo "2783"] [Annotator "GM Gilberto Milos"] [PlyCount "68"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0} e6 {0} 3. Nf3 {0} d5 {0} 4. g3 {14} dxc4 {0} 5. Bg2 {18} c5 {4} 6. Qa4+ {225} Bd7 {136} 7. Qxc4 {78} Bc6 {25} 8. O-O {183} Nbd7 {54 } 9. Nc3 {324} (9. Be3) 9... Rc8 {149} 10. Be3 $2 {It's difficult to say exactly when Radjabov lost this game but certainly this was the start.} ({He should have played} 10. Qd3) 10... b5 $1 {Anand wins a lot of space in the queenside with tempo and is already better.} 11. Qd3 {168} b4 {44} 12. Nb1 {65} c4 {36} 13. Qc2 {5} Be7 {334} 14. a3 {265} b3 {A difficult move. Most players would choose a5 controlling the square c3 but the world champion plans to control the light squares and ...b3 is in line with this plan.} 15. Qc1 {49} Nb6 {30} 16. Nc3 {25} Nfd5 {156} 17. Bd2 {142} O-O {41} 18. Ne5 {801} ({Perhaps } 18. Re1 {is better but Black is better after} Nxc3 19. Bxc3 Be4) 18... Nxc3 { 57} 19. Bxc3 {4} Bxg2 {44} 20. Kxg2 {2} Na4 {42} 21. Re1 {512} (21. e4 f6 $1 22. Nf3 f5 $1 {and soon the black queen will go to d5.}) 21... f5 $1 {50} 22. f3 {231} Bg5 {192} 23. e3 {20} Bf6 {37 Black controls the light squares and White's bishop on c3 is a bad piece.} 24. e4 {325} Bxe5 {699} 25. dxe5 {3} fxe4 {28} 26. Rxe4 {75} Qd3 {39} 27. Re3 {28} Qd5 {245} 28. Qe1 {126} Rfd8 {16} 29. Rc1 {153} Qb5 {55 To play the decisive ...Rd3.} 30. Rd1 {1291} Rd3 {after this move White has no defense. Black will use one of the central open lines to invade the position.} 31. Rexd3 {6} ({If} 31. Rc1 Rcd8 32. h4 (32. Bb4 Nxb2) 32... Rxe3 33. Qxe3 Rd3 34. Qxa7 Nxc3 35. Rxc3 Rxc3 36. bxc3 h5 {avoiding perpetuals and the b-pawn wins the game.}) 31... cxd3 {9} 32. Bd4 {2} Qc4 {25} 33. Be3 {807} Nxb2 {15} 34. Rc1 {3} d2 {11 A great strategic game by Anand!} ( 34... d2 35. Qxd2 ({If} 35. Bxd2 Nd3 $1 36. Rxc4 Nxe1+ 37. Bxe1 Rxc4 {and the pawn will queen.}) 35... Qxc1 36. Qxc1 Rxc1 37. Bxc1 Nd3 38. Bg5 b2) 0-1
Peter Svidler and Veselin Topalov played a Sicilian Moscow that has been quite popular of late though it quickly degenerated into an endgame. Svidler had hoped to play for an edge, and was quite critical of himself in the post-mortem, as he explained that his gut had been to play 24.b4 instead of 24.f4 as in the game, but for whatever reason he talked himself out of it, which he was not happy about.
Sergey Karjakin is not about to relinquish his pole position without a fight
Tournament leader Sergey Karjakin played Hikaru Nakamura and after his close call against Anand the day before, his state of mind was unclear. The two played a Sicilian Najdorf, with a Dragon flavor, in which the American started out with good chances, but missed the most precise continuation such as 15…Rac8. Nakamura’s inaccuracies led to a very bad position where he gave up the queen for rook and knight and could only wait to see how long it would take Karjakin to put him out of his misery. The Russian did and secured his lead with an anxious Carlsen breathing down his neck.
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Karjakin, Sergey"] [Black "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B94"] [WhiteElo "2767"] [BlackElo "2775"] [Annotator "GM Gilberto Milos"] [PlyCount "117"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} Nf6 {0} 5. Nc3 {0} a6 {0} 6. Bg5 {6} Nbd7 {5} 7. Qe2 {23} g6 {A strange but playable mix between Najdorf and Dragon.} 8. O-O-O {165} Bg7 {23} 9. f4 {540} Qa5 {485} 10. g3 {1182} h6 {357} 11. Bxf6 {397} Nxf6 {25} 12. Bg2 {386} Bg4 {469} 13. Bf3 {14 } Bxf3 {4} 14. Qxf3 {67} O-O {200} 15. Rhe1 {24} Nd7 {576} 16. Nb3 {237} Qc7 { A necessary retreat since after} (16... Qd8 17. e5 {is strong.}) 17. Nd5 {24} Qd8 {4} 18. h4 $1 {Slow but very good. If Black plays h5 then White can play g4 later otherwise White will advance this pawn and open Black's king.} Rc8 { 172} (18... h5) 19. h5 {421} e6 {535} 20. Nc3 {20 Curious. Krajakin is not worried about doubling pawns.} (20. Ne3 {seems more natural.}) 20... Bxc3 {138} 21. bxc3 {8} Qf6 {1} 22. hxg6 {203} fxg6 {338} (22... Rxc3 {was the computer option}) 23. Rxd6 {310} Ne5 $2 {A serious and maybe decisive mistake.} (23... Rxc3 {was necessary.}) 24. Qh1 {108} (24. Qd1 {was also strong.} Nc4 25. e5) 24... Nc4 {7} 25. e5 {8} Qf7 {1} 26. Rd4 {229} h5 {23} 27. Qe4 {With this pawn structure, control of the open line, and a centralized queen, White is winning. } b5 {173} 28. Red1 {150} Rc7 {728} 29. Nc5 $1 {26 The decisive move, forcing the penetration on the seventh rank.} Rxc5 {There is no solution for Black.} ( 29... Nb6 30. Nxe6 Qxe6 31. Rd6 {and the knight on b6 is falling as well as the g6 pawn.}) 30. Rd7 {21} Rc7 {2} (30... Qe8 31. Qb7 Rf7 32. Rxf7 Qxf7 33. Rd8+ Kg7 34. Rd7) 31. Rxf7 {28} Kxf7 {2} 32. g4 {Though the White win is slow, it is also easy and Sergey does his job.} hxg4 {48} 33. Rh1 {153} Kg7 {95} 34. Qg2 {16} Rh8 {48} 35. Rxh8 {9} Kxh8 {2} 36. Qxg4 {12} Rh7 {12} 37. Qd1 {53} Rf7 {10} 38. Qd4 {135} Kg7 {124} 39. Kd1 {44} g5 {83} 40. fxg5 {179} Kg6 {98} 41. Qh4 {3009} Nxe5 {3043} 42. Qh3 {0} Kxg5 {93} 43. Qxe6 {0} Rf5 {0} 44. Qxa6 {0} Nc4 {0} 45. Ke2 {20} Re5+ {0} 46. Kf2 {0} Ne3 {0} 47. Qa7 {0} Ng4+ {0} 48. Kf3 {0} Rf5+ {0} 49. Ke2 {0} Re5+ {0} 50. Kd2 {0} Rd5+ {0} 51. Kc1 {0} Kf4 {0} 52. Qf7+ {0} Ke4 {0} 53. Qh7+ {0} Kf4 {0} 54. Qh4 {0} Re5 {0} 55. Kb2 {0} Kf3 {0} 56. c4 {0} Ne3 {0} 57. Qf6+ {0} Ke4 {0} 58. Qc6+ {0} Kd4 {0} 59. Qd6+ {0} 1-0
The Battle of the Vikings begins
Magnus Carlsen supposedly played his easiest opponent today, Jon Hammer, rated over 250 Elo less, but that was not the whole story. He has usually had trouble playing his best against his compatriot, and this was one of the greatest reasons the outcome was not as clear cut as one would expect. Hammer played an Open Catalan and accounted himself quite well as he never let Magnus show so much as the shadow of an advantage. As the time control approached, this changed, and several mistakes by Jon left him with a hopeless endgame and he resigned on move 40.
GM Daniel King provides video analysis of Karjakin vs Nakamura and Hammer vs Carlsen
[Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Svidler, Peter"] [Black "Topalov, Veselin"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "B51"] [WhiteElo "2769"] [BlackElo "2793"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "67"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. Bb5+ {0} Nd7 {0} 4. O-O {2} Ngf6 {0} 5. d4 {231} cxd4 {54} 6. Qxd4 {13} a6 {302} 7. Bxd7+ {117} Bxd7 {6} 8. Bg5 {57} e6 {7} 9. Nbd2 {561} Bc6 {489} 10. Rfd1 {494} Be7 {419} 11. e5 {742} dxe5 {27} 12. Qxd8+ {67} Rxd8 {18} 13. Nxe5 {6} Rd5 {515} 14. Ndf3 {51} Rxd1+ {183} 15. Rxd1 {7} Be4 {356} 16. Rd4 {661} Bxf3 {150} 17. Nxf3 {348} Nd5 {64} 18. c4 {503} Nb4 {51} 19. Bxe7 {79} Kxe7 {8} 20. Ne5 {16} Rd8 {1011} 21. Rxd8 {17} Kxd8 {4} 22. a3 {6} Nc6 {3} 23. Nxc6+ {35} bxc6 {7} 24. f4 {522} c5 {220} 25. b4 {16} a5 { 139} 26. b5 {25} f5 {19} 27. Kf2 {160} a4 {21} 28. Kg3 {64} g6 {16} 29. Kh4 { 163} h6 {11} 30. g4 {15} Kd7 {10} 31. gxf5 {13} exf5 {6} 32. Kg3 {3} Kc7 {10} 33. h4 {5} h5 {5} 34. Kf2 {4} 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Radjabov, Teimour"] [Black "Anand, Viswanathan"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E04"] [WhiteElo "2745"] [BlackElo "2783"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "68"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0} e6 {0} 3. Nf3 {0} d5 {0} 4. g3 {14} dxc4 {0} 5. Bg2 {18} c5 {4} 6. Qa4+ {225} Bd7 {136} 7. Qxc4 {78} Bc6 {25} 8. O-O {183} Nbd7 {54 } 9. Nc3 {324} Rc8 {149} 10. Be3 {715} b5 {850} 11. Qd3 {168} b4 {44} 12. Nb1 { 65} c4 {36} 13. Qc2 {5} Be7 {334} 14. a3 {265} b3 {154} 15. Qc1 {49} Nb6 {30} 16. Nc3 {25} Nfd5 {156} 17. Bd2 {142} O-O {41} 18. Ne5 {801} Nxc3 {57} 19. Bxc3 {4} Bxg2 {44} 20. Kxg2 {2} Na4 {42} 21. Re1 {512} f5 {50} 22. f3 {231} Bg5 {192 } 23. e3 {20} Bf6 {37} 24. e4 {325} Bxe5 {699} 25. dxe5 {3} fxe4 {28} 26. Rxe4 {75} Qd3 {39} 27. Re3 {28} Qd5 {245} 28. Qe1 {126} Rfd8 {16} 29. Rc1 {153} Qb5 {55} 30. Rd1 {1291} Rd3 {597} 31. Rexd3 {6} cxd3 {9} 32. Bd4 {2} Qc4 {25} 33. Be3 {807} Nxb2 {15} 34. Rc1 {3} d2 {11} 0-1 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Wang, Hao"] [Black "Aronian, Levon"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [ECO "A06"] [WhiteElo "2743"] [BlackElo "2813"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "73"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. Nf3 {0} d5 {0} 2. g3 {0} Bg4 {5} 3. Bg2 {0} Nd7 {6} 4. c4 {5} e6 {15} 5. O-O {58} Ngf6 {43} 6. d3 {435} dxc4 {284} 7. dxc4 {7} Be7 {26} 8. Nc3 {369} O-O 9. Nh4 {172} c6 {343} 10. h3 {19} Bh5 {4} 11. g4 {50} Ne8 {142} 12. Nf3 {317} Bg6 {7} 13. Bf4 {33} f6 {1384} 14. Nd4 {589} Nc5 {226} 15. Be3 {354} a5 16. Nb3 { 872} Nd7 {550} 17. Na4 {30} Qc7 {990} 18. Nbc5 {362} Nxc5 {78} 19. Nxc5 {84} Bf7 {186} 20. Qd7 {614} Bxc5 {201} 21. Qxc7 {9} Nxc7 {3} 22. Bxc5 {6} Rfc8 {42} 23. f4 {149} e5 {110} 24. fxe5 {214} fxe5 {10} 25. b3 {8} Ne6 {34} 26. Be3 {10} Re8 {615} 27. Rad1 {167} Re7 {169} 28. a3 {512} h6 {265} 29. Rd6 {529} Rae8 { 144} 30. Be4 {121} Nf4 {339} 31. Bxf4 {28} exf4 {5} 32. Bd3 {45} g5 {295} 33. Rxh6 {6} Kg7 {20} 34. Rh7+ {396} Kg8 {8} 35. Rh6 {5} Kg7 {3} 36. Rh7+ {53} Kg8 {4} 37. Rh6 {3} 1/2-1/2 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Hammer, Jon Ludvig"] [Black "Carlsen, Magnus"] [Result "0-1"] [ECO "E04"] [WhiteElo "2608"] [BlackElo "2868"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "80"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. d4 {0} Nf6 {0} 2. c4 {0} e6 {0} 3. Nf3 {0} d5 {44} 4. g3 {7} dxc4 {45} 5. Bg2 {7} Bb4+ {27} 6. Bd2 {9} a5 {9} 7. Qc2 {59} Bxd2+ {155} 8. Qxd2 {10} c6 {42 } 9. a4 {7} Ne4 {11} 10. Qc2 {803} Nd6 {23} 11. Nbd2 {334} Na6 {403} 12. Nxc4 { 167} Nb4 {6} 13. Nxd6+ {343} Qxd6 {6} 14. Qd2 {87} O-O {275} 15. O-O {5} Rd8 { 66} 16. Rfd1 {391} b6 {49} 17. Qc3 {301} Ba6 {112} 18. Rd2 {18} Rac8 {221} 19. Rad1 {40} Qe7 {552} 20. h4 {347} c5 {868} 21. dxc5 {194} Rd5 {347} 22. Rxd5 { 529} Nxd5 {50} 23. Qe5 {15} Qxc5 {1033} 24. Bh3 {865} Re8 {973} 25. Nd4 {370} Kf8 {1138} 26. Bf1 {167} Rc8 {171} 27. Nb5 {715} Bxb5 {36} 28. axb5 {6} Nf6 {83 } 29. Qd6+ {78} Ke8 {10} 30. Qd3 {262} Qd5 {37} 31. Qxd5 {105} exd5 {9} 32. e4 {462} Rc2 {94} 33. e5 {14} Ne4 {29} 34. Rxd5 {38} Rxb2 {4} 35. Rd4 {165} Rb4 { 63} 36. Rd1 {66} a4 {13} 37. Bg2 {17} Nc3 {44} 38. Bc6+ {12} Ke7 {2} 39. Rd7+ { 75} Ke6 {5} 40. Ra7 {4} Kxe5 {13} 0-1 [Event "Norway Chess 2013"] [Site "Stavanger"] [Date "2013.05.15"] [Round "7"] [White "Karjakin, Sergey"] [Black "Nakamura, Hikaru"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "B94"] [WhiteElo "2767"] [BlackElo "2775"] [Annotator ""] [PlyCount "117"] [EventDate "2013.??.??"] [EventCountry "NOR"] [TimeControl "40/6000+30:20/3000:900+30"] 1. e4 {0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} d6 {0} 3. d4 {0} cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0} Nf6 {0} 5. Nc3 {0} a6 {0} 6. Bg5 {6} Nbd7 {5} 7. Qe2 {23} g6 {303} 8. O-O-O {165} Bg7 {23} 9. f4 {540} Qa5 {485} 10. g3 {1182} h6 {357} 11. Bxf6 {397} Nxf6 {25} 12. Bg2 { 386} Bg4 {469} 13. Bf3 {14} Bxf3 {4} 14. Qxf3 {67} O-O {200} 15. Rhe1 {24} Nd7 {576} 16. Nb3 {237} Qc7 {77} 17. Nd5 {24} Qd8 {4} 18. h4 {595} Rc8 {172} 19. h5 {421} e6 {535} 20. Nc3 {20} Bxc3 {138} 21. bxc3 {8} Qf6 {1} 22. hxg6 {203} fxg6 {338} 23. Rxd6 {310} Ne5 {1191} 24. Qh1 {108} Nc4 {7} 25. e5 {8} Qf7 {1} 26. Rd4 {229} h5 {23} 27. Qe4 {87} b5 {173} 28. Red1 {150} Rc7 {728} 29. Nc5 {26} Rxc5 {167} 30. Rd7 {21} Rc7 {2} 31. Rxf7 {28} Kxf7 {2} 32. g4 {280} hxg4 {48} 33. Rh1 {153} Kg7 {95} 34. Qg2 {16} Rh8 {48} 35. Rxh8 {9} Kxh8 {2} 36. Qxg4 {12 } Rh7 {12} 37. Qd1 {53} Rf7 {10} 38. Qd4 {135} Kg7 {124} 39. Kd1 {44} g5 {83} 40. fxg5 {179} Kg6 {98} 41. Qh4 {3009} Nxe5 {3043} 42. Qh3 {0} Kxg5 {93} 43. Qxe6 {0} Rf5 {0} 44. Qxa6 {0} Nc4 {0} 45. Ke2 {20} Re5+ {0} 46. Kf2 {0} Ne3 {0} 47. Qa7 {0} Ng4+ {0} 48. Kf3 {0} Rf5+ {0} 49. Ke2 {0} Re5+ {0} 50. Kd2 {0} Rd5+ {0} 51. Kc1 {0} Kf4 {0} 52. Qf7+ {0} Ke4 {0} 53. Qh7+ {0} Kf4 {0} 54. Qh4 {0} Re5 {0} 55. Kb2 {0} Kf3 {0} 56. c4 {0} Ne3 {0} 57. Qf6+ {0} Ke4 {0} 58. Qc6+ {0 } Kd4 {0} 59. Qd6+ {0} 1-0
16.5.2013 - Once a month Karsten Müller hosts the endgame magic show. The reknown endgame expert shows brilliant endgames from recent tournament games. Today Pascal Simon is his guest. Starting at 4pm. Become Premium Member!
15.5.2013 - The Norway Chess tournament is held for the first time with a super strong field of Grandmasters including Carlsen, Anand, Aronian and many more. Beginning at 4 pm Daniel King will analyse the games. Become Premium Member!
for Apple y Android.
From club players to World Champions - ChessBase 12 is every ambitious chess player’s Swiss army knife. The latest version leaves the competition in the starting blocks thanks to 64-bit capability and a host of innovative analysis and training features.
€269.90
Extra 153, with more than 24,000 current games and three classics: Dejan Bojkov, Larence Trent and Robert Ris present on video the fantastic duels Larsen-Stahlberg (Copenhagen 1958), Trent-Hebden, (London 2006) and Nezhmetdinov-Chernikov (Rostov 1962)
€12.99
Everything you need to create a complete and powerful repertoire: more than 5,200 opening surveys, 4,5 million games (about 80,000 of them annotated), 728 opening articles from CBMagazine and a 1 GB opening book with all statistics.
€99.90
The Philidor structure (White pawns on d4 and e4, Black pawns on d6 and e5), is a fundamental position in the open games. In his new training course, IM Sam Collins shows you just how much explosive power is packed into this apparently simple structure.
€27.90
The Najdorf Powerbook 2013 bases on an unbelievable amount of informations: 58 000 master games and more than 1 070 000 top class Najdorf games from the engine room on playchess.com are the basis for a must have product to any serious Najdorf player.
€9.90
See what the Réti System is all about in the English, King’s Indian Attack or Bird’s openings with this collection of master games, and prepare to launch surprise attack!
€29.90
What is the best way to use your pieces to their full potential in the endgame? GM Karsten Müller demonstrates “knight geometry”, and teaches you how to employ the “knight check shadow” in your own games!