FIDE has
just announced the dates of the Candidates Matches in Kazan.

Dates for Candidates Matches 2011
Tuesday, 23 November 2010 07:20
FIDE announces that the Candidates Matches to determine the challenger
for the next World Championship Match will be held in Kazan, Russia from
3 to 27 May 2011.
The eight original qualifiers are GMs Veselin Topalov (Bulgaria), Magnus
Carlsen (Norway), Vladimir Kramnik (Russia), Levon Aronian (Armenia),
Boris Gelfand (Israel), Shakhriyar Mamedyarov (Azerbaijan), Teimour Radjabov
(Azerbaijan) and Gata Kamsky (USA). In case of replacements, the three
first reserves from the FIDE Grand-Prix 2008-2009 are respectively GMs
Alexander Grischuk (Russia), Dmitry Jakovenko (Russia) and Wang Yue (China).
All the participants are requested to confirm their participation by
returning their ATTACHED
PLAYER'S CONTRACT signed to the FIDE Secretariat by 22 December 2010,
13:00 GMT, through fax or email and by registered post. The full technical
regulations of the Candidates Matches 2011 are available on the FIDE
website. |
As you can see the replacement of Carlsen by Grischuk is dealt with as a hypothetical
– and in fact our colleagues at the Blitz World Championship in Moscow
tell us that it appeared that FIDE was lobbying quite vigorously to get Magnus
to change his mind. But if he sticks to his decision the pairings will in our
opinion be as follows:
Previous pairings |
|
New pairings |
Veselin Topalov |
-Gata Kamsky |
|
Veselin Topalov |
-Gata Kamsky |
Magnus Carlsen |
-Teimour Radjabov |
|
Vladimir Kramnik |
-Teimour Radjabov |
Vladimir Kramnik |
-Shakhriyar Mamedyarov |
|
Levon Aronian |
-Alexander Grischuk |
Levon Aronian |
-Boris Gelfand |
|
Boris Gelfand |
-Shakhriyar Mamedyarov |
So it is possibly a matter of "Gentlemen, restart your preparations!"
Here for the recordn are the relevant regulations pertaining to the matches
themselves, which carry a total prize fund of 420,000 Euros:
3. 1 Matches Format & System
A - First Round of Matches (8 players)
a1 - Matches System: The player who lost the World Championship Match 2010
(V. Anand or V. Topalov) is ranked No.1, the rest are ranked in rating order
using the FIDE Rating List of January 2010. The players are paired the following
way: 1 vs 8 (match 1), 2 vs 7 (match 2), 3 vs 6 (match 3), 4 vs 5 (match 4).
Each match will consist of 4 games.
a2 - The four (4) winners will qualify for the second round of the Candidate
Matches.
B - Second Round of Matches (4 players)
b1 - The Second Round of Matches will start 2 days after the end of the
First Round. Any qualified player for the second round of the Candidates Matches
can only be replaced by the player he defeated in the first round of the Candidate
Matches.
b2 - Matches System: The players are ranked according to the results of
the first round of the Candidates Matches: winner of match 1 is No.1, winner
of match 2 is No.2, winner of match 3 is No.3 and winner of match 4 is No.4.
The players are paired the following way: 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3. Each match will
consist of 4 games.
b3 - The two (2) winners will qualify for the third round of the Candidate
Matches.
C - Third Round of Matches (2 players)
c1 - The Third Round of Matches will start 2 days after the end of the Second
Round. Any qualified player for the third round of the Candidates Matches
can only be replaced by the player he defeated in the second round of the
Candidates Matches.
c2 - Matches System: The match between the two players will consist of 6
games.
c3 - The winner will qualify for the World Championship Match 2011.

Teimour Radjabov: "And what if tomorrow Carlsen changes his mind?.."
asks the headline in the above interview, conducted by Eugeny Surov, that appeared
on the Russian site Chess-News.
The full audio is provided, but is of course in Russian – though even
if you do not speak the language you can get an impression on how determined
and eloquent this young man is. Here is the gist of what he says, gleaned from
that excellent service Chess
in Translation.
Surov first asks Radjabov about the Blitz
World Championship that took place a week earlier in Moscow and which the
young Azeri finished in a close second place. Radjabov came from nowhere –
he finished the first day on seven points and in 11th place – to almost
catch Levon Aronian. He gives an interesting insight into the factors that count
in blitz when he talks about how he managed that feat:
After the first day I simply wanted to find my game. I didn’t even
think about climbing the table. The main thing was to get the feel for the
game in my hand. In blitz that feel is very important – when you’re
moving the pieces correctly, putting them on the right squares, when you’re
allocating everything precisely – both time and your chances at the
board. That was what crippled me on the first day – I wasn’t evaluating
positions very clearly or correctly. I was playing too aggressively. I simply
got warmed up on the first day, but really warmed up, as 14 games is a full
tournament. On the second and third days I was already approaching optimum
form. When you haven’t had blitz experience for a long time –
before we’d spend all our time playing on the ICC, every day, each of
us playing for days on end, while now we do it less as there are classical
tournaments, classical chess, higher aims, and so on. We try to play less
blitz and here we needed some training, so it was necessary to get warmed
up at the Championship itself, on the first day.
And then, it seems to me, my game went very well. The second day and today…
Today I think I won a great number of games.
Today you simply chalked up one victory after another.
Yes, I simply won almost every game.
But what happened in the penultimate round?
In the penultimate game I thought that as Aronian was playing Karjakin with
White he wouldn’t lose, so I had to win. Therefore on 1.e4 I went for
the Scandinavian, which I don’t play in general. The opening’s
relatively dubious and hard to play even in blitz, but I didn’t see
any other variations I could play for a win. In the Sicilian Sergey (Movsesian)
can play 2. c3 or something like that, and you get a heavy struggle, but I
wanted something sharper. It was, of course, a mistake – I should have
played normally as I’d been playing in all the other rounds, i.e. more
calmly. Though once again, it depends on the play. During the game I had an
excellent position and at some point I could have played Nf3+. I don’t
know if you saw it – 29…e4 30. Bg2, I played 30…Ne5 there,
and then I had the move 31…Nf3+ 31. Kf2 Qe5.
I had excellent chances and really could have achieved the desired result,
but when I didn’t go for that I lost. So ok, all that was left was to
play Gelfand for second place.
The second half of the interview was devoted to the announcement
by Magnus Carlsen that he was withdrawing from the Candidates Matches. To this
Georgios Makropoulos had
responded on behalf of FIDE stating:
At this point in time, the current cycle is in its final stages and it is
not possible for FIDE to change its regulations. In the case of GM Magnus
Carlsen not participating, according to regulations GM Alexander Grischuk
from Russia will be his replacement.
To this the new ECU President Silvio Danailov responded in an interview:
According to my knowledge nobody can replace Magnus by regulations. Article
3. 3. 3 says that “Any player who withdraws after the 15th of May 2010
shall not be replaced and his opponent in the first round is declared as winner.”
This means that according to the regulations Radjabov has to move directly
to the second round. But maybe I am missing something, FIDE should know better.
Radjabov appears to share a similar opinion, as his interview with Surov continued:
Teimur, I still haven’t asked your opinion on the recent decision
of Magnus Carlsen to leave the Candidates Cycle. That’s even though
you are, so to speak, the main injured (or not injured) party – I
don’t know how to put it. You were supposed to play Carlsen. What
do you think about it?
I honestly don’t want to comment on it for one simple reason: it’s
not an official decision at the moment. He wrote to FIDE that he didn’t
want to play in the cycle, and so on, but I don’t consider that official.
He hasn’t rejected the contract they’re supposed to send him.
When he rejects the contract then I’ll genuinely be able to say something.
But what if tomorrow he says “I’ll play”? Then what happens?
All the same, as I understand it FIDE has already officially declared
that Carlsen will be replaced by Grischuk. They’ve even already carried
out the draw and decided on the new pairings.
I haven’t seen that. To be honest, I’ve looked at all the sites
but I don’t think I’ve seen any official pairings. I’ve
seen the reply of Makropoulos – the FIDE Vice President – saying
that if Carlsen won’t play he’ll be replaced by Grischuk according
to the regulations. But that raises big questions as according to the regulations
players who refuse to play after 15 May should be treated as having lost…
So have I understood correctly that when the official decisions are
taken you’ll have a close look at them, consult on the legality, and
if something doesn’t suit you you’ll perhaps try to take some
measures?
Yes, most likely. Firstly, I conducted my preparation specifically for Carlsen,
and this isn’t the first month – it’s been a certain period
of time. As a result I’ve wasted some resources on trainers and preparation
for the match, because my opponent, to put it mildly, is a serious one. Probably
the most serious in the whole cycle, or one of them, let’s say. And
if things are done according to the rules…
It’s like the Football World Cup. If one team drops out then they
don’t look for a replacement but that team is considered to have lost.
So in the given situation – I have nothing against Carlsen or, of course,
Sasha Grischuk. I have excellent relations with both of them. I’d simply
like everything to be done according to the regulations. And if they’re
broken, then FIDE should in some way be held responsible, because it’s
a professional organization and it should keep to its contracts after drawing
them up with the players. It’s a professional sport, and I think contracts
should be honoured. I’m not against someone playing, entering the cycle.
I’m always glad, and so on. But after the targeted preparation I’ve
done for Carlsen… If you can just replace someone like that it’s
very strange. It’s all very strange for me right now.
Again, as I said, I need to look into it and I can’t make any precise
declarations now, because tomorrow, if Magnus says he’s decided to play,
then he’ll be back in the cycle, as I understand it. For now there’s
no official refusal and I think it would be silly to comment. The only thing
is that as you’ve correctly noted, if FIDE introduces changes then I’ll
check everything carefully, what’s legally contained in the regulations
and contracts. We, of course, have had a quick look at all that, but we haven’t
gone into it the way the FIDE people have. So now it’ll be necessary
to check.
Sources: Chess-News
+ Chess in Translation