Interview with Carsten Hensel
By André Schulz
Carsten Hensel, manager of Vladimir Kramnik and Peter Leko
Question: Were you satisfied with the performance of
your clients in Dortmund?
Hensel: Naturally, very satisfied. Vladimir Kramnik did not
just win Dortmund for the eighth time, he has won a series of tournaments, starting
with the Chess Olympiade in Turin in 2006. This was the fifth classical chess
event, which he completed with an Elo performance of over 2800. That just goes
to show how he is dominating the chess scene for over a year now. Peter [Leko]
also gave a good performance and applied pressure in almost every game. He could
have easily won Dortmund if he had been able to make use of the chances he had
more efficiently. Anyway, both players are in excellent condition.
Was Kramnik’s victory important from a psychological point of view,
considering the upcoming world championship in Mexico.
As I said, Kramnik has been dominating top level chess for some time now. That
will not have escaped the attention of his rivals, who are certain to be impressed.
However, I do not believe that this is an advantage for Vladimir, since he has
to carry the greatest burden of expectations. The cards will be reshuffled in
Mexico and a great deal will depend on preparation and on his condition during
the tournament – physical, mental and chess-wise.
How significant are the results of the recent rapid chess matches, for
instance Leko vs Kramnik?
From a purely sporting point of view they are quite insignificant, especially
since the games are not counted for the world rankings. But these events are
an excellent platform to present chess in an entertaining form to a new target
audience.
While the Dortmund tournament was being played a FIDE presidential board
meeting was held. The result was a five-year-plan, presented with a fairly
complicated chart, for the upcoming world championship. Did you understand
the plan?
The new system is not difficult to understand, although the chart does lead
to some misunderstandings, I have to admit.
Can you explain the system in a few sentences?
Very simple: in future the winners of the World Cup and the Grand Prix will
play a match to determine who will challenge the World Champion.
Jorge Saggiante, organiser of the Mexico City World Championship, with Carsten
Hensel
But why does Kramnik have a special right to a world championship match
in case he does not win Mexico?
The World Championship in Mexico City will be the last one to be held as a
tournament. FIDE has quite logically decided that in future at the end of each
cycle there should be a classical match for the world championship. Because
of the unification of the title there is no longer a necessity to experiment.
Since the Mexico tournament format had already been agreed by FIDE we signed
a contract accepting a compromise: Kramnik is seeded to the final of a world
championship match in 2008, irrespective of how he fares in Mexico. It would
be a very sorry situation if the three times match world champion were to be
sacrificed in a tournament in which he perhaps came second and lost in a tiebreak.
This would lead to more turmoil in the chess world, since many fans would continue
regarding Kramnik as the champion who had to be defeated in a match. So, if
Kramnik does not win Mexico himself he will for the moment recognize the winner
of Mexico as the new world champion, but only under the condition that he gets
a one-time return match in 2008.
Who are the favourites in Mexico?
Nobody can count Kramnik out. Anand, Aronian and Leko certainly also have good
chances. But the tournament is incredibly strong, especially since the strongest
players succeeded in qualifying in the Candidates matches. The Elo average is
2752, the tournament is category 21. It is clearly stronger than the world championship
tournament in San Luis.
FIDE has also integrated Topalov in the new cycle. He receives the right,
without qualification, to immediately play against Kramnik or to play a Candidates
Final against the winner of the World Cup. What do you think of that?
For Kramnik the decision is not relevant. In any case he will play Mexico City
and then a world championship match in 2008. Who his opponent will be in this
match is not critical. However, the privilege that Topalov is getting, to play
against the winner of the World Cup or to immediately challenge Kramnik in a
world championship match, must be of concern to the other top players. I expect
all top grandmasters, including Peter Leko, to protest against this special
privilege. Possibly the world chess federation is risking a boycott of the World
Cup. This must not be allowed to happen.
Vladimir Kramnik with Carsten Hensel
Consultation: the World Champion and his manager
Are there any plans for the world championship match with Kramnik. Where
could this be staged?
It is a little early to start talking about that. Right now the world championship
tournament in Mexico is the focus of our interest. Only after that is over will
we know who will play in the 2008 world championship match. But naturally there
are certain activities going on in the background. A number of large cities
in different continents have shown interest in staging the match. The German
company Universal Event Promotion has secured all rights for this match from
FIDE. In the end its investor and owner Josef Resch will decide where it will
be held. I can only say the following: Germany has good chances to receive the
nomination. One of the reasons is that the match between Kramnik and Deep Fritz
in Bonn last year produced such an incredible media response. It was quite possibly
the best organized event in chess history.
FIDE has always had difficulty attracting major sponsors. For instance
the theoretically very attractive Candidates Matches once again had to be
held in Elista. What is the reason for that and how can the commercial marketing
of big chess tournaments and matches be improved.
In the past there were gigantic problems in this area. The main reason was
that FIDE did not have any proper commercial structure, and that this important
field was being handled essentially by amateurs. In the meantime all rights
have been transferred to Global Chess. That is a genuine opportunity for professional
chess. Right now it is important that Global Chess takes the time it needs to
survey the field and find the necessary sponsors. Naturally there is great pressure
on Bessel Kok and Co. to get things started. I hope that this will not lead
to snap decisions, which could create new problems.
What about the Grand Slam idea proposed by Silvio Danailov? Why is Dortmund
not participating?
In its current form I don’t believe in it at all. Apart from the fact
that it should be in the hands of FIDE and Global Chess, it seems to be an attempt
by certain people to gain influence in the chess world. Dortmund is not participating
because it doesn’t want to lose its independence. The Grand Slam is, in
my opinion, nothing but a PR stunt. They have nothing to offer, no general sponsor,
no recognition by the world chess federation, and certainly no rules that have
been recognized by FIDE or by the players. One central point of criticism is
that the manager of one of the top players is the organizer of one of the tournaments,
in Sofia, and also of the Grand Prix. He wants to exert direct influence on
the rules, the conditions and the commercial factors. That can potentially lead
to a very volatile conflict of interest, one I do not need to elaborate on.
It is time for the chess world and for the responsible people in Sofia to start
thinking about these points. Incidentally the communication strategy is hardly
honest: for example the Dutch Corus Tournament, like Dortmund, is not a member
of the “Association”, as is being claimed.
This interview was conducted in German. The original is
available on our German
news page.
