FIDE replies
Shortly after publishing the above report we received a message from
Morten Sand, FIDE Vice President and member of the Presential Board.
Dear ChessBase,
I have read with great interest, the article published today on your website
concerning the World Cup regulations and the remarks made by GMs Kamsky and
Shirov. With this opportunity, and in order to avoid confusion among the players
and the chess fans worldwide, I would like to clarify some points:
-
With the updated regulations, FIDE has increased the number of qualifiers
from the World Cup to ten (10) instead of five (5). These 10 players will
qualify directly to the Candidates matches. Therefore the updated regulations
of the World Cup cannot in any way be "detrimental" to the players
participating. In fact, the participants of the World Cup have gained considerably
compared with the previous version of the regulations.
-
Even in the previous regulations, five (5) players were qualified by rating
to the stages after the World Cup. The only slight difference is that previously
they would first enter the Last Chance Tournament before the Candidates,
together with the players placed 6-10 in the World Cup. So the "guaranteed
selection into next step" of the 5 top rated players was effective
with the previous version of the regulations as well.
-
Most of the regulation updates were made after FIDE consulted the ACP
and the participants from San Luis. Therefore, there was no "demonstration
of complete lack of respect to all players involved" by FIDE in any
way. On the contrary, FIDE adopts many of the proposals made by the chess
professionals and not only in this case.
I would finally like to note that in order to continuously improve the attractiveness
of our sport, FIDE is implementing necessary updates to its regulations in
accordance with the demand of its member federations for a fair, viable and
transparent World Championship system. By following this principle, FIDE has
consequently succeeded in securing more than 5 million USD for its World Championships
during the last two years. The interest of the national federations and the
majority of chess players is always our highest priority.
Thank you for publishing our reply.
Best regards,
Morten Sand
FIDE Vice-President
To which Gata Kamsky fires back...
Dear Chessbase,
I've just had an opportunity to read FIDE Vice-President's Mr. Morten Sand
reply and would like to make some short comments to clarify my previous post.
Former world championship finalist Gata Kamsky
First, and with all due respect to Mr. Sand, I would like to point an internal
inconsistency within his remarks, as in one sweep he claims that World Cup
players "gained considerably" by having 10 qualifiers getting direct
places into the Candidates (instead of based on previous rules, where 5 were
directly qualified and the other 5 came from the Last Chance Supertournament,
where they had an additional chance to qualify) while there was a "slight
change" with the 5 top rated players who now advance directly into Cadidates,
compared to the situation where they had to fight it out for the 3 qualification
spots with the other 5 world cup players. This is a strange logic, at least
as it seems to me.
Second, I would like to point out, with all due respect to the ACP, and again
with all due respect to the San Luis participants, taking a moment to congratulate
them on the spectacular show of fighting chess that they have shown to the
chess world, there were only eight San Luis participants, who are not all at
the top of the chess world ranking, compared with 128 world cup players. The
ACP currently does NOT represent all chess professionals. For example, I'm
not a member and highly doubt that the 127 other world cup players are all
members of the ACP as well.
What I fault FIDE with is that they did not take care to consult directly
with everyone who is actually going to play in the World Cup. These players
are clearly in the majority here. This is what I mean by a complete and total
lack of respect that was demonstrated to us. I don't even want to mention that
these world cup players represent countless other players from zonal tournaments
and federations they represented originally. All those thousands of players
have the right to know the rules and to rely on the rules staying consistent
before they agreed to start playing in the qualification steps.
With regards to the improvement of chess as a sport in general, I strongly
believe that we all, as the current and future professional players, rely on
FIDE as the organization that brings stability to chess, and not to change
rules in the middle of the existing world championship cycle, a cycle that
is a culmination and hope of every player that will bring him the dream of
his life, the title of the world champion. Many people have tried and still
keep trying to fulfill that dream that only a few from the millions of us can
ever fulfill.
Personally, I believe it is clear that there are changes that are necessary
to make our sport more attractive. However, FIDE, as a sole responsible organization
to protect everyone's interests, must temper this desire to make fast changes
for the better, with fair and just approach, in which there will be no room
for favoritism. for high Elo or anything that will jeopardize the faith of
players who would like to have an equal opportunity for the shot at the title.
Sincerely,
Gata Kamsky
